Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Theau.Clément, M. | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Guardia, S. | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Davoust, C. | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Galliot, P. | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Souchet, C. | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Bignon, L. | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Fortun-Lamothe, L. | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-03-28T12:32:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-03-28T12:32:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-12-28 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1257-5011 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/79160 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] The aim of this study was to evaluate 2 alternative breeding systems that differ from the current system in terms of reproduction rhythm, age of females at first insemination and the age of kits at weaning and at slaughter. We measured the performance of 332 females and their offspring over 4 consecutive cycles, as well as the sustainability of the systems. We compared an intensive (group I: reproduction rhythm [RR]=35 d; first insemination [AI1]=20.6 wk of age; weaning age [WA]=32 d; slaughter age [WS]=63 d) an extensive (group E: RR=49 d; AI1=16.6 wk; WA=30 d; WS=70 d) and a semi-intensive system (group S: RR=42 d; AI1=19.6 wk; WA=35 d; WS=70 d) considered as the control system. Sustainability was evaluated using a multicriteria assessment method that takes 14 economic, environmental and social criteria into account, for which 3 to 5 indicators were expressed as the relative score [–1; –0.5; 0; +0.5; +1] for alternative systems compared to the control system. The productivity measured at 28 d (3.5, 4.2 and 4.6 kg/AI, for groups I, S and E, respectively), at 63 d post-partum (30, 38 and 42 kg/female for 4 cycles, respectively), and the total body energy measured 3 d after the 1st and at the 4th insemination (45.4, 46.8 and 49.5 MJ, respectively), were significantly increased when the reproductive rhythm decreased (P<0.001). Before and after weaning, kit mortality decreased when the reproduction rhythm decreased (11.4, 7.3, and 1.9% and 18.3, 15.3 and 10.6% for groups I, S and E, respectively, P<0.05). Carcass quality (weight and dressing percentage) was lower in I than in the S and E groups (P<0.001). On this basis, the yearly productivity per doe at weaning could be estimated at 79, 83, and 78 kg for groups I, S and E, respectively. Consequently, the productivity per reproductive cycle increases with the extensification of the breeding system. Nevertheless, compared with the current French system (S), simultaneous changes in several breeding practices could lead to new coherent and functional systems capable of improving various aspects of sustainability. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported by the CAS DAR (Cunipalm n° 9023) and by the French Interprofessional Rabbit Association (CLIPP). | |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Universitat Politècnica de València | |
dc.relation.ispartof | World Rabbit Science | |
dc.rights | Reserva de todos los derechos | es_ES |
dc.subject | Rabbit | es_ES |
dc.subject | Breeding system | es_ES |
dc.subject | Productivity | es_ES |
dc.subject | Body composition | es_ES |
dc.subject | Growth | es_ES |
dc.subject | Sustainability | es_ES |
dc.title | Performance and sustainability of two alternative rabbit breeding systems | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.date.updated | 2017-03-28T10:01:56Z | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4995/wrs.2016.5154 | |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Ministère de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation /CASDAR 9023/FR/Évaluation de la durabilité et innovations pour des ateliers CUNIcoles et PALMipèdes gras plus durables/CUNIPALM | |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Theau.clément, M.; Guardia, S.; Davoust, C.; Galliot, P.; Souchet, C.; Bignon, L.; Fortun-Lamothe, L. (2016). Performance and sustainability of two alternative rabbit breeding systems. World Rabbit Science. 24(4):253-265. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2016.5154 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | SWORD | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2016.5154 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 253 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 265 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 24 | |
dc.description.issue | 4 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1989-8886 | |
dc.contributor.funder | Ministère de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation, Francia | |
dc.contributor.funder | Comité Lapin Interprofessionnel pour la Promotion des Produits Français | |
dc.description.references | Basset-Mens, C., van der Werf, H. M. G., Robin, P., Morvan, T., Hassouna, M., Paillat, J.-M., & Vertès, F. (2007). Methods and data for the environmental inventory of contrasting pig production systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(15), 1395-1405. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.03.009 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bivolarski B.L., Vachkova E., Ribarski S.S. 2011. Effect of weaning age upon the slaughter and physiochemical traits of rabbit meat. Veterinarski Archiv., 8: 499-511. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Coudurier B., Peyraud J.L., Blesbois E., Jeuland F., Urruty N., Huyghe C., Guyomard H. 2015. Methodology for the conception and evaluation of multiperforming production systems: application to a dairy farm and broiler chicken production. INRA Prod. Anim., 28: 51-76. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Fortun-Lamothe, L., Prunier, A., Bolet, G., & Lebas, F. (1999). Physiological mechanisms involved in the effects of concurrent pregnancy and lactation on foetal growth and mortality in the rabbit. Livestock Production Science, 60(2-3), 229-241. doi:10.1016/s0301-6226(99)00096-2 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Fortun-Lamothe L., Litt J., Coutelet G., Gidenne T. 2012. A participatory approach to define objectives, criteria and indicators for evaluating the sustainability of rabbit rearing units. 10th World Rabbit Congress, 3-6 september 2012, Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, 821-825. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Lairez J., Feschet P., Aubin, J., Bosckstaller, C., Bouvarel, I. 2015. Guide pour l'évaluation multicritère. Quae Ed., 232 pp. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Maertens L., Perez, J.M., Villamide M., Cervera C., Gidenne T., Xiccato G. 2002. Nutritive value of raw materials for rabbits: EGRAN tables 2002. World Rabbit Sci. 10, 157-166. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Theau-Clément M., Roustan A., 1992. A study on relationships between receptivity and lactation in the doe, and their influence on reproductive performances. 5th Congress of World Rabbit Science Association, July 25-30, 1992, Corvallis, U.S.A., Vol A: 412-421. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Theau-Clément M., Boiti C., Mercier P., Falières J. 2000. Description of the ovarian status and fertilising ability of primiparous rabbit does at different lactation stage, In Proc.: 7th World Rabbit Congress Valencia Spain, Vol A: 259-266. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Xiccato G., Trocino A., 2013. Energy and protein metabolism and requirements. In Nutrition of the rabbit (De Blas C., Wiseman J., eds), CABI; UK, 83-118. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Zita L., Tůmová E., Skřivanová V., Ledvinka Z. 2007. The effect of weaning age on performance and nutrient digestibility of broiler rabbits. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 25. 341-347. | es_ES |