- -

Clinical information modeling processes for semantic interoperability of electronic health records: systematic review and inductive analysis

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Clinical information modeling processes for semantic interoperability of electronic health records: systematic review and inductive analysis

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Moreno-Conde, Alberto es_ES
dc.contributor.author Moner Cano, David es_ES
dc.contributor.author Da Cruz, Wellington Dimas es_ES
dc.contributor.author Santos, Marcelo R. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Maldonado Segura, José Alberto es_ES
dc.contributor.author Robles Viejo, Montserrat es_ES
dc.contributor.author Kalra, Dipak es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2016-06-01T08:08:44Z
dc.date.available 2016-06-01T08:08:44Z
dc.date.issued 2015-07
dc.identifier.issn 1067-5027
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/65033
dc.description This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association following peer review. The version of record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv008 es_ES
dc.description.abstract [EN] [Objective] This systematic review aims to identify and compare the existing processes and methodologies that have been published in the literature for defining clinical information models (CIMs) that support the semantic interoperability of electronic health record (EHR) systems. [Material and Methods] Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses systematic review methodology, the authors reviewed published papers between 2000 and 2013 that covered that semantic interoperability of EHRs, found by searching the PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and ScienceDirect databases. Additionally, after selection of a final group of articles, an inductive content analysis was done to summarize the steps and methodologies followed in order to build CIMs described in those articles. [Results] Three hundred and seventy-eight articles were screened and thirty six were selected for full review. The articles selected for full review were analyzed to extract relevant information for the analysis and characterized according to the steps the authors had followed for clinical information modeling. [Discussion] Most of the reviewed papers lack a detailed description of the modeling methodologies used to create CIMs. A representative example is the lack of description related to the definition of terminology bindings and the publication of the generated models. However, this systematic review confirms that most clinical information modeling activities follow very similar steps for the definition of CIMs. Having a robust and shared methodology could improve their correctness, reliability, and quality. [Conclusion] Independently of implementation technologies and standards, it is possible to find common patterns in methods for developing CIMs, suggesting the viability of defining a unified good practice methodology to be used by any clinical information modeler. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This research has been partially funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Platform for Innovation in Medical Technologies and Health), grant PT13/0006/0036 and the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, grants TIN2010-21388-C02-01 and PTQ-12-05620.
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Oxford University Press es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Electronic health record es_ES
dc.subject Semantic interoperability es_ES
dc.subject Clinical information modeling es_ES
dc.subject Systematic review es_ES
dc.subject Clinical information model es_ES
dc.subject.classification FISICA APLICADA es_ES
dc.title Clinical information modeling processes for semantic interoperability of electronic health records: systematic review and inductive analysis es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1093/jamia/ocv008
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//PT13%2F0006%2F0036/ES/Plataforma de Innovación en Tecnologías Médicas y Sanitarias/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//TIN2010-21388-C02-01/ES/HERRAMIENTAS INTELIGENTES PARA ENLAZAR HISTORIAS CLINICAS ELECTRONICAS CON SISTEMAS DE ENSAYOS CLINICOS-I/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//PTQ-12-05620/ES/PTQ-12-05620/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Física Aplicada - Departament de Física Aplicada es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto Universitario de Aplicaciones de las Tecnologías de la Información - Institut Universitari d'Aplicacions de les Tecnologies de la Informació es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Moreno-Conde, A.; Moner Cano, D.; Da Cruz, WD.; Santos, MR.; Maldonado Segura, JA.; Robles Viejo, M.; Kalra, D. (2015). Clinical information modeling processes for semantic interoperability of electronic health records: systematic review and inductive analysis. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 22(4):925-934. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv008 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv008 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 925 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 934 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 22 es_ES
dc.description.issue 4 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 283759 es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid 25796595
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
dc.contributor.funder Instituto de Salud Carlos III
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
dc.description.references Goossen W Goossen-Baremans A van der Zel M . Detailed clinical models: a review. Healthc Inform Res. 2010;16:201. es_ES
dc.description.references Beeler, G. W. (1998). HL7 Version 3—An object-oriented methodology for collaborative standards development1Presented at the International Medical Informatics Association Working Group 16 Conference on Standardisation in Medical Informatics—Towards International Consensus and Cooperation, Bermuda, 12 September, 1997.1. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 48(1-3), 151-161. doi:10.1016/s1386-5056(97)00121-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Dolin, R. H., Alschuler, L., Boyer, S., Beebe, C., Behlen, F. M., Biron, P. V., & Shabo (Shvo), A. (2006). HL7 Clinical Document Architecture, Release 2. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13(1), 30-39. doi:10.1197/jamia.m1888 es_ES
dc.description.references Fast Health Interoperability Resources (FHIR). http://www.hl7.org/fhir/. Accessed July 18, 2014. es_ES
dc.description.references Beale T . Archetypes: constraint-based domain models for futureproof information systems. OOPSLA 2002 Workshop Behav Semant. 2002. es_ES
dc.description.references ISO 13606:2008 - Health informatics - Electronic health record communication. 2008. www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=40784. es_ES
dc.description.references OpenEHR. http://www.openehr.org/. Accessed July 18, 2014. es_ES
dc.description.references Clinical Information Modeling Initiative (CIMI). http://www.opencimi.org/. Accessed July 18, 2014. es_ES
dc.description.references Goossen WT . Using detailed clinical models to bridge the gap between clinicians and HIT. Stud Health Technol Inf. 2008;141:3–10. es_ES
dc.description.references Oniki TA Coyle JF Parker CG . Lessons learned in detailed clinical modeling at Intermountain Healthcare. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014. Advance access published; doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002875. es_ES
dc.description.references Jacobson I Booch G Rumbaugh J . The Unified Software Development Process. Massachusetts, USA: Addison-Wesley Reading; 1999. es_ES
dc.description.references Ahn, S., Huff, S. M., Kim, Y., & Kalra, D. (2013). Quality metrics for detailed clinical models. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(5), 408-417. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.09.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Kalra D . Editorial principles for the development of standards for the structure and content of health records. 2012. https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/editorial-principles-for-the-development-of-record-standards.pdf. Accessed July 16, 2014. es_ES
dc.description.references Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339(jul21 1), b2535-b2535. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 es_ES
dc.description.references Transparent reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). http://www.prisma-statement.org/. Accessed July 18, 2014. es_ES
dc.description.references US National Library of Medicine. http://www.pubmed.gov. Accessed July 18, 2014. es_ES
dc.description.references IEEE Xplore Digital Library. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/. Accessed July 18, 2014. es_ES
dc.description.references ScienceDirect. http://www.sciencedirect.com/. Accessed July 18, 2014. es_ES
dc.description.references Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x es_ES
dc.description.references Rinner C Kohler M Hübner-Bloder G . Creating ISO/EN 13606 archetypes based on clinical information needs. In: Proceedings of EFMI Special Topic Conference, 14–15 April 2011, Lǎsko, Slovenia e-Health Across Borders Without Boundaries. 2011:14–15. es_ES
dc.description.references Muñoz Carrero A Romero Gutiérrez A Marco Cuenca G . Manual práctico de interoperabilidad semántica para entornos sanitarios basada en arquetipos. Unidad de investigación en Telemedicina y e-Salud. Instituto de Salud Carlos III - Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad. 2013. es_ES
dc.description.references Kalra D . Editorial principles for the development of standards for the structure and content of health records. 2012. https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/editorial-principles-for-the-development-of-record-standards.pdf . Accessed July 18, 2015. es_ES
dc.description.references Yuksel, M., & Dogac, A. (2011). Interoperability of Medical Device Information and the Clinical Applications: An HL7 RMIM based on the ISO/IEEE 11073 DIM. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 15(4), 557-566. doi:10.1109/titb.2011.2151868 es_ES
dc.description.references Nagy M Hanzlicek P Precková P . Semantic interoperability in Czech healthcare environment supported by HL7 version 3. Methods Inf Med. 2010;49:186. es_ES
dc.description.references LOPEZ, D., & BLOBEL, B. (2009). A development framework for semantically interoperable health information systems. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78(2), 83-103. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.05.009 es_ES
dc.description.references Lopez DM Blobel B . Enhanced semantic interoperability by profiling health informatics standards. Methods Inf Med. 2009;48:170–177. es_ES
dc.description.references Lopez DM Blobel B . Enhanced semantic interpretability by healthcare standards profiling. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;136:735. es_ES
dc.description.references Knaup, P., Garde, S., & Haux, R. (2007). Systematic planning of patient records for cooperative care and multicenter research. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76(2-3), 109-117. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.08.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Goossen, W. T. F., Ozbolt, J. G., Coenen, A., Park, H.-A., Mead, C., Ehnfors, M., & Marin, H. F. (2004). Development of a Provisional Domain Model for the Nursing Process for Use within the Health Level 7 Reference Information Model. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 11(3), 186-194. doi:10.1197/jamia.m1085 es_ES
dc.description.references Anderson, H. V., Weintraub, W. S., Radford, M. J., Kremers, M. S., Roe, M. T., Shaw, R. E., … Tcheng, J. E. (2013). Standardized Cardiovascular Data for Clinical Research, Registries, and Patient Care. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 61(18), 1835-1846. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.047 es_ES
dc.description.references Jian, W.-S., Hsu, C.-Y., Hao, T.-H., Wen, H.-C., Hsu, M.-H., Lee, Y.-L., … Chang, P. (2007). Building a portable data and information interoperability infrastructure—framework for a standard Taiwan Electronic Medical Record Template. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 88(2), 102-111. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2007.07.014 es_ES
dc.description.references Spigolon, D. N., & Moro, C. M. C. (2012). Arquétipos do conjunto de dados essenciais de enfermagem para atendimento de portadoras de endometriose. Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, 33(4), 22-32. doi:10.1590/s1983-14472012000400003 es_ES
dc.description.references Späth, M. B., & Grimson, J. (2011). Applying the archetype approach to the database of a biobank information management system. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 80(3), 205-226. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.11.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Smith, K., & Kalra, D. (2008). Electronic health records in complementary and alternative medicine. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(9), 576-588. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.11.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Bax, M. P., Kalra, D., & Santos, M. R. (2012). Dealing with the Archetypes Development Process for a Regional EHR System. Applied Clinical Informatics, 03(03), 258-275. doi:10.4338/aci-2011-12-ra-0074 es_ES
dc.description.references Moner D Moreno A Maldonado JA . Using archetypes for defining CDA templates. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;180:53–57. es_ES
dc.description.references Moner D Maldonado JA Boscá D . CEN EN13606 normalisation framework implementation experiences. In: Seamless Care, Safe Care: The Challenges of Interoperability and Patient Safety in Health Care: Proceedings of the EFMI Special Topic Conference, June 2–4, 2010; Reykjavik, Iceland. IOS Press; 2010: 136. es_ES
dc.description.references Marcos, M., Maldonado, J. A., Martínez-Salvador, B., Boscá, D., & Robles, M. (2013). Interoperability of clinical decision-support systems and electronic health records using archetypes: A case study in clinical trial eligibility. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 46(4), 676-689. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2013.05.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Leslie H . International developments in openEHR archetypes and templates. Health Inf Manag J. 2008;37:38. es_ES
dc.description.references Kohl CD Garde S Knaup P . Facilitating secondary use of medical data by using openEHR archetypes. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;160:1117–1121. es_ES
dc.description.references Garde, S., Hovenga, E., Buck, J., & Knaup, P. (2007). Expressing clinical data sets with openEHR archetypes: A solid basis for ubiquitous computing. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76, S334-S341. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.02.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Garcia D Moro CM Cicogna PE . Method to integrate clinical guidelines into the electronic health record (EHR) by applying the archetypes approach. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;192:871–875. es_ES
dc.description.references Duftschmid, G., Rinner, C., Kohler, M., Huebner-Bloder, G., Saboor, S., & Ammenwerth, E. (2013). The EHR-ARCHE project: Satisfying clinical information needs in a Shared Electronic Health Record System based on IHE XDS and Archetypes. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(12), 1195-1207. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.08.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Dias, R. D., Cook, T. W., & Freire, S. M. (2011). Modeling healthcare authorization and claim submissions using the openEHR dual-model approach. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 11(1). doi:10.1186/1472-6947-11-60 es_ES
dc.description.references Buck, J., Garde, S., Kohl, C. D., & Knaup-Gregori, P. (2009). Towards a comprehensive electronic patient record to support an innovative individual care concept for premature infants using the openEHR approach. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78(8), 521-531. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.03.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Puentes, J., Roux, M., Montagner, J., & Lecornu, L. (2012). Development framework for a patient-centered record. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 108(3), 1036-1051. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.06.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Liu, D., Wang, X., Pan, F., Yang, P., Xu, Y., Tang, X., … Rao, K. (2010). Harmonization of health data at national level: A pilot study in China. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79(6), 450-458. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.03.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Liu, D., Wang, X., Pan, F., Xu, Y., Yang, P., & Rao, K. (2008). Web-based infectious disease reporting using XML forms. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(9), 630-640. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.10.011 es_ES
dc.description.references Kim, Y., & Park, H.-A. (2011). Development and Validation of Detailed Clinical Models for Nursing Problems in Perinatal care. Applied Clinical Informatics, 02(02), 225-239. doi:10.4338/aci-2011-01-ra-0007 es_ES
dc.description.references Khan, W. A., Hussain, M., Afzal, M., Amin, M. B., Saleem, M. A., & Lee, S. (2013). Personalized-Detailed Clinical Model for Data Interoperability Among Clinical Standards. Telemedicine and e-Health, 19(8), 632-642. doi:10.1089/tmj.2012.0189 es_ES
dc.description.references Jing, X., Kay, S., Marley, T., Hardiker, N. R., & Cimino, J. J. (2012). Incorporating personalized gene sequence variants, molecular genetics knowledge, and health knowledge into an EHR prototype based on the Continuity of Care Record standard. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 45(1), 82-92. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2011.09.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Hsu, W., Taira, R. K., El-Saden, S., Kangarloo, H., & Bui, A. A. T. (2012). Context-Based Electronic Health Record: Toward Patient Specific Healthcare. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 16(2), 228-234. doi:10.1109/titb.2012.2186149 es_ES
dc.description.references Hoy D Hardiker NR McNicoll IT . Collaborative development of clinical templates as a national resource. Int J Med Inf. 2009;78:S3–S8. es_ES
dc.description.references Buyl, R., & Nyssen, M. (2009). Structured electronic physiotherapy records. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78(7), 473-481. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.02.007 es_ES
dc.description.references D’Amore JD Mandel JC Kreda DA . Are Meaningful Use Stage 2 certified EHRs ready for interoperability? Findings from the SMART C-CDA Collaborative. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014. Advance access published; doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002883. es_ES
dc.description.references Kalra D Tapuria A Austin T . Quality requirements for EHR archetypes. In: MIE; 2012: 48–52. es_ES
dc.description.references Garde S Hovenga EJ Gränz J . Managing archetypes for sustainable and semantically interoperable electronic health records. Electron J Health Inform. 2007;2:e9. es_ES
dc.description.references Madsen M Leslie H Hovenga EJS . Sustainable clinical knowledge management: an archetype development life cycle. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;151:115–132. es_ES
dc.description.references Kohl CD Garde S Knaup P . Facilitating the openEHR approach-organizational structures for defining high-quality archetypes. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;136:437. es_ES
dc.description.references Stroetmann VN Kalra D Lewalle P . Semantic interoperability for better health and safer healthcare. European Commission, Directorate-General Information Society and Media; 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.2759/38514 . es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem