Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Garcia-Garces, P. | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Ruiz Sánchez, Tomás | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-02-24T08:39:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-02-24T08:39:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0361-1981 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/47417 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper presents a global characterization of activity travel scheduling decisions that uses a new data set recently collected in Valencia, Spain. As an innovative approach, bivariate probit sample selection models are used to take into account potential self-selectivity bias in the decision process. Model 1 studies decisions to realize or not realize activity travel episodes by considering whether they have been included in the planned agenda. Model 2 analyzes decisions to perform activity travel episodes as they were planned or to modify one or more of their attributes before execution by considering whether their realization had been previously decided. Random parameters are used in both models to accommodate heterogeneity effects. Location, timing, and duration of activity travel episodes are important explanatory variables in the two scheduling processes studied. Few demographic and socioeconomic variables affect the decision processes. Significant correlations between decisions included in both models are found. Policy implications of the analysis results are highlighted. | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | National Academy of Sciences | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | Transportation Research Record | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reserva de todos los derechos | es_ES |
dc.subject.classification | INGENIERIA E INFRAESTRUCTURA DE LOS TRANSPORTES | es_ES |
dc.title | Simultaneous Analysis of Global Decisions in Activity Travel Scheduling Process | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3141/2382-14 | |
dc.rights.accessRights | Cerrado | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería e Infraestructura de los Transportes - Departament d'Enginyeria i Infraestructura dels Transports | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Garcia-Garces, P.; Ruiz Sánchez, T. (2013). Simultaneous Analysis of Global Decisions in Activity Travel Scheduling Process. Transportation Research Record. (2382):121-131. doi:10.3141/2382-14 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2382-14 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 121 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 131 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.issue | 2382 | es_ES |
dc.relation.senia | 257486 | |
dc.description.references | Akar, G., Clifton, K. J., & Doherty, S. T. (2012). Redefining activity types: Who participates in which leisure activity? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(8), 1194-1204. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2012.05.007 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Mohammadian, A. (Kouros), & Doherty, S. T. (2005). Mixed Logit Model of Activity-Scheduling Time Horizon Incorporating Spatial–Temporal Flexibility Variables. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1926(1), 33-40. doi:10.1177/0361198105192600105 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Lee, M., & McNally, M. G. (2006). An empirical investigation on the dynamic processes of activity scheduling and trip chaining. Transportation, 33(6), 553-565. doi:10.1007/s11116-006-7728-1 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Mohammadian, A., & Doherty, S. T. (2006). Modeling activity scheduling time horizon: Duration of time between planning and execution of pre-planned activities. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40(6), 475-490. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2005.08.005 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Clark, A. F., & Doherty, S. T. (2009). Activity Rescheduling Strategies and Decision Processes in Day-to-Day Life. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2134(1), 143-152. doi:10.3141/2134-17 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Akar, G., Clifton, K. J., & Doherty, S. T. (2009). How Travel Attributes Affect Planning Time Horizon of Activities. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2132(1), 33-41. doi:10.3141/2132-04 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Auld, J., & Mohammadian, A. (2012). Activity planning processes in the Agent-based Dynamic Activity Planning and Travel Scheduling (ADAPTS) model. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(8), 1386-1403. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2012.05.017 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Joh, C.-H., Doherty, S., & Polak, J. (2005). Analysis of Factors Affecting the Frequency and Type of Activity Schedule Modification. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1926, 19-25. doi:10.3141/1926-03 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ruiz, T., & Timmermans, H. (2006). Changing the timing of activities in resolving Scheduling Conflicts. Transportation, 33(5), 429-445. doi:10.1007/s11116-006-0010-8 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ruiz, T., & Roorda, M. J. (2008). Analysis of Planning Decisions during the Activity-Scheduling Process. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2054(1), 46-55. doi:10.3141/2054-06 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ruiz, T., & Roorda, M. J. (2011). Assessing planning decisions by activity type during the scheduling process. Transportmetrica, 7(6), 417-442. doi:10.1080/18128602.2010.520276 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Nurul Habib, K. M., & Miller, E. J. (2009). Modelling activity generation: a utility-based model for activity-agenda formation. Transportmetrica, 5(1), 3-23. doi:10.1080/18128600802591384 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Van Bladel, K., Bellemans, T., Janssens, D., & Wets, G. (2009). Activity Travel Planning and Rescheduling Behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2134(1), 135-142. doi:10.3141/2134-16 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Auld, J., Rashidi, T. H., Javanmardi, M., & Mohammadian, A. (Kouros). (2011). Dynamic Activity Generation Model Using Competing Hazard Formulation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2254(1), 28-35. doi:10.3141/2254-04 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Puhani, P. (2000). The Heckman Correction for Sample Selection and Its Critique. Journal of Economic Surveys, 14(1), 53-68. doi:10.1111/1467-6419.00104 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Kang, H., Scott, D. M., & Doherty, S. T. (2009). Investigation of Planning Priority of Joint Activities in Household Activity-Scheduling Process. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2134(1), 82-88. doi:10.3141/2134-10 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Lee, M. S., & McNally, M. G. (2003). On the structure of weekly activity/travel patterns. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 37(10), 823-839. doi:10.1016/s0965-8564(03)00047-8 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Clark, A. F., & Doherty, S. T. (2008). Examining the Nature and Extent of the Activity-Travel Preplanning Decision Process. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2054(1), 83-92. doi:10.3141/2054-10 | es_ES |