FMAP: Distributed Cooperative Multi-Agent Planning

dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Sistemas Informáticos y Computación
dc.contributor.affiliationEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Informática
dc.contributor.affiliationInstituto Universitario Valenciano de Investigación en Inteligencia Artificial
dc.contributor.authorTorreño Lerma, Alejandroes_ES
dc.contributor.authorOnaindia De La Rivaherrera, Eva
dc.contributor.authorSapena Vercher, Oscar
dc.contributor.funderGeneralitat Valencianaes_ES
dc.contributor.funderUniversitat Politècnica de Valènciaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-15T12:30:55Z
dc.date.available2015-01-15T12:30:55Z
dc.date.issued2014-09
dc.description.abstractThis paper proposes FMAP (Forward Multi-Agent Planning), a fully-distributed multi-agent planning method that integrates planning and coordination. Although FMAP is specifically aimed at solving problems that require cooperation among agents, the flexibility of the domain-independent planning model allows FMAP to tackle multi-agent planning tasks of any type. In FMAP, agents jointly explore the plan space by building up refinement plans through a complete and flexible forward-chaining partial-order planner. The search is guided by h D T G , a novel heuristic function that is based on the concepts of Domain Transition Graph and frontier state and is optimized to evaluate plans in distributed environments. Agents in FMAP apply an advanced privacy model that allows them to adequately keep private information while communicating only the data of the refinement plans that is relevant to each of the participating agents. Experimental results show that FMAP is a general-purpose approach that efficiently solves tightly-coupled domains that have specialized agents and cooperative goals as well as loosely-coupled problems. Specifically, the empirical evaluation shows that FMAP outperforms current MAP systems at solving complex planning tasks that are adapted from the International Planning Competition benchmarks.es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationTorreño Lerma, A.; Onaindia De La Rivaherrera, E.; Sapena Vercher, O. (2014). FMAP: Distributed Cooperative Multi-Agent Planning. Applied Intelligence. 41(2):606-626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-014-0540-2es_ES
dc.description.issue2es_ES
dc.description.referencesBenton J, Coles A, Coles A (2012) Temporal planning with preferences and time-dependent continuous costs. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on automated planning and scheduling (ICAPS). AAAI, pp 2–10es_ES
dc.description.referencesBorrajo D. (2013) Multi-agent planning by plan reuse. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems (AAMAS). IFAAMAS, pp 1141–1142es_ES
dc.description.referencesBoutilier C, Brafman R (2001) Partial-order planning with concurrent interacting actions. J Artif Intell Res 14(105):136es_ES
dc.description.referencesBrafman R, Domshlak C (2008) From one to many: planning for loosely coupled multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on automated planning and scheduling (ICAPS). AAAI, pp 28–35es_ES
dc.description.referencesBrenner M, Nebel B (2009) Continual planning and acting in dynamic multiagent environments. J Auton Agents Multiagent Syst 19(3):297–331es_ES
dc.description.referencesBresina J, Dearden R, Meuleau N, Ramakrishnan S, Smith D, Washington R (2002) Planning under continuous time and resource uncertainty: a challenge for AI. In: Proceedings of the 18th conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence (UAI). Morgan Kaufmann, pp 77–84es_ES
dc.description.referencesCox J, Durfee E (2009) Efficient and distributable methods for solving the multiagent plan coordination problem. Multiagent Grid Syst 5(4):373–408es_ES
dc.description.referencesCrosby M, Rovatsos M, Petrick R (2013) Automated agent decomposition for classical planning. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on automated planning and scheduling (ICAPS). AAAI, pp 46–54es_ES
dc.description.referencesDimopoulos Y, Hashmi MA, Moraitis P (2012) μ-satplan: Multi-agent planning as satisfiability. Knowl-Based Syst 29:54–62es_ES
dc.description.referencesFikes R, Nilsson N (1971) STRIPS: a new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artif Intell 2(3):189–208es_ES
dc.description.referencesGerevini A, Haslum P, Long D, Saetti A, Dimopoulos Y (2009) Deterministic planning in the fifth international planning competition: PDDL3 and experimental evaluation of the planners. Artif Intell 173(5-6):619–668es_ES
dc.description.referencesGhallab M, Nau D, Traverso P (2004) Automated planning. Theory and practice. Morgan Kaufmannes_ES
dc.description.referencesGünay A, Yolum P (2013) Constraint satisfaction as a tool for modeling and checking feasibility of multiagent commitments. Appl Intell 39(3):489–509es_ES
dc.description.referencesHelmert M (2004) A planning heuristic based on causal graph analysis. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on automated planning and scheduling ICAPS. AAAI, pp 161–170es_ES
dc.description.referencesHoffmann J, Nebel B (2001) The FF planning system: fast planning generation through heuristic search. J Artif Intell Res 14:253–302es_ES
dc.description.referencesJannach D, Zanker M (2013) Modeling and solving distributed configuration problems: a CSP-based approach. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 25(3):603–618es_ES
dc.description.referencesJonsson A, Rovatsos M (2011) Scaling up multiagent planning: a best-response approach. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on automated planning and scheduling (ICAPS). AAAI, pp 114–121es_ES
dc.description.referencesKala R, Warwick K (2014) Dynamic distributed lanes: motion planning for multiple autonomous vehicles. Appl Intell:1–22es_ES
dc.description.referencesKoehler J, Ottiger D (2002) An AI-based approach to destination control in elevators. AI Mag 23(3):59–78es_ES
dc.description.referencesKovacs DL (2011) Complete BNF description of PDDL3.1. Technical reportes_ES
dc.description.referencesvan der Krogt R (2009) Quantifying privacy in multiagent planning. Multiagent Grid Syst 5(4):451–469es_ES
dc.description.referencesKvarnström J (2011) Planning for loosely coupled agents using partial order forward-chaining. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on automated planning and scheduling (ICAPS). AAAI, pp 138–145es_ES
dc.description.referencesLesser V, Decker K, Wagner T, Carver N, Garvey A, Horling B, Neiman D, Podorozhny R, Prasad M, Raja A et al (2004) Evolution of the GPGP/TAEMS domain-independent coordination framework. Auton Agents Multi-Agent Syst 9(1–2):87–143es_ES
dc.description.referencesLong D, Fox M (2003) The 3rd international planning competition: results and analysis. J Artif Intell Res 20:1–59es_ES
dc.description.referencesNissim R, Brafman R, Domshlak C (2010) A general, fully distributed multi-agent planning algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS). IFAAMAS, pp 1323–1330es_ES
dc.description.referencesO’Brien P, Nicol R (1998) FIPA - towards a standard for software agents. BT Tech J 16(3):51–59es_ES
dc.description.referencesÖztürk P, Rossland K, Gundersen O (2010) A multiagent framework for coordinated parallel problem solving. Appl Intell 33(2):132–143es_ES
dc.description.referencesPal A, Tiwari R, Shukla A (2013) Communication constraints multi-agent territory exploration task. Appl Intell 38(3):357–383es_ES
dc.description.referencesRichter S, Westphal M (2010) The LAMA planner: guiding cost-based anytime planning with landmarks. J Artif Intell Res 39(1):127–177es_ES
dc.description.referencesde la Rosa T, García-Olaya A, Borrajo D (2013) A case-based approach to heuristic planning. Appl Intell 39(1):184–201es_ES
dc.description.referencesSapena O, Onaindia E (2008) Planning in highly dynamic environments: an anytime approach for planning under time constraints. Appl Intell 29(1):90–109es_ES
dc.description.referencesSapena O, Onaindia E, Garrido A, Arangú M (2008) A distributed CSP approach for collaborative planning systems. Eng Appl Artif Intell 21(5):698–709es_ES
dc.description.referencesSerrano E, Such J, Botía J, García-Fornes A (2013) Strategies for avoiding preference profiling in agent-based e-commerce environments. Appl Intell:1–16es_ES
dc.description.referencesSmith D, Frank J, Jónsson A (2000) Bridging the gap between planning and scheduling. Knowl Eng Rev 15(1):47–83es_ES
dc.description.referencesSuch J, García-Fornes A, Espinosa A, Bellver J (2012) Magentix2: a privacy-enhancing agent platform. Eng Appl Artif Intell:96–109es_ES
dc.description.referencesTonino H, Bos A, de Weerdt M, Witteveen C (2002) Plan coordination by revision in collective agent based systems. Artif Intell 142(2):121–145es_ES
dc.description.referencesTorreño A, Onaindia E, Sapena O (2012) An approach to multi-agent planning with incomplete information. In: Proceedings of the 20th European conference on artificial intelligence (ECAI), vol 242. IOS Press, pp 762–767es_ES
dc.description.referencesTorreño A, Onaindia E, Sapena O (2014) A flexible coupling approach to multi-agent planning under incomplete information. Knowl Inf Syst 38(1):141–178es_ES
dc.description.referencesVan Der Krogt R, De Weerdt M (2005) Plan repair as an extension of planning. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on automated planning and scheduling (ICAPS). AAAI, pp 161–170es_ES
dc.description.referencesde Weerdt M, Clement B (2009) Introduction to planning in multiagent systems. Multiagent Grid Syst 5(4):345– 355es_ES
dc.description.referencesYokoo M, Durfee E, Ishida T, Kuwabara K (1998) The distributed constraint satisfaction problem: formalization and algorithms. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 10(5):673–685es_ES
dc.description.referencesZhang J, Nguyen X, Kowalczyk R (2007) Graph-based multi-agent replanning algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS). IFAAMAS, pp 798–805es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work has been partly supported by the Spanish MICINN under projects Consolider Ingenio 2010 CSD2007-00022 and TIN2011-27652-C03-01, the Valencian Prometeo project II/2013/019, and the FPI-UPV scholarship granted to the first author by the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia.en_EN
dc.description.upvformatpfin626es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio606es_ES
dc.description.volume41es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10489-014-0540-2
dc.identifier.issn0924-669X
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/46104
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag (Germany)es_ES
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Intelligencees_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//TIN2011-27652-C03-01/ES/INTERACCION MULTIAGENTE PARA PLANIFICACION/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/GVA//PROMETEOII%2F2013%2F019/ES/HUMBACE: HUMAN-LIKE COMPUTATIONAL MODELS FOR AGENT-BASED COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MEC//CSD2007-00022/ES/Agreement Technologies/ /es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10489-014-0540-2es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10458-009-9081-1es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3233/MGS-2009-0134es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.knosys.2011.07.019es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0004-3702(71)90010-5es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.artint.2008.10.012es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/B978-155860856-6/50021-1es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10489-013-0428-6es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1613/jair.855es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/TKDE.2011.236es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10489-014-0517-1es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3233/MGS-2009-0135es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1023/B:AGNT.0000019690.28073.04es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1023/A:1026044009832es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1023/A:1009621729979es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10489-008-0154-7es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10489-012-0376-6es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1613/jair.2972es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10489-012-0404-6es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10489-007-0083-xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.engappai.2008.03.005es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1017/S0269888900001089es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0004-3702(02)00273-4es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10115-012-0569-7es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3233/MGS-2009-0133es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/69.729707es_ES
dc.relation.senia278103
dc.rightsReserva de todos los derechoses_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectDistributed algorithmses_ES
dc.subjectMulti-agent planninges_ES
dc.subjectHeuristic planninges_ES
dc.subjectPrivacyes_ES
dc.subject.classificationLENGUAJES Y SISTEMAS INFORMATICOSes_ES
dc.titleFMAP: Distributed Cooperative Multi-Agent Planninges_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier596
person.identifier21560
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6931-8293
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0533-5603
relation.isAuthorOfPublication68614a60-99aa-41af-bf14-bf030b27b3f8
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc8bc857d-ddda-4f19-80f7-fd3895bae97e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery68614a60-99aa-41af-bf14-bf030b27b3f8
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication3bea99aa-2e86-4478-b61d-bcef5499b366
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd307086e-520c-4cdc-8116-d7178d71bfdc
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication5418c955-82ca-4caa-8482-6531b44b86ab
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3bea99aa-2e86-4478-b61d-bcef5499b366
upv.uuid2b292cdf-658f-485e-9762-e64750f14396es_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Torreño;Onaindia;Sapena - FMAP: Distributed Cooperative Multi-Agent Planning.pdf
Tamaño:
1.1 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión del Autor.
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
14_APIN_version_publicada.pdf
Tamaño:
1.52 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial