Environmentally sustainable biogas? the key role of manure co-digestion with energy crops

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorAgostini, Alessandroes_ES
dc.contributor.authorBattini, Ferdinandoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorGiuntoli, Jacopoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorTabaglio, Vincenzoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorPadella, Monicaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorBaxter, Davides_ES
dc.contributor.authorMarelli, Luisaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorAmaducci, Stefanoes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-13T11:57:34Z
dc.date.available2016-07-13T11:57:34Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractWe analyzed the environmental impacts of three biogas systems based on dairy manure, sorghum and maize. The geog. scope of the anal. is the Po valley, in Italy. The anaerobic digestion of manure guarantees high GHG (Green House Gases) savings thanks to the avoided emissions from the traditional storage and management of raw manure as org. fertiliser. GHG emissions for maize and sorghum-based systems, on the other hand, are similar to those of the Italian electricity mix. In crop-based systems, the plants with open-tank storage of digestate emit 50% more GHG than those with gas-tight tanks. In all the environmental impact categories analyzed (acidification, particulate matter emissions, and eutrophication), energy crops based systems have much higher impacts than the Italian electricity mix. Maize-based systems cause higher impacts than sorghum, due to more intensive cultivation. Manure-based pathways have always lower impacts than the energy crops based pathways, however, all biogas systems cause much higher impacts than the current Italian electricity mix. We conclude that manure digestion is the most efficient way to reduce GHG emissions; although there are trade-offs with other local environmental impacts. Biogas prodn. from crops; although not providing environmental benefits per se; may be regarded as an option to facilitate the deployment of manure digestion.es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationAgostini, A.; Battini, F.; Giuntoli, J.; Tabaglio, V.; Padella, M.; Baxter, D.; Marelli, L.... (2015). Environmentally sustainable biogas? the key role of manure co-digestion with energy crops. Energies. 8(6):5234-5265. https://doi.org/10.3390/en8065234es_ES
dc.description.issue6es_ES
dc.description.referencesBacenetti, J., Fusi, A., Negri, M., Guidetti, R., & Fiala, M. (2014). Environmental assessment of two different crop systems in terms of biomethane potential production. Science of The Total Environment, 466-467, 1066-1077. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.109es_ES
dc.description.referencesCapponi, S., Fazio, S., & Barbanti, L. (2012). CO2 savings affect the break-even distance of feedstock supply and digestate placement in biogas production. Renewable Energy, 37(1), 45-52. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2011.05.005es_ES
dc.description.referencesGerin, P. A., Vliegen, F., & Jossart, J.-M. (2008). Energy and CO2 balance of maize and grass as energy crops for anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technology, 99(7), 2620-2627. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.049es_ES
dc.description.referencesBattini, F., Agostini, A., Boulamanti, A. K., Giuntoli, J., & Amaducci, S. (2014). Mitigating the environmental impacts of milk production via anaerobic digestion of manure: Case study of a dairy farm in the Po Valley. Science of The Total Environment, 481, 196-208. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.038es_ES
dc.description.referencesBoulamanti, A. K., Donida Maglio, S., Giuntoli, J., & Agostini, A. (2013). Influence of different practices on biogas sustainability. Biomass and Bioenergy, 53, 149-161. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.02.020es_ES
dc.description.referencesBlengini, G. A., Brizio, E., Cibrario, M., & Genon, G. (2011). LCA of bioenergy chains in Piedmont (Italy): A case study to support public decision makers towards sustainability. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 57, 36-47. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.10.003es_ES
dc.description.referencesGonzález-García, S., Bacenetti, J., Negri, M., Fiala, M., & Arroja, L. (2013). Comparative environmental performance of three different annual energy crops for biogas production in Northern Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 43, 71-83. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.017es_ES
dc.description.referencesLansche, J., & Müller, J. (2012). Life cycle assessment of energy generation of biogas fed combined heat and power plants: Environmental impact of different agricultural substrates. Engineering in Life Sciences, 12(3), 313-320. doi:10.1002/elsc.201100061es_ES
dc.description.referencesLijó, L., González-García, S., Bacenetti, J., Fiala, M., Feijoo, G., Lema, J. M., & Moreira, M. T. (2014). Life Cycle Assessment of electricity production in Italy from anaerobic co-digestion of pig slurry and energy crops. Renewable Energy, 68, 625-635. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2014.03.005es_ES
dc.description.referencesLijó, L., González-García, S., Bacenetti, J., Fiala, M., Feijoo, G., & Moreira, M. T. (2014). Assuring the sustainable production of biogas from anaerobic mono-digestion. Journal of Cleaner Production, 72, 23-34. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.022es_ES
dc.description.referencesWhiting, A., & Azapagic, A. (2014). Life cycle environmental impacts of generating electricity and heat from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion. Energy, 70, 181-193. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.03.103es_ES
dc.description.referencesBerndes, G. (2002). Bioenergy and water—the implications of large-scale bioenergy production for water use and supply. Global Environmental Change, 12(4), 253-271. doi:10.1016/s0959-3780(02)00040-7es_ES
dc.description.referencesGheewala, S. H., Berndes, G., & Jewitt, G. (2011). The bioenergy and water nexus. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 5(4), 353-360. doi:10.1002/bbb.295es_ES
dc.description.referencesAmaducci, S., Amaducci, M. T., Benati, R., & Venturi, G. (2000). Crop yield and quality parameters of four annual fibre crops (hemp, kenaf, maize and sorghum) in the North of Italy. Industrial Crops and Products, 11(2-3), 179-186. doi:10.1016/s0926-6690(99)00063-1es_ES
dc.description.referencesAmaducci, S., Monti, A., & Venturi, G. (2004). Non-structural carbohydrates and fibre components in sweet and fibre sorghum as affected by low and normal input techniques. Industrial Crops and Products, 20(1), 111-118. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2003.12.016es_ES
dc.description.referencesMahmood, A., & Honermeier, B. (2012). Chemical composition and methane yield of sorghum cultivars with contrasting row spacing. Field Crops Research, 128, 27-33. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2011.12.010es_ES
dc.description.referencesZegada-Lizarazu, W., & Monti, A. (2011). Energy crops in rotation. A review. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35(1), 12-25. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesBarbanti, L., Grandi, S., Vecchi, A., & Venturi, G. (2006). Sweet and fibre sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench), energy crops in the frame of environmental protection from excessive nitrogen loads. European Journal of Agronomy, 25(1), 30-39. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2006.03.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesSearchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R. A., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., … Yu, T.-H. (2008). Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change. Science, 319(5867), 1238-1240. doi:10.1126/science.1151861es_ES
dc.description.referencesStyles, D., Gibbons, J., Williams, A. P., Stichnothe, H., Chadwick, D. R., & Healey, J. R. (2014). Cattle feed or bioenergy? Consequential life cycle assessment of biogas feedstock options on dairy farms. GCB Bioenergy, 7(5), 1034-1049. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12189es_ES
dc.description.referencesPE International AGwww.pe-international.comes_ES
dc.description.referencesPlevin, R. J., Delucchi, M. A., & Creutzig, F. (2013). Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate-Change Mitigation Benefits Misleads Policy Makers. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 18(1), 73-83. doi:10.1111/jiec.12074es_ES
dc.description.referencesMarañón, E., Salter, A. M., Castrillón, L., Heaven, S., & Fernández-Nava, Y. (2011). Reducing the environmental impact of methane emissions from dairy farms by anaerobic digestion of cattle waste. Waste Management, 31(8), 1745-1751. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.015es_ES
dc.description.referencesChantigny, M