- -

Heterogeneous behavioral patterns influencing the proactive environmental orientation of firms: How does your company look like?

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Heterogeneous behavioral patterns influencing the proactive environmental orientation of firms: How does your company look like?

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Segarra Oña, María del Val es_ES
dc.contributor.author Mondejar Jimenez, Jose es_ES
dc.contributor.author Peiró Signes, Angel es_ES
dc.contributor.author Mondéjar Jiménez, Juan Antonio es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2016-06-03T14:50:10Z
dc.date.available 2016-06-03T14:50:10Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.issn 1447-9338
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/65234
dc.description Special Issue: Eco-innovation es_ES
dc.description.abstract Components related to sustainable development such as environmental attitude, eco-innovation or environmental management are considered key variables at the competitive level, which is why it has become urgent to study which factors motivate companies to move towards a more proactive environmental attitude. The identification of different groups in connection with estimates in the inner path model constitutes a critical issue when applying the path modelling methodology. In this paper, we identify groups of firms with similar behaviour (that is, firm segments) using the FIMIX-PLS algorithm. We surveyed and interviewed 135 industrial companies located in the Valencia region of Spain. The results indicate the companies belong to three different groups that are defined by their motivation towards environmental proactivity, namely environmental opponents, environmental driven and environmental trainers . es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship The authors would like to thank the Spanish Economy and Competitiveness Ministry for its support through the research projects (EC02011-27369 & ECO2012-36685), and the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia for its research funding of the project (SP20140647). en_EN
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher e-Content Management es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Environmentally orientation drivers es_ES
dc.subject Environmental proactivity es_ES
dc.subject Industrial firms es_ES
dc.subject Sustainable behavior es_ES
dc.subject FIMIX analysis es_ES
dc.subject PLS study es_ES
dc.subject.classification ORGANIZACION DE EMPRESAS es_ES
dc.title Heterogeneous behavioral patterns influencing the proactive environmental orientation of firms: How does your company look like? es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/14479338.2015.1012187
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//ECO2012-36685/ES/FINANZAS EMPIRICAS/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//ECO2011-27369/ES/TECNICAS MULTICRITERIO Y TOMA DE DECISIONES PARTICIPATIVA PARA UNA GESTION SOSTENIBLE/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/UPV//SP20140647/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Cerrado es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Organización de Empresas - Departament d'Organització d'Empreses es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Segarra Oña, MDV.; Mondejar Jimenez, J.; Peiró Signes, A.; Mondéjar Jiménez, JA. (2015). Heterogeneous behavioral patterns influencing the proactive environmental orientation of firms: How does your company look like?. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice. 17(1):69-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2015.1012187 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2015.1012187 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 69 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 80 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 17 es_ES
dc.description.issue 1 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 269557 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Universitat Politècnica de València es_ES
dc.description.references Antonioli, D., Mancinelli, S., & Mazzanti, M. (2013). Is environmental innovation embedded within high-performance organisational changes? The role of human resource management and complementarity in green business strategies. Research Policy, 42(4), 975-988. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.12.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Banerjee, S. B. (2002). Corporate environmentalism: the construct and its measurement. Journal of Business Research, 55(3), 177-191. doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(00)00135-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Banerjee, S. B., Iyer, E. S., & Kashyap, R. K. (2003). Corporate Environmentalism: Antecedents and Influence of Industry Type. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 106-122. doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.2.106.18604 es_ES
dc.description.references Bostan, I., Burciu, A., Condrea, P., & Grosu, V. (2010). FINANCING THE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES IN THE COMMUNITARIAN SPACE. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 9(9), 1179-1185. doi:10.30638/eemj.2010.153 es_ES
dc.description.references Chappin, M. M. H., Vermeulen, W. J. V., Meeus, M. T. H., & Hekkert, M. P. (2009). Enhancing our understanding of the role of environmental policy in environmental innovation: adoption explained by the accumulation of policy instruments and agent-based factors. Environmental Science & Policy, 12(7), 934-947. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2009.06.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189-217. doi:10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018 es_ES
dc.description.references Business Strategy and the Environment. (s. f.). doi:10.1002/(issn)1099-0836 es_ES
dc.description.references Eiadat, Y., Kelly, A., Roche, F., & Eyadat, H. (2008). Green and competitive? An empirical test of the mediating role of environmental innovation strategy. Journal of World Business, 43(2), 131-145. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2007.11.012 es_ES
dc.description.references Gadenne, D. L., Kennedy, J., & McKeiver, C. (2008). An Empirical Study of Environmental Awareness and Practices in SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 45-63. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9672-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Garau, G., Mandras, G., & Schirru, L. (2011). A STATISTICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM SUPPORTING ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 10(12), 1903-1910. doi:10.30638/eemj.2011.254 es_ES
dc.description.references González-Benito, Ó., & González-Benito, J. (2008). Implications of market orientation on the environmental transformation of industrial firms. Ecological Economics, 64(4), 752-762. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.012 es_ES
dc.description.references Griffiths, A. (2004). Preface. Innovation, 6(2), vi-xiv. doi:10.5172/impp.2004.6.2.vi es_ES
dc.description.references Hahn, C., Johnson, M. D., Herrmann, A., & Huber, F. (2002). Capturing Customer Heterogeneity using a Finite Mixture PLS Approach. Schmalenbach Business Review, 54(3), 243-269. doi:10.1007/bf03396655 es_ES
dc.description.references Hall, J., & Vredenburg, H. (2004). Introduction. Innovation, 6(2), 129-140. doi:10.5172/impp.2004.6.2.129 es_ES
dc.description.references Sustainable Development. (s. f.). doi:10.1002/(issn)1099-1719 es_ES
dc.description.references Hemmelskamp, J. (1997). Environmental policy instruments and their effects on innovation. European Planning Studies, 5(2), 177-194. doi:10.1080/09654319708720392 es_ES
dc.description.references Horbach, J. (2008). Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources. Research Policy, 37(1), 163-173. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Jedidi, K., Jagpal, H. S., & DeSarbo, W. S. (1997). Finite-Mixture Structural Equation Models for Response-Based Segmentation and Unobserved Heterogeneity. Marketing Science, 16(1), 39-59. doi:10.1287/mksc.16.1.39 es_ES
dc.description.references Johnstone, N., & Labonne, J. (2009). Why do manufacturing facilities introduce environmental management systems? Improving and/or signaling performance. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 719-730. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Peiro-Signes, A., Segarra-Ona, M.-V., Miret-Pastor, L., & Verma, R. (2011). ECO-INNOVATION ATTITUDE AND INDUSTRY’S TECHNOLOGICAL LEVEL - AN IMPORTANT KEY FOR PROMOTING EFFICIENT VERTICAL POLICIES. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 10(12), 1893-1901. doi:10.30638/eemj.2011.253 es_ES
dc.description.references Pohoryles, R. J. (2010). Europe in the making – what role environmentalism; and, why should sustainable development be less than environmentalism? Arépliqueto Warleigh-Lack. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 23(4), 319-322. doi:10.1080/13511610.2011.566101 es_ES
dc.description.references Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. van der. (1995). Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118. doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 es_ES
dc.description.references Pujari, D. (2006). Eco-innovation and new product development: understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation, 26(1), 76-85. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2004.07.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Ramaswamy, V., Desarbo, W. S., Reibstein, D. J., & Robinson, W. T. (1993). An Empirical Pooling Approach for Estimating Marketing Mix Elasticities with PIMS Data. Marketing Science, 12(1), 103-124. doi:10.1287/mksc.12.1.103 es_ES
dc.description.references Strategic Management Journal. (s. f.). doi:10.1002/(issn)1097-0266 es_ES
dc.description.references Starik, M. (2004). Foreword. Innovation, 6(2), iii-iii. doi:10.5172/impp.2004.6.2.iii es_ES
dc.description.references Telle, K., & Larsson, J. (2007). Do environmental regulations hamper productivity growth? How accounting for improvements of plants’ environmental performance can change the conclusion. Ecological Economics, 61(2-3), 438-445. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.015 es_ES
dc.description.references Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y.-M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159-205. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Vastag, G., Kerekes, S., & Rondinelli, D. A. (1996). Evaluation of corporate environmental management approaches: A framework and application. International Journal of Production Economics, 43(2-3), 193-211. doi:10.1016/0925-5273(96)00040-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Winsemius, P., & Guntram, U. (1992). Responding to the environmental challenge. Business Horizons, 35(2), 12-20. doi:10.1016/s0007-6813(05)80188-0 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem