Different ways to express personal attitudes in Spanish and English engineering papers: An analysis of metadiscourse devices, affective evaluation and sentiment analysis

dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Lingüística Aplicada
dc.contributor.affiliationEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Geodésica, Cartográfica y Topográfica
dc.contributor.affiliationGrupo de Análisis de las Lenguas de Especialidad (GALE)
dc.contributor.authorCarrió-Pastor, María Luisa
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Economía y Competitividades_ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-16T04:32:25Z
dc.date.available2021-01-16T04:32:25Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-26es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN] The hypothesis of this paper is that writers with similar academic backgrounds express personal attitudes in English and in Spanish differently in research papers. Thus, the main objectives are, first, to study the differences in the use of attitude devices in Spanish and English academic discourse; second, to compare the results in the different sections of articles; and finally to study the positive or negative semantic implications of the lexical items by carrying out a sentiment analysis. To this end, fifteen Spanish industrial engineering papers were compared with fifteen English industrial engineering papers. The results showed that there are in fact differences in the way academic writers communicate attitude, but the sentiment analysis revealed that neutral lexical items were the most commonly used in engineering research papers. Even though engineering researchers share the knowledge of the specialist content and the academic style of expressing their thoughts, personal attitudes were expressed in different ways in Spanish and in English.en_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationCarrió-Pastor, ML. (2019). Different ways to express personal attitudes in Spanish and English engineering papers: An analysis of metadiscourse devices, affective evaluation and sentiment analysis. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics (Online). 15(1):45-67. https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2019-0004es_ES
dc.description.issue1es_ES
dc.description.referencesAbdollahzadeh, E. (2011). Poring over the findings: Interpersonal authorial engagement in applied linguistics papers. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1), 288-297. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.019es_ES
dc.description.referencesHyland, K. (2004). Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156-177. doi:10.1093/applin/25.2.156es_ES
dc.description.referencesCarrió-Pastor, M. L., & Calderón, R. M. (2015). A Contrastive Analysis of Metadiscourse Features in Business e-mails Written by Non-native Speakers of English. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 173, 214-221. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.055es_ES
dc.description.referencesHyland, K., & Jiang, F. (Kevin). (2016). Change of Attitude? A Diachronic Study of Stance. Written Communication, 33(3), 251-274. doi:10.1177/0741088316650399es_ES
dc.description.referencesHyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192. doi:10.1177/1461445605050365es_ES
dc.description.referencesGillaerts, P., & Van de Velde, F. (2010). Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 128-139. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.004es_ES
dc.description.referencesLee, J. J., & Casal, J. E. (2014). Metadiscourse in results and discussion chapters: A cross-linguistic analysis of English and Spanish thesis writers in engineering. System, 46, 39-54. doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.07.009es_ES
dc.description.referencesYakhontova, T. (2006). Cultural and disciplinary variation in academic discourse: The issue of influencing factors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 153-167. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2006.03.002es_ES
dc.description.referencesAlonso Almeida, F., & Carrió Pastor, M. (2015). Sobre la categorización de seem en inglés y su traducción en español: Análisis de un corpus paralelo. Revista signos, 48(88), 154-173. doi:10.4067/s0718-09342015000200001es_ES
dc.description.referencesSoler, V. (2002). Analysing adjectives in scientific discourse: an exploratory study with educational applications for Spanish speakers at advanced university level. English for Specific Purposes, 21(2), 145-165. doi:10.1016/s0889-4906(00)00034-xes_ES
dc.description.referencesKoutsantoni, D. (2004). Attitude, certainty and allusions to common knowledge in scientific research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(2), 163-182. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2003.08.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesCambria, E., Schuller, B., Xia, Y., & Havasi, C. (2013). New Avenues in Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 28(2), 15-21. doi:10.1109/mis.2013.30es_ES
dc.description.referencesConnor, U. (2004). Intercultural rhetoric research: beyond texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(4), 291-304. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.003es_ES
dc.description.referencesMur-Dueñas, P. (2011). An intercultural analysis of metadiscourse features in research articles written in English and in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(12), 3068-3079. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.002es_ES
dc.description.referencesThompson, G. (2001). Interaction in academic writing: learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 58-78. doi:10.1093/applin/22.1.58es_ES
dc.description.referencesCarrió-Pastor, M. L., & Muñiz-Calderón, R. (2015). Identification and causes of lexical variation in Chinese Business English. English Today, 31(1), 10-15. doi:10.1017/s0266078414000480es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin67es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio45es_ES
dc.description.volume15es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/lpp-2019-0004es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn1898-4436es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/159216
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherLodz University Presses_ES
dc.relation.ispartofLodz Papers in Pragmatics (Online)es_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaS\401011es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//FFI2016-77941-P/ES/IDENTIFICACION Y ANALISIS DE LAS ESTRATEGIAS METADISCURSIVAS EN ARTICULOS CIENTIFICOS EN ESPAÑOL E INGLES/es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2019-0004es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.019es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/applin/25.2.156es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.055es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.004es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1177/0741088316650399es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.004es_ES
dc.relation.references10.4067/S0718-09342015000200001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.pragma.2009.11.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1017/S0266078414000480es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.langcom.2017.04.002es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/MIS.2013.30es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.003es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1177/1461445605050365es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.system.2014.07.009es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jeap.2006.03.002es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jeap.2003.08.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00034-Xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.002es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/applin/22.1.58es_ES
dc.rightsReserva de todos los derechoses_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectResearch paperses_ES
dc.subjectAttitude deviceses_ES
dc.subjectSpanishes_ES
dc.subjectEnglishes_ES
dc.subjectEngineeringes_ES
dc.subject.classificationFILOLOGIA INGLESAes_ES
dc.titleDifferent ways to express personal attitudes in Spanish and English engineering papers: An analysis of metadiscourse devices, affective evaluation and sentiment analysises_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier185536
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3040-5362
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5172a9a2-e8c1-4f50-bd21-f0cae66e615c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5172a9a2-e8c1-4f50-bd21-f0cae66e615c
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication786564af-4761-48f9-8099-76bab4f8ebff
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication9d1abfb4-d3a8-4bda-ae58-13f1971682a0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationba0fa6ff-60a8-44a0-afbe-5f506a05ac85
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery786564af-4761-48f9-8099-76bab4f8ebff
upv.uuid324c4617-e7d7-4697-8846-8ed214e672ffes_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Carrió-Pastor - Different ways to express personal attitudes in Spanish and English engineering p....pdf
Tamaño:
517.08 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial