- -

Linking ideas in women’s writing: evidence from the Coruña Corpus

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Linking ideas in women’s writing: evidence from the Coruña Corpus

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Moskowich, Isabel es_ES
dc.contributor.author Monaco, Leida María es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2016-11-16T12:40:37Z
dc.date.available 2016-11-16T12:40:37Z
dc.date.issued 2016-07-15
dc.identifier.issn 1886-2438
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/74193
dc.description.abstract [EN] This paper provides an overview of some rhetorical devices found in scientific works by late Modern English women. We will focus on apparently marginal linguistic elements as devices fundamental for the expression of logical reasoning in different disciplines. We have based our study on four subcorpora in the Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing, so that the behaviour and distribution of rhetorical devices will be studied at a microscopic level and attending not only to how they appear in each discipline, but also taking into consideration elements such as time and genre. Our conclusions are limited but we observe the effort women made at a moment when their role in society was not related to knowledge. In general there is an overall increase in the frequency of features typical of an abstract style as well as an increase of conjuncts and adverbial subordinators as linking devices. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship The research reported here has been funded by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (MINECO), grant number FFI2013-42215-P. This grant is hereby gratefully acknowledged.
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València
dc.relation.ispartof Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas
dc.rights Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) es_ES
dc.subject Coruña Corpus es_ES
dc.subject Abstraction es_ES
dc.subject Logical reasoning es_ES
dc.subject Female writing es_ES
dc.subject Scientific English es_ES
dc.subject Late Modern English es_ES
dc.title Linking ideas in women’s writing: evidence from the Coruña Corpus es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.date.updated 2016-11-16T10:37:26Z
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/rlyla.2016.4660
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//FFI2013-42215-P/ES/ETIQUETADO ELECTRONICO DE TEXTOS CIENTIFICO-TECNICOS EN LENGUA INGLESA ENTRE LOS SIGLOS XVIII Y XX (3): CORUÑA CORPUS/
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Moskowich, I.; Monaco, LM. (2016). Linking ideas in women’s writing: evidence from the Coruña Corpus. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas. 11:35-49. https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2016.4660 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod SWORD es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2016.4660 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 35 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 49 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 11
dc.identifier.eissn 1886-6298
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
dc.description.references Besnier, N. (1994). Involvement in linguistic practice: An ethnographic appraisal. Journal of Pragmatics, 22(3-4), 279-299. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(94)90113-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511621024 es_ES
dc.description.references Biber, D. (1995). Dimensions of register variation. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511519871 es_ES
dc.description.references Conrad, S. and Biber, D., ed. (2001). Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies. Essex: Pearson Edu. es_ES
dc.description.references Gómez-Guinovart, J. and Pérez-Guerra, J. (2000). A Multidimensional corpus-based analysis of English spoken and written-to-be-spoken discourse. Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa, 9(1): 39-70. es_ES
dc.description.references HYLAND, K. (1996). Writing Without Conviction? Hedging in Science Research Articles. Applied Linguistics, 17(4), 433-454. doi:10.1093/applin/17.4.433 es_ES
dc.description.references Lakoff, R. T. (1990). Talking power: The politics of language in our lives. New York: Basic Books. es_ES
dc.description.references Moskowich, I. (2012). 3. CETA as a tool for the study of modern astronomy in English. Astronomy ‘playne and simple’, 35-56. doi:10.1075/z.173.03mos es_ES
dc.description.references Moskowich, I. (2013). Eighteenth Century Female Authors: Women and Science in theCoruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 33(4), 467-487. doi:10.1080/07268602.2013.857570 es_ES
dc.description.references Moskowich, I. and Crespo, B. (2007). Presenting the Coru-a Corpus: A Collection of Samples for the Historical Study of English Scientific Writing. In 'Of Varying Language and Opposing Creed': New Insights into Late Modern English, ed. By Javier Pérez Guerra et al., 341-357. Bern:Peter Lang. es_ES
dc.description.references Moskowich, I. and Monaco, L. M. (2014). Abstraction as a Means of Expressing Reality: Women Writing Science in Late Modern English. In Corpus Analysis for Descriptive and Pedagogical Purposes, ed. By Maurizio Gotti and Davide Giannoni, 203-224. Bern: Peter Lang. es_ES
dc.description.references Moskowich, I., Lareo, I. Cami-a. G. and Crespo, B. (2012). Corpus of English Texts on Astronomy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. es_ES
dc.description.references Crespo Garcia, B., & Moskowich-Spiegel Fandino, I. (2009). CETA in the Context of the Coruna Corpus. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 25(2), 153-164. doi:10.1093/llc/fqp038 es_ES
dc.description.references Prelli, L J. (1989). A rhetoric of science: inventing scientific discourse. Columbia, SC: U of South Carolina P. es_ES
dc.description.references Quirk, R, Greenbaum, S. Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem