Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Pellicer Armiñana, Teresa María | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Pellicer Armiñana, Eugenio | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Eaton, David | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-04-05T09:37:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-04-05T09:37:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0969-9988 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/62227 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyse the international construction sector from a macroeconomic point of view through production functions. The aim is to contribute additional knowledge on the European construction sector, highlighting differences in the industry among European countries Design/methodology/approach – In order to analyse the sector panel, data from 1996-2005 for nine European countries were used. Raw data were obtained from Eurostat (Bach Project). Variables for the production functions were chosen after a correlation analysis. Annual turnover was taken as the dependent variable, whereas total assets and personnel costs were the independent variables. The econometric regression models considered were linear (bivariate and multivariate) and logarithmic (Cobb-Douglas). Findings – In spite of the limitations stated, there are some factors that can explain the results obtained, such as the diverse preponderance of small and medium enterprises and the different roles played by informal economy, migration and subcontracting in each of the countries. Research limitations/implications – Data collected by Eurostat are provided by the enterprises voluntarily. This implies a bias in the representativeness of the data. Thus, the discrepancies and inconsistencies in the results obtained are a direct consequence of the data limitations. Furthermore, the regression models obtained should be tested using future data to predict the behaviour of the construction industry in each one of the countries. Originality/value – The use of production functions in the construction industry is a novel approach that should be further developed to gather more precise information on the behaviour of the sector. | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Emerald | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reserva de todos los derechos | es_ES |
dc.subject | Europe | es_ES |
dc.subject | Macroeconomics | es_ES |
dc.subject | Production economics | es_ES |
dc.subject | Construction industry | es_ES |
dc.subject | Small to medium-sized enterprises | es_ES |
dc.subject.classification | PROYECTOS DE INGENIERIA | es_ES |
dc.subject.classification | INGENIERIA DE LA CONSTRUCCION | es_ES |
dc.subject.classification | EXPRESION GRAFICA ARQUITECTONICA | es_ES |
dc.title | A macroeconomic regression analysis of the European construction industry | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1108/09699980911002584 | |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería de la Construcción y de Proyectos de Ingeniería Civil - Departament d'Enginyeria de la Construcció i de Projectes d'Enginyeria Civil | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Pellicer Armiñana, TM.; Pellicer Armiñana, E.; Eaton, D. (2009). A macroeconomic regression analysis of the European construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 16(6):573-597. doi:10.1108/09699980911002584 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09699980911002584 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 573 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 597 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 16 | es_ES |
dc.description.issue | 6 | es_ES |
dc.relation.senia | 37483 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bon, R. (1988). Direct and indirect resource utilisation by the construction sector. Habitat International, 12(1), 49-74. doi:10.1016/0197-3975(88)90039-2 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bon, R., & Crosthwaite, D. (2001). The future of international construction: some results of 1992-1999 surveys. Building Research & Information, 29(3), 242-247. doi:10.1080/096132101300099790 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bon, R., & Pietroforte, R. (1990). Historical comparison of construction sectors in the United States, Japan, Italy and Finland using input-output tables. Construction Management and Economics, 8(3), 233-247. doi:10.1080/01446199000000021 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Clarke, L., & Wall, C. (2000). Craft versus industry: the division of labour in European housing construction. Construction Management and Economics, 18(6), 689-698. doi:10.1080/014461900414745 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Dikmen, I., Birgonul, M. T., & Budayan, C. (2009). Strategic Group Analysis in the Construction Industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(4), 288-297. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2009)135:4(288) | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Drewer, S. (2001). A perspective of the international construction system. Habitat International, 25(1), 69-79. doi:10.1016/s0197-3975(00)00027-8 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Druker, J., & Croucher, R. (2000). National collective bargaining and employment flexibility in the European building and civil engineering industries. Construction Management and Economics, 18(6), 699-709. doi:10.1080/014461900414754 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Fellini, I., Ferro, A., & Fullin, G. (2007). Recruitment processes and labour mobility: the construction industry in Europe. Work, Employment and Society, 21(2), 277-298. doi:10.1177/0950017007076635 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hua, G. B., & Pin, T. H. (2000). Forecasting construction industry demand, price and productivity in Singapore: the BoxJenkins approach. Construction Management and Economics, 18(5), 607-618. doi:10.1080/014461900407419 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Janssen, J. (2000). The European construction industry and its competitiveness: a construct of the European Commission. Construction Management and Economics, 18(6), 711-720. doi:10.1080/014461900414763 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Lillie, N., & Greer, I. (2007). Industrial Relations, Migration, and Neoliberal Politics: The Case of the European Construction Sector. Politics & Society, 35(4), 551-581. doi:10.1177/0032329207308179 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Lopes, J., Ruddock, L., & Ribeiro, F. L. (2002). Investment in construction and economic growth in developing countries. Building Research & Information, 30(3), 152-159. doi:10.1080/09613210110114028 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Miozzo, M., & Dewick, P. (2002). Building competitive advantage: innovation and corporate governance in European construction. Research Policy, 31(6), 989-1008. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00173-1 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ofori, G. (2000). Globalization and construction industry development: research opportunities. Construction Management and Economics, 18(3), 257-262. doi:10.1080/014461900370627 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ofori, G. (2003). Frameworks for analysing international construction. Construction Management and Economics, 21(4), 379-391. doi:10.1080/0144619032000049746 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Pietroforte, R., & Gregori, T. (2003). An input-output analysis of the construction sector in highly developed economies. Construction Management and Economics, 21(3), 319-327. doi:10.1080/0144619032000056153 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Pries ∗, F., & Janszen, F. (1995). Innovation in the construction industry: the dominant role of the environment. Construction Management and Economics, 13(1), 43-51. doi:10.1080/01446199500000006 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ruddock, L. (2002). Measuring the global construction industry: improving the quality of data. Construction Management and Economics, 20(7), 553-556. doi:10.1080/01446190210159908 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ruddock, L., & Lopes, J. (2006). The construction sector and economic development: the ‘Bon curve’. Construction Management and Economics, 24(7), 717-723. doi:10.1080/01446190500435218 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Schneider, F., & Enste, D. H. (2000). Shadow Economies: Size, Causes, and Consequences. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(1), 77-114. doi:10.1257/jel.38.1.77 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Sorrell, S. (2003). Making the link: climate policy and the reform of the UK construction industry. Energy Policy, 31(9), 865-878. doi:10.1016/s0301-4215(02)00130-1 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Wells, J. (1996). Labour migration and international construction. Habitat International, 20(2), 295-306. doi:10.1016/0197-3975(95)00064-x | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Winch, G. (1998). The growth of self-employment in British construction. Construction Management and Economics, 16(5), 531-542. doi:10.1080/014461998372079 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Winch, G. M. (2000). Institutional reform in British construction: partnering and private finance. Building Research & Information, 28(2), 141-155. doi:10.1080/096132100369046 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Wong, J. M. W., Chiang, Y. H., & Ng, T. S. (2008). Construction and economic development: the case of Hong Kong. Construction Management and Economics, 26(8), 815-826. doi:10.1080/01446190802189927 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ngowi, A. B., Pienaar, E., Talukhaba, A., & Mbachu, J. (2005). The globalisation of the construction industry—a review. Building and Environment, 40(1), 135-141. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.05.008 | es_ES |