- -

Comparison of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Drivers versus Circunferencial Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. A Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trial

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Comparison of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Drivers versus Circunferencial Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. A Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trial

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Martínez Alzamora, Mª Nieves es_ES
dc.contributor.author Atienza, Felipe es_ES
dc.contributor.author Almendral, Jesús es_ES
dc.contributor.author Ormaetxe, José Miguel es_ES
dc.contributor.author Moya, Ángel es_ES
dc.contributor.author Martínez-Alday, Jesús Daniel es_ES
dc.contributor.author Hernández-Madrid, Antonio es_ES
dc.contributor.author Castellanos, Eduardo es_ES
dc.contributor.author Arribas, Fernando es_ES
dc.contributor.author Arias, Miguel Ángel es_ES
dc.contributor.author Tercedor, Luis es_ES
dc.contributor.author Peinado, Rafael es_ES
dc.contributor.author Arcocha, Maria Fe es_ES
dc.contributor.author Ortiz, Mercedes es_ES
dc.contributor.author Arenal, Ángel es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2017-07-31T13:40:34Z
dc.date.available 2017-07-31T13:40:34Z
dc.date.issued 2014-12-16
dc.identifier.issn 0735-1097
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/86007
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND Empiric circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) has become the therapy of choice for drugrefractory atrial fibrillation (AF). Although results are suboptimal, it is unknown whether mechanistically-based strategies targeting AF drivers are superior. OBJECTIVES This study sought to determine the efficacy and safety of localized high-frequency source ablation (HFSA) compared with CPVI in patients with drug-refractory AF. METHODS This prospective, multicenter, single-blinded study of 232 patients (age 53 10 years, 186 males) randomized those with paroxysmal AF (n ¼ 115) to CPVI or HFSA-only (noninferiority design) and those with persistent AF (n ¼ 117) to CPVI or a combined ablation approach (CPVI þ HFSA, superiority design). The primary endpoint was freedom from AF at 6 months post-first ablation procedure. Secondary endpoints included freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (AT) at 6 and 12 months, periprocedural complications, overall adverse events, and quality of life. RESULTS In paroxysmal AF, HFSA failed to achieve noninferiority at 6 months after a single procedure but, after redo procedures, was noninferior to CPVI at 12 months for freedom from AF and AF/AT. Serious adverse events were significantly reduced in the HFSA group versus CPVI patients (p ¼ 0.02). In persistent AF, there were no significant differences between treatment groups for primary and secondary endpoints, but CPVI þ HFSA trended toward more serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS In paroxysmal AF, HFSA failed to achieve noninferiority at 6 months but was noninferior to CPVI at 1 year in achieving freedom of AF/AT and a lower incidence of severe adverse events. In persistent AF, CPVI þ HFSA offered no incremental value. (Radiofrequency Ablation of Drivers of Atrial Fibrillation [RADAR-AF]; NCT00674401) (J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:2455–67). es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This study was funded by the Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares and by an unrestricted research grant from St. Jude Medical. Dr. Atienza has received research grants from St. Jude Medical; and is on the advisory board of Medtronic, Inc. Dr. Jalife is on the scientific advisory board of Topera, Inc. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose. en_EN
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Elsevier es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of the American College of Cardiology es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Dominant frequency mapping es_ES
dc.subject High-frequency source ablation es_ES
dc.subject.classification ESTADISTICA E INVESTIGACION OPERATIVA es_ES
dc.title Comparison of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Drivers versus Circunferencial Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. A Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trial es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.053
dc.rights.accessRights Cerrado es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa Aplicadas y Calidad - Departament d'Estadística i Investigació Operativa Aplicades i Qualitat es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Martínez Alzamora, MN.; Atienza, F.; Almendral, J.; Ormaetxe, JM.; Moya, Á.; Martínez-Alday, JD.; Hernández-Madrid, A.... (2014). Comparison of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Drivers versus Circunferencial Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. A Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 64(23):2455-2467. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.053 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.053 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 2455 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 2467 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 64 es_ES
dc.description.issue 23 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 269351 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 1558-3597
dc.contributor.funder Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares es_ES
dc.contributor.funder St. Jude Medical es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem