- -

Computational approaches for conflict resolution in decision making: New advances and developments

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Computational approaches for conflict resolution in decision making: New advances and developments

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Computational ...
Tamaño: 96.35Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión del Autor.
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Aydogan, Reyhan es_ES
dc.contributor.author Sánchez Anguix, Víctor es_ES
dc.contributor.author Julian Inglada, Vicente Javier es_ES
dc.contributor.author Broekens, Joost es_ES
dc.contributor.author Jonker, Catholijn es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2015-05-04T09:36:35Z
dc.date.available 2015-05-04T09:36:35Z
dc.date.issued 2014-04
dc.identifier.issn 0196-9722
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/49586
dc.description.abstract Conflict is an omnipresent phenomenon in human society. It spans from individual decision-making trade-offs such as deciding what to do next (sleep, eat, work, play), to complex scenarios including politics and business. The social sciences, psychology, economy, and biology study the nature of conflict, its consequences, and strategies to successfully deal with it. Over the last decades computer science has joined those disciplines and studies conflict from a computational perspective. This special issue presents a selection of the best papers presented at the First Workshop of Conflict Resolution in Decision Making (COREDEMA). The workshop focused on computational approaches that tackle conflict in order to provide new insights and explore potential applications. The workshop was jointly hosted with the 12th International Conference on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (PAAMS) in Salamanca, Spain, from June 4 to 6, 2013. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Taylor & Francis es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Cybernetics and Systems es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Agreement technologies es_ES
dc.subject Conflict resolution es_ES
dc.subject Artificial intelligence es_ES
dc.subject Intelligent systems es_ES
dc.subject Decision making es_ES
dc.subject Negotiation es_ES
dc.subject.classification CIENCIAS DE LA COMPUTACION E INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL es_ES
dc.subject.classification LENGUAJES Y SISTEMAS INFORMATICOS es_ES
dc.title Computational approaches for conflict resolution in decision making: New advances and developments es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/01969722.2014.894844
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Sistemas Informáticos y Computación - Departament de Sistemes Informàtics i Computació es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Aydogan, R.; Sánchez Anguix, V.; Julian Inglada, VJ.; Broekens, J.; Jonker, C. (2014). Computational approaches for conflict resolution in decision making: New advances and developments. Cybernetics and Systems. 45(3):217-221. doi:10.1080/01969722.2014.894844 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01969722.2014.894844 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 217 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 221 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 45 es_ES
dc.description.issue 3 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 286800
dc.description.references Argente, E., Botti, V., Carrascosa, C., Giret, A., Julian, V., & Rebollo, M. (2010). An abstract architecture for virtual organizations: The THOMAS approach. Knowledge and Information Systems, 29(2), 379-403. doi:10.1007/s10115-010-0349-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Broekens, J., Harbers, M., Brinkman, W.-P., Jonker, C. M., Van den Bosch, K., & Meyer, J.-J. (2012). Virtual Reality Negotiation Training Increases Negotiation Knowledge and Skill. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 218-230. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33197-8_23 es_ES
dc.description.references Chevaleyre, Y., Endriss, U., Lang, J., & Maudet, N. (2007). A Short Introduction to Computational Social Choice. SOFSEM 2007: Theory and Practice of Computer Science, 51-69. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69507-3_4 es_ES
dc.description.references Core, M., Traum, D., Lane, H. C., Swartout, W., Gratch, J., van Lent, M., & Marsella, S. (2006). Teaching Negotiation Skills through Practice and Reflection with Virtual Humans. SIMULATION, 82(11), 685-701. doi:10.1177/0037549706075542 es_ES
dc.description.references Foroughi, A. (2011). A Survey Of The Use Of Computer Support For Negotiation. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 11(2), 121. doi:10.19030/jabr.v11i2.5882 es_ES
dc.description.references Minghua He, Jennings, N. R., & Ho-Fung Leung. (2003). On agent-mediated electronic commerce. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 15(4), 985-1003. doi:10.1109/tkde.2003.1209014 es_ES
dc.description.references Jennings, N. R., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A. R., Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M. J., & Sierra, C. (2001). Group Decision and Negotiation, 10(2), 199-215. doi:10.1023/a:1008746126376 es_ES
dc.description.references Maillé , P. and B. Tuffin . “Multibid Auctions for Bandwidth Allocation in Communication Networks.” InINFOCOM 2004. Twenty-third Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, Vol. 1. Hong Kong, China: IEEE , 2004 . es_ES
dc.description.references Marsa-Maestre, I., Klein, M., Jonker, C. M., & Aydoğan, R. (2014). From problems to protocols: Towards a negotiation handbook. Decision Support Systems, 60, 39-54. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.019 es_ES
dc.description.references RAHWAN, I., RAMCHURN, S. D., JENNINGS, N. R., McBURNEY, P., PARSONS, S., & SONENBERG, L. (2003). Argumentation-based negotiation. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 18(4), 343-375. doi:10.1017/s0269888904000098 es_ES
dc.description.references Sanchez-Anguix, V., Julian, V., Botti, V., & García-Fornes, A. (2013). Tasks for agent-based negotiation teams: Analysis, review, and challenges. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 26(10), 2480-2494. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2013.07.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Shoham, Y., & Leyton-Brown, K. (2008). Multiagent Systems. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511811654 es_ES
dc.description.references Sierra, C., Botti, V., & Ossowski, S. (2010). Agreement Computing. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 25(1), 57-61. doi:10.1007/s13218-010-0070-y es_ES
dc.description.references Tambe , M. , E. Bowring , H. Jung , G. Kaminka , R. Maheswaran , J. Marecki , P. J. Modi , R. Nair , S. Okamoto , J. P. Pearce , P. Paruchuri , D. Pynadath , P. Scerri , N. Schurr , and P. Varakantham . “Conflicts in Teamwork: Hybrids to the Rescue.” InProceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 3–10. New York: ACM , 2005 . es_ES
dc.description.references Thierry, B., Aureli, F., Nunn, C. L., Petit, O., Abegg, C., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2008). A comparative study of conflict resolution in macaques: insights into the nature of trait covariation. Animal Behaviour, 75(3), 847-860. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.07.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Thomas, K. W. (1992). Conflict and conflict management: Reflections and update. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(3), 265-274. doi:10.1002/job.4030130307 es_ES
dc.description.references Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2004). The Interpersonal Effects of Emotions in Negotiations: A Motivated Information Processing Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(4), 510-528. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.510 es_ES
dc.description.references Ziebart , B. , M. Dudík , G. Gordon , K. Sycara , W. Adair , and J. Brett . “Identifying Culture and Leveraging Cultural Differences for Negotiation Agents.” In2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS), 618–27. Hong Kong, China: IEEE , 2012 . es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem