- -

Response of nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L. var sativus Boeck.) tuber production to drip irrigation based on volumetric soil water content

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Response of nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L. var sativus Boeck.) tuber production to drip irrigation based on volumetric soil water content

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Pascual Seva, N - ...
Tamaño: 406.1Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión del Autor.
Abrir
[Cerrado]
Nombre: art%3A10.1007%2Fs ...
Tamaño: 754.8Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author Pascual Seva, Nuria es_ES
dc.contributor.author San Bautista Primo, Alberto es_ES
dc.contributor.author López Galarza, Salvador Vicente es_ES
dc.contributor.author Maroto Borrego, José Vicente es_ES
dc.contributor.author Pascual España, Bernardo es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2016-03-07T11:13:07Z
dc.date.available 2016-03-07T11:13:07Z
dc.date.issued 2015-01
dc.identifier.issn 0342-7188
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/61519
dc.description The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00271-014-0446-0 es_ES
dc.description.abstract Cultivated nutsedge is a common crop in Valencia (Spain). The aim of this research, which was conducted over two consecutive years, was to compare the productive response of the nutsedge crop with drip irrigation and traditional furrow irrigation, calculating the yield and the irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE). The volumetric soil water content was monitored with capacitance probes. Four irrigation strategies were considered: three in drip irrigation [D70, D80 and D90 with refill points at 70, 80 and 90 % of the field capacity, respectively] and one in furrow irrigation (refill point at 60 % field capacity); in the second year, the irrigation management was automated. On average, strategy D90 produced the highest yield and D70 the lowest, while the highest IWUE was obtained with D80 and the lowest with furrow irrigation. Considering the automation of irrigation management, strategy D90 led to the highest yield and to the highest IWUE. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This study was funded by the Regulatory Council of Denomination of Origin Chufa of Valencia of Spain. en_EN
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer Verlag (Germany) es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Irrigation Science es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Use efficiency es_ES
dc.subject Chufa crops es_ES
dc.subject Yield es_ES
dc.subject Potato es_ES
dc.subject Growth es_ES
dc.subject Furrow es_ES
dc.subject Management es_ES
dc.subject Corn es_ES
dc.subject.classification PRODUCCION VEGETAL es_ES
dc.title Response of nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L. var sativus Boeck.) tuber production to drip irrigation based on volumetric soil water content es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s00271-014-0446-0
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Producción Vegetal - Departament de Producció Vegetal es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Pascual Seva, N.; San Bautista Primo, A.; López Galarza, SV.; Maroto Borrego, JV.; Pascual España, B. (2015). Response of nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L. var sativus Boeck.) tuber production to drip irrigation based on volumetric soil water content. Irrigation Science. 33(1):31-42. doi:10.1007/s00271-014-0446-0 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00271-014-0446-0 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 31 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 42 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 33 es_ES
dc.description.issue 1 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 278603 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 1432-1319
dc.contributor.funder Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Chufa de Valencia es_ES
dc.description.references Abrisqueta I, Vera J, Tapia LM, Abrisqueta JM, Ruiz-Sánchez MC (2012) Soil water content criteria for peach trees water stress detection during the postharvest period. Agric Water Manag 104:62–67 es_ES
dc.description.references Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO, Rome es_ES
dc.description.references Ayers RS, Westcot DW (1994) Water quality for agriculture. FAO Irrigation and Drainage, 29 Rev1. FAO, Roma, Italy es_ES
dc.description.references Bell JP, Dean TJ, Hodnett MG (1987) Soil moisture measurements by an improved capacitance technique, part II. Field techniques, evaluation and calibration. J Hydrol 93:79–90 es_ES
dc.description.references Bernstein L, Francois LE (1973) Comparisons of drip, furrow, and sprinkler irrigation. Soil Sci 115:73–86 es_ES
dc.description.references Bos MG (1980) Irrigation efficiencies at crop production level. ICID Bull 29:18–25 es_ES
dc.description.references Bresler E (1977) Trickle-drip irrigation: principles and application to soil-water management. Adv Agron 29:343–393 es_ES
dc.description.references Cabello MJ, Castellanos MT, Romojaro F, Martínez-Madrid C, Ribas F (2009) Yield and quality melon grown under different irrigation and nitrogen rates. Agric Water Manag 96:874–886 es_ES
dc.description.references Clemmens AJ, Molden DJ (2007) Water uses and productivity of irrigation systems. Irrig Sci 25:247–261 es_ES
dc.description.references Condori B, Mamani P, Botello R, Patiño F, Devaux A, Ledent JF (2008) Agrophysiological characterisation and parameterisation of Andean tubers: potato (Solanum sp.), oca (Oxalis tuberosa), isaño (Tropaeolum tuberosum) and papalisa (Ullucus tuberosus). Eur J Agron 28:526–540 es_ES
dc.description.references Corominas J (2009) Agua y energía en el riego, en la época de la sostenibilidad. Ingeniería del Agua 17:219–233 es_ES
dc.description.references Farré I, Faci JM (2009) Deficit irrigation in maize for reducing agricultural water use in a Mediterranean environment. Agric Water Manag 96:383–394 es_ES
dc.description.references Howell TA (2001) Enhancing water use efficiency in irrigated agriculture. Agron J 93:281–289 es_ES
dc.description.references Howell TA, Cuenca RH, Solomon KH (1990) Crop yield response. In: GJ Hoffman, TA Howell, KH Solomon (eds), Management of farm irrigation systems. ASAE, St Joseph, MI, USA, pp:93-122 es_ES
dc.description.references Howell TA, Yazar A, Schneider AD, Dusek DA, Copeland KS (1995) Yield and water use efficiency of corn in response to LEPA irrigation. Trans ASAE 36:1737–1747 es_ES
dc.description.references Hussein-Mounzer O, Mendoza-Hernández JR, Abrisqueta-Villena I, Tapia-Vargas L, Abrisqueta-García JM, Vera-Muñoz J, Ruiz-Sánchez MC (2008) Soil water content measured by FDR probes and thresholds for drip irrigation management in peach trees. Agric Téc Méx 34:313–322 es_ES
dc.description.references Ko J, Piccinni G (2009) Corn yield responses under crop evapotranspiration-based irrigation management. Agric Water Manag 96:799–808 es_ES
dc.description.references Maynard DN, Hochmuth GJ (1997) Knott’s handbook for vegetable growers. Wiley, NY es_ES
dc.description.references MINETUR [Spanish Ministry of Industry, Energy and Tourism] (2014) Peajes y tarifas. Energía eléctrica. Ministerio de Industria, Energía y Turismo. http://www.minetur.gob.es/energia/electricidad/Tarifas/Paginas/index.aspx . Accessed 3 August 2014 es_ES
dc.description.references Molden D, Murray-Rust H, Sakthivadivel R, Makin I (2003) A water-productivity framework for understanding and action. In: Kjine JW, Barker R, Molden D (eds) Water productivity in agriculture. International Water Management Institute, Colombo, pp 1–18 es_ES
dc.description.references MOPT [Spanish Ministry of Public Works and Transport] (1992) Guía para la elaboración de estudios del medio físico. Ministerio de Obras Públicas y Transporte, Madrid es_ES
dc.description.references Mushagalusa GN, Ledent JF, Draye X (2008) Shoot and root competition in potato/maize intercropping: effects on growth and yield. Environ Exper Bot 64:180–188 es_ES
dc.description.references Pascual B, Maroto JV, López-Galarza S, Alagarda J, Castell-Zeising V (1997) El cultivo de la chufa (Cyperus esculentus L. var. sativus Boeck.). Estudios realizados. Generalitat Valenciana, Conselleria de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación, Valencia, Spain es_ES
dc.description.references Pascual B, Maroto JV, López-Galarza S, San Bautista A, Alagarda J (1999) Chufa (Cyperus esculentus L. var. sativus Boeck): an unconventional crop. Studies related to applications and cultivation. Econ Bot 54:439–448 es_ES
dc.description.references Pascual-Seva N, San Bautista A, López-Galarza S, Alagarda J, Maroto JV, Pascual B (2008) Respuesta productiva de la chufa (Cyperus esculentus L. var. sativus Boeck.) en riego localizado. Actas de Horticultura 50:170–175 es_ES
dc.description.references Pascual-Seva N, Pascual B, San Bautista A, López-Galarza S, Maroto JV (2009) Growth and nutrient absorption in chufa (Cyperus esculentus L. var. sativus Boeck.) in soilless culture. J Hort Sci Biot 84:393–398 es_ES
dc.description.references Pascual-Seva N, San Bautista A, López-Galarza S, Maroto JV, Pascual B (2013a) Furrow-irrigated chufa crops in Valencia (Spain). I: productive response to two irrigation strategies. Span J Agric Res 11:258–267 es_ES
dc.description.references Pascual-Seva N, San Bautista A, López-Galarza S, Maroto JV, Pascual B (2013b) Furrow-irrigated chufa crops in Valencia (Spain). II: performance analysis and optimization. Span J Agric Res 11:268–278 es_ES
dc.description.references Quemada M, Gabriel JL, Lizaso J (2010) Calibration of capacitance probes: laboratory versus field procedures. In: Paltineanu IC, Vera J (eds), Transactions. The third international symposium on soil water measurement using capacitance, impedance and TDT. CEBAS-CSIC, PALTIN International Inc, Murcia, Spain, pp: 2.2:1-14 es_ES
dc.description.references Shahnazari A, Liu F, Andersen MN, Jacobsen SE, Jensen CR (2007) Effects of partial root-zone drying on yield, tuber size and water use efficiency in potato under field conditions. Field Crops Res 100:117–124 es_ES
dc.description.references Shock CC, Feibert EBG, Saunders LD (1998) Potato yield and quality response to deficit irrigation. HortScience 33:655–659 es_ES
dc.description.references Soil Survey Staff (2010) Keys to soil taxonomy, 11th edn. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington es_ES
dc.description.references Solomon KH, El-Gindy AM, Ibatullin SR (2007) Planing and system selection. In: Hoffman GJ, Evans RG, Jensen ME, Martin DL, Elliot RL (eds) Design and operation of farm irrigation systems. ASABE, St Joseph, MI, USA, pp 57–75 es_ES
dc.description.references Statistical Graphics Corporation (2005) Statgraphics Plus for Windows 5.1. Statistical Graphics, Rockville, Maryland, USA es_ES
dc.description.references Tolk JA, Howell T (2003) Water use efficiencies of grain sorghum grown in three USA southern Great Plains soils. Agric Water Manag 59:97–111 es_ES
dc.description.references Van der Veeken AJH, Loomen WJM (2009) How planting density affects number and yield of potato minitubers in a commercial glasshouse production system. Potato Res 52:105–119 es_ES
dc.description.references Veihmeyer FJ, Hendrickson AH (1931) The moisture equivalent as a measure of the field capacity of soils. Soil Sci 32:181–193 es_ES
dc.description.references Vera J, Mounzer O, Ruiz-Sánchez MC, Abrisqueta I, Tapia LM, Abrisqueta JM (2009) Soil water balance trial involving capacitance and neutron probe measurements. Agric Water Manag 96:905–911 es_ES
dc.description.references Viets FG (1962) Fertilizers and the efficient use of wáter. Adv Agron 14:223–264 es_ES
dc.description.references Yuan BZ, Nishiyama S, Kang Y (2003) Effects of different irrigation regimes on the growth and yield of drip-irrigated potato. Agric Water Manag 63:153–167 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem