- -

New firm creation and innovation: industrial patterns and inter-sectoral linkages

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

New firm creation and innovation: industrial patterns and inter-sectoral linkages

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

[Cerrado]
Nombre: Alba;García;Mas - ...
Tamaño: 255.9Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author Alba, Martín Federico es_ES
dc.contributor.author García Alvarez-Coque, José María es_ES
dc.contributor.author Mas Verdú, Francisco es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2015-06-08T10:55:46Z
dc.date.available 2015-06-08T10:55:46Z
dc.date.issued 2013-12
dc.identifier.issn 1555-1938
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/51389
dc.description “The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11365-011-0210-3”. es_ES
dc.description.abstract This article analyzes the linkages between entrepreneurship and innovation behaviour at an industrial level. The research question refers to the extent that the industrial pattern of generation/absorption of knowledge affects the industrial ability to create new firms. An embodied knowledge approach has been applied, by combining the input-output framework with innovation and new firm creation data. As a result, four industrial patterns of innovation/new firm creation have been identified, taking into account the firm size and the model of generation and absorption of knowledge. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer Verlag (Germany) es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject New firm creation es_ES
dc.subject Entrepreneurship es_ES
dc.subject Innovation pattern es_ES
dc.subject Embodied knowledge es_ES
dc.subject Sectoral linkages es_ES
dc.subject Input-output es_ES
dc.subject.classification ECONOMIA APLICADA es_ES
dc.title New firm creation and innovation: industrial patterns and inter-sectoral linkages es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s11365-011-0210-3
dc.rights.accessRights Cerrado es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales - Departament d'Economia i Ciències Socials es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Alba, MF.; García Alvarez-Coque, JM.; Mas Verdú, F. (2013). New firm creation and innovation: industrial patterns and inter-sectoral linkages. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 9(4):501-519. doi:10.1007/s11365-011-0210-3 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11365-011-0210-3 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 501 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 519 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 9 es_ES
dc.description.issue 4 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 207920
dc.identifier.eissn 1555-1938
dc.description.references Acs, Z., Audretsch, D., Braunerhjelm, P. & Carlsson, B. (2004). The missing link: The knowledge filter, entrepreneurship and endogenous growth. Working Paper. Centre for Economic Policy Research, London. es_ES
dc.description.references Acs, Z., Armington, C., & Zhang, T. (2007). The determinants of new-firm survival across regional economies: The role of human capital stock and knowledge spillover. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 367–391. es_ES
dc.description.references Acs, Z., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D., & Carlsson, B. (2008). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32(1), 1–15. es_ES
dc.description.references Acs, Z., Audretsch, D., Braunerhjelm, P., & Carlsson, B. (2011). Growth and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics. doi: 10.1007/s11187-010-9307-2 . es_ES
dc.description.references Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60(2), 323–351. es_ES
dc.description.references Aghion, P., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., Howitt, P., & Prantl, S. (2004). Entry and productivity growth: Evidence from microlevel panel data. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(2), 265–276. es_ES
dc.description.references Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Howitt, P. (2005). Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2), 701–728. es_ES
dc.description.references Aghion, P., Blundell, R., Griffifth, R., Howitt, P., & Prantl, S. (2009). The effects of entry on incumbent innovation and productivity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(1), 20–32. es_ES
dc.description.references Alpkan, L., Bulut, C., Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., & Kilic, K. (2010). Organizational support for intrapreneurship and its interaction with human capital to enhance innovative performance. Management Decision, 48(5), 732–755. es_ES
dc.description.references Audretsch, D., & Keilbach, M. (2008). Resolving the knowledge paradox: Knowledge-spillover entrepreneurship and economic growth. Research Policy, 37(10), 1697–1705. es_ES
dc.description.references Audretsch, D., Bönte, W., & Keilbach, M. (2008). Entrepreneurship capital and its impact on knowledge diffusion and economic performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 687–698. es_ES
dc.description.references Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323–1339. es_ES
dc.description.references Burton, J. (1999). Innovation, entrepreneurship and the firm: A post-schumpeterian approach. International Journal of Technology Management, 17(1–2), 16–36. es_ES
dc.description.references Callejón, M., & Ortún, V. (2009). La caja negra de la dinámica empresarial. Investigaciones Regionales, 15, 167–189. es_ES
dc.description.references Cefis, E., & Marsili, O. (2006). Survivor: The role of innovation in firms’ survival. Research Policy, 35(5), 626–641. es_ES
dc.description.references Cefis, E., & Marsili, O. (2011). Born to flip. Exit decisions of entrepreneurial firms in high-tech and low-tech industries. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. doi: 10.1007/s00191-010-0210-4 . es_ES
dc.description.references Deeds, D. L. (2001). The role of R&D intensity, technical development and absorptive capacity in creating entrepreneurial wealth in high technology start-ups. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 18(1), 29–47. es_ES
dc.description.references den Hertog, P., Broersma, L., & van Ark, B. (2003). On the soft side of innovation: Services innovation and its policy implications. Economist, 151(4), 433–452. es_ES
dc.description.references Eurostat. (2010). Community innovation survey, 2006. Found at http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/science_technology_innovation/data/database Accessed 5 July 2011. es_ES
dc.description.references Hauknes, J., & Knell, M. (2009). Embodied knowledge and sectoral linkages: An input–output approach to the interaction of high- and low-tech industries. Research Policy, 38(3), 459–469. es_ES
dc.description.references Houthoofd, N., Desmidt, S., & Fidalgo, E. G. (2010). Analyzing firm performance heterogeneity: The relative effect of business domain. Management Decision, 48(6), 996–1009. es_ES
dc.description.references Huang, J. Y., Chou, T. C., & Lee, G. G. (2010). Imitative innovation strategies. Management Decision, 48(6), 952–975. es_ES
dc.description.references INE. (2007). Encuesta sobre Innovación en las Empresas del año 2006. Found at http://www.ine.es/inebmenu/mnu_imasd.htm Accessed 6 July 2011. es_ES
dc.description.references INE. (2010). Directorio Central De Empresas. found at http://www.ine.es/jaxi/menu.do?type=pcaxis&path=%2Ft37%2Fp201&file=inebase&L=0 Accessed 6 July 2011. es_ES
dc.description.references INEa. (2009). Marco input output de España: Tabla simétrica del año 2005. Found at http://www.ine.es/daco/daco42/cne00/cneio2000.htm Accessed 6 July 2011. es_ES
dc.description.references INEb. (2009). Matriz de formación bruta de capital fijo del año 2005. Found at http://www.ine.es/daco/daco42/cne00/dacocne_b00.htm Accessed 6 July 2011. es_ES
dc.description.references Leontief, W. (1936). Quantitative input and output relations in the economic systems of the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics, 18, 105–125. es_ES
dc.description.references Leontief, W. (1937). Interrelation of prices, output, savings, and investment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 19, 109–132. es_ES
dc.description.references Lin, E., Lin, T. M. Y., & Lin, B.-W. (2010). New high-tech venturing as process of resource accumulation. Management Decision, 48(8), 1230–1246. es_ES
dc.description.references Marsili, O. (2002). Technological regimes and sources of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 19(3), 217–231. es_ES
dc.description.references Mas-Verdú, F., Wensley, A., Alba, M., & García Álvarez-Coque, J. M. (2011). How much does KIBS contribute to the generation and diffusion of innovation? Service Business. doi: 10.1007/s11628-011-0110-1 . es_ES
dc.description.references Mueller, P. (2007). Exploiting entrepreneurial opportunities: The impact of entrepreneurship on growth. Small Business Economics, 28(4), 355–362. es_ES
dc.description.references Papaconstantinou, G., Sakurai, N., & Wyckoff, A. (1996). Embodied technology diffusion. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. es_ES
dc.description.references Papaconstantinou, G., Sakurai, N., & Wyckoff, A. (1998). Domestic and international product-embodied R&D diffusion. Research Policy, 27(3), 301–314. es_ES
dc.description.references Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13(6), 343–373. es_ES
dc.description.references Robinsohn, C., Stokes, L., Stuivenwold, E., & van Ark, B. (2003). Industry structure and taxonomies. In M. O’Mahoney & B. van Ark (Eds.), EU productivity and competitiveness: An industry perspective. can Europe resume the catching-up process? (pp. 41–37). Luxembourg: European Commission. es_ES
dc.description.references Sakurai, N., & Papaconstantinou, G. (1997). Impact of R&D and technology diffusion on productivity. Economic Systems Research, 9(1), 81. es_ES
dc.description.references Salavou, H. (2010). Strategy types of service firms: Evidence from Greece. Management Decision, 48(7), 1033–1047. es_ES
dc.description.references Scherer, F. (1982a). Inter-industry technology flows and productivity growth. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 64(4), 627. es_ES
dc.description.references Scherer, F. (1982b). Inter-industry technology flows in the United States. Research Policy, 11(4), 227–245. es_ES
dc.description.references Scherer, F. (2003). Technology flows matrix estimation revisited. Economic Systems Research, 15(3), 327. es_ES
dc.description.references Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper. es_ES
dc.description.references Sonmez, M., & Moorhouse, A. (2010). Purchasing professional services: Which decision criteria? Management Decision, 48(2), 189–206. es_ES
dc.description.references Stam, E., & Wennberg, K. (2009). The roles of R&D in new firm growth. Small Business Economics, 33(1), 77–89. es_ES
dc.description.references Terleckyj, N. (1974). Effects of R&D on the productivity growth of industries: An exploratory study. Washington DC: National Planning Association. es_ES
dc.description.references Visscher, K., & Visscher-Voerman, J. (2010). Organizational design approaches in management consulting. Management Decision, 48(5), 713–731. es_ES
dc.description.references Zhang, J., & Duan, Y. (2010). The impact of different types of market orientation on product innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturers. Management Decision, 48(6), 849–867. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem