- -

U.S. academic libraries: understanding their web presence and their relationship with economic indicators

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

U.S. academic libraries: understanding their web presence and their relationship with economic indicators

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Orduña Malea, Enrique es_ES
dc.contributor.author Regazzi, John J. es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2014-10-29T18:19:19Z
dc.date.available 2014-10-29T18:19:19Z
dc.date.issued 2014-01
dc.identifier.issn 0138-9130
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/43692
dc.description The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1001-0 es_ES
dc.description.abstract The main goal of this research is to analyze the web structure and performance of units and services belonging to U.S. academic libraries in order to check their suitability for webometric studies. Our objectives include studying their possible correlation with economic data and assessing their use for complementary evaluation purposes. We conducted a survey of library homepages, institutional repositories, digital collections, and online catalogs (a total of 374 URLs) belonging to the 100 U.S. universities with the highest total expenditures in academic libraries according to data provided by the National Center for Education Statistics. Several data points were taken and analyzed, including web variables (page count, external links, and visits) and economic variables (total expenditures, expenditures on printed and electronic books, and physical visits). The results indicate that the variety of URL syntaxes is wide, diverse and complex, which produces a misrepresentation of academic libraries’ web resources and reduces the accuracy of web analysis. On the other hand, institutional and web data indicators are not highly correlated. Better results are obtained by correlating total library expenditures with URL mentions measured by Google (r = 0.546) and visits measured by Compete (r = 0.573), respectively. Because correlation values obtained are not highly significant, we estimate such correlations will increase if users can avoid linkage problems (due to the complexity of URLs) and gain direct access to log files (for more accurate data about visits). es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Akadémiai Kiadó es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Scientometrics es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Academic libraries es_ES
dc.subject Webometrics es_ES
dc.subject Web-based indicators es_ES
dc.subject Economic variables es_ES
dc.subject Repositories es_ES
dc.subject Digital collections es_ES
dc.subject Online catalogs es_ES
dc.subject Universities es_ES
dc.subject United States es_ES
dc.subject.classification BIBLIOTECONOMIA Y DOCUMENTACION es_ES
dc.subject.classification COMUNICACION AUDIOVISUAL Y PUBLICIDAD es_ES
dc.title U.S. academic libraries: understanding their web presence and their relationship with economic indicators es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s11192-013-1001-0
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto de Diseño para la Fabricación y Producción Automatizada - Institut de Disseny per a la Fabricació i Producció Automatitzada es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Orduña Malea, E.; Regazzi, JJ. (2014). U.S. academic libraries: understanding their web presence and their relationship with economic indicators. Scientometrics. 98(1):315-336. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1001-0 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11192-013-1001-0 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 315 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 336 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 98 es_ES
dc.description.issue 1 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 245131
dc.identifier.eissn 1588-2861
dc.description.references Adecannby, J. (2011). Web link analysis of interrelationship between top ten African universities and world universities. Annals of library and information studies, 58(2), 128–138. es_ES
dc.description.references Aguillo, I. F. (2009). Measuring the institutions’ footprint in the web. Library Hi Tech, 27(4), 540–556. es_ES
dc.description.references Aguillo, I. F., Ortega, J. L., & Fernández, M. (2008). Webometric Ranking of World Universities: Introduction, methodology, and future developments. Higher education in Europe, 33(2/3), 234–244. es_ES
dc.description.references Aguillo, I. F., Ortega, J. L., Fernandez, M., & Utrilla, A. M. (2010). Indicators for a webometric ranking of open Access repositories. Scientometrics, 82(3), 477–486. es_ES
dc.description.references Arakaki, M., & Willet, P. (2009). Webometric analysis of departments of librarianship and information science: A follow-up study. Journal of information science, 35(2), 143–152. es_ES
dc.description.references Arlitsch, K., & O’Brian, P. S. (2012). Invisible institutional repositories: Addresing the low indexing ratios of IR in Google Scholar. Library Hi Tech, 30(1), 60–81. es_ES
dc.description.references Bar-Ilan, J. (1999). Search engine results over time—A case study on search engine stability”. Cybermetrics, 2/3. Retrieved February 18, 2013 from http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v2i1p1.html. es_ES
dc.description.references Bar-Ilan, J. (2001). Data collection methods on the Web for informetric purposes: A review and analysis. Scientometrics, 50(1), 7–32. es_ES
dc.description.references Bermejo, F. (2007). The internet audience: Constitution & measurement. New York: Peter Lang Pub Incorporated. es_ES
dc.description.references Buigues-Garcia, M., & Gimenez-Chornet, V. (2012). Impact of Web 2.0 on national libraries. International Journal of Information Management, 32(1), 3–10. es_ES
dc.description.references Chu, H., He, S., & Thelwall, M. (2002). Library and information science schools in Canada and USA: A Webometric perspective. Journal of education for Library and Information Science, 43(2), 110–125. es_ES
