Abstract:
|
[EN] Boosting technologies have been key enablers for automotive engines development through downsizing and
downspeeding. In this situation, numerous multistage boosting systems have appeared in the last decade. The ...[+]
[EN] Boosting technologies have been key enablers for automotive engines development through downsizing and
downspeeding. In this situation, numerous multistage boosting systems have appeared in the last decade. The complexity
arising from multistage architectures requires an efficient matching methodology to obtain the best overall powertrain
performance.
The paper presents a model aimed to choose the best 2-stage boosting system architecture able to meet required criteria
on boosting pressure, EGR ratios for both short and long route loops while respecting the engine thermo-mechanical limits
such as in-cylinder pressure, compressor outlet temperature and exhaust manifold temperature. The model includes
filling-and-emptying 0D elements together with mean value. The engine model is set in a way that, for given requirements
and boosting system layout, calculates in seconds if the requirements will be achieved and the position of variable
geometry, waste-gate, EGR and by-pass valves. The model is thus inversed thanks to a new representation of turbine
maps that converts the classical iterative matching procedure in straight forward. The model can be also used in a
predictive manner to calculate the engine transient response.
The model has been calibrated to 3 different turbocharged diesel engines. The model gives good results provided that
wave effects are not important. This is the case of compact exhaust manifolds, typically used in turbocharged diesel
engines, below 3500 rpm. Tuned intake air lines can be taken into account through a tuning parameter affecting boosting
pressure.
An example is given in the paper for the matching procedure in a 2-stage, double route EGR, including steady and
transient results.
[-]
|