- -

The equivalence of two definitions of sequential pseudocompactness

RiuNet: Institutional repository of the Polithecnic University of Valencia

Share/Send to

Cited by

Statistics

  • Estadisticas de Uso

The equivalence of two definitions of sequential pseudocompactness

Show full item record

Lipparini, P. (2016). The equivalence of two definitions of sequential pseudocompactness. Applied General Topology. 17(1):1-5. https://doi.org/10.4995/agt.2016.4616

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/72369

Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name: 4616-17033-1-PB.pdf
Size: 127.4Kb
Format: PDF
Open/Preview

Item Metadata

Title: The equivalence of two definitions of sequential pseudocompactness
Author: Lipparini, Paolo
Issued date:
Abstract:
We show that two possible definitions of sequential pseudocompactness are equivalent, and point out some consequences.[EN]
Subjects: Sequentially pseudocompact , Feebly compact , Topological space
Copyrigths: Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)
Source:
Applied General Topology. (issn: 1576-9402 ) (eissn: 1989-4147 )
DOI: 10.4995/agt.2016.4616
Publisher:
Universitat Politècnica de València
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.4995/agt.2016.4616
Type: Artículo

References

Artico, G., Marconi, U., Pelant, J., Rotter, L., & Tkachenko, M. (2002). Selections and suborderability. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 175(1), 1-33. doi:10.4064/fm175-1-1

Dow, A., Porter, J. R., Stephenson, R. M., & Grant Woods, R. (2004). Spaces whose Pseudocompact Subspaces are Closed Subsets. Applied General Topology, 5(2), 243. doi:10.4995/agt.2004.1973

recommendations

 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record