dc.description.references Chua, Alton, Y. K., & Goh, D. H. (2010). A study of Web 2.0 applications in library websites. Library and Information Science Research, 32(3), 203–211. es_ES
dc.description.references Gallego, I., García, I.-M., & Rodríguez, L. (2009). Universities’ websites: Disclosure practices and the revelation of financial information. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 9(15), 153–192. es_ES
dc.description.references Gomes, B. & Smith, B. T. (2003). Detecting query-specific duplicate documents. [Patent]. Retrieved February 18, 2013 from http://www.patents.com/Detecting-query-specific-duplicate-documents/US6615209/en-US . es_ES
dc.description.references Harinarayana, N. S., & Raju, N. V. (2010). Web 2.0 features in university library web sites. Electronic Library, 28(1), 69–88. es_ES
dc.description.references Lewandowski, D., Wahlig, H., & Meyer-Bautor, G. (2006). The freshness of web search engine databases. Journal of Information Science, 32(2), 131–148. es_ES
dc.description.references Mahmood, K., & Richardson, J. V, Jr. (2012). Adoption of Web 2.0 in US academic libraries: A survey of ARL library websites. Program, 45(4), 365–375. es_ES
dc.description.references Orduña-Malea, E., & Ontalba-Ruipérez, J-A. (2012). Selective linking from social platforms to university websites: A case study of the Spanish academic system. Scientometrics. (in press). es_ES
dc.description.references Ortega, J. L., & Aguillo, I. F. (2009). Mapping World-class universities on the Web. Information Processing and Management, 45(2), 272–279. es_ES
dc.description.references Ortega, José L. & Aguillo, Isidro F. (2009b). North America Academic Web Space: Multicultural Canada vs. The United States Homogeneity. In: ASIST & ISSI pre-conference symposium on informetrics and scientometrics. es_ES
dc.description.references Phan, T., Hardesty, L., Sheckells, C., & George, A. (2009). Documentation for the academic libraries survey (ALS) public-use data file: Fiscal year 2008. Washington DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Institute of Education Sciences U.S. Department of Education. es_ES
dc.description.references Qiu, J., Cheng, J., & Wang, Z. (2004). An analysis of backlinks counts and web impact factors for Chinese university websites. Scientometrics, 60(3), 463–473. es_ES
dc.description.references Regazzi, J. J. (2012a). Constrained?—An analysis of U.S. Academic Libraries and shifts in spending, staffing and utilization, 1998–2008. College and Research Libraries, 73(5), 449–468. es_ES
dc.description.references Regazzi, J. J. (2012b). Comparing Academic Library Spending with Public Libraries, Public K-12 Schools, Higher Education Public Institutions, and Public Hospitals Between 1998–2008. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38(4), 205–216. es_ES
dc.description.references Rousseau, R. (1999). Daily time series of common single word searches in AltaVista and NorthernLight. Cybermetrics, 2/3. Retrieved February 18, 2013 from http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v2i1p2.html . es_ES
dc.description.references Sato, S., & Itsumura, H. (2011). How do people use open access papers in non-academic activities? A link analysis of papers deposited in institutional repositories. Library, Information and Media Studies, 9(1), 51–64. es_ES
dc.description.references Scholze, F. (2007). Measuring research impact in an open access environment. Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries, 17(1–4), 220–232. es_ES
dc.description.references Smith, A. G. (2011). Wikipedia and institutional repositories: An academic symbiosis? In: Proceedings of the ISSI 2011 conference. Durban, South Africa, 4–7 July 2011. Retrieved February 18, 2013 from http://www.vuw.ac.nz/staff/alastair_smith/publns/SmithAG2011_ISSI_paper.pdf . es_ES
dc.description.references Smith, A.G. (2012). Webometric evaluation of institutional repositories. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on webometrics informetrics and scientometrics & 13th collnet meeting. Seoul (Korea), 722–729. es_ES
dc.description.references Smith, A., & Thelwall, M. (2002). Web impact factors for Australasian Universities. Scientometrics, 54(3), 363–380. es_ES
dc.description.references Tang, R., & Thelwall, M. (2008). A hyperlink analysis of US public and academic libraries’ web sites. Library Quarterly, 78(4), 419–435. es_ES
dc.description.references Thelwall, M. (2008). Extracting accurate and complete results from search engines: Case study Windows Live. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 38–50. es_ES
dc.description.references Thelwall, M. (2009). Introduction to webometrics: Quantitative web research for the social sciences. San Rafael: Morgan & Claypool. es_ES
dc.description.references Thelwall, M., & Sud, P. (2011). A comparison of methods for collecting web citation data for academic organisations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(8), 1488–1497. es_ES
dc.description.references Thelwall, M., Sud, P., & Wilkinson, D. (2012). Link and co-inlink network diagrams with URL citations or title mentions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(10), 1960–1972. es_ES
dc.description.references Thelwall, M., & Zuccala, A. (2008). A University-centred European Union link analysis. Scientometrics, 75(3), 407–442. es_ES
dc.description.references Uyar, A. (2009a). Google stemming mechanisms. Journal of Information Science, 35(5), 499–514. es_ES
dc.description.references Uyar, A. (2009b). Investigation of the accuracy of search engine hit counts. Journal of Information Science, 35(4), 469–480. es_ES
dc.description.references Zuccala, A., Thelwall, M., Oppenheim, C., & Dhiensa, R. (2007). Web intelligence analyses of digital libraries: A case study of the National Electronic Library for Health (NeLH). Journal of Documentation, 63(4), 558–589. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem