Patent Overlay Mapping: Visualizing Technological Distance

dc.contributor.authorKay L.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorNewman, N.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorYoutie, J.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorPorter A.L.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorRafols García, Ismaeles_ES
dc.contributor.funderNational Science Foundation, EEUUes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-18T10:32:36Z
dc.date.available2014-11-18T10:32:36Z
dc.date.issued2014-05-07
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a new global patent map that represents all technological categories and a method to locate patent data of individual organizations and technological fields on the global map. This overlay map technique may support competitive intelligence and policy decision making. The global patent map is based on similarities in citing-to-cited relationships between categories of the International Patent Classification (IPC) of European Patent Office (EPO) patents from 2000 to 2006. This patent data set, extracted from the PATSTAT database, includes 760,000 patent records in 466 IPC-based categories. We compare the global patent maps derived from this categorization to related efforts of other global patent maps. The paper overlays the nanotechnology-related patenting activities of two companies and two different nanotechnology subfields on the global patent map. The exercise shows the potential of patent overlay maps to visualize technological areas and potentially support decision making. Furthermore, this study shows that IPC categories that are similar to one another based on citing-to-cited patterns (and thus close in the global patent map) are not necessarily in the same hierarchical IPC branch, thereby revealing new relationships between technologies that are classified as pertaining to different (and sometimes distant) subject areas in the IPC scheme.es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationKay L.; Newman, N.; Youtie, J.; Porter A.L.; Rafols García, I. (2014). Patent Overlay Mapping: Visualizing Technological Distance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 65(12):2432-2443. doi:10.1002/asi.23146es_ES
dc.description.issue12es_ES
dc.description.referencesBollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Hagberg, A., Bettencourt, L., Chute, R., Rodriguez, M. A., & Balakireva, L. (2009). Clickstream Data Yields High-Resolution Maps of Science. PLoS ONE, 4(3), e4803. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004803es_ES
dc.description.referencesBoyack, K. W., Börner, K., & Klavans, R. (2008). Mapping the structure and evolution of chemistry research. Scientometrics, 79(1), 45-60. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0403-5es_ES
dc.description.referencesBoyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2008). Measuring science–technology interaction using rare inventor–author names. Journal of Informetrics, 2(3), 173-182. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.03.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesBoyack, K. W., Klavans, R., & Börner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351-374. doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0255-6es_ES
dc.description.referencesBreschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Malerba, F. (2003). Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy, 32(1), 69-87. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00004-5es_ES
dc.description.referencesChen, C. (2003). Mapping Scientific Frontiers: The Quest for Knowledge Visualization. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0051-5es_ES
dc.description.referencesEtzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and «Mode 2» to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00055-4es_ES
dc.description.referencesFranz , J.S. 2009 Constructing technological distances from US patent dataes_ES
dc.description.referencesHinze , S. Reiss , T. Schmoch , U. 1997 Statistical analysis on the distance between fields of technology http://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/isi-media/docs/isi-publ/1997/isi97b81/technology-fields-diastance.pdf?WSESSIONID=5712ff2ca5ffcf0d9590afc8ef7e1486es_ES
dc.description.referencesJanssens, F., Zhang, L., Moor, B. D., & Glänzel, W. (2009). Hybrid clustering for validation and improvement of subject-classification schemes. Information Processing & Management, 45(6), 683-702. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2009.06.003es_ES
dc.description.referencesKauffman, S., Lobo, J., & Macready, W. G. (2000). Optimal search on a technology landscape. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 43(2), 141-166. doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(00)00114-1es_ES
dc.description.referencesKlavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2009). Toward a consensus map of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 455-476. doi:10.1002/asi.20991es_ES
dc.description.referencesLeydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348-362. doi:10.1002/asi.20967es_ES
dc.description.referencesMoya-Anegón, Sci. G. F. de, Vargas-Quesada, B., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Corera-Álvarez, E., Munoz-Fernández, F. J., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2007). Visualizing the marrow of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(14), 2167-2179. doi:10.1002/asi.20683es_ES
dc.description.referencesMoya-Anegón, F., Vargas-Quesada, B., Herrero-Solana, V., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Corera-Álvarez, E., & Munoz-Fernández, F. J. (2004). A new technique for building maps of large scientific domains based on the cocitation of classes and categories. Scientometrics, 61(1), 129-145. doi:10.1023/b:scie.0000037368.31217.34es_ES
dc.description.referencesPorter, A. L., & Youtie, J. (2009). Where does nanotechnology belong in the map of science? Nature Nanotechnology, 4(9), 534-536. doi:10.1038/nnano.2009.207es_ES
dc.description.referencesRafols, I., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(9), 1823-1835. doi:10.1002/asi.21086es_ES
dc.description.referencesRafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2009). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263-287. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0041-yes_ES
dc.description.referencesRafols, I., Porter, A. L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1871-1887. doi:10.1002/asi.21368es_ES
dc.description.referencesRosvall, M., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2010). Mapping Change in Large Networks. PLoS ONE, 5(1), e8694. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008694es_ES
dc.description.referencesSchoen , A. Villard , L. Laurens , P. Cointet , J. Heimeriks , G. Alkemade , F. 2012 The network structure of technological developments: Technological distance as a walk on the technology mapes_ES
dc.description.referencesSmall, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. doi:10.1002/asi.4630240406es_ES
dc.description.referencesVan den Besselaar, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (1996). Mapping change in scientific specialties: A scientometric reconstruction of the development of artificial intelligence. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(6), 415-436. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199606)47:6<415::aid-asi3>3.0.co;2-yes_ES
dc.description.referencesWaltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2012). A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2378-2392. doi:10.1002/asi.22748es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipWe thank Kevin Boyack, Loet Leydesdorff, and Antoine Schoen for open and fruitful discussions about this paper. This research was undertaken largely at Georgia Tech drawing on support from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) through the Center for Nanotechnology in Society (Arizona State University; Award No. 0531194); and NSF Award No. 1064146 ("Revealing Innovation Pathways: Hybrid Science Maps for Technology Assessment and Foresight"). Part of this research was also undertaken in collaboration with the Center for Nanotechnology in Society, University of California Santa Barbara (NSF Awards No. 0938099 and No. 0531184). The findings and observations contained in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the US National Science Foundation.en_EN
dc.description.upvformatpfin2443es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio2432es_ES
dc.description.volume65es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/asi.23146
dc.identifier.issn1532-2882
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/44358
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherAssociation for Information Science and Technology (ASIS&T): JASIS&Tes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technologyes_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/NSF//1064146/US/TLS: Revealing Innovation Pathways/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/NSF//0531184/US/NSEC: Center for Nanotechnology in Society at University of California, Santa Barbara/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/NSF//0938099/US/NSEC: Center for Nanotechnology in Society at University of California, Santa Barbara/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/NSF//0531194/US/NSEC: Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University/es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23146es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1371/journal.pone.0004803es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s11192-009-0403-5es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.joi.2008.03.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s11192-005-0255-6es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00004-5es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/978-1-4471-0051-5es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ipm.2009.06.003es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00114-1es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/asi.20991es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/asi.20967es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/asi.20683es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1023/B:SCIE.0000037368.31217.34es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/nnano.2009.207es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/asi.21086es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s11192-009-0041-yes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/asi.21368es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1371/journal.pone.0008694es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/asi.4630240406es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199606)47:6<415::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-Yes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/asi.22748es_ES
dc.relation.senia260531
dc.rightsReserva de todos los derechoses_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectInformation mappinges_ES
dc.subjectInnovationes_ES
dc.subjectPatentses_ES
dc.titlePatent Overlay Mapping: Visualizing Technological Distancees_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
upv.uuid3220201d-5cf5-41a9-a415-c8a9c1df9cc6es_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
- Patent Overlay Mapping: Visualizing Technological Distance..pdf
Tamaño:
1.31 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión del Autor.
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
asi23146.pdf
Tamaño:
5.81 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial