- -

Ants impact the energy reserves of natural enemies through the shared honeydew exploitation

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Ants impact the energy reserves of natural enemies through the shared honeydew exploitation

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: 2015-E Ants impact ...
Tamaño: 1.066Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión del Autor.
Abrir
[Cerrado]
Nombre: -Calabuig;Tena;Felix ...
Tamaño: 280.3Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author Calabuig Gomar, Altea es_ES
dc.contributor.author Tena Barreda, Alejandro es_ES
dc.contributor.author Wäkers, Felix L. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Lucia Fernandez-Arrojo es_ES
dc.contributor.author Plou, Francisco J. es_ES
dc.contributor.author García Mari, Ferran es_ES
dc.contributor.author Pekas, Apostolos es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2016-05-17T10:10:26Z
dc.date.available 2016-05-17T10:10:26Z
dc.date.issued 2015-12
dc.identifier.issn 0307-6946
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/64226
dc.description.abstract [EN] Ants, as well as many species of parasitoids and predators, rely on sugar-richfoodssuchashoneydewtofulfilltheirenergeticneeds.Thus,antsandnatural enemies may interact through the shared honeydew exploitation. 2.Ant-exclusionexperimentswereperformedinacitrusorchardtotestthehypothesis that ants may impact the energy reserves of predators and parasitoids through the competitionforhoneydew.Throughtheuseofhigh-performanceliquidchromatography (HPLC)thelevelofantactivitywiththeenergyreservesandfeedinghistoryofindividual specimens collected in the field during representative days of spring, summer, and autumn were related. 3. Out of 145 Aphytis chrysomphali Mercet parasitoids captured in the field, 65% were classified as sugar-fed and 24.7% as honeydew-fed. In summer, when ant activity peaked,therewasasignificant negativecorrelationbetweenthelevelofantactivityand the total sugar content and honeydew feeding incidence by A.chrysomphali. Out of 47 individuals of the predator Chrysoperla carnea sensu lato (Stephens), captured in the field, 55.3% were classified as sugar-fed. We found a significant negative effect of the level of ant activity on the sugar-feeding incidence by C.carneain spring. 4.Thepresentstudyprovidesevidencethatantscaninterferewiththeenergyreserves of natural enemies. This interaction may be widespread in various ecosystems with important consequences for the arthropod community composition and with practical implicationsforbiologicalcontrolgiventhatabsenceofsugarfeedingisdetrimentalfor thefitness of many species of predatorsand parasitoids es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship Dr Jerome Casas is greatly acknowledged for valuable comments on earlier versions of the manuscript and Dr Petr Duelli for providing help with the Chrysoperla identifications. We also thank Dr Cristina Navarro Campos and Dr Aleixandre Beltra for their help in the field samplings and for stimulating discussions, Barbara Rodriguez for help in the laboratory analyses and the reviewers for their helpful comments. This work was supported by the project (RTA2010-00012-C02-02) assigned to F. G. M from the Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Spain and the project (BIO2013-48779-C4-1-R) from Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and COST action CM1303 on Systems Biocatalysis. en_EN
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Wiley es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Ecological Entomology es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Ant hemiptera mutualism es_ES
dc.subject Aphytis chrysomphali es_ES
dc.subject Biological control es_ES
dc.subject Chrysoperla carnea es_ES
dc.subject Multitrophic interactions es_ES
dc.subject.classification PRODUCCION VEGETAL es_ES
dc.title Ants impact the energy reserves of natural enemies through the shared honeydew exploitation es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1111/een.12237
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//RTA2010-00012-C02-02/ES/Influencia de las hormigas en las poblaciones de artrópodos fitófagos y sus enemigos naturales en parcelas de cítricos/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/COST//CM1303/EU/Systems Biocatalysis/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//BIO2013-48779-C4-1-R/ES/PREPARACION DE NUEVOS PREBIOTICOS Y POLIFENOLES GLICOSILADOS PARA ALIMENTOS FUNCIONALES EMPLEANDO ENZIMAS GLICOSIDICAS INMOVILIZADAS/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto Agroforestal Mediterráneo - Institut Agroforestal Mediterrani es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ecosistemas Agroforestales - Departament d'Ecosistemes Agroforestals es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Calabuig Gomar, A.; Tena Barreda, A.; Wäkers, FL.; Lucia Fernandez-Arrojo; Plou, FJ.; García Mari, F.; Pekas, A. (2015). Ants impact the energy reserves of natural enemies through the shared honeydew exploitation. Ecological Entomology. 40:687-695. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12237 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 687 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 695 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 40 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 301819 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 1365-2311
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación es_ES
dc.contributor.funder European Cooperation in Science and Technology es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad es_ES
dc.description.references Avidov, Z., Balshin, M., & Gerson, U. (1970). Studies onAphytis coheni, a parasite of the California red scale,Aonidiella aurantii in Israel. Entomophaga, 15(2), 191-207. doi:10.1007/bf02371871 es_ES
dc.description.references Bartlett, B. R. (1961). The Influence of Ants Upon Parasites, Predators, and Scale Insects1. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 54(4), 543-551. doi:10.1093/aesa/54.4.543 es_ES
dc.description.references Bascompte, J., Jordano, P., & Olesen, J. M. (2006). Asymmetric Coevolutionary Networks Facilitate Biodiversity Maintenance. Science, 312(5772), 431-433. doi:10.1126/science.1123412 es_ES
dc.description.references Blüthgen, N., E. Stork, N., & Fiedler, K. (2004). Bottom-up control and co-occurrence in complex communities: honeydew and nectar determine a rainforest ant mosaic. Oikos, 106(2), 344-358. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12687.x es_ES
dc.description.references Calabuig, A., Garcia-Marí, F., & Pekas, A. (2013). Ants affect the infestation levels but not the parasitism of honeydew and non-honeydew producing pests in citrus. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 104(4), 405-417. doi:10.1017/s0007485313000564 es_ES
dc.description.references Campbell, M. M. (1976). Colonisation of Aphytis melinus DeBach (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae) in Aonidiella aurantii (Mask.) (Hemiptera, Coccidae) on citrus in South Australia. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 65(4), 659-668. doi:10.1017/s0007485300006350 es_ES
dc.description.references Carroll, C. R., & Janzen, D. H. (1973). Ecology of Foraging by Ants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4(1), 231-257. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.001311 es_ES
dc.description.references Cerdá, X., Palacios, R., & Retana, J. (2009). Ant Community Structure in Citrus Orchards in the Mediterranean Basin: Impoverishment as a Consequence of Habitat Homogeneity. Environmental Entomology, 38(2), 317-324. doi:10.1603/022.038.0203 es_ES
dc.description.references DUELLI, P. (1980). Adaptive dispersal and appetitive flight in the green lacewing, Chrysopa cornea. Ecological Entomology, 5(3), 213-220. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.1980.tb01144.x es_ES
dc.description.references Duelli, P. (1980). Preovipository migration flights in the green lacewing, Chrysopa carnea (Planipennia, Chrysopidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 7(3), 239-246. doi:10.1007/bf00299370 es_ES
dc.description.references Eubanks, M. D., & Finke, D. L. (2014). Interaction webs in agroecosystems: beyond who eats whom. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 2, 1-6. doi:10.1016/j.cois.2014.06.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Faria, C. A., Wäckers, F. L., & Turlings, T. C. J. (2008). The nutritional value of aphid honeydew for non-aphid parasitoids. Basic and Applied Ecology, 9(3), 286-297. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2007.02.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Finney, G. L. (1948). Culturing Chrysopa californica and Obtaining Eggs for Field Distribution. Journal of Economic Entomology, 41(5), 719-721. doi:10.1093/jee/41.5.719 es_ES
dc.description.references HEIMPEL, G. E., & COLLIER, T. R. (1996). THE EVOLUTION OF HOST-FEEDING BEHAVIOUR IN INSECT PARASITOIDS. Biological Reviews, 71(3), 373-400. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1996.tb01279.x es_ES
dc.description.references Heimpel, G. E., Rosenheim, J. A., & Mangel, M. (1997). Predation on adult Aphytis parasitoids in the field. Oecologia, 110(3), 346-352. doi:10.1007/s004420050168 es_ES
dc.description.references Heimpel, G. E., Rosenheim, J. A., & Kattari, D. (1997). Adult feeding and lifetime reproductive success in the parasitoid Aphytis melinus. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 83(3), 305-315. doi:10.1046/j.1570-7458.1997.00185.x es_ES
dc.description.references HOGERVORST, P. A. M., WÄCKERS, F. L., & ROMEIS, J. (2007). Detecting nutritional state and food source use in field-collected insects that synthesize honeydew oligosaccharides. Functional Ecology, 21(5), 936-946. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01297.x es_ES
dc.description.references Hölldobler, B., & Wilson, E. O. (1990). The Ants. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-10306-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Holway, D. A., Lach, L., Suarez, A. V., Tsutsui, N. D., & Case, T. J. (2002). The Causes and Consequences of Ant Invasions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33(1), 181-233. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150444 es_ES
dc.description.references James, D. G., Stevens, M. M., O’Malley, K. J., & Faulder, R. J. (1999). Ant Foraging Reduces the Abundance of Beneficial and Incidental Arthropods in Citrus Canopies. Biological Control, 14(2), 121-126. doi:10.1006/bcon.1998.0678 es_ES
dc.description.references JERVIS, M. A., & KIDD, N. A. C. (1986). HOST-FEEDING STRATEGIES IN HYMENOPTERAN PARASITOIDS. Biological Reviews, 61(4), 395-434. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1986.tb00660.x es_ES
dc.description.references Jervis, M. A., Kidd, N. A. C., Fitton, M. G., Huddleston, T., & Dawah, H. A. (1993). Flower-visiting by hymenopteran parasitoids. Journal of Natural History, 27(1), 67-105. doi:10.1080/00222939300770051 es_ES
dc.description.references Kaplan, I., & Eubanks, M. D. (2005). APHIDS ALTER THE COMMUNITY-WIDE IMPACT OF FIRE ANTS. Ecology, 86(6), 1640-1649. doi:10.1890/04-0016 es_ES
dc.description.references Lach, L. (2007). Argentine ants displace floral arthropods in a biodiversity hotspot. Diversity and Distributions, 14(2), 281-290. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00410.x es_ES
dc.description.references Laverty, T. M., & Plowright, R. C. (1985). Competition between hummingbirds and bumble bees for nectar in flowers of Impatiens biflora. Oecologia, 66(1), 25-32. doi:10.1007/bf00378548 es_ES
dc.description.references LeVan, K. E., Hung, K.-L. J., McCann, K. R., Ludka, J. T., & Holway, D. A. (2013). Floral visitation by the Argentine ant reduces pollinator visitation and seed set in the coast barrel cactus, Ferocactus viridescens. Oecologia, 174(1), 163-171. doi:10.1007/s00442-013-2739-z es_ES
dc.description.references Teresa Martinez-Ferrer, M., Grafton-Cardwell, E. E., & Shorey, H. H. (2003). Disruption of parasitism of the California red scale (Homoptera: Diaspididae) by three ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Biological Control, 26(3), 279-286. doi:10.1016/s1049-9644(02)00158-5 es_ES
dc.description.references McEwen, P. K., Clow, S., Jervis, M. A., & Kidd, N. A. C. (1993). Alteration in searching behaviour of adult female green lacewingsChrysoperla carnea (Neur.: Chrysopidae) following contact with honeydew of the black scaleSaissetia oleae (Hom.: Coccidae) and solutions containing acidhydrolysed L-tryptophan. Entomophaga, 38(3), 347-354. doi:10.1007/bf02374452 es_ES
dc.description.references Miller, T. E. (1994). Direct and Indirect Species Interactions in an Early Old-Field Plant Community. The American Naturalist, 143(6), 1007-1025. doi:10.1086/285646 es_ES
dc.description.references Moreno, D. S., Haney, P. B., & Luck, R. F. (1987). Chlorpyrifos and Diazinon as Barriers to Argentine Ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Foraging on Citrus Trees1. Journal of Economic Entomology, 80(1), 208-214. doi:10.1093/jee/80.1.208 es_ES
dc.description.references Ohgushi, T. (2008). Herbivore‐induced indirect interaction webs on terrestrial plants: the importance of non‐trophic, indirect, and facilitative interactions. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 128(1), 217-229. doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.2008.00705.x es_ES
dc.description.references OLSON, D. M., & WÄCKERS, F. L. (2006). Management of field margins to maximize multiple ecological services. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44(1), 13-21. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01241.x es_ES
dc.description.references Pace, M. L., Cole, J. J., Carpenter, S. R., & Kitchell, J. F. (1999). Trophic cascades revealed in diverse ecosystems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14(12), 483-488. doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01723-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Pekas, A., Aguilar, A., Tena, A., & Garcia-Marí, F. (2010). Influence of host size on parasitism by Aphytis chrysomphali and A. melinus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) in Mediterranean populations of California red scale Aonidiella aurantii (Hemiptera: Diaspididae). Biological Control, 55(2), 132-140. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2010.07.010 es_ES
dc.description.references Pekas, A., Tena, A., Aguilar, A., & Garcia-Marí, F. (2010). Effect of Mediterranean Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on California Red Scale (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) Populations in Citrus Orchards. Environmental Entomology, 39(3), 827-834. doi:10.1603/en09207 es_ES
dc.description.references Pekas, A., Tena, A., Aguilar, A., & Garcia-Marí, F. (2010). Spatio-temporal patterns and interactions with honeydew-producing Hemiptera of ants in a Mediterranean citrus orchard. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 13(1), 89-97. doi:10.1111/j.1461-9563.2010.00501.x es_ES
dc.description.references Rosen, D., & DeBach, P. (1979). Species of Aphytis of the World. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-9603-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Rosumek, F. B., Silveira, F. A. O., de S. Neves, F., de U. Barbosa, N. P., Diniz, L., Oki, Y., … Cornelissen, T. (2009). Ants on plants: a meta-analysis of the role of ants as plant biotic defenses. Oecologia, 160(3), 537-549. doi:10.1007/s00442-009-1309-x es_ES
dc.description.references Rudgers, J. A., & Gardener, M. C. (2004). EXTRAFLORAL NECTAR AS A RESOURCE MEDIATING MULTISPECIES INTERACTIONS. Ecology, 85(6), 1495-1502. doi:10.1890/03-0391 es_ES
dc.description.references Sheldon, J. K., & MacLeod, E. G. (1971). Studies on the Biology of the Chrysopidae II. The Feeding Behavior of the Adult of Chrysopa carnea (Neuroptera). Psyche: A Journal of Entomology, 78(2), 107-121. doi:10.1155/1971/505909 es_ES
dc.description.references Stelzl, M., & Devetak, D. (1999). Neuroptera in agricultural ecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 74(1-3), 305-321. doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(99)00040-7 es_ES
dc.description.references STEPPUHN, A., & WACKERS, F. L. (2004). HPLC sugar analysis reveals the nutritional state and the feeding history of parasitoids. Functional Ecology, 18(6), 812-819. doi:10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00920.x es_ES
dc.description.references Styrsky, J. D., & Eubanks, M. D. (2006). Ecological consequences of interactions between ants and honeydew-producing insects. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1607), 151-164. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3701 es_ES
dc.description.references Tena, A., Hoddle, C. D., & Hoddle, M. S. (2013). Competition between honeydew producers in an ant–hemipteran interaction may enhance biological control of an invasive pest. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 103(6), 714-723. doi:10.1017/s000748531300045x es_ES
dc.description.references Tena, A., Llácer, E., & Urbaneja, A. (2013). Biological control of a non-honeydew producer mediated by a distinct hierarchy of honeydew quality. Biological Control, 67(2), 117-122. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.07.018 es_ES
dc.description.references TENA, A., PEKAS, A., WÄCKERS, F. L., & URBANEJA, A. (2013). Energy reserves of parasitoids depend on honeydew from non-hosts. Ecological Entomology, 38(3), 278-289. doi:10.1111/een.12018 es_ES
dc.description.references Tena, A., Pekas, A., Cano, D., Wäckers, F. L., & Urbaneja, A. (2015). Sugar provisioning maximizes the biocontrol service of parasitoids. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52(3), 795-804. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12426 es_ES
dc.description.references Völkl, W., Woodring, J., Fischer, M., Lorenz, M. W., & Hoffmann, K. H. (1999). Ant-aphid mutualisms: the impact of honeydew production and honeydew sugar composition on ant preferences. Oecologia, 118(4), 483-491. doi:10.1007/s004420050751 es_ES
dc.description.references Wackers, F. L. (2000). Do oligosaccharides reduce the suitability of honeydew for predators and parasitoids? A further facet to the function of insect-synthesized honeydew sugars. Oikos, 90(1), 197-201. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900124.x es_ES
dc.description.references Wäckers, F. L. (2001). A comparison of nectar- and honeydew sugars with respect to their utilization by the hymenopteran parasitoid Cotesia glomerata. Journal of Insect Physiology, 47(9), 1077-1084. doi:10.1016/s0022-1910(01)00088-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Wäckers, F. L. (2005). Suitability of (extra-)floral nectar, pollen, and honeydew as insect food sources. Plant-Provided Food for Carnivorous Insects, 17-74. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511542220.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Wäckers, F. L., van Rijn, P. C. J., & Heimpel, G. E. (2008). Honeydew as a food source for natural enemies: Making the best of a bad meal? Biological Control, 45(2), 176-184. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.01.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Wade, M. R., Zalucki, M. P., Wratten, S. D., & Robinson, K. A. (2008). Conservation biological control of arthropods using artificial food sprays: Current status and future challenges. Biological Control, 45(2), 185-199. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.10.024 es_ES
dc.description.references Way, M. J. (1963). Mutualism Between Ants and Honeydew-Producing Homoptera. Annual Review of Entomology, 8(1), 307-344. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.08.010163.001515 es_ES
dc.description.references Wilder, S. M., Barnum, T. R., Holway, D. A., Suarez, A. V., & Eubanks, M. D. (2012). Introduced fire ants can exclude native ants from critical mutualist-provided resources. Oecologia, 172(1), 197-205. doi:10.1007/s00442-012-2477-7 es_ES
dc.description.references YOO, H. J. S., KIZNER, M. C., & HOLWAY, D. A. (2013). Ecological effects of multi-species, ant-hemipteran mutualisms in citrus. Ecological Entomology, 38(5), 505-514. doi:10.1111/een.12042 es_ES
dc.description.references ZAPPALA, L., CAMPOLO, O., GRANDE, S. B., SARACENO, F., BIONDI, A., SISCARO, G., & PALMERI, V. (2012). Dispersal of Aphytis melinus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) after augmentative releases in citrus orchards. European Journal of Entomology, 109(4), 561-568. doi:10.14411/eje.2012.070 es_ES
dc.description.references Zoebelein, G. (2009). Der Honigtau als Nahrung der Insekten: Teil I. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie, 38(4), 369-416. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0418.1956.tb01612.x es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem