One plug fits all? Multi-sectoral complementarities, operator diversity, and geographies of transition in Spain's electric vehicle recharge networks

dc.contributor.authorFerloni, Andreaes_ES
dc.contributor.funderSwiss National Science Foundationes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-12T06:52:17Z
dc.date.available2026-03-12T06:52:17Z
dc.date.issued2026-03es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN] The acceleration of the Electric Vehicle (EV) transition requires upscaling recharge infrastructure, creating localized economic opportunities around new sociotechnical configurations. Existing studies have investigated the technical aspects of EV recharge but not the multi-sectoral interactions and complementarities that chargers involve, with their geographical foundations. Research on the geography of transitions is developing across transition studies and economic geography, but a framework to connect innovation, technology diffusion, and the emergence of new markets and institutions is still lacking. This paper aims to identify the activities, constraints, actors, and strategies that are involved in EV recharge, and reflect on how the diffusion of chargers relates to the emergence of new local development paths. Expert interviews showed that EV recharge involves six interconnected domains ranging from electric generation to recharge demand. Operators differ in the tasks they perform and the strategies they pursue, according to whether they engage in high- or low-speed recharge and if recharge is their core or secondary business. Diversity of technological and business approaches by recharge operators involves different geographical orientations. Understanding the geography of new sociotechnical configurations requires embracing this variability and building on it to devise place-sensitive policies and recommendations.es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationFerloni, A. (2026). One plug fits all? Multi-sectoral complementarities, operator diversity, and geographies of transition in Spain's electric vehicle recharge networks. Energy Research & Social Science. 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.104579es_ES
dc.description.referencesMarkard, J. (2018). The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy. Nature Energy, 3(8), 628-633. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0171-7es_ES
dc.description.referencesRodríguez-Pose. (2023). The green transition and its potential territorial discontents. Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMarkard, J. (2011). Transformation of Infrastructures: Sector Characteristics and Implications for Fundamental Change. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 17(3), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)is.1943-555x.0000056es_ES
dc.description.referencesMiorner, J., Schelbert, V., & Binz, C. (2025). How Transformative Innovations Travel: Tracing the Diffusion of Circular District-Scale Sanitation Systems in Europe. Economic Geography, 101(2-3), 93-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2025.2489965es_ES
dc.description.referencesAnadón Martínez, V., & Sumper, A. (2023). Planning and Operation Objectives of Public Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructures: A Review. Energies, 16(14), 5431. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16145431es_ES
dc.description.referencesGeels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8es_ES
dc.description.referencesKöhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., Fünfschilling, L., Hess, D., Holtz, G., Hyysalo, S., Jenkins, K., Kivimaa, P., Martiskainen, M., McMeekin, A., Mühlemeier, M. S., … Wells, P. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004es_ES
dc.description.referencesBoschma, R. A., & Frenken, K. (2006). Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(3), 273-302. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbi022es_ES
dc.description.referencesBoschma, R., Coenen, L., Frenken, K., & Truffer, B. (2017). Towards a theory of regional diversification: combining insights from Evolutionary Economic Geography and Transition Studies. Regional Studies, 51(1), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460es_ES
dc.description.referencesBinz, C., Coenen, L., Frenken, K., Murphy, J. T., Strambach, S., Trippl, M., & Truffer, B. (2025). Exploring the Economic Geographies of Sustainability Transitions: Commentary and Agenda. Economic Geography, 101(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2024.2445530es_ES
dc.description.referencesBinz, C., Coenen, L., Murphy, J. T., & Truffer, B. (2020). Geographies of transition—From topical concerns to theoretical engagement: A comment on the transitions research agenda. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.002es_ES
dc.description.referencesAndersen, A. D., Steen, M., Mäkitie, T., Hanson, J., Thune, T. M., & Soppe, B. (2020). The role of inter-sectoral dynamics in sustainability transitions: A comment on the transitions research agenda. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 348-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.009es_ES
dc.description.referencesMaskell, P. (1999). Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2), 167-185. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/23.2.167es_ES
dc.description.referencesLosacker, S., Hansmeier, H., Horbach, J., & Liefner, I. (2023). The geography of environmental innovation: a critical review and agenda for future research. Review of Regional Research, 43(2), 291-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-023-00193-6es_ES
dc.description.referencesCastaldi, C., & Drivas, K. (2023). Relatedness, Cross-relatedness and Regional Innovation Specializations: An Analysis of Technology, Design, and Market Activities in Europe and the US. Economic Geography, 99(3), 253-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2023.2187374es_ES
dc.description.referencesHassink, R., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2019). Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development. Regional Studies, 53(11), 1636-1645. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704es_ES
dc.description.referencesCaldarola, B., Mazzilli, D., Napolitano, L., Patelli, A., & Sbardella, A. (2024). Economic complexity and the sustainability transition: a review of data, methods, and literature. Journal of Physics: Complexity, 5(2), 022001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-072x/ad4f3des_ES
dc.description.referencesAndersen, A. D., & Gulbrandsen, M. (2020). The innovation and industry dynamics of technology phase-out in sustainability transitions: Insights from diversifying petroleum technology suppliers in Norway. Energy Research & Social Science, 64, 101447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101447es_ES
dc.description.referencesBinz. (2024). Toward a normative turn in research on the geography of innovation? Evolving perspectives on innovation, institutions, and human well-being. Prog Econ Geogr. 2(2).es_ES
dc.description.referencesEgli, F., Schmid, N., & Schmidt, T. S. (2022). Backlash to fossil fuel phase-outs: the case of coal mining in US presidential elections. Environmental Research Letters, 17(9), 094002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac82fees_ES
dc.description.referencesScott, A. J. (2000). Economic geography: the great half-century. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24(4), 483-504. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/24.4.483es_ES
dc.description.referencesStorper, M. (1995). The Resurgence of Regional Economies, Ten Years Later: The Region as a Nexus of Untraded Interdependencies. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2(3), 191-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/096977649500200301es_ES
dc.description.referencesDosi. (1988). Technical Change and Economic Theory.es_ES
dc.description.referencesGlaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A., & Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in Cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100(6), 1126-1152. https://doi.org/10.1086/261856es_ES
dc.description.referencesBoschma, R. A., & Wenting, R. (2007). The spatial evolution of the British automobile industry: Does location matter? Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(2), 213-238. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm004es_ES
dc.description.referencesBalland, P.-A., Jara-Figueroa, C., Petralia, S. G., Steijn, M. P. A., Rigby, D. L., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2020). Complex economic activities concentrate in large cities. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(3), 248-254. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0803-3es_ES
dc.description.referencesMartin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395-437. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl012es_ES
dc.description.referencesBalland, P.-A., Boschma, R., Crespo, J., & Rigby, D. L. (2018). Smart specialization policy in the European Union: relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification. Regional Studies, 53(9), 1252-1268. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1437900es_ES
dc.description.referencesFrenken, K., & Boschma, R. A. (2007). A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), 635-649. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbm018es_ES
dc.description.referencesHidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabási, A.-L., & Hausmann, R. (2007). The Product Space Conditions the Development of Nations. Science, 317(5837), 482-487. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144581es_ES
dc.description.referencesBoschma, R. (2016). Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: a research agenda. Regional Studies, 51(3), 351-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1254767es_ES
dc.description.referencesTacchella, A., Cristelli, M., Caldarelli, G., Gabrielli, A., & Pietronero, L. (2012). A New Metrics for Countries’ Fitness and Products’ Complexity. Scientific Reports, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00723es_ES
dc.description.referencesBalland, P.-A., Broekel, T., Diodato, D., Giuliani, E., Hausmann, R., O’Clery, N., & Rigby, D. (2022). The new paradigm of economic complexity. Research Policy, 51(3), 104450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104450es_ES
dc.description.referencesJuhász, S., Broekel, T., & Boschma, R. (2021). Explaining the dynamics of relatedness: The role of co‐location and complexity. Papers in Regional Science, 100(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12567es_ES
dc.description.referencesGong. (2023). Beating the casino: conceptualizing an anchoring-based third route to regional development. Econ. Geogr.es_ES
dc.description.referencesGarud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2), 277-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00100-2es_ES
dc.description.referencesMacKinnon, D., Dawley, S., Pike, A., & Cumbers, A. (2019). Rethinking Path Creation: A Geographical Political Economy Approach. Economic Geography, 95(2), 113-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2018.1498294es_ES
dc.description.referencesBinz, C., Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2015). Path Creation as a Process of Resource Alignment and Anchoring: Industry Formation for On-Site Water Recycling in Beijing. Economic Geography, 92(2), 172-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2015.1103177es_ES
dc.description.referencesKogler, D. F., Evenhuis, E., Giuliani, E., Martin, R., Uyarra, E., & Boschma, R. (2023). Re-imagining evolutionary economic geography. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 16(3), 373-390. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsad029es_ES
dc.description.referencesBoschma, R., Fitjar, R. D., Giuliani, E., & Iammarino, S. (2025). Unseen costs: the inequities of the geography of innovation. Regional Studies, 59(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2024.2445594es_ES
dc.description.referencesCastellacci, F., Evenhuis, E., & Frenken, K. (2025). Geographies of innovation and well-being. Review of Regional Research, 45(3), 377-394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-025-00257-9es_ES
dc.description.referencesBarbieri, N., Consoli, D., Napolitano, L., Perruchas, F., Pugliese, E., & Sbardella, A. (2022). Regional technological capabilities and green opportunities in Europe. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 48(2), 749-778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09952-yes_ES
dc.description.referencesHassink, R., & Gong, H. (2019). Six critical questions about smart specialization. European Planning Studies, 27(10), 2049-2065. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1650898es_ES
dc.description.referencesMazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 803-815. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty034es_ES
dc.description.referencesKemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 175-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329808524310es_ES
dc.description.referencesMarkard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013es_ES
dc.description.referencesAbernathy, W. J., & Clark, K. B. (1985). Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(85)90021-6es_ES
dc.description.referencesKemeny, T., Petralia, S., & Storper, M. (2022). Disruptive innovation and spatial inequality. Regional Studies, 59(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2076824es_ES
dc.description.referencesGeels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003es_ES
dc.description.referencesAndersen, A. D., Markard, J., Bauknecht, D., & Korpås, M. (2023). Architectural change in accelerating transitions: Actor preferences, system architectures, and flexibility technologies in the German energy transition. Energy Research & Social Science, 97, 102945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.102945es_ES
dc.description.referencesSteen, M., & Weaver, T. (2017). Incumbents’ diversification and cross-sectorial energy industry dynamics. Research Policy, 46(6), 1071-1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.04.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesAndersen, A. D., & Markard, J. (2020). Multi-technology interaction in socio-technical transitions: How recent dynamics in HVDC technology can inform transition theories. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119802es_ES
dc.description.referencesMäkitie, T., Hanson, J., Steen, M., Hansen, T., & Andersen, A. D. (2022). Complementarity formation mechanisms in technology value chains. Research Policy, 51(7), 104559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104559es_ES
dc.description.referencesHansen, T., & Coenen, L. (2015). The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 92-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesMiörner, J., & Binz, C. (2021). Towards a multi-scalar perspective on transition trajectories. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 40, 172-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.06.004es_ES
dc.description.referencesFuenfschilling, L., & Binz, C. (2018). Global socio-technical regimes. Research Policy, 47(4), 735-749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.003es_ES
dc.description.referencesSengers, F., & Raven, R. (2015). Toward a spatial perspective on niche development: The case of Bus Rapid Transit. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 166-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.12.003es_ES
dc.description.referencesDewald, U., & Truffer, B. (2012). The Local Sources of Market Formation: Explaining Regional Growth Differentials in German Photovoltaic Markets. European Planning Studies, 20(3), 397-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.651803es_ES
dc.description.referencesJohnstone, P., Stirling, A., & Sovacool, B. (2017). Policy mixes for incumbency: Exploring the destructive recreation of renewable energy, shale gas ‘fracking,’ and nuclear power in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science, 33, 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.005es_ES
dc.description.referencesTrippl. (2024). Challenge-oriented regional innovation systems: towards a research agenda. Investig. Reg. 60.es_ES
dc.description.referencesJenkins, K., Sovacool, B. K., & McCauley, D. (2018). Humanizing sociotechnical transitions through energy justice: An ethical framework for global transformative change. Energy Policy, 117, 66-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.036es_ES
dc.description.referencesFrangenheim, A., Trippl, M., & Chlebna, C. (2019). Beyond the Single Path View: Interpath Dynamics in Regional Contexts. Economic Geography, 96(1), 31-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2019.1685378es_ES
dc.description.referencesKempton, W., & Letendre, S. E. (1997). Electric vehicles as a new power source for electric utilities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2(3), 157-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1361-9209(97)00001-1es_ES
dc.description.referencesRichardson, D. B. (2013). Electric vehicles and the electric grid: A review of modeling approaches, Impacts, and renewable energy integration. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19, 247-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.042es_ES
dc.description.referencesGarcía-Villalobos, J., Zamora, I., San Martín, J. I., Asensio, F. J., & Aperribay, V. (2014). Plug-in electric vehicles in electric distribution networks: A review of smart charging approaches. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 38, 717-731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.040es_ES
dc.description.referencesLaMonaca, S., & Ryan, L. (2022). The state of play in electric vehicle charging services – A review of infrastructure provision, players, and policies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 154, 111733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111733es_ES
dc.description.referencesFalchetta, G., & Noussan, M. (2021). Electric vehicle charging network in Europe: An accessibility and deployment trends analysis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 94, 102813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102813es_ES
dc.description.referencesEsmaili, A., Oshanreh, M. M., Naderian, S., MacKenzie, D., & Chen, C. (2024). Assessing the spatial distributions of public electric vehicle charging stations with emphasis on equity considerations in King County, Washington. Sustainable Cities and Society, 107, 105409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105409es_ES
dc.description.referencesDijk, M., Wells, P., & Kemp, R. (2016). Will the momentum of the electric car last? Testing an hypothesis on disruptive innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 105, 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.013es_ES
dc.description.referencesTrippl, M., Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., Goracinova, E., & Wolfe, D. A. (2021). Automotive regions in transition: Preparing for connected and automated vehicles. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53(5), 1158-1179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x20987233es_ES
dc.description.referencesGong, H., & Hansen, T. (2023). The rise of China’s new energy vehicle lithium-ion battery industry: The coevolution of battery technological innovation systems and policies. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 46, 100689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.100689es_ES
dc.description.referencesBakker, S. (2014). Actor rationales in sustainability transitions – Interests and expectations regarding electric vehicle recharging. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 13, 60-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.08.002es_ES
dc.description.referencesCuesta-Fernandez, I., Belda-Miquel, S., & Calabuig Tormo, C. (2020). Challengers in energy transitions beyond renewable energy cooperatives: community-owned electricity distribution cooperatives in Spain. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 33(2), 140-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2020.1732197es_ES
dc.description.referencesLode, M. L., Felice, A., Martinez Alonso, A., De Silva, J., Angulo, M. E., Lowitzsch, J., Coosemans, T., & Ramirez Camargo, L. (2023). Energy communities in rural areas: The participatory case study of Vega de Valcarce, Spain. Renewable Energy, 216, 119030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119030es_ES
dc.description.referencesLampón, J. F., & Muñoz-Dueñas, P. (2023). Are sustainable mobility firms reshaping the traditional relationships in the automotive industry value Chain? Journal of Cleaner Production, 413, 137522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137522es_ES
dc.description.referencesAcharige, S. S. G., Haque, Md. E., Arif, M. T., Hosseinzadeh, N., Hasan, K. N., & Oo, A. M. T. (2023). Review of Electric Vehicle Charging Technologies, Standards, Architectures, and Converter Configurations. IEEE Access, 11, 41218-41255. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3267164es_ES
dc.description.referencesNeaimeh, M., & Andersen, P. B. (2020). Mind the gap- open communication protocols for vehicle grid integration. Energy Informatics, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42162-020-0103-1es_ES
dc.description.referencesPerkins, G., & Murmann, J. P. (2018). What Does the Success of Tesla Mean for the Future Dynamics in the Global Automobile Sector? Management and Organization Review, 14(3), 471-480. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2018.31es_ES
dc.description.referencesVandermerwe, S., & Rada, J. (1988). Servitization of business: Adding value by adding services. European Management Journal, 6(4), 314-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-2373(88)90033-3es_ES
dc.description.referencesRietveld. (2021). Platform competition: a systematic and interdisciplinary review of the literature. J. Manag. 47(6).es_ES
dc.description.referencesvan Mossel, A., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2018). Navigators through the storm: A review of organization theories and the behavior of incumbent firms during transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 26, 44-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.07.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesRichter, I., & Smith Stegen, K. (2022). A choreography of delay: The response of German auto incumbents to environmental policy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 45, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.08.002es_ES
dc.description.referencesBurke, M. J., & Stephens, J. C. (2018). Political power and renewable energy futures: A critical review. Energy Research & Social Science, 35, 78-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.018es_ES
dc.description.referencesRoberts, C., Geels, F. W., Lockwood, M., Newell, P., Schmitz, H., Turnheim, B., & Jordan, A. (2018). The politics of accelerating low-carbon transitions: Towards a new research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science, 44, 304-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesSovacool, B. K., Geels, F. W., Andersen, A. D., Grubb, M., Jordan, A. J., Kern, F., Kivimaa, P., Lockwood, M., Markard, J., Meadowcroft, J., Meckling, J., Moore, B., Raven, R., Rogge, K. S., Rosenbloom, D., Schmidt, T. S., Schot, J., Sharp, D., Stephenson, J., … Yang, K. (2025). The acceleration of low-carbon transitions: Insights, concepts, challenges, and new directions for research. Energy Research & Social Science, 121, 103948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.103948es_ES
dc.description.referencesCampos. (2020). Regulatory challenges and opportunities for collective renewable energy prosumers in the EU. Energy Policy. 138.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMey, F., Mangalagiu, D., & Lilliestam, J. (2024). Anticipating socio-technical tipping points. Global Environmental Change, 89, 102911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102911es_ES
dc.description.referencesAudretsch. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Am. Econ. Rev. 86(3).es_ES
dc.description.referencesBalland, P.-A., & Boschma, R. (2021). Mapping the potentials of regions in Europe to contribute to new knowledge production in Industry 4.0 technologies. Regional Studies, 55(10-11), 1652-1666. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1900557es_ES
dc.description.referencesSchot, J., Kanger, L., & Verbong, G. (2016). The roles of users in shaping transitions to new energy systems. Nature Energy, 1(5). https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.54es_ES
dc.description.referencesMartin, H., Martin, R., & Zukauskaite, E. (2019). The multiple roles of demand in new regional industrial path development: A conceptual analysis. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 51(8), 1741-1757. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x19863438es_ES
dc.description.referencesJeannerat. (2024). Let’s innovate! But for what value(s)? Towards an economic geography of valuation in markets and society. Prog Econ Geogr. 2(2).es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author gratefully acknowledges financial support by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Postdoc Mobility grant number 217739) .es_ES
dc.description.volume133es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.erss.2026.104579es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2214-6296es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/233358
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relation.ispartofEnergy Research & Social Sciencees_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaS\575804es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/SNSF//217739/es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.104579es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento (by)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectElectric vehiclees_ES
dc.subjectSocio-technical transitionses_ES
dc.subjectEconomic geographyes_ES
dc.subjectMulti-sectoral complementaritieses_ES
dc.subjectRecharge networkses_ES
dc.titleOne plug fits all? Multi-sectoral complementarities, operator diversity, and geographies of transition in Spain's electric vehicle recharge networkses_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublicationes_ES
upv.uuid09006a2b-2f34-4dfb-ac40-45d4afed0f2ees_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Ferloni - One plug fits all Multi-sectoral complementarities operator diversity and geographies o....pdf
Tamaño:
3.39 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial