- -

Vector-valued impact measures and generation of specific indexes for research assessment

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Vector-valued impact measures and generation of specific indexes for research assessment

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: CalabuigFerrerSan ...
Tamaño: 418.4Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión del Autor.
Abrir
[Cerrado]
Nombre: VectorValuedImpac ...
Tamaño: 512.1Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author Calabuig, J. M. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Ferrer Sapena, Antonia es_ES
dc.contributor.author Sánchez Pérez, Enrique Alfonso es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2017-03-20T11:50:46Z
dc.date.available 2017-03-20T11:50:46Z
dc.date.issued 2016-09
dc.identifier.issn 0138-9130
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/78852
dc.description.abstract A mathematical structure for defining multi-valued bibliometric indices is provided with the aim of measuring the impact of general sources of information others than articles and journals-for example, repositories of datasets. The aim of the model is to use several scalar indices at the same time for giving a measure of the impact of a given source of information, that is, we construct vector valued indices. We use the properties of these vector valued indices in order to give a global answer to the problem of finding the optimal scalar index for measuring a particular aspect of the impact of an information source, depending on the criterion we want to fix for the evaluation of this impact. The main restrictions of our model are (1) it uses finite sets of scalar impact indices (altmetrics), and (2) these indices are assumed to be additive. The optimization procedure for finding the best tool for a fixed criterion is also presented. In particular, we show how to create an impact measure completely adapted to the policy of a specific research institution. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Akadémiai Kiadó es_ES
dc.publisher Springer es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Scientometrics es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Impact factor es_ES
dc.subject Vector valued es_ES
dc.subject Model es_ES
dc.subject Mathematics es_ES
dc.subject Altmetrics es_ES
dc.subject.classification MATEMATICA APLICADA es_ES
dc.subject.classification BIBLIOTECONOMIA Y DOCUMENTACION es_ES
dc.title Vector-valued impact measures and generation of specific indexes for research assessment es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s11192-016-2039-6
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales - Escola Tècnica Superior d'Enginyers Industrials es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos - Escola Tècnica Superior d'Enginyers de Camins, Canals i Ports es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Escola Tècnica Superior d'Enginyeria Informàtica es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto Universitario de Matemática Pura y Aplicada - Institut Universitari de Matemàtica Pura i Aplicada es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Calabuig, JM.; Ferrer Sapena, A.; Sánchez Pérez, EA. (2016). Vector-valued impact measures and generation of specific indexes for research assessment. Scientometrics. 108(3):1425-1443. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2039-6 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s11192-016-2039-6 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1425 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 1443 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 108 es_ES
dc.description.issue 3 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 326629 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 1588-2861
dc.description.references Aleixandre Benavent, R., Valderrama Zurián, J. C., & González Alcaide, G. (2007). Scientific journals impact factor: Limitations and alternative indicators. El Profesional de la Información, 16(1), 4–11. es_ES
dc.description.references Alguliyev, R., Aliguliyev, R. & Ismayilova, N. (2015). Weighted impact factor (WIF) for assessing the quality of scientific journals. arXiv:1506.02783 es_ES
dc.description.references Beauzamy, B. (1982). Introduction to Banach spaces and their geometry. Amsterdam: North-Holland. es_ES
dc.description.references Beliakov, G., & James, S. (2011). Citation-based journal ranks: the use of fuzzy measures. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 167, 101–119. es_ES
dc.description.references Buela-Casal, G. (2003). Evaluating quality of articles and scientific journals. Proposal of weighted impact factor and a quality index. Psicothema, 15(1), 23–25. es_ES
dc.description.references Diestel, J., & Uhl, J. J. (1977). Vector measures. Providence: Am. Math. Soc. es_ES
dc.description.references Dorta-González, P., & Dorta-González, M. I. (2013). Comparing journals from different fields of science and social science through a JCR subject categories normalized impact factor. Scientometrics, 95(2), 645–672. es_ES
dc.description.references Dorta-González, P., Dorta-González, M. I., Santos-Penate, D. R., & Suarez-Vega, R. (2014). Journal topic citation potential and between-field comparisons: The topic normalized impact factor. Journal of Informetrics, 8(2), 406–418. es_ES
dc.description.references Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2002). A general frame-work for relative impact indicators. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 27(1), 29–48. es_ES
dc.description.references Ferrer-Sapena, A., Sánchez-Pérez, E. A., González, L. M., Peset, F. & Aleixandre-Benavent, R. (2016). The impact factor as a measuring tool of the prestige of the journals in research assessment in mathematics. Research Evaluation, 1–9. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvv041 . es_ES
dc.description.references Ferrer-Sapena, A., Sánchez-Pérez, E. A., González, L. M., Peset, F., & Aleixandre-Benavent, R. (2015). Mathematical properties of weighted impact factors based on measures of prestige of the citing journals. Scientometrics, 105(3), 2089–2108. es_ES
dc.description.references Gagolewski, M., & Mesiar, R. (2014). Monotone measures and universal integrals in a uniform framework for the scientific impact assessment problem. Information Sciences, 263, 166–174. es_ES
dc.description.references Habibzadeh, F., & Yadollahie, M. (2008). Journal weighted impact factor: A proposal. Journal of Informetrics, 2(2), 164–172. es_ES
dc.description.references Klement, E., Mesiar, R., & Pap, E. (2010). A universal integral as common frame for Choquet and Sugeno integral. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 18, 178–187. es_ES
dc.description.references Leydesdorff, L., & Opthof, T. (2010). Scopus’s source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 2365–2369. es_ES
dc.description.references Li, Y. R., Radicchi, F., Castellano, C., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2013). Quantitative evaluation of alternative field normalization procedures. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 746–755. es_ES
dc.description.references Moed, H. F. (2010). Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics, 4, 265–277. es_ES
dc.description.references Owlia, P., Vasei, M., Goliaei, B., & Nassiri, I. (2011). Normalized impact factor (NIF): An adjusted method for calculating the citation rate of biomedical journals. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 44(2), 216–220. es_ES
dc.description.references Pinski, G., & Narin, F. (1976). Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing and Management, 12, 297–312. es_ES
dc.description.references Piwowar, H. (2013). Altmetrics: Value all research products. Nature, 493(7431), 159–159. es_ES
dc.description.references Pudovkin,A.I., & Garfield, E. (2004). Rank-normalized impact factor: A way to compare journal performance across subject categories. In Proceedings of the 67th annual meeting of the American Society for Information science and Technology, 41, 507-515. es_ES
dc.description.references Rousseau, R. (2002). Journal evaluation: Technical and practical issues. Library Trends, 50(3), 418–439. es_ES
dc.description.references Ruiz Castillo, J., & Waltman, L. (2015). Field-normalized citation impact indicators using algorithmically constructed classification systems of science. Journal of Informetrics, 9, 102–117. es_ES
dc.description.references Torra, V., & Narukawa, Y. (2008). The h-index and the number of citations: Two fuzzy integrals. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 16, 795–797. es_ES
dc.description.references Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2008). Some comments on the journal weighted impact factor proposed by Habibzadeh and Yadollahie. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 369–372. es_ES
dc.description.references Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2010). The relation between Eigenfactor, audience factor, and influence weight. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 1476–1486. es_ES
dc.description.references Zahedi, Z., Costas, R., & Wouters, P. (2014). How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ’alternative metrics’ in scientific publications. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1491–1513. es_ES
dc.description.references Zitt, M. (2010). Citing-side normalization of journal impact: A robust variant of the Audience Factor. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 392–406. es_ES
dc.description.references Zitt, M. (2011). Behind citing-side normalization of citations: Some properties of the journal impact factor. Scientometrics, 89, 329–344. es_ES
dc.description.references Zitt, M., & Small, H. (2008). Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 1856–1860. es_ES
dc.description.references Zyczkowski, K. (2010). Citation graph, weighted impact factors and performance indices. Scientometrics, 85(1), 301–315. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem