- -

Evaluating the Functionality of Agricultural Systems: Social Preferences for multifunctional peri-urban agriculture. The Huerta de Valencia as case study.

RiuNet: Institutional repository of the Polithecnic University of Valencia

Share/Send to

Cited by

Statistics

Evaluating the Functionality of Agricultural Systems: Social Preferences for multifunctional peri-urban agriculture. The Huerta de Valencia as case study.

Show full item record

Marqués Pérez, I.; Segura García Del Río, B.; Maroto Álvarez, MC. (2014). Evaluating the Functionality of Agricultural Systems: Social Preferences for multifunctional peri-urban agriculture. The Huerta de Valencia as case study. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 12(4):889-901. doi:10.5424/sjar/2014124-6061

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/73835

Files in this item

Item Metadata

Title: Evaluating the Functionality of Agricultural Systems: Social Preferences for multifunctional peri-urban agriculture. The Huerta de Valencia as case study.
Author:
UPV Unit: Universitat Politècnica de València. Facultad de Administración y Dirección de Empresas - Facultat d'Administració i Direcció d'Empreses
Universitat Politècnica de València. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y del Medio Natural - Escola Tècnica Superior d'Enginyeria Agronòmica i del Medi Natural
Issued date:
Abstract:
The debate on the multifunctionality of agriculture and its connections with territorial policies are the basis of the most appropriate approach to legitimize public interventions in the agricultural sector. The main ...[+]
Subjects: Public goods , Ecosystem services , Social optimum , Analytic Hierarchy Process , Priorities , Consistency , Social utility function , Eigenvector.
Copyrigths: Reconocimiento (by)
Source:
Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. (issn: 1695-971X )
DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2014124-6061
Publisher:
Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA)
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2014124-6061
Thanks:
The authors acknowledge the support received from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the research project "Multiple Criteria and Group Decision Making integrated into Sustainable Management" (Ref. ...[+]
Type: Artículo

References

Abbler D, 2001. A synthesis of country reports on jointness between commodity and non commodity outputs in OECD agriculture. Workshop on Multifunctionality Vol 2(3), Paris, France.

Aczél, J., & Saaty, T. L. (1983). Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgements. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 27(1), 93-102. doi:10.1016/0022-2496(83)90028-7

Aull-Hyde, R., Erdogan, S., & Duke, J. M. (2006). An experiment on the consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 171(1), 290-295. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.06.037 [+]
Abbler D, 2001. A synthesis of country reports on jointness between commodity and non commodity outputs in OECD agriculture. Workshop on Multifunctionality Vol 2(3), Paris, France.

Aczél, J., & Saaty, T. L. (1983). Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgements. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 27(1), 93-102. doi:10.1016/0022-2496(83)90028-7

Aull-Hyde, R., Erdogan, S., & Duke, J. M. (2006). An experiment on the consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 171(1), 290-295. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.06.037

Aznar J, Estruch V, 2007. Valoración de activos ambientales mediante métodos multicriterio. Aplicación a la valoración del Parque Natural del Alto Tajo. Econ Agrar Recurs Nat 7(13): 107-125.

de Blaeij A, Linderhof V, Polman N, Reinhard S, 2009. Social preferences for exploiting commercial wetlands. Conf on Economic Instruments to Enhance the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biodiversity. Venice (Italia).

Duke, J. M., & Aull-Hyde, R. (2002). Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process. Ecological Economics, 42(1-2), 131-145. doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00053-8

Easley, R. F., Valacich, J. S., & Venkataramanan, M. A. (2000). Capturing group preferences in a multicriteria decision. European Journal of Operational Research, 125(1), 73-83. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(99)00196-4

EC, 1999. Safeguarding the multifunctional role of agriculture: which instruments? Info paper. European Commission DGVI A II 1. Info-Paper. Brussels, Belgium. September.

Forman E, Peniwati K, 1998. Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierachy process. Eur J Oper Res 9: 108-165.

Gómez-Limón J, Barreiros J, 2007. La multifuncionalidad de la agricultura en Espa-a. In: La multifuncionalidad de la agricultura en Espa-a. Eumedia, Madrid (Spain), pp: 9-16.

Gómez-Navarro, T., García-Melón, M., Acuña-Dutra, S., & Díaz-Martín, D. (2009). An environmental pressure index proposal for urban development planning based on the analytic network process. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29(5), 319-329. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2008.10.004

Gómez-Orea D, 2001. Agricultura y medio ambiente. In: El sector agrario y agroalimentario de Almería ante el siglo XXI: evolución y perspectiva de nuestra agricultura en el a-o 2000. Producción integrada: incidencia de las nuevas normativas de residuos de plaguicidas sobre la horticultura almeriense. Instituto de Estudios Almerienses, pp: 143-162.

Gómez-Villarino T, Gómez-Orea D, 2012. Agricultura y medio ambiente: en pos del desarrollo sostenible. UFLO Calidad de Vida 7: 3-22.

Hall, C., McVittie, A., & Moran, D. (2004). What does the public want from agriculture and the countryside? A review of evidence and methods. Journal of Rural Studies, 20(2), 211-225. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2003.08.004

Huang, I. B., Keisler, J., & Linkov, I. (2011). Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends. Science of The Total Environment, 409(19), 3578-3594. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022

Ishizaka A, Labib A, 2011. Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Syst Appl 38: 14336-14345.

Kallas Z, Gómez-Limón J, Barreiro J, 2007. Oferta y demanda de bienes y servicios públicos de la agricultura espa-ola. In: La multifuncionalidad de la agricultura en Espa-a. Eumedia, Madrid (Spain), pp: 131-153.

Madureira, L., Rambonilaza, T., & Karpinski, I. (2007). Review of methods and evidence for economic valuation of agricultural non-commodity outputs and suggestions to facilitate its application to broader decisional contexts. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 120(1), 5-20. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.04.015

Maroto Álvarez, C., Segura, M., Ginestar, C., Uriol, J., & Segura, B. (2013). Sustainable Forest Management in a Mediterranean region: Social preferences. Forest Systems, 22(3), 546. doi:10.5424/fs/2013223-04135

Mesa P, Martín-Ortega J, Berbel J, 2008. Análisis multicriterio de preferencias sociales en gestión hídrica bajo la DMA. Econ Agrar Recurs Nat 8(2): 105-1026.

Moyano E, 2008. Multifuncionalidad, territorio y desarrollo de las areas rurales. Ambienta 81: 7-19.

Nordström, E.-M., Eriksson, L. O., & Öhman, K. (2010). Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis in participatory forest planning: Experience from a case study in northern Sweden. Forest Policy and Economics, 12(8), 562-574. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2010.07.006

Parra-López, C., Calatrava-Requena, J., & de-Haro-Giménez, T. (2008). A systemic comparative assessment of the multifunctional performance of alternative olive systems in Spain within an AHP-extended framework. Ecological Economics, 64(4), 820-834. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.004

Ramanathan, R. (2001). A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 63(1), 27-35. doi:10.1006/jema.2001.0455

Reig E, 2007. Fundamentos económicos de la multifuncionalidad. In: La multifuncionalidad de la agricultura espa-ola. Eumedia Madrid (Spain), pp: 19-39.

Reig E, 2008. Agricultura, desarrollo rural y sostenibilidad medioambiental. Ciriec 61: 103-126.

Ríos V, Díaz L, Romero C, 1998. Economía y gestión ambiental: un enfoque decisional multicriterio. Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales 92(4): 399-408.

Saaty T, 1997. Toma de decisiones para líderes: El proceso analítico jerárquico, la toma de decisiones en un mundo complejo. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, USA.

SAATY, T. L., & VARGAS, L. G. (2005). THE POSSIBILITY OF GROUP WELFARE FUNCTIONS. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 04(02), 167-176. doi:10.1142/s0219622005001453

Silva Pérez, R. (2010). Multifuncionalidad agraria y territorio: Algunas reflexiones y propuestas de análisis. EURE (Santiago), 36(109), 5-33. doi:10.4067/s0250-71612010000300001

Sólnes, J. (2003). Environmental quality indexing of large industrial development alternatives using AHP. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23(3), 283-303. doi:10.1016/s0195-9255(03)00004-0

Tió C, Atance I, 2000. La multifuncionalidad de la agricultura: aspectos económicos e implicaciones sobre política agraria. Estud Agrosoc Pesqu 189: 29-48.

Van Huylenbroeck G, Vandermeulen V, Mettepenningen E, Verspecht A, 2007. Multifuntionality of agriculture: a review of definitions, evidence and instruments. Living Reviews in Landscape Research 1(3): 1-43.

Whitmarsh, D., & Palmieri, M. G. (2009). Social acceptability of marine aquaculture: The use of survey-based methods for eliciting public and stakeholder preferences. Marine Policy, 33(3), 452-457. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2008.10.003

Wiggering H, Müller F, Werner A, Helming K, 2003. The concept of multifuncionality in sustainable land development. In: Sustainable Land Development. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp: 3-18.

Zasada, I. (2011). Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture—A review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy, 28(4), 639-648. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.01.008

[-]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record