- -

Economic Costs of Sustaining Water Supplies: Findings from the Rio Grande

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Economic Costs of Sustaining Water Supplies: Findings from the Rio Grande

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Ward, F. A. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Pulido-Velazquez, M. es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2015-02-24T09:12:26Z
dc.date.available 2015-02-24T09:12:26Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.issn 0920-4741
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/47418
dc.description.abstract [EN] Water claims in many of the world's arid basins exceed reliable supplies. Water demands for irrigation, urban use, the environment, and energy continue to grow, while supplies remain constrained by unsustainable use, drought and impacts of climate change. For example, policymakers in North America's Upper Rio Grande Basin face the challenge of designing plans for allocating the basin's water supplies efficiently and fairly to support current uses and current environments. Managers also seek resilient institutions that can ensure adequate supplies for future generations. This paper addresses those challenges by designing and applying an integrated basin-scale framework that accounts for the basin's most important hydrologic, economic, and institutional constraints. Its unique contribution is a quantitative analysis of three policies for addressing long term goals for the basin's reservoirs and aquifers: (1) no sustainability for water stocks, (2) sustaining water stocks, and (3) renewing water stocks. It identifies water use and allocation trajectories over time that result from each of these three plans. Findings show that it is hydrologically and institutionally feasible to manage the basin's water supplies sustainably. The economic cost of protecting the sustainability of the basin's water stocks can be achieved at 6-11 percent of the basin's average annual total economic value of water over a 20 year time horizon. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship The authors are grateful for financial support for this work by the New Mexico Agricultural Experiment Station and by the European Community 7th Framework Project GENESIS (226536) on Groundwater Systems en_EN
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer Netherlands es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Water Resources Management es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject River basins es_ES
dc.subject Water resources es_ES
dc.subject Resilient institutions es_ES
dc.subject Hydrology. es_ES
dc.subject Economics es_ES
dc.subject Sustainable policy es_ES
dc.subject Hydroeconomic modelling es_ES
dc.subject.classification INGENIERIA HIDRAULICA es_ES
dc.title Economic Costs of Sustaining Water Supplies: Findings from the Rio Grande es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s11269-012-0055-8
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/226536/EU/Groundwater and dependent Ecosystems: NEw Scientific basIS on climate change and land-use impacts for the update of the EU Groundwater Directive/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería Hidráulica y Medio Ambiente - Departament d'Enginyeria Hidràulica i Medi Ambient es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Ward, FA.; Pulido-Velazquez, M. (2012). Economic Costs of Sustaining Water Supplies: Findings from the Rio Grande. Water Resources Management. 26(10):2883-2909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0055-8 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0055-8 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 2883 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 2909 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 26 es_ES
dc.description.issue 10 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 241755
dc.contributor.funder European Commission
dc.contributor.funder Agricultural Experiment Station, New Mexico State University es_ES
dc.description.references Booker JF (1995) Hydrologic and economic impacts of drought under alternative policy responses. Water Resour Bull 31:889–906 es_ES
dc.description.references Booker JF, Young RA (1994) Modeling intrastate and interstate markets for colorado river water resources. J Environ Econ Manag 26:66–87 es_ES
dc.description.references Booker JF, Michelsen AM, Ward FA (2005) Economic impact of alternative policy responses to prolonged and severe drought in the Rio Grande Basin. Water Resour Res 41:W02026 es_ES
dc.description.references Brown T (1990) Marginal economic value of streamflow: a case study for the Colorado River Basin. Water Resour Res 26:2845–2859 es_ES
dc.description.references Brown GM (2000) Renewable natural resource management and use without markets. J Econ Lit 38:875–914 es_ES
dc.description.references Burke SM, Adams RM, Wallender WW (2004) Water banks and environmental water, and demands: case of the Klamath Project. Water Resour Res 40:2004 es_ES
dc.description.references Cai X, Rosegrant MW (2004) Irrigation technology choices under hydrologic uncertainty: a case study from Maipo River Basin, Chile. Water Resour Res 40:W04103. doi: 04110.01029/02003WR002810 es_ES
dc.description.references Cai X, Ringler C, Rosegrant M (2006) Modeling water resources management at the basin level: Methodology and application to the maipo river basin research report. 149 International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC es_ES
dc.description.references Characklis GW, Griffin RC, Bedient PB (1999) Improving the ability of a water market to efficiently manage drought. Water Resour Res 35:823–831 es_ES
dc.description.references City of Albuquerque Water Utilities (2011) On the web at: http://www.cabq.gov/water/ es_ES
dc.description.references Draper AJ, Jenkins MW, Kirby KW, Lund JR, Howitt RE (2003) Economic engineering optimization for California water management. J Water Res PL-Manag 129:155–164 es_ES
dc.description.references Elephant Butte Irrigation District (2011) On the web at: http://www.ebid-nm.org es_ES
dc.description.references El-Naqa A, Al-Shayeb A (2009) Groundwater protection and management strategy in Jordan. Water Resour Manag 23:2379–2394 es_ES
dc.description.references El Paso County Water Improvement District #1 (2011) On the web at: www.epcwid1.org es_ES
dc.description.references El Paso Water Utilities (2011) On the web at: http://www.epwu.org es_ES
dc.description.references Flugel WA (2007) The adaptive integrated data information system (AIDIS) for global water research. Water Resour Manag 21:199–210 es_ES
dc.description.references Gohar A, Ward FA (2010) Gains from expanded irrigation water trading in Egypt: an integrated basin approach. Ecol Econ 69:2535–2548 es_ES
dc.description.references Gürlük S, Ward FA (2009) Integrated basin management: water and food policy options for Turkey. Ecol Econ 68:2666–2678 es_ES
dc.description.references Hawkes JM, Libbin JD (2011) Cost and Return Estimates. November 12 at http://aces.nmsu.edu/cropcosts/ es_ES
dc.description.references Jenkins MW, Lund JR, Howitt RE, Draper AJ, Msangi SM, Tanaka SK, Ritzema RS, Marques GF (2004) Optimization of California’s Water System: results and insights. J Water Resour Pl-Manag 130:271–280 es_ES
dc.description.references Knapp KC, Weinberg M, Howitt RE, Posnikoff JF (2003) Water transfers, agriculture and groundwater management: A dynamic economic analysis. J Environ Manag 67:291–301 es_ES
dc.description.references Koundouri P (2004) Current issues in the economics of groundwater resource management. J Econ Surv 18:703–740 es_ES
dc.description.references Letcher RA, Jakeman AJ, Croke BFW (2004) Model development for intgegrated assessment of water allocation options. Water Resour Res 40:W05502. doi: 05510.01029/02003WR002933 es_ES
dc.description.references Livingston ML, Garrido A (2004) Entering the policy debate: an economic valuation of groundwater policy in flux. Water Resour Res 40:W12S02 es_ES
dc.description.references Lund J, Guzman J (1999) Some derived operating rules for reservoirs in series or in parallel. J Water Resour Pl-Manag 125:143–153 es_ES
dc.description.references McCarl BA, Dillon CR, Keplinger KO, Williams RL (1999) Limiting pumping from the edwards aquifer: an economic investigation of proposals, water markets, and spring flow guarantees. Water Resour Res 35:1257–1268 es_ES
dc.description.references Michelsen A, McGuckin T, Stumpf D (1999) Nonprice water conservation programs as a demand management tool. J Am Water Resour Assoc 35:593–602 es_ES
dc.description.references Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District (2011) On the web at: http://www.mrgcd.com es_ES
dc.description.references Molina JL, Arostegui JLG, Benavente J, Varela C, de la Hera A, Geta JAL (2009) Aquifers overexploitation in SE Spain: a proposal for the integrated analysis of water management. Water Resour Manag 23:2737–2760 es_ES
dc.description.references Murad AA, Al Nuaimi H, Al Hammadi M (2007) Comprehensive assessment of water resources in the united arab emirates (UAE). Water Resour Manag 21:1449–1463 es_ES
dc.description.references National Research Council (1997) Valuing ground water: economic concepts and approaches. National Academic Press, Washington es_ES
dc.description.references Newlin BD, Jenkins MW, Lund JR, Howitt RE (2002) Southern California water markets: potential and limitations. J Water Resour Pl-Manag 128:21–32 es_ES
dc.description.references New Mexico Water Resources Research Institute (2006) Rio Grande Compact Text es_ES
dc.description.references Pascual P (2007) Avoiding tragedies of the intellectual commons through Integrated Impact Assessments. Water Resour Manag 21:2005–2013 es_ES
dc.description.references Prodanovic P, Simonovic SP (2011) An operational model for support of integrated watershed management. Water Resour Manag 24:1161–1194 es_ES
dc.description.references Pulido-Velazquez M, Jenkins MW, Lund JR (2004) Economic values for conjunctive use and water banking in Southern California. Water Resour Res 40(3):W03401 es_ES
dc.description.references Pulido-Velazquez M, Andreu J, Sahuquillo A (2006) Economic optimization of conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater at the basin scale. J Water Resour Pl-Manag 132(6):454–467 es_ES
dc.description.references Ringler CJ, von Braun J, Rosegrant MW (2004) Water policy analysis for the Mekong River Basin. Water Int 29:30–42 es_ES
dc.description.references Rio Grande Water Conservation District (2011) On the web at: http://www.rgwcd.org es_ES
dc.description.references Schulze RE (2007) Some foci of integrated water resources management in the “south” which are oft-forgotten by the “north”: a perspective from southern Africa. Water Resour Manag 21:269–294 es_ES
dc.description.references Speed R (2009) Transferring and trading water rights in the People's Republic of China. Int J Water Resour Dev 25:(2)269–281 es_ES
dc.description.references Tanaka SK, Zhu T, Lund JR, Howitt RE, Jenkins MW, Pulido-Velazquez M, Tauber M, Ritzema RS, Ferreira IC (2006) Climate warming and water management adaptation for California. Climatic Change 76:361–384 es_ES
dc.description.references Tietenberg T, Lewis L (2009) Environmental and natural resource economics, 8th edn. Prentice-Hall es_ES
dc.description.references Torell G, Ward FA (2010) Improved water institutions for food security and rural livelihoods in Afghanistan’s Balkh River Basin. Int J Water Resour Dev 26:613–637 es_ES
dc.description.references van der Keur P, Henriksen HJ, Refsgaard JC, Brugnach M, Pahl-Wostl C, Dewulf A, Buiteveld H (2008) Identification of major sources of uncertainty in current IWRM practice. Illustrated for the Rhine basin. Water Resour Manag 22:1677–1708 es_ES
dc.description.references Ward FA, Lynch TP (1997) Is dominant use management compatible with basin-wide economic efficiency? Water Resour Res 33:1165–1170 es_ES
dc.description.references Ward FA, Pulido-Velazquez M (2008) Efficiency, equity and sustainability in a water quantity-quality optimization model in the Rio Grande basin. Ecol Econ 66:26–37 es_ES
dc.description.references Ward FA, Pulido-Velazquez M (2009) Incentive pricing and cost recovery at the basin scale. J Environ Manag 90(1):293–313 es_ES
dc.description.references Ward FA, Cole RA, Deitner RA, Green-Hammond KA (1997) Limiting environmental program contradictions: a demand systems application to fishery management. Am J Agr Econ 79:803–813 es_ES
dc.description.references Ward FA, Booker JF, Michelsen AM (2006) Integrated economic, hydrologic, and institutional analysis of policy responses to mitigate drought impacts in the Rio Grande Basin. J Water Resour Pl-Manag 132:488–502 es_ES
dc.description.references Watkins DW Jr., McKinney DC (1999) Screening water supply options for the edwards aquifer region in Central Texas. J Water Resour Pl-Manag 125:14–24 es_ES
dc.description.references Watkins DW, Moser DA (2006) Economic-based optimization of panama canal system operations. J Water Resour Pl-Manag 132:454–467 es_ES
dc.description.references Willis DB, Whittlesey NK (1998) Water management policies for streamflow augmentation in an irrigated River Basin. J Agr Resour Econ 23:170–190 es_ES
dc.description.references Young RA (2005) Determining the economic value of water: concepts and methods. Washington D.C, USA: Resources For the Future es_ES
dc.description.references Zarghaami M (2006) Integrated water resources management in polrud irrigation system. Water Resour Manag 20:215–225 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem