- -

Influence Analysis in Consensus Search - A Multi Criteria Group Decision Making Approach in Environmental Management

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Influence Analysis in Consensus Search - A Multi Criteria Group Decision Making Approach in Environmental Management

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

[Cerrado]
Nombre: S0219622016400034 ...
Tamaño: 1.553Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
Thumbnail
Nombre: 1.A.1.26. IJITDM ...
Tamaño: 1.051Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión de autor
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Romero Gelvez, Jorge Ivan es_ES
dc.contributor.author García Melón, Mónica es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2017-06-20T09:16:07Z
dc.date.available 2017-06-20T09:16:07Z
dc.date.issued 2016-07
dc.identifier.issn 0219-6220
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/83247
dc.description.abstract The environmental decision problems often are divisive, even in a technical realm, decision makers with strong personalities influence outcomes. The purpose of this study is to define and quantify the factors that affect the conservation objectives of a national natural park located in Colombia, South America adding the judgments of six decision makers with different knowledge (every decision maker is also a stakeholder representative). This paper uses a hybrid multiple criteria group decision making model (MCDM), combining the social network analysis (SNA), analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and similarity measures to solve the consensus and anchoring problem among environmental decision makers. The SNA technique is used to build an influential network relation map among decision makers and to obtain their weights for applying a weighted analytic hierarchy process. Then, the final decision matrices for every decision maker are compared between them in order to identify the consensus level of the problem. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher World Scientific Publishing es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Group decision-making es_ES
dc.subject Stakeholder analysis es_ES
dc.subject Consensus es_ES
dc.subject MCDM es_ES
dc.subject AHP es_ES
dc.subject SNA es_ES
dc.subject.classification PROYECTOS DE INGENIERIA es_ES
dc.title Influence Analysis in Consensus Search - A Multi Criteria Group Decision Making Approach in Environmental Management es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1142/S0219622016400034
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Proyectos de Ingeniería - Departament de Projectes d'Enginyeria es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Romero Gelvez, JI.; García Melón, M. (2016). Influence Analysis in Consensus Search - A Multi Criteria Group Decision Making Approach in Environmental Management. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making. 15(4):791-813. doi:10.1142/S0219622016400034 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622016400034 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 791 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 813 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 15 es_ES
dc.description.issue 4 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 322814 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 1793-6845
dc.description.references Regan, H. M., Colyvan, M., & Markovchick-Nicholls, L. (2006). A formal model for consensus and negotiation in environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 80(2), 167-176. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.09.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417-2431. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014 es_ES
dc.description.references Gomez-Navarro, T., & Garcia-Melon, M. (2011). DESIGN OF AN EFFICIENCY INDEX FOR THE RANK ORDER OF SOIL REMEDIATION TECHNIQUES. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 10(5), 603-613. doi:10.30638/eemj.2011.083 es_ES
dc.description.references Aragonés-Beltrán, P., García-Melón, M., & Estruch-Guitart, V. (2015). ANALYSIS OF THE PARTICIPATION OF STAKEHOLDERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT BASED ON ANP: APPLICATION TO A SPANISH NATURAL PARK. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 7(1). doi:10.13033/ijahp.v7i1.276 es_ES
dc.description.references Belton, V., & Stewart, T. J. (2002). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Ginevičius, R., & Podvezko, V. (2009). EVALUATING THE CHANGES IN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT OF LITHUANIAN COUNTIES BY MULTIPLE CRITERIA METHODS. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 15(3), 418-436. doi:10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.418-436 es_ES
dc.description.references Ramzan, N., Degenkolbe, S., & Witt, W. (2008). Evaluating and improving environmental performance of HC’s recovery system: A case study of distillation unit. Chemical Engineering Journal, 140(1-3), 201-213. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2007.09.042 es_ES
dc.description.references Sólnes, J. (2003). Environmental quality indexing of large industrial development alternatives using AHP. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23(3), 283-303. doi:10.1016/s0195-9255(03)00004-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Beccali, M., Cellura, M., & Mistretta, M. (2003). Decision-making in energy planning. Application of the Electre method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology. Renewable Energy, 28(13), 2063-2087. doi:10.1016/s0960-1481(03)00102-2 es_ES
dc.description.references Varvasovszky, Z. (2000). A stakeholder analysis. Health Policy and Planning, 15(3), 338-345. doi:10.1093/heapol/15.3.338 es_ES
dc.description.references Prell, C., Hubacek, K., & Reed, M. (2009). Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Management. Society & Natural Resources, 22(6), 501-518. doi:10.1080/08941920802199202 es_ES
dc.description.references Charnley, S., & Engelbert, B. (2005). Evaluating public participation in environmental decision-making: EPA’s superfund community involvement program. Journal of Environmental Management, 77(3), 165-182. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., … Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933-1949. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Bonner, B. L., & Bolinger, A. R. (2013). Separating the confident from the correct: Leveraging member knowledge in groups to improve decision making and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122(2), 214-221. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.07.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Kirchler, E., & Davis, J. H. (1986). The influence of member status differences and task type on group consensus and member position change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 83-91. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.83 es_ES
dc.description.references Sniezek, J. A., & Henry, R. A. (1989). Accuracy and confidence in group judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43(1), 1-28. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(89)90055-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Bonner, B. L., Sillito, S. D., & Baumann, M. R. (2007). Collective estimation: Accuracy, expertise, and extroversion as sources of intra-group influence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(1), 121-133. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.05.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Burgman, M. (2005). Risks and Decisions for Conservation and Environmental Management. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511614279 es_ES
dc.description.references Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886. doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105 es_ES
dc.description.references Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when Stakeholders matter. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21-53. doi:10.1080/14719030410001675722 es_ES
dc.description.references Biggs, S., & Matsaert, H. (1999). An actor-oriented approach for strengthening research and development capabilities in natural resource systems. Public Administration and Development, 19(3), 231-262. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-162x(199908)19:3<231::aid-pad71>3.0.co;2-e es_ES
dc.description.references Wu, J., & Chiclana, F. (2014). A social network analysis trust–consensus based approach to group decision-making problems with interval-valued fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Knowledge-Based Systems, 59, 97-107. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2014.01.017 es_ES
dc.description.references Sabidussi, G. (1966). The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika, 31(4), 581-603. doi:10.1007/bf02289527 es_ES
dc.description.references Chiclana, F., Tapia García, J. M., del Moral, M. J., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2013). A statistical comparative study of different similarity measures of consensus in group decision making. Information Sciences, 221, 110-123. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2012.09.014 es_ES
dc.description.references Wu, J., Chiclana, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2015). Trust based consensus model for social network in an incomplete linguistic information context. Applied Soft Computing, 35, 827-839. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.02.023 es_ES
dc.description.references Xu, J., & Wu, Z. (2011). A discrete consensus support model for multiple attribute group decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 24(8), 1196-1202. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2011.05.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Verdegay, J. . (1998). Choice processes for non-homogeneous group decision making in linguistic setting. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 94(3), 287-308. doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(96)00251-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Chiclana, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., & Alonso, S. (2007). Some induced ordered weighted averaging operators and their use for solving group decision-making problems based on fuzzy preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 182(1), 383-399. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.08.032 es_ES
dc.description.references Xu, Z. (2000). On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgement matrix in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 126(3), 683-687. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(99)00082-x es_ES
dc.description.references Rosso, M., Bottero, M., Pomarico, S., La Ferlita, S., & Comino, E. (2014). Integrating multicriteria evaluation and stakeholders analysis for assessing hydropower projects. Energy Policy, 67, 870-881. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.007 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem