Comparative evaluation of the intermediate systems employed in two-stage refrigeration cycles driven by compound compressors

dc.contributor.authorCabello, R.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorTorrella Alcaraz, Enriquees_ES
dc.contributor.authorLlopis, R.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorSanchez, D.es_ES
dc.contributor.funderFundación Bancaja
dc.contributor.funderUniversitat Jaume Ies_ES
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-19T12:42:30Z
dc.date.available2018-04-19T12:42:30Z
dc.date.issued2010es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN] This work presents an experimental evaluation, from an energy analysis point of view, for two of the most used inter-stage systems in two-stage vapour compression cycles driven by compound compressors: the direct liquid injection and subcooler systems. The evaluation, considers the two-stage cycle with no intermediate systems as reference cycle and was performed on a plant, driven by a compound compressor using the refrigerant R404A for an evaporating temperature range of -36 to -20 degrees C and for a condensing temperature range of 30-47 degrees C. The analysis of the results shows that the inter-stage systems determine the performance of the energy parameters, which are discussed in the paper. The configuration yielding the best results was the two-stage compression cycle with subcooler, since the cooling capacity and COP values for this configuration were the highest. Conversely, the two-stage compression cycle working with direct liquid injection showed lower performance from an energy point of view, though this configuration allows a substantial reduction of the discharge temperature.en_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationCabello, R.; Torrella Alcaraz, E.; Llopis, R.; Sanchez, D. (2010). Comparative evaluation of the intermediate systems employed in two-stage refrigeration cycles driven by compound compressors. Energy. 35(3):1274-1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.11.009es_ES
dc.description.issue3es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to thank BANCAJA for its partial support to the project P1-1B2008-12.en_EN
dc.description.upvformatpfin1280es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio1274es_ES
dc.description.volume35es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.energy.2009.11.009es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0360-5442es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/100724
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relation.ispartofEnergyes_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaS\39679es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/UJI//P1·1B2008-12/
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.11.009es_ES
dc.rightsReserva de todos los derechoses_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsCerradoes_ES
dc.subjectTwo-stage systemes_ES
dc.subjectIntermediate injectiones_ES
dc.subjectSubcooleres_ES
dc.subjectCompound compressores_ES
dc.subjectR404Aes_ES
dc.subject.classificationMAQUINAS Y MOTORES TERMICOSes_ES
dc.titleComparative evaluation of the intermediate systems employed in two-stage refrigeration cycles driven by compound compressorses_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
upv.uuid29c9a8bf-eeca-441a-a3b7-def549d6870ees_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
18_ Comparativa Doble Etapa_2010_Energy.pdf
Tamaño:
1.03 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial