Estimating rock strength parameters across varied failure criteria: Application of spreadsheet and R-based orthogonal regression to triaxial test data

dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Ingeniería del Terreno
dc.contributor.affiliationEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería de Caminos, Canales y Puertos
dc.contributor.affiliationCentro de Investigación en Arquitectura, Patrimonio y Gestion para el desarrollo Sostenible
dc.contributor.authorÚcar, Robertoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorArlegui, Luises_ES
dc.contributor.authorBelandria, Norlyes_ES
dc.contributor.authorTorrijo, F.J.
dc.contributor.funderGobierno de Aragónes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-12T12:16:42Z
dc.date.available2026-05-12T12:16:42Z
dc.date.issued2025-08es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN] Triaxial tests, a staple in rock engineering, are labor-intensive, sample-demanding, and costly, making their optimization highly advantageous. These tests are essential for characterizing rock strength, and by adopting a failure criterion, they allow for the derivation of criterion parameters through regression, facilitating their integration into modeling programs. In this study, we introduce the application of an underutilized statistical techniquedorthogonal regressiond well-suited for analyzing triaxial test data. Additionally, we present an innovation in this technique by minimizing the Euclidean distance while incorporating orthogonality between vectors as a constraint, for the case of orthogonal linear regression. Also, we consider the Modi ed Least Squares method. We exemplify this approach by developing the necessary equations to apply the Mohr-Coulomb, Murrell, Hoek-Brown, and Úcar criteria, and implement these equations in both spreadsheet calculations and R scripts. Finally, we demonstrate the technique's application using ve datasets of varied lithologies from specialized literature, showcasing its versatility and effectiveness.es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationÚcar, R.; Arlegui, L.; Belandria, N.; Torrijo, F.J. (2025). Estimating rock strength parameters across varied failure criteria: Application of spreadsheet and R-based orthogonal regression to triaxial test data. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 17(8):4685-4699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.11.024es_ES
dc.description.issue8es_ES
dc.description.referencesAdcock. (1878). A problem in least squares. AnN. Sat. 5.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBaty, F., Ritz, C., Charles, S., Brutsche, M., Flandrois, J.-P., & Delignette-Muller, M.-L. (2015). A Toolbox for Nonlinear Regression in<i>R</i>: The Package<b>nlstools</b>. Journal of Statistical Software, 66(5). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v066.i05es_ES
dc.description.referencesBertuzzi, R. (2013). Discussion on ‘Sari, M., An improved method of fitting experimental data to the Hoek–Brown failure criterion, Engineering Geology (2012)’. Engineering Geology, 152(1), 213-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.07.013es_ES
dc.description.referencesBertuzzi, R., Douglas, K., & Mostyn, G. (2016). Improving the GSI Hoek-Brown criterion relationships. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 89, 185-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.09.008es_ES
dc.description.referencesBertuzzi, R., Douglas, K., & Mostyn, G. (2017). Comparison of Intact Rock Strength Criteria for Pragmatic Design. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 143(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001644es_ES
dc.description.referencesBetournay. (1991). New considerations in the determination of Hoek and Brown material constants.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBieniawski. (1974). Estimating the strength of rock materials. J. South. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 74(8).es_ES
dc.description.referencesBorecki. (1982). Triaxial compresive strength of two mineralogical/diagenetic varieties of coal measure, fine-medium grained Pniowek and Anna sandstones tested under confining pressure up to 60 MPa. Prace Instytutu PBKiOP Politechniki Slaskiej. 119(2).es_ES
dc.description.referencesBrace. (1964). Brittle fracture of rocks.es_ES
dc.description.referencesCaizada. (2003). Contrasting total least squares with ordinary least squares part ii: examples and comparisons. Math. Comput. Educ. 37(2).es_ES
dc.description.referencesCarr. (2012). Orthogonal regression: a teaching perspective. Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. 43(1).es_ES
dc.description.referencesCarter, B. J., Scott Duncan, E. J., & Lajtai, E. Z. (1991). Fitting strength criteria to intact rock. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 9(1), 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00880985es_ES
dc.description.referencesDing, G. L., Chu, B., Jin, Y., & Zhu, C. A. (2013). Comparison of Orthogonal Regression and Least Squares in Measurement Error Modeling for Prediction of Material Property. Advanced Materials Research, 661, 166-170. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.661.166es_ES
dc.description.referencesDouglas. (2004). The shear strength of rock masses.es_ES
dc.description.referencesElliott. (1993). Triaxial testing for rock strength.es_ES
dc.description.referencesFairhurst, C. (1964). On the validity of the ‘Brazilian’ test for brittle materials. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences &amp; Geomechanics Abstracts, 1(4), 535-546. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(64)90060-9es_ES
dc.description.referencesGuo. (2020). Triaxial strength criteria in Mohr stress space for intact rocks. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2020(1).es_ES
dc.description.referencesHe, P.-f., Ma, X.-d., He, M.-c., Tao, Z.-g., & Liu, D.-q. (2022). Comparative Study of Nine Intact Rock Failure Criteria via Analytical Geometry. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 55(6), 3083-3106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-02816-9es_ES
dc.description.referencesHoek. (1964). Fracture of anisotropic rock. J. South. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 64(10).es_ES
dc.description.referencesHoek, E., & Brown, E. T. (1980). Empirical Strength Criterion for Rock Masses. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 106(9), 1013-1035. https://doi.org/10.1061/ajgeb6.0001029es_ES
dc.description.referencesHoek, E., & Brown, E. T. (2019). The Hoek–Brown failure criterion and GSI – 2018 edition. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 11(3), 445-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.08.001es_ES
dc.description.references(ed.). (1978). Suggested methods for determining tensile strength of rock materials. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences &amp; Geomechanics Abstracts, 15(3), 99-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(78)90003-7es_ES
dc.description.referencesJaeger, J. C., & Hoskins, E. R. (1966). Rock failure under the confined Brazilian test. Journal of Geophysical Research, 71(10), 2651-2659. https://doi.org/10.1029/jz071i010p02651es_ES
dc.description.referencesKeleş. (2018). Comparison of classical least squares and orthogonal regression in measurement error models. Int. Online J. Educ. Sci. 10(3).es_ES
dc.description.referencesKeleş. (2016). Comparison of classical linear regression and orthogonal regression according to the sum of squares perpendicular distances. J. Meas. Eval. Educ. Psychol. 7(2).es_ES
dc.description.referencesKwasniewski. (1983). Deformational and strength properties of the three structural varieties of carboniferous sandstones.es_ES
dc.description.referencesLakirouhani. (2011). Review of rock strength criteria.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMahetaji, M., & Brahma, J. (2024). A critical review of rock failure Criteria: A scope of Machine learning approach. Engineering Failure Analysis, 159, 107998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.107998es_ES
dc.description.referencesMahetaji, M., Brahma, J., & Kumar Vij, R. (2023). Multivariable Regression 3D Failure Criteria for In-Situ Rock. Earth Sciences Research Journal, 27(3), 273-287. https://doi.org/10.15446/esrj.v27n3.105872es_ES
dc.description.referencesMellor, M., & Hawkes, I. (1971). Measurement of tensile strength by diametral compression of discs and annuli. Engineering Geology, 5(3), 173-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(71)90001-9es_ES
dc.description.referencesMishra. (2017). Laboratory triaxial testing-from historical outlooks to technical aspects.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMogi, K. (1967). Effect of the intermediate principal stress on rock failure. Journal of Geophysical Research, 72(20), 5117-5131. https://doi.org/10.1029/jz072i020p05117es_ES
dc.description.referencesMogi, K. (1971). Fracture and flow of rocks under high triaxial compression. Journal of Geophysical Research, 76(5), 1255-1269. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb076i005p01255es_ES
dc.description.referencesMoshrefi. (2019). New empirical failure criterion for shale. J. Min. Environ. Times. 10(1).es_ES
dc.description.referencesMostyn. (2000). Strength of intact rock and rock masses. vol. 1.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMujica. (2017). Análisis comparativo de regresión ortogonal como alternativa a la regresión ordinaria. Matemática. 15(2).es_ES
dc.description.referencesMurrell, S. A. F. (1965). The Effect of Triaxial Stress Systems on the Strength of Rocks at Atmospheric Temperatures. Geophysical Journal International, 10(3), 231-281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.1965.tb03155.xes_ES
dc.description.referencesNievergelt, Y. (1994). Total Least Squares: State-of-the-Art Regression in Numerical Analysis. SIAM Review, 36(2), 258-264. https://doi.org/10.1137/1036055es_ES
dc.description.referencesPackulak. (2024). Measurement of true tensile strength from brazilian tensile strength laboratory tests. Can. Geotech. J. 00.es_ES
dc.description.referencesPallavi, Joshi, S., Singh, D., Kaur, M., & Lee, H.-N. (2022). Comprehensive Review of Orthogonal Regression and Its Applications in Different Domains. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 29(6), 4027-4047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-022-09728-5es_ES
dc.description.referencesPariseau, W. G. (2007). Fitting failure criteria to laboratory strength tests. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 44(4), 637-646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.09.006es_ES
dc.description.referencesPatel, S., & Martin, C. D. (2017). Evaluation of Tensile Young’s Modulus and Poisson’s Ratio of a Bi-modular Rock from the Displacement Measurements in a Brazilian Test. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 51(2), 361-373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-017-1345-5es_ES
dc.description.referencesPérez-Rey, I., Muñoz-Ibáñez, A., González-Fernández, M. A., Muñiz-Menéndez, M., Herbón Penabad, M., Estévez-Ventosa, X., Delgado, J., & Alejano, L. R. (2023). Size effects on the tensile strength and fracture toughness of granitic rock in different tests. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 15(9), 2179-2192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.11.005es_ES
dc.description.referencesPerras, M. A., & Diederichs, M. S. (2014). A Review of the Tensile Strength of Rock: Concepts and Testing. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 32(2), 525-546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-014-9732-0es_ES
dc.description.referencesRamsey, J. M., & Chester, F. M. (2004). Hybrid fracture and the transition from extension fracture to shear fracture. Nature, 428(6978), 63-66. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02333es_ES
dc.description.referencesRecio-López. (2021). Orthogonal linear regression. Pensamiento Matemático. 11.es_ES
dc.description.referencesRivas. (1993). Regresión no lineal. Rev. Colomb. Estad. 1(27).es_ES
dc.description.referencesSainsbury. (2024). Consideration of the accuracy of empirical and indirect laboratory methods for the characterization of tension strength. Geotech. Geol. Eng.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSari, M. (2012). An improved method of fitting experimental data to the Hoek–Brown failure criterion. Engineering Geology, 127, 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.12.011es_ES
dc.description.referencesShen, J., Jimenez, R., Karakus, M., & Xu, C. (2013). A Simplified Failure Criterion for Intact Rocks Based on Rock Type and Uniaxial Compressive Strength. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 47(2), 357-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0408-5es_ES
dc.description.referencesSheorey, P. R., Das, M. N., Bordia, S. K., & Singh, B. (1986). Pillar strength approaches based on a new failure criterion for coal seams. International Journal of Mining and Geological Engineering, 4(4), 273-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01552957es_ES
dc.description.referencesTarokh, A., Sharpe, J. D., & Labuz, J. F. (2022). Confined Tensile Testing of Porous Sandstone. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 55(11), 6555-6566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-03007-2es_ES
dc.description.referencesÚcar. (2011). Una metodología reciente para determinar la resistencia al corte en macizos rocosos. vol. 2694.es_ES
dc.description.referencesUcar, R. (2021). Determination of a New Failure Criterion for Rock Mass and Concrete. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 39(5), 3795-3813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01728-9es_ES
dc.description.referencesYawei. (2018). Rock failure behavior and brittleness under the confined brazilian test.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipWe acknowledge the funding support from Gobierno de Aragon (Grant No. E32_23R Geotransfer Research Group) .es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin4699es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio4685es_ES
dc.description.volume17es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.11.024es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn1674-7755es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/235044
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineeringes_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaS\559924es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Gobierno de Aragón//E32_23R/es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.11.024es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectRock failure criteriaes_ES
dc.subjectNonlinear regressiones_ES
dc.subjectOrthogonal regressiones_ES
dc.subjectTriaxial testinges_ES
dc.subjectDot productes_ES
dc.titleEstimating rock strength parameters across varied failure criteria: Application of spreadsheet and R-based orthogonal regression to triaxial test dataes_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier284282
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6048-6792
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2d6de7b4-fbbd-47cc-a0f3-a44b82df9f2f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery2d6de7b4-fbbd-47cc-a0f3-a44b82df9f2f
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication479b5ebe-e63a-48c5-9101-6cbbae0ca3e0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa4b47ff5-95f4-430f-a1a3-541cb8eaa9b7
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicatione96b797d-c024-4b32-9e34-72a01c7b42be
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery479b5ebe-e63a-48c5-9101-6cbbae0ca3e0
upv.uuid02a1d58b-fe7a-4c2c-9c05-b0b4d758fc67es_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
UcarArleguiBelandria - Estimating rock strength parameters across varied failure criteria Applica....pdf
Tamaño:
1.69 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial