- -

Scenario 2040 for Oslo as model city

RiuNet: Institutional repository of the Polithecnic University of Valencia

Share/Send to

Cited by

Statistics

Scenario 2040 for Oslo as model city

Show simple item record

Files in this item

dc.contributor.author Venkatesh, Govindarajan es_ES
dc.contributor.author Sægrov, Sveinung es_ES
dc.contributor.author Brattebø, Helge es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2015-02-02T07:35:35Z
dc.date.available 2015-02-02T07:35:35Z
dc.date.issued 2014-12-16
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/46623
dc.description.abstract This report – D34.2, authored by NTNU, is a sequel to D34.1 in which interventions suggested by the water-sanitation utility in Oslo - Oslo Vann og Avløpsetaten, had been tested using both the models – the WaterMet 2 (WM2) model developed by Exeter and the Dynamic Metabolism Model (DMM) developed at NTNU, as part of TRUST. The report starts off by emphasising the need for a holistic long-term sustainability approach in decision-making in water and wastewater utilities around the world. The models referred to above, are proposed as aids in meeting this need. With the help of references to earlier published works and TRUST deliverables related to these models, as well as some new tests carried out using one of them (DMM), the usability of the same has been demonstrated. ‘Usability’ here refers to understanding the impact of interventions on selected metrics/indicators in year-2040 (in keeping with the title of the deliverable; and the timeframe which has been considered for the TRUST project); and subsequent choices/selections which utilities would like to make depending on their priorities, targets and benchmarks they would set for themselves. As concluded in D34.1, there are differences between WM2 and DMM – which make them useful in different contexts – situational, circumstantial etc. These differences are recounted here again, in order to make it clear to the readers and end-users that one model is not meant to substitute the other, per se. Simply put, depending on what the end-users’ needs, goals, objectives and constraints are, one or the other would be preferable. The models have been extensively tested at Oslo VAV. A brief summary of the initial feedback from personnel at Oslo VAV is provided. The models were also introduced to pilot cities to understand their points of view, which have been presented in brief. es_ES
dc.format.extent 35 es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) es_ES
dc.subject Energy consumption es_ES
dc.subject Greenhouse gas emissions es_ES
dc.subject Oslo VAV es_ES
dc.subject PLAN es_ES
dc.subject Weighting es_ES
dc.subject Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) es_ES
dc.subject Urban water system (UWS) es_ES
dc.subject Dynamic Metabolism Model (DMM) es_ES
dc.subject WaterMet2 (WM2) es_ES
dc.title Scenario 2040 for Oslo as model city es_ES
dc.type Informe es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/265122 es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Venkatesh, G.; Sægrov, S.; Brattebø, H. (2014). Scenario 2040 for Oslo as model city. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/46623 es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://www.trust-i.net/downloads/index.php?iddesc=115 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record