- -

Knowledge creation. The ongoing search for strategic renewal

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Knowledge creation. The ongoing search for strategic renewal

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Lloria, M. Begoña es_ES
dc.contributor.author Peris-Ortiz, Marta es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2016-07-12T08:30:49Z
dc.date.available 2016-07-12T08:30:49Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.identifier.issn 0263-5577
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/67448
dc.description.abstract Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyse how changes in a set of structural design variables (i.e. liaison position, networked design, innovation teams and work teams) affect the creation of new knowledge within organizations. The enablers intention, autonomy, fluctuation and creative chaos, redundancy, variety, and trust and commitment, taken from Nonaka s framework, are used as intermediate variables. Design/methodology/approach A sample of 167 large Spanish companies was used to empirically test a general relational model. Findings The analysis yielded two main conclusions. First, the relationship between structural variables and enablers, and, second, the relationship of enablers with knowledge creation emerged as highly relevant for knowledge creation in organizations. Research limitations/implications A major limitation of this study was the relatively small number of variables used to define organizational structure. In reality, a large number of variables combine to create organizational structure, yet this study only included four: liaison position, networked design, innovation teams and work teams. A further limitation is the importance of the organizational context itself, which was not addressed in this study. Practical implications This research has yielded findings that can help firms to understand and appreciate the changes that may occur in certain organizational design variables that affect knowledge creation. Equally, this research shows that knowledge creation has the potential to act as a catalyst for innovation, and may consequently drive change within the firm. Originality/value Despite a long tradition of research into organizations and the ways in which these entities create knowledge, the literature requires enhancing through the publication of articles that provide a deeper knowledge of the context and tools that aid knowledge creation. The novel approach adopted in the current study verified whether certain variables related to organization design (i.e. liaison positions, networked design, innovation teams and work teams) exert a relevant influence on knowledge creation. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Emerald es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Industrial Management and Data Systems es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Innovation es_ES
dc.subject Knowledge creation es_ES
dc.subject Enablers es_ES
dc.subject Structural variables es_ES
dc.subject.classification ORGANIZACION DE EMPRESAS es_ES
dc.title Knowledge creation. The ongoing search for strategic renewal es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1108/IMDS-01-2014-0011
dc.rights.accessRights Cerrado es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Organización de Empresas - Departament d'Organització d'Empreses es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Lloria, MB.; Peris-Ortiz, M. (2014). Knowledge creation. The ongoing search for strategic renewal. Industrial Management and Data Systems. 144(7):1022-1035. doi:10.1108/IMDS-01-2014-0011 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-01-2014-0011 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1022 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 1035 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 144 es_ES
dc.description.issue 7 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 282742 es_ES
dc.description.references Bagozzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. W. (1982). Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(3), 459. doi:10.2307/2392322 es_ES
dc.description.references Chiva, R., Alegre, J., & Lapiedra, R. (2007). Measuring organisational learning capability among the workforce. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3/4), 224-242. doi:10.1108/01437720710755227 es_ES
dc.description.references Curado, C. (2008). Perceptions of knowledge management and intellectual capital in the banking industry. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(3), 141-155. doi:10.1108/13673270810875921 es_ES
dc.description.references Delgado‐Verde, M., Martín‐de Castro, G., & Emilio Navas‐López, J. (2011). Organizational knowledge assets and innovation capability. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(1), 5-19. doi:10.1108/14691931111097890 es_ES
dc.description.references María Díez, J., Lizet Ochoa, M., Begoña Prieto, M., & Santidrián, A. (2010). Intellectual capital and value creation in Spanish firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(3), 348-367. doi:10.1108/14691931011064581 es_ES
dc.description.references Earl, M. (2001), “Knowledge management strategies: toward a taxonomy”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 215-233. es_ES
dc.description.references Englehardt, C. S., & Simmons, P. R. (2002). Creating an organizational space for learning. The Learning Organization, 9(1), 39-47. doi:10.1108/09696470210414818 es_ES
dc.description.references Glassop, L. I. (2002). The Organizational Benefits of Teams. Human Relations, 55(2), 225-249. doi:10.1177/0018726702055002184 es_ES
dc.description.references Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109-122. doi:10.1002/smj.4250171110 es_ES
dc.description.references Hedlund, G. (2007). A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2), 73-90. doi:10.1002/smj.4250151006 es_ES
dc.description.references Leonard, D., & Sensiper, S. (1998). The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation. California Management Review, 40(3), 112-132. doi:10.2307/41165946 es_ES
dc.description.references Lloria, M.B. and Peris, F. (2007), “Mecanismos de coordinación estructural, facilitadores y creación de conocimiento”, Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 29-46. es_ES
dc.description.references March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 es_ES
dc.description.references Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37. doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 es_ES
dc.description.references Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The Concept of «Ba»: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40-54. doi:10.2307/41165942 es_ES
dc.description.references Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2005). The theory of the knowledge-creating firm: subjectivity, objectivity and synthesis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(3), 419-436. doi:10.1093/icc/dth058 es_ES
dc.description.references Pauleen, D. J., Rooney, D., & Holden, N. J. (2010). Practical wisdom and the development of cross-cultural knowledge management: a global leadership perspective. European J. of International Management, 4(4), 382. doi:10.1504/ejim.2010.033608 es_ES
dc.description.references Sáenz, J., Aramburu, N., & Blanco, C. E. (2012). Knowledge sharing and innovation in Spanish and Colombian high‐tech firms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(6), 919-933. doi:10.1108/13673271211276191 es_ES
dc.description.references Scarbrough, H. (2003). Knowledge management, HRM and the innovation process. International Journal of Manpower, 24(5), 501-516. doi:10.1108/01437720310491053 es_ES
dc.description.references Spender, J.-C. (1996). Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 45-62. doi:10.1002/smj.4250171106 es_ES
dc.description.references Spender, J. C. (2007). Data, meaning and practice: how the knowledge-based view can clarify technology’s relationship with organisations. International Journal of Technology Management, 38(1/2), 178. doi:10.1504/ijtm.2007.012435 es_ES
dc.description.references Spender, J.-C. (2008). Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management: Whence and Whither? Management Learning, 39(2), 159-176. doi:10.1177/1350507607087582 es_ES
dc.description.references Lopez, S. V., Ortiz, M. P., & Armengot, C. R. (2011). Managing talent for organisational learning. European J. of International Management, 5(5), 540. doi:10.1504/ejim.2011.042178 es_ES
dc.description.references López, S. V., Ortiz, M. P., & Oltra, V. (2013). Learning, knowledge and dynamic capabilities: theoretical implications for competitiveness and innovation in the 21st century. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 14(3/4), 259. doi:10.1504/ijil.2013.056228 es_ES
dc.description.references Von Krogh, G. (1998). Care in Knowledge Creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 133-153. doi:10.2307/41165947 es_ES
dc.description.references Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339-351. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem