Analysis of Academic Literature on Environmental Valuation

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.affiliationFacultad de Administración y Dirección de Empresas
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales
dc.contributor.affiliationInstituto Universitario de Matemática Pura y Aplicada
dc.contributor.authorGuijarro, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorTsinaslanidis, Prodromoses_ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-03T03:32:59Z
dc.date.available2021-06-03T03:32:59Z
dc.date.issued2020-04es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN] Environmental valuation refers to a variety of techniques to assign monetary values to environmental impacts, especially non-market impacts. It has experienced a steady growth in the number of publications on the subject in the last 30 years. We performed a search for papers containing the term "environmental valuation" in the title, abstract, or keywords. The search was conducted with an online literature search engine of the Web of Science (WoS) electronic databases. A search of this database revealed that the term "environmental valuation" appeared for the first time in 1987. Since then a large number of studies have been published, including significant breakthroughs in theory and applications. In the present work 661 publications were selected for a review of the literature on environmental valuation over the period 1987-2019. This paper analyzes the evolution of the leading methodologies and authors, highlights the preference for the choice experiment method over the contingent valuation method, and shows that relatively few papers have had a strong impact on the researchers in this areaen_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationGuijarro, F.; Tsinaslanidis, P. (2020). Analysis of Academic Literature on Environmental Valuation. International Journal of Environmental research and Public Health (Online). 17(7):1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072386es_ES
dc.description.issue7es_ES
dc.description.referencesNyborg, K. (2000). Project analysis as input to public debate: Environmental valuation versus physical unit indicators. Ecological Economics, 34(3), 393-408. doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00180-4es_ES
dc.description.referencesChristie, M., Fazey, I., Cooper, R., Hyde, T., & Kenter, J. O. (2012). An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies. Ecological Economics, 83, 67-78. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.012es_ES
dc.description.referencesRemoundou, K., & Koundouri, P. (2009). Environmental Effects on Public Health: An Economic Perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 6(8), 2160-2178. doi:10.3390/ijerph6082160es_ES
dc.description.referencesNiemeyer, S., & Spash, C. L. (2001). Environmental Valuation Analysis, Public Deliberation, and their Pragmatic Syntheses: A Critical Appraisal. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 19(4), 567-585. doi:10.1068/c9ses_ES
dc.description.referencesBaranzini, A., & Ramirez, J. V. (2005). Paying for Quietness: The Impact of Noise on Geneva Rents. Urban Studies, 42(4), 633-646. doi:10.1080/00420980500060186es_ES
dc.description.referencesGuijarro, F. (2019). Assessing the Impact of Road Traffic Externalities on Residential Price Values: A Case Study in Madrid, Spain. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(24), 5149. doi:10.3390/ijerph16245149es_ES
dc.description.referencesThorne, R., & Shepherd, D. (2013). Quiet as an Environmental Value: A Contrast between Two Legislative Approaches. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(7), 2741-2759. doi:10.3390/ijerph10072741es_ES
dc.description.referencesHanemann, W. M. (2003). Willingness To Pay and Willingness To Accept: How Much Can They Differ? Reply. American Economic Review, 93(1), 464-464. doi:10.1257/000282803321455449es_ES
dc.description.referencesAdamowicz, W. L., Bhardwaj, V., & Macnab, B. (1993). Experiments on the Difference between Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept. Land Economics, 69(4), 416. doi:10.2307/3146458es_ES
dc.description.referencesPlottu, E., & Plottu, B. (2007). The concept of Total Economic Value of environment: A reconsideration within a hierarchical rationality. Ecological Economics, 61(1), 52-61. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.027es_ES
dc.description.referencesAznar, J., Guijarro, F., & Moreno-Jiménez, J. M. (2009). Mixed valuation methods: a combined AHP-GP procedure for individual and group multicriteria agricultural valuation. Annals of Operations Research, 190(1), 221-238. doi:10.1007/s10479-009-0527-2es_ES
dc.description.referencesAdamowicz, W. L. (2004). What’s it worth? An examination of historical trends and future directions in environmental valuation*. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 48(3), 419-443. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8489.2004.00258.xes_ES
dc.description.referencesHoyos, D. (2010). The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments. Ecological Economics, 69(8), 1595-1603. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.011es_ES
dc.description.referencesAria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007es_ES
dc.description.referencesIs Choice Experiment Becoming More Popular Than Contingent Valuation? A Systematic Review in Agriculture, Environment and Healthhttps://econpapers.repec.org/paper/faewpaper/2014.12.htmes_ES
dc.description.referencesBoxall, P. C., & Adamowicz, W. L. (2002). Environmental and Resource Economics, 23(4), 421-446. doi:10.1023/a:1021351721619es_ES
dc.description.referencesLancsar, E., & Louviere, J. (2008). Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making. PharmacoEconomics, 26(8), 661-677. doi:10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004es_ES
dc.description.referencesHanley, N., Mourato, S., & Wright, R. E. (2002). Choice Modelling Approaches: A Superior Alternative for Environmental Valuatioin? Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(3), 435-462. doi:10.1111/1467-6419.00145es_ES
dc.description.referencesHanley, N., Wright, R. E., & Adamowicz, V. (1998). Environmental and Resource Economics, 11(3/4), 413-428. doi:10.1023/a:1008287310583es_ES
dc.description.referencesTurner, R. K., Paavola, J., Cooper, P., Farber, S., Jessamy, V., & Georgiou, S. (2003). Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions. Ecological Economics, 46(3), 493-510. doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(03)00189-7es_ES
dc.description.referencesMartinez-Alier, J., Munda, G., & O’Neill, J. (1998). Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 26(3), 277-286. doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(97)00120-1es_ES
dc.description.referencesBoxall, P. C., Adamowicz, W. L., Swait, J., Williams, M., & Louviere, J. (1996). A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation. Ecological Economics, 18(3), 243-253. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(96)00039-0es_ES
dc.description.referencesFerrini, S., & Scarpa, R. (2007). Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: A Monte Carlo study. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53(3), 342-363. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2006.10.007es_ES
dc.description.referencesAdamowicz, W., Swait, J., Boxall, P., Louviere, J., & Williams, M. (1997). Perceptions versus Objective Measures of Environmental Quality in Combined Revealed and Stated Preference Models of Environmental Valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32(1), 65-84. doi:10.1006/jeem.1996.0957es_ES
dc.description.referencesKahneman, D., & Knetsch, J. L. (1992). Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22(1), 57-70. doi:10.1016/0095-0696(92)90019-ses_ES
dc.description.referencesAdamowicz, W., Boxall, P., Williams, M., & Louviere, J. (1998). Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(1), 64-75. doi:10.2307/3180269es_ES
dc.description.referencesAdamowicz, W., Louviere, J., & Williams, M. (1994). Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26(3), 271-292. doi:10.1006/jeem.1994.1017es_ES
dc.description.referencesLancaster, K. J. (1966). A New Approach to Consumer Theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132-157. doi:10.1086/259131es_ES
dc.description.referencesŠčasný, M., Zvěřinová, I., Czajkowski, M., Kyselá, E., & Zagórska, K. (2016). Public acceptability of climate change mitigation policies: a discrete choice experiment. Climate Policy, 17(sup1), S111-S130. doi:10.1080/14693062.2016.1248888es_ES
dc.description.referencesStreimikiene, Balezentis, Alisauskaite-Seskiene, Stankuniene, & Simanaviciene. (2019). A Review of Willingness to Pay Studies for Climate Change Mitigation in the Energy Sector. Energies, 12(8), 1481. doi:10.3390/en12081481es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin14es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio1es_ES
dc.description.volume17es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph17072386es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn1660-4601es_ES
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC7178272es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid32244553es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/167219
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherMDPI AGes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Environmental research and Public Health (Online)es_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaS\406611es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072386es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00180-4es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.012es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3390/ijerph6082160es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1068/c9ses_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/00420980500060186es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3390/ijerph16245149es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3390/ijerph10072741es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1257/000282803321455449es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2307/3146458es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.027es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10479-009-0527-2es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1111/j.1467-8489.2004.00258.xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.011es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1023/A:1021351721619es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1111/1467-6419.00145es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1023/A:1008287310583es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00189-7es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00120-1es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0921-8009(96)00039-0es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jeem.2006.10.007es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1006/jeem.1996.0957es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0095-0696(92)90019-Ses_ES
dc.relation.references10.2307/3180269es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1006/jeem.1994.1017es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1086/259131es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/14693062.2016.1248888es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3390/en12081481es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento (by)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectEnvironmental valuationes_ES
dc.subjectLiterature surveyes_ES
dc.subjectWillingness to payes_ES
dc.subjectChoice experimentes_ES
dc.subjectContingent valuationes_ES
dc.subject.classificationECONOMIA FINANCIERA Y CONTABILIDADes_ES
dc.titleAnalysis of Academic Literature on Environmental Valuationes_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier30034
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8803-5165
relation.isAuthorOfPublication378a0b30-bdcb-4663-8406-a4a5186266a0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery378a0b30-bdcb-4663-8406-a4a5186266a0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication67c03db1-c7ed-41d2-8506-f61e5b5de340
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication1562846a-1e62-49bb-a253-92b3901edd08
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication7e7e57e7-7dd0-4216-b896-7a30ad9dcac3
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery67c03db1-c7ed-41d2-8506-f61e5b5de340
upv.uuid07dca560-4ba6-4940-9ed0-beb3b756a8a6es_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Gujarro;Tsnaslands - Analyss of Academc Lterature on Envronmental Valuaton.pdf
Tamaño:
3.23 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial
[object Object] Descargar

Colecciones

Artículos, conferencias, monografías