- -

Are 'STEM from Mars and SSH from Venus'?: Challenging disciplinary stereotypes of research's social value

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Are 'STEM from Mars and SSH from Venus'?: Challenging disciplinary stereotypes of research's social value

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Olmos-Peñuela, Julia es_ES
dc.contributor.author Benneworth, P. es_ES
dc.contributor.author CASTRO-MARTINEZ, ELENA es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2016-05-09T10:21:38Z
dc.date.available 2016-05-09T10:21:38Z
dc.date.issued 2014-06
dc.identifier.issn 0302-3427
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/63777
dc.description.abstract There is a reasonably settled consensus within the innovation community that science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) research is more 'useful' to societies than other types of research, notably social sciences and humanities (SSH) research es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Oxford University Press (OUP): Policy F - Oxford Open Option D es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Science and Public Policy es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Research policy es_ES
dc.subject User engagement es_ES
dc.subject Knowledge transfer es_ES
dc.subject Research utilisation es_ES
dc.subject Social sciences and humanities es_ES
dc.subject.classification ORGANIZACION DE EMPRESAS es_ES
dc.title Are 'STEM from Mars and SSH from Venus'?: Challenging disciplinary stereotypes of research's social value es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1093/scipol/sct071
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto de Gestión de la Innovación y del Conocimiento - Institut de Gestió de la Innovació i del Coneixement es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Olmos-Peñuela, J.; Benneworth, P.; Castro-Martinez, E. (2014). Are 'STEM from Mars and SSH from Venus'?: Challenging disciplinary stereotypes of research's social value. Science and Public Policy. 41(3):384-400. doi:10.1093/scipol/sct071 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct071 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 384 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 400 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 41 es_ES
dc.description.issue 3 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 278797 es_ES
dc.description.references Abreu, M., & Grinevich, V. (2013). The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities. Research Policy, 42(2), 408-422. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Alrøe, H. F., & Kristensen, E. S. (2002). Agriculture and Human Values, 19(1), 3-23. doi:10.1023/a:1015040009300 es_ES
dc.description.references Azagra-Caro, J. M. (2007). What type of faculty member interacts with what type of firm? Some reasons for the delocalisation of university–industry interaction. Technovation, 27(11), 704-715. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2007.05.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Bonaccorsi, A., & Piccaluga, A. (1994). A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university-industry relationships. R&D Management, 24(3), 229-247. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1994.tb00876.x es_ES
dc.description.references Bullen *, E., Robb, S., & Kenway, J. (2004). ‘Creative destruction’: knowledge economy policy and the future of the arts and humanities in the academy1. Journal of Education Policy, 19(1), 3-22. doi:10.1080/0268093042000182609 es_ES
dc.description.references Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1-23. doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273 es_ES
dc.description.references D’Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University–industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36(9), 1295-1313. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Donovan, C. (2005). The Governance of Social Science and Everyday Epistemology. Public Administration, 83(3), 597-615. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00464.x es_ES
dc.description.references Edgar, A., & Pattison, S. (2006). Need humanities be so useless? Justifying the place and role of humanities as a critical resource for performance and practice. Medical Humanities, 32(2), 92-98. doi:10.1136/jmh.2006.000226 es_ES
dc.description.references Geuna, A., & Muscio, A. (2009). The Governance of University Knowledge Transfer: A Critical Review of the Literature. Minerva, 47(1), 93-114. doi:10.1007/s11024-009-9118-2 es_ES
dc.description.references Gulbrandsen, M., & Kyvik, S. (2010). Are the concepts basic research, applied research and experimental development still useful? An empirical investigation among Norwegian academics. Science and Public Policy, 37(5), 343-353. doi:10.3152/030234210x501171 es_ES
dc.description.references Hessels, L. K., van Lente, H., & Smits, R. (2009). In search of relevance: the changing contract between science and society. Science and Public Policy, 36(5), 387-401. doi:10.3152/030234209x442034 es_ES
dc.description.references Jaaniste, L. (2009). Placing the creative sector within innovation: The full gamut. Innovation, 11(2), 215-229. doi:10.5172/impp.11.2.215 es_ES
dc.description.references Kaiser, R., & Prange-Gstöhl, H. (2010). A paradigm shift in European R&D policy? The EU Budget Review and the economic crisis. Science and Public Policy, 37(4), 253-265. doi:10.3152/030234210x496655 es_ES
dc.description.references Kyvik, S. (1994). Popular science publishing. Scientometrics, 31(2), 143-153. doi:10.1007/bf02018557 es_ES
dc.description.references Kyvik, S. (2005). Popular Science Publishing and Contributions to Public Discourse among University Faculty. Science Communication, 26(3), 288-311. doi:10.1177/1075547004273022 es_ES
dc.description.references Leisyte, L., & Horta, H. (2011). Introduction to a special issue: Academic knowledge production, diffusion and commercialization: policies, practices and perspectives. Science and Public Policy, 38(6), 422-424. doi:10.3152/030234211x12960315267697 es_ES
dc.description.references Molas-Gallart, J., & Tang, P. (2011). Tracing «productive interactions» to identify social impacts: an example from the social sciences. Research Evaluation, 20(3), 219-226. doi:10.3152/095820211x12941371876706 es_ES
dc.description.references Nightingale, P., & Scott, A. (2007). Peer review and the relevance gap: ten suggestions for policy-makers. Science and Public Policy, 34(8), 543-553. doi:10.3152/030234207x254396 es_ES
dc.description.references Pavitt, K. (1991). What makes basic research economically useful? Research Policy, 20(2), 109-119. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(91)90074-z es_ES
dc.description.references Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259-280. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x es_ES
dc.description.references Pilegaard, M., Moroz, P. W., & Neergaard, H. (2010). An Auto-Ethnographic Perspective on Academic Entrepreneurship: Implications for Research in the Social Sciences and Humanities. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(1), 46-61. doi:10.5465/amp.2010.50304416 es_ES
dc.description.references Schartinger, D., Rammer, C., Fischer, M. M., & Fröhlich, J. (2002). Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy, 31(3), 303-328. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00111-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Spaapen, J., & van Drooge, L. (2011). Introducing «productive interactions» in social impact assessment. Research Evaluation, 20(3), 211-218. doi:10.3152/095820211x12941371876742 es_ES
dc.description.references Van Langenhove, L. (2012). Make social sciences relevant. Nature, 484(7395), 442-442. doi:10.1038/484442a es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem