Empirical study of variation in lidar point density over different land covers

dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Ingeniería Cartográfica Geodesia y Fotogrametría
dc.contributor.affiliationEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Geodésica, Cartográfica y Topográfica
dc.contributor.authorBalsa Barreiro, Josées_ES
dc.contributor.authorLerma, José Luis
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-30T09:19:47Z
dc.date.available2015-12-30T09:19:47Z
dc.date.issued2014-04
dc.descriptionThis is an author's accepted manuscript of an article published in International Journal of Remote Sensing; Volume 35, Issue 9, 2014 ; copyright Taylor & Francis, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01431161.2014.903355es_ES
dc.description.abstractPoint density in airborne lidar surveys is one of the key parameters that influence not only the accuracy of generated DSM/DEM but also processing and costs. Point density variations occur (independently of keeping constant flight parameters) throughout the survey depending on the topography, the land cover, and the laser scanning mechanism. In this article, variations in point density across different land covers are analysed with an airborne oscillating mirror laser scanner. A wide group of samples from the different land covers is taken from single flight strips over level ground in order to minimize the effect of topography. The influence of the oscillating mirror laser scanner system is also minimized considering points along the central swath area. Mean values for each land cover are established regarding ground point density and first pulse returns. Significant differences in both raw points as well as on-the-ground points are registered, mainly due to the presence of features over the ground and the degree of opacity thereof. Regarding ground points, the relative differences between the two software packages used are 5% approximately. Significant point density differences can be found among the six analysed land covers. Furthermore, extrapolated pulse rate increments are presented to fulfil lidar specifications that neglect land cover as an input parameter to satisfy ground point density values, namely in non-overlapping areas.es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationBalsa Barreiro, J.; Lerma García, JL. (2014). Empirical study of variation in lidar point density over different land covers. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 35(9):3372-3383. doi:10.1080/01431161.2014.903355es_ES
dc.description.issue9es_ES
dc.description.referencesAnderson, E. S., Thompson, J. A., & Austin, R. E. (2005). LIDAR density and linear interpolator effects on elevation estimates. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(18), 3889-3900. doi:10.1080/01431160500181671es_ES
dc.description.referencesAnderson, E. S., Thompson, J. A., Crouse, D. A., & Austin, R. E. (2006). Horizontal resolution and data density effects on remotely sensed LIDAR-based DEM. Geoderma, 132(3-4), 406-415. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.06.004es_ES
dc.description.referencesArtuso, R., S. Bovet, and A. Streilein. 2003. “Practical Methods for the Verification of Countrywide Produced Terrain and Surface Models.” International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, IAPRS, vol. XXXIV (3/W13), 14–19. Dresden, October 8–10.es_ES
dc.description.referencesAxelsson, P. 2000. “DEM Generation from Laser Scanner Data Using Adaptative TIN Models.” International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, IAPRS, Amsterdam, Netherlands, vol. XXXIII (B4/1), 110–117, Amsterdam, July 16–22.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBalsa-Barreiro, J., & Lerma, J. L. (2014). A new methodology to estimate the discrete-return point density on airborne lidar surveys. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 35(4), 1496-1510. doi:10.1080/01431161.2013.878063es_ES
dc.description.referencesBalsa-Barreiro, J. (2012). Airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) point density analysis. Scientific Research and Essays, 7(33). doi:10.5897/sre12.278es_ES
dc.description.referencesBaltsavias, E. P. (1999). Airborne laser scanning: existing systems and firms and other resources. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 54(2-3), 164-198. doi:10.1016/s0924-2716(99)00016-7es_ES
dc.description.referencesHeidemann, H. K. 2012. “Lidar Base Specification (Version 1.0).” InU.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, Book 11, Chap. B4, 63p. Reston, VA: USGS.es_ES
dc.description.referencesHodgson, M. E., & Bresnahan, P. (2004). Accuracy of Airborne Lidar-Derived Elevation. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 70(3), 331-339. doi:10.14358/pers.70.3.331es_ES
dc.description.referencesLiu, X., Z. Zhang, J. Peterson, and S. Chandra. 2007. “The Effect of LiDAR Data Density on DEM Accuracy.” InInternational Congress on Modelling and Simulation: Land, Water and Environmental Management: Integrated Systems for Sustainability, December 10–13, 1363–1369. Christchurch: Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand.es_ES
dc.description.referencesRaber, G. 2003. “The Effect of LiDAR Posting Density on DEM Accuracy and Flood Extent Delineation: A GIS-Simulation Approach.” InProceedings of the UCGIS Summer Assembly, June 17–19, 34pp, Pacific Grove, CA: United Consortium for Geographic Information Science (UCGIS).es_ES
dc.description.referencesRaber, G. T., Jensen, J. R., Hodgson, M. E., Tullis, J. A., Davis, B. A., & Berglund, J. (2007). Impact of Lidar Nominal Post-spacing on DEM Accuracy and Flood Zone Delineation. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 73(7), 793-804. doi:10.14358/pers.73.7.793es_ES
dc.description.referencesReutebuch, S. E., McGaughey, R. J., Andersen, H.-E., & Carson, W. W. (2003). Accuracy of a high-resolution lidar terrain model under a conifer forest canopy. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(5), 527-535. doi:10.5589/m03-022es_ES
dc.description.referencesSu, J., & Bork, E. (2006). Influence of Vegetation, Slope, and Lidar Sampling Angle on DEM Accuracy. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 72(11), 1265-1274. doi:10.14358/pers.72.11.1265es_ES
dc.description.referencesTesfamichael, S. G., Ahmed, F. B., & Van Aardt, J. A. N. (2010). Investigating the impact of discrete-return lidar point density on estimations of mean and dominant plot-level tree height in Eucalyptus grandis plantations. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 31(11), 2925-2940. doi:10.1080/01431160903144086es_ES
dc.description.referencesTriglav-Čekada, M., Crosilla, F., & Kosmatin-Fras, M. (2009). A Simplified Analytical Model for a-priori Lidar Point-positioning Error Estimation and a Review of Lidar Error Sources. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 75(12), 1425-1439. doi:10.14358/pers.75.12.1425es_ES
dc.description.referencesWang, Y., Weinacker, H., & Koch, B. (2008). A Lidar Point Cloud Based Procedure for Vertical Canopy Structure Analysis And 3D Single Tree Modelling in Forest. Sensors, 8(6), 3938-3951. doi:10.3390/s8063938es_ES
dc.description.referencesWatershed Sciences, Inc. 2010.Minimum LiDAR considerations in the Pacific Northwest. Accessed April 1, 2014. http://www.oregongeology.org/sub/projects/olc/minimum-lidar-data-density.pdf.es_ES
dc.description.referencesWehr, A., & Lohr, U. (1999). Airborne laser scanning—an introduction and overview. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 54(2-3), 68-82. doi:10.1016/s0924-2716(99)00011-8es_ES
dc.description.referencesYu, X., J. Hyyppä, H. Hyyppä, and M. Maltamo. 2004. “Effects of Flight Altitude on Tree Height Estimation Using Airborne Laser Scanning.” InInternational Conference NATSCAN International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, October 3–6, vol. XXXVI (8/W2), 96–101. Freiburg: IAPRS.es_ES
dc.description.referencesYu, X., H. Hyyppä, H. Kaartinen, J. Hyyppä, E. Ahokas, and S. Kaasalainen. 2005. “Applicability of First Pulse Derived Digital Terrain Models for Boreal Forest Studies.” ISPRS Workshop Laser scanning, WG III/3, III/4, V/3, 97–102, Enschede, September 12–14.es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin3383es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio3372es_ES
dc.description.volume35es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01431161.2014.903355
dc.identifier.issn0143-1161
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/59299
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis: STM, Behavioural Science and Public Health Titleses_ES
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Remote Sensinges_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2014.903355es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.09.003.es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/01431160500181671es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.06.004es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/01431161.2013.878063es_ES
dc.relation.references10.5897/SRE12.278es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0924-2716(99)00016-7es_ES
dc.relation.references10.5589/m06-011.es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3133/tm11B3es_ES
dc.relation.references10.14358/PERS.70.3.331es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0924-2716(98)00009-4.es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3390/s110606237.es_ES
dc.relation.references10.14358/PERS.73.7.793es_ES
dc.relation.references10.5589/m03-022es_ES
dc.relation.references10.14358/PERS.72.11.1265es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/01431160903144086es_ES
dc.relation.references10.14358/PERS.75.12.1425es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3390/s8063938es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0924-2716(99)00011-8es_ES
dc.relation.senia281320es_ES
dc.rightsReserva de todos los derechoses_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsCerradoes_ES
dc.subjectLIDARes_ES
dc.subjectPoint densityes_ES
dc.subjectLand coverses_ES
dc.subject.classificationINGENIERIA CARTOGRAFICA, GEODESIA Y FOTOGRAMETRIAes_ES
dc.titleEmpirical study of variation in lidar point density over different land coverses_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier3992
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9443-9214
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa0a42ccf-7a7a-493b-83db-4f4aab705c1c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya0a42ccf-7a7a-493b-83db-4f4aab705c1c
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd6948e84-fae2-4b0a-b844-a4930d5b8f47
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication9d1abfb4-d3a8-4bda-ae58-13f1971682a0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd6948e84-fae2-4b0a-b844-a4930d5b8f47
upv.uuid608653d6-27f3-42e1-a764-e091bcf032eees_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Empirical study of variation in lidar point density.pdf
Tamaño:
503.43 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial