- -

Comparison between light scattering and gravimetric samplers for PM10 mass concentration in poultry and pig houses

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Comparison between light scattering and gravimetric samplers for PM10 mass concentration in poultry and pig houses

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Cambra López, María es_ES
dc.contributor.author Winkel, Albert es_ES
dc.contributor.author Mosquera, Julio es_ES
dc.contributor.author Ogink, Nico W.M es_ES
dc.contributor.author Aarnink, André Johannes Antonius es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2017-02-28T12:09:25Z
dc.date.available 2017-02-28T12:09:25Z
dc.date.issued 2015-06
dc.identifier.issn 1352-2310
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/78365
dc.description.abstract The objective of this study was to compare co-located real-time light scattering devices and equivalent gravimetric samplers in poultry and pig houses for PM10 mass concentration, and to develop animal-specific calibration factors for light scattering samplers. These results will contribute to evaluate the comparability of different sampling instruments for PM10, concentrations. Paired DustTrak light scattering device (DustTrak aerosol monitor, TSI, U.S.) and PM10 gravimetric cyclone sampler were used for measuring PM10 mass concentrations during 24 h periods (from noon to noon) inside animal houses. Sampling was conducted in 32 animal houses in the Netherlands, including broilers, broiler breeders, layers in floor and in aviary system, turkeys, piglets, growing-finishing pigs in traditional and low emission housing with dry and liquid feed, and sows in individual and group housing. A total of 119 pairs of 24 h measurements (55 for poultry and 64 for pigs) were recorded and analyzed using linear regression analysis. Deviations between samplers were calculated and discussed. In poultry, cyclone sampler and DustTrak data fitted well to a linear regression, with a regression coefficient equal to 0.41, an intercept of 0.16 mg m(-3) and a correlation coefficient of 0.91 (excluding turkeys). Results in turkeys showed a regression coefficient equal to 1.1 (P = 0.49), an intercept of 0.06 mg m(-3) (P < 0.0001) and a correlation coefficient of 0.98. In pigs, we found a regression coefficient equal to 0.61, an intercept of 0.05 mg m(-3) and a correlation coefficient of 0.84. Measured PM10 concentrations using DustTraks were clearly underestimated (approx. by a factor 2) in both poultry and pig housing systems compared with cyclone pre-separators. Absolute, relative, and random deviations increased with concentration. DustTrak light scattering devices should be self-calibrated to investigate PM10 mass concentrations accurately in animal houses. We recommend linear regression equations as animal-specific calibration factors for DustTraks instead of manufacturer calibration factors, especially in heavily dusty environments such as animal houses. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship The study was financed by the Dutch Ministry of Economic affairs, Agriculture and Innovation. Authors wish to thank the Campus de Excelencia Internacional of the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia (Spain) for funding Dr. Cambra-Lopez's postdoc contract. en_EN
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Elsevier es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Atmospheric Environment es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) es_ES
dc.subject Calibration factor es_ES
dc.subject Dust measurement es_ES
dc.subject Dust trak es_ES
dc.subject Gravimetry es_ES
dc.subject Livestock housing es_ES
dc.subject.classification BIOLOGIA ANIMAL es_ES
dc.subject.classification PRODUCCION ANIMAL es_ES
dc.title Comparison between light scattering and gravimetric samplers for PM10 mass concentration in poultry and pig houses es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.03.051
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología Animal - Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Animal es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Cambra López, M.; Winkel, A.; Mosquera, J.; Ogink, NW.; Aarnink, AJA. (2015). Comparison between light scattering and gravimetric samplers for PM10 mass concentration in poultry and pig houses. Atmospheric Environment. 111:20-27. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.03.051 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.03.051 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 20 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 27 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 111 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 301555 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 1352-2310
dc.contributor.funder Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation, Holanda es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Universitat Politècnica de València es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem