- -

Wonen's features and inter/intra rater agreement on mammographic density assesment in full-field digital mammograms

RiuNet: Institutional repository of the Polithecnic University of Valencia

Share/Send to

Cited by

Statistics

Wonen's features and inter/intra rater agreement on mammographic density assesment in full-field digital mammograms

Show full item record

Perez-Gomez, B.; Ruiz, F.; Martinez, I.; Casals, M.; Miranda, J.; Sanchez-Contador, C.; Vidal, C.... (2012). Wonen's features and inter/intra rater agreement on mammographic density assesment in full-field digital mammograms. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 132(1):287-295. doi:10.1007/s10549-011-1833-3

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/57831

Files in this item

Item Metadata

Title: Wonen's features and inter/intra rater agreement on mammographic density assesment in full-field digital mammograms
Author: Perez-Gomez, Beatriz Ruiz, Franciso Martinez, Inmaculada Casals, Maria Miranda, Josefa Sanchez-Contador, Carmen Vidal, Carmen Llobet Azpitarte, Rafael Pollan, Marina Salas, Dolores
UPV Unit: Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Sistemas Informáticos y Computación - Departament de Sistemes Informàtics i Computació
Issued date:
Abstract:
Measurement of mammographic density (MD), one of the leading risk factors for breast cancer, still relies on subjective assessment. However, the consistency of MD measurement in full-digital mammograms has yet to ...[+]
Subjects: Mammographic density , Digital mammograms , Agreement , Kappa , Rater , Risk factors
Copyrigths: Cerrado
Source:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. (issn: 0167-6806 )
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1833-3
Publisher:
Springer Verlag (Germany)
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1833-3
Thanks:
This study was supported by research grants from Fundacion Gent per Gent (EDEMAC Project); grants FIS PI09/1230 & PI060386 from Spain's Health Research Fund (Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria); the EPY 1306/06 Collaboration ...[+]
Type: Artículo

References

Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, Sun L, Stone J, Fishell E, Jong RA, Hislop G, Chiarelli A, Minkin S, Yaffe MJ (2007) Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:227–236

Stone J, Dite GS, Gunasekara A, English DR, McCredie MR, Giles GG, Cawson JN, Hegele RA, Chiarelli AM, Yaffe MJ, Boyd NF, Hopper JL (2006) The heritability of mammographically dense and nondense breast tissue. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:612–617

Boyd NF, Dite GS, Stone J, Gunasekara A, English DR, McCredie MR, Giles GG, Tritchler D, Chiarelli A, Yaffe MJ, Hopper JL (2002) Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:886–894 [+]
Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, Sun L, Stone J, Fishell E, Jong RA, Hislop G, Chiarelli A, Minkin S, Yaffe MJ (2007) Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:227–236

Stone J, Dite GS, Gunasekara A, English DR, McCredie MR, Giles GG, Cawson JN, Hegele RA, Chiarelli AM, Yaffe MJ, Boyd NF, Hopper JL (2006) The heritability of mammographically dense and nondense breast tissue. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:612–617

Boyd NF, Dite GS, Stone J, Gunasekara A, English DR, McCredie MR, Giles GG, Tritchler D, Chiarelli A, Yaffe MJ, Hopper JL (2002) Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:886–894

El Bastawissi AY, White E, Mandelson MT, Taplin S (2001) Variation in mammographic breast density by race. Ann Epidemiol 11:257–263

El Bastawissi AY, White E, Mandelson MT, Taplin SH (2000) Reproductive and hormonal factors associated with mammographic breast density by age (United States). Cancer Causes Control 11:955–963

Vacek PM, Geller BM (2004) A prospective study of breast cancer risk using routine mammographic breast density measurements. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13:715–722

Kelemen LE, Pankratz VS, Sellers TA, Brandt KR, Wang A, Janney C, Fredericksen ZS, Cerhan JR, Vachon CM (2008) Age-specific trends in mammographic density: the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Study. Am J Epidemiol 167:1027–1036

Cuzick J, Warwick J, Pinney E, Warren RM, Duffy SW (2004) Tamoxifen and breast density in women at increased risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:621–628

Boyd N, Martin L, Stone J, Little L, Minkin S, Yaffe M (2002) A longitudinal study of the effects of menopause on mammographic features. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:1048–1053

Stone J, Gunasekara A, Martin LJ, Yaffe M, Minkin S, Boyd NF (2003) The detection of change in mammographic density. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:625–630

McCormack VA, dos SS I, De Stavola BL, Perry N, Vinnicombe S, Swerdlow AJ, Hardy R, Kuh D (2003) Life-course body size and perimenopausal mammographic parenchymal patterns in the MRC 1946 British birth cohort. Br J Cancer 89:852–859

American College of Radiology (1993) Breast imaging reporting and data system (BIRADS). American College of Radiology, Reston, Va

Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, Fishell EK, Little LE, Miller AB, Lockwood GA, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ (1995) Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:670–675

Byng JW, Boyd NF, Fishell E, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ (1994) The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol 39:1629–1638

Ciatto S, Houssami N, Apruzzese A, Bassetti E, Brancato B, Carozzi F, Catarzi S, Lamberini MP, Marcelli G, Pellizzoni R, Pesce B, Risso G, Russo F, Scorsolini A (2005) Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories. Breast 14:269–275

Gao J, Warren R, Warren-Forward H, Forbes JF (2008) Reproducibility of visual assessment on mammographic density. Breast Cancer Res Treat 108:121–127

Ooms EA, Zonderland HM, Eijkemans MJ, Kriege M, Mahdavian DB, Burger CW, Ansink AC (2007) Mammography: interobserver variability in breast density assessment. Breast 16:568–576

Tagliafico A, Tagliafico G, Tosto S, Chiesa F, Martinoli C, Derchi LE, Calabrese M (2009) Mammographic density estimation: comparison among BI-RADS categories, a semi-automated software and a fully automated one. Breast 18:35–40

Lee-Han H, Cooke G, Boyd NF (1995) Quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a comparison of methods of assessment. Eur J Cancer Prev 4:285–292

Nicholson BT, LoRusso AP, Smolkin M, Bovbjerg VE, Petroni GR, Harvey JA (2006) Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions. Acad Radiol 13:1143–1149

Berg WA, Campassi C, Langenberg P, Sexton MJ (2000) Breast imaging reporting and data system: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1769–1777

Benichou J, Byrne C, Capece LA, Carroll LE, Hurt-Mullen K, Pee DY, Salane M, Schairer C, Gail MH (2003) Secular stability and reliability of measurements of the percentage of dense tissue on mammograms. Cancer Detect Prev 27:266–274

Jong R, Fishell E, Little L, Lockwood G, Boyd NF (1996) Mammographic signs of potential relevance to breast cancer risk: the agreement of radiologists’ classification. Eur J Cancer Prev 5:281–286

Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Frankel SD, Ominsky SH, Sickles EA, Ernster V (1998) Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1801–1809

Antonio AL, Crespi CM (2010) Predictors of interobserver agreement in breast imaging using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Breast Cancer Res Treat 120:539–546

Garrido-Estepa M, Ruiz-Perales F, Miranda J, Ascunce N, Gonzalez-Roman I, Sanchez-Contador C, Santamarina C, Moreo P, Vidal C, Peris M, Moreno MP, Vaquez-Carrete JA, Collado-Garcia F, Casanova F, Ederra M, Salas D, Pollan M (2010) Evaluation of mammographic density patterns: reproducibility and concordance among scales. BMC Cancer 10:485

Cabanes A, Pastor-Barriuso R, Garcia-Lopez M, Pedraz-Pingarron C, Sanchez-Contador C, Vazquez Carrete JA, Moreno MP, Vidal C, Salas D, Miranda-Garcia J, Peris M, Moreo P, Santamarina MC, Collado-Garcia F, Gonzalez-Roman I, Ascunce N, Pollan M (2011) Alcohol, tobacco, and mammographic density: a population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 129(1):135–147

Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Measur 20:37–46

Cohen J (1968) Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 70:213–220

Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

Gelman A, Hill J (2007) Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Caldwell CB, Stapleton SJ, Holdsworth DW, Jong RA, Weiser WJ, Cooke G, Yaffe MJ (1990) Characterisation of mammographic parenchymal pattern by fractal dimension. Phys Med Biol 35:235–247

Jeffreys M, Warren R, Smith GD, Gunnell D (2003) Breast density: agreement of measures from film and digital image. Br J Radiol 76:561–563

Fischmann A, Siegmann KC, Wersebe A, Claussen CD, Muller-Schimpfle M (2005) Comparison of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography: image quality and lesion detection. Br J Radiol 78:312–315

Venta LA, Hendrick RE, Adler YT, DeLeon P, Mengoni PM, Scharl AM, Comstock CE, Hansen L, Kay N, Coveler A, Cutter G (2001) Rates and causes of disagreement in interpretation of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography in a diagnostic setting. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:1241–1248

Maclure M, Willett WC (1987) Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa-statistic. Am J Epidemiol 126:161–169

Cicchetti DV, Allison T (1971) A new procedure for assessing reliability of scoring EEG sleep recordings. Am J EEG Technol 11:101–110

Fleiss JL, Cohen J (1973) Equivalence of weighted kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Measur 33:613–619

Yaffe MJ, Mainprize JG, Jong RA (2008) Technical developments in mammography. Health Phys 95:599–611

Tice JA, Feldman MD (2008) Full-field digital mammography compared with screen-film mammography in the detection of breast cancer: rays of light through DMIST or more fog? Breast Cancer Res Treat 107:157–165

Vinnicombe S, Pinto Pereira SM, McCormack VA, Shiel S, Perry N, dos Santos Silva I (2009) Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data. Radiology 251:347–358

Del Turco MR, Mantellini P, Ciatto S, Bonardi R, Martinelli F, Lazzari B, Houssami N (2007) Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:860–866

Boyd NF (2011) Tamoxifen, mammographic density, and breast cancer prevention. J Natl Cancer Inst 103:704–705

[-]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record