- -

The silent fading of an academic search engine: the case of Microsoft Academic Search

RiuNet: Institutional repository of the Polithecnic University of Valencia

Share/Send to

Cited by

Statistics

The silent fading of an academic search engine: the case of Microsoft Academic Search

Show full item record

Orduña Malea, E.; Martín-Martín, A.; Ayllón, JM.; Delgado-López-Cózar, E. (2014). The silent fading of an academic search engine: the case of Microsoft Academic Search. Online Information Review. 38(7):936-953. doi:10.1108/OIR-07-2014-0169

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/82266

Files in this item

Item Metadata

Title: The silent fading of an academic search engine: the case of Microsoft Academic Search
Author: Orduña Malea, Enrique Martín-Martín, Alberto Ayllón, Juan M Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio
UPV Unit: Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto de Diseño para la Fabricación y Producción Automatizada - Institut de Disseny per a la Fabricació i Producció Automatitzada
Issued date:
Abstract:
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to describe the obsolescence process of Microsoft Academic Search (MAS) as well as the effects of this decline in the coverage of disciplines and journals, and their influence in the ...[+]
Subjects: Universities , Google Scholar , Academic journals , Academic search engines , Microsoft Academic Search , Scientific fields
Copyrigths: Reserva de todos los derechos
Source:
Online Information Review. (issn: 1468-4527 )
DOI: 10.1108/OIR-07-2014-0169
Publisher:
Emerald
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OIR-07-2014-0169
Thanks:
This research was funded under Project HAR2011-30383-C02-02 from Direccion General de Investigacion y Gestion del Plan Nacional de I+D+I (Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness) and Project APOSTD/2013/002 from the Regional ...[+]
Type: Artículo

References

Beel, J. , Gipp, B. and Wilde, E. (2010), “Academic search engine optimization (ASEO)”, Journal of Scholarly Publishing, Vol. 41 No. 2, pp. 176-190.

Butler, D. (2011), “Computing giants launch free science metrics: new Google and Microsoft services promise to democratize citation data”, Nature, Vol. 476 No. 7358, p.

Carlson, S. (2006), “Challenging Google, Microsoft unveils a search tool for scholarly articles”, Chronicle of Higher Education, Vol. 52 No. 33, p. [+]
Beel, J. , Gipp, B. and Wilde, E. (2010), “Academic search engine optimization (ASEO)”, Journal of Scholarly Publishing, Vol. 41 No. 2, pp. 176-190.

Butler, D. (2011), “Computing giants launch free science metrics: new Google and Microsoft services promise to democratize citation data”, Nature, Vol. 476 No. 7358, p.

Carlson, S. (2006), “Challenging Google, Microsoft unveils a search tool for scholarly articles”, Chronicle of Higher Education, Vol. 52 No. 33, p.

Delgado-López-Cózar, E., & Cabezas-Clavijo, Á. (2013). Ranking journals: could Google Scholar Metrics be an alternative to Journal Citation Reports and Scimago Journal Rank? Learned Publishing, 26(2), 101-113. doi:10.1087/20130206

Delgado López-Cózar, E., Robinson-García, N., & Torres-Salinas, D. (2013). The Google scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(3), 446-454. doi:10.1002/asi.23056

Haley, M. R. (2014). Ranking top economics and finance journals using Microsoft academic search versus Google scholar: How does the new publish or perish option compare? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(5), 1079-1084. doi:10.1002/asi.23080

Haustein, S., Peters, I., Bar-Ilan, J., Priem, J., Shema, H., & Terliesner, J. (2014). Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1145-1163. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1221-3

Jacsó, P. (2005), “As we may search – comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar”, Current Science, Vol. 89 No. 9, pp. 1537-1547.

Jacsó, P. (2008). Google Scholar revisited. Online Information Review, 32(1), 102-114. doi:10.1108/14684520810866010

Jacsó, P. (2011). The pros and cons of Microsoft Academic Search from a bibliometric perspective. Online Information Review, 35(6), 983-997. doi:10.1108/14684521111210788

Jacsó, P. (2012). Google Scholar Metrics for Publications. Online Information Review, 36(4), 604-619. doi:10.1108/14684521211254121

Khabsa, M. and Giles, C.L. (2014), “The number of scholarly documents on the public web”, PloS One, Vol. 9 No. 5, p.

Labbé, C. (2010), “Ike Antkare one of the greatest stars in the scientific firmament”, ISSI Newsletter, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 48-52.

Orduña-Malea, E., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2013). Google Scholar Metrics evolution: an analysis according to languages. Scientometrics, 98(3), 2353-2367. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1164-8

Ortega, J. L. (2014). Influence of co-authorship networks in the research impact: Ego network analyses from Microsoft Academic Search. Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 728-737. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.07.001

Ortega, J. L., & Aguillo, I. F. (2013). Institutional and country collaboration in an online service of scientific profiles: Google Scholar Citations. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 394-403. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.12.007

Ortega, J. L., & Aguillo, I. F. (2014). Microsoft academic search and Google scholar citations: Comparative analysis of author profiles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(6), 1149-1156. doi:10.1002/asi.23036

Van Noorden, R. (2014). Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network. Nature, 512(7513), 126-129. doi:10.1038/512126a

[-]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record