- -

A new collaborative methodology for assessment and management of ecosystem services

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

A new collaborative methodology for assessment and management of ecosystem services

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Segura Maroto, M.; Maroto Álvarez, MC.; Belton, V.; Ginestar Peiro, CM. (2015). A new collaborative methodology for assessment and management of ecosystem services. Forests. 6(5):1696-1720. https://doi.org/10.3390/f6051696

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/63801

Ficheros en el ítem

Metadatos del ítem

Título: A new collaborative methodology for assessment and management of ecosystem services
Autor: Segura Maroto, Marina Maroto Álvarez, Mª Concepción Belton, Valerie Ginestar Peiro, Concepción Mª
Entidad UPV: Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa Aplicadas y Calidad - Departament d'Estadística i Investigació Operativa Aplicades i Qualitat
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
Collaborative management is a new framework to help implement programmes in protected areas. Within this context, the aim of this work is twofold. First, to propose a robust methodology to implement collaborative management ...[+]
Palabras clave: Collaborative management , Ecosystem services assessment , Multiple criteria decision analysis , AHP , PROMETHEE , Natural resource management
Derechos de uso: Reconocimiento (by)
Fuente:
Forests. (issn: 1999-4907 )
DOI: 10.3390/f6051696
Editorial:
MDPI
Versión del editor: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f6051696
Código del Proyecto:
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//ECO2011-27369/ES/TECNICAS MULTICRITERIO Y TOMA DE DECISIONES PARTICIPATIVA PARA UNA GESTION SOSTENIBLE/
Descripción: © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Agradecimientos:
The authors acknowledge the support received from the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the research project Ref. ECO2011-27369, as well as the time and expert judgments from all the decision makers, technical ...[+]
Tipo: Artículo

References

Fitzsimons, J., Pearson, C. J., Lawson, C., & Hill, M. J. (2012). Evaluation of land-use planning in greenbelts based on intrinsic characteristics and stakeholder values. Landscape and Urban Planning, 106(1), 23-34. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.012

Kijazi, M. H., & Kant, S. (2011). Social acceptability of alternative forest regimes in Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania, using stakeholder attitudes as metrics of uncertainty. Forest Policy and Economics, 13(4), 242-257. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2010.12.001

Mustajoki, J., Saarikoski, H., Marttunen, M., Ahtikoski, A., Hallikainen, V., Helle, T., … Ylisirniö, A.-L. (2011). Use of decision analysis interviews to support the sustainable use of the forests in Finnish Upper Lapland. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(6), 1550-1563. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.01.007 [+]
Fitzsimons, J., Pearson, C. J., Lawson, C., & Hill, M. J. (2012). Evaluation of land-use planning in greenbelts based on intrinsic characteristics and stakeholder values. Landscape and Urban Planning, 106(1), 23-34. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.012

Kijazi, M. H., & Kant, S. (2011). Social acceptability of alternative forest regimes in Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania, using stakeholder attitudes as metrics of uncertainty. Forest Policy and Economics, 13(4), 242-257. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2010.12.001

Mustajoki, J., Saarikoski, H., Marttunen, M., Ahtikoski, A., Hallikainen, V., Helle, T., … Ylisirniö, A.-L. (2011). Use of decision analysis interviews to support the sustainable use of the forests in Finnish Upper Lapland. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(6), 1550-1563. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.01.007

Palacios-Agundez, I., Casado-Arzuaga, I., Madariaga, I., & Onaindia, M. (2013). The Relevance of Local Participatory Scenario Planning for Ecosystem Management Policies in the Basque Country, Northern Spain. Ecology and Society, 18(3). doi:10.5751/es-05619-180307

Tompkins, E. L., Few, R., & Brown, K. (2008). Scenario-based stakeholder engagement: Incorporating stakeholders preferences into coastal planning for climate change. Journal of Environmental Management, 88(4), 1580-1592. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.07.025

Apostolopoulou, E., Drakou, E. G., & Pediaditi, K. (2012). Participation in the management of Greek Natura 2000 sites: Evidence from a cross-level analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 113, 308-318. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.006

Liu, J., Ouyang, Z., & Miao, H. (2010). Environmental attitudes of stakeholders and their perceptions regarding protected area-community conflicts: A case study in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(11), 2254-2262. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.06.007

Rees, S. E., Attrill, M. J., Austen, M. C., Mangi, S. C., & Rodwell, L. D. (2013). A thematic cost-benefit analysis of a marine protected area. Journal of Environmental Management, 114, 476-485. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.048

Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417-2431. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014

Mendoza, G. A., & Martins, H. (2006). Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. Forest Ecology and Management, 230(1-3), 1-22. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.03.023

De Brucker, K., Macharis, C., & Verbeke, A. (2013). Multi-criteria analysis and the resolution of sustainable development dilemmas: A stakeholder management approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 224(1), 122-131. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.02.021

Petrokofsky, G., Brown, N. D., Hemery, G. E., Woodward, S., Wilson, E., Weatherall, A., … Arnold, J. E. M. (2010). A participatory process for identifying and prioritizing policy-relevant research questions in natural resource management: a case study from the UK forestry sector. Forestry, 83(4), 357-367. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpq018

Maroto Álvarez, C., Segura, M., Ginestar, C., Uriol, J., & Segura, B. (2013). Sustainable Forest Management in a Mediterranean region: Social preferences. Forest Systems, 22(3), 546. doi:10.5424/fs/2013223-04135

Segura, M., Ray, D., & Maroto, C. (2014). Decision support systems for forest management: A comparative analysis and assessment. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 101, 55-67. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2013.12.005

Martinez-Harms, M. J., Bryan, B. A., Balvanera, P., Law, E. A., Rhodes, J. R., Possingham, H. P., & Wilson, K. A. (2015). Making decisions for managing ecosystem services. Biological Conservation, 184, 229-238. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.024

Sijtsma, F. J., van der Heide, C. M., & van Hinsberg, A. (2013). Beyond monetary measurement: How to evaluate projects and policies using the ecosystem services framework. Environmental Science & Policy, 32, 14-25. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.06.016

Macharis, C., Springael, J., De Brucker, K., & Verbeke, A. (2004). PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(2), 307-317. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00153-x

Fontana, V., Radtke, A., Bossi Fedrigotti, V., Tappeiner, U., Tasser, E., Zerbe, S., & Buchholz, T. (2013). Comparing land-use alternatives: Using the ecosystem services concept to define a multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecological Economics, 93, 128-136. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.05.007

Turcksin, L., Bernardini, A., & Macharis, C. (2011). A combined AHP-PROMETHEE approach for selecting the most appropriate policy scenario to stimulate a clean vehicle fleet. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20, 954-965. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.104

Macharis, C., Turcksin, L., & Lebeau, K. (2012). Multi actor multi criteria analysis (MAMCA) as a tool to support sustainable decisions: State of use. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 610-620. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.08.008

Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, R. B., Albadvi, A., & Aghdasi, M. (2010). PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), 198-215. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021

Huang, I. B., Keisler, J., & Linkov, I. (2011). Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends. Science of The Total Environment, 409(19), 3578-3594. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022

Ananda, J., & Herath, G. (2009). A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning. Ecological Economics, 68(10), 2535-2548. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.010

Vacik, H., Kurttila, M., Hujala, T., Khadka, C., Haara, A., Pykäläinen, J., … Tikkanen, J. (2014). Evaluating collaborative planning methods supporting programme-based planning in natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 144, 304-315. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.029

Fisher, B., & Kerry Turner, R. (2008). Ecosystem services: Classification for valuation. Biological Conservation, 141(5), 1167-1169. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.02.019

Corner, J., Buchanan, J., & Henig, M. (2001). Dynamic decision problem structuring. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 10(3), 129-141. doi:10.1002/mcda.295

Marques-Perez, I., Segura, B., & Maroto, C. (2014). Evaluating the functionality of agricultural systems: social preferences for multifunctional peri-urban agriculture. The «Huerta de Valencia» as case study. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 12(4), 889. doi:10.5424/sjar/2014124-6061

Xu, Z. (2000). On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgement matrix in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 126(3), 683-687. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(99)00082-x

Banville, C., Landry, M., Martel, J.-M., & Boulaire, C. (1998). A stakeholder approach to MCDA. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 15(1), 15-32. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1743(199801/02)15:1<15::aid-sres179>3.0.co;2-b

Harrison, S. R., & Qureshi, M. E. (2000). Choice of stakeholder groups and members in multicriteria decision models. Natural Resources Forum, 24(1), 11-19. doi:10.1111/j.1477-8947.2000.tb00925.x

Scholten, L., Scheidegger, A., Reichert, P., Mauer, M., & Lienert, J. (2014). Strategic rehabilitation planning of piped water networks using multi-criteria decision analysis. Water Research, 49, 124-143. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2013.11.017

Miller, K. A., & Belton, V. (2014). Water resource management and climate change adaptation: a holistic and multiple criteria perspective. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 19(3), 289-308. doi:10.1007/s11027-013-9537-0

The OECD Glossary of Statistical Terms http://stats.oecd.org/glossary/

Parcs Naturals de la Comunitat Valenciana http://www.cma.gva.es/webdoc/documento.ashx?id=141553

The List of Wetlands of International Importance http://www.ramsar.org

De Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., & Boumans, R. M. . (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41(3), 393-408. doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00089-7

Costanza, R., d’ Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., … van den Belt, M. (1998). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological Economics, 25(1), 3-15. doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(98)00020-2

Plan de Acción Territorial Forestal de la Comunitat Valenciana http://www.cma.gva.es/webdoc/documento.ashx?id=144302

Tofallis, C. (2014). Add or Multiply? A Tutorial on Ranking and Choosing with Multiple Criteria. INFORMS Transactions on Education, 14(3), 109-119. doi:10.1287/ited.2013.0124

Valls-Donderis, P., Vallés, M. C., & Galiana, F. (2015). Criteria and indicators for sustainable forestry under Mediterranean conditions applicable in Spain at the forest management unit scale. Forest Systems, 24(1), 004. doi:10.5424/fs/2015241-05542

Ananda, J. (2007). Implementing Participatory Decision Making in Forest Planning. Environmental Management, 39(4), 534-544. doi:10.1007/s00267-006-0031-2

Mendelsohn, R., & Olmstead, S. (2009). The Economic Valuation of Environmental Amenities and Disamenities: Methods and Applications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34(1), 325-347. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-011509-135201

Wilson, M. A., & Hoehn, J. P. (2006). Valuing environmental goods and services using benefit transfer: The state-of-the art and science. Ecological Economics, 60(2), 335-342. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.08.015

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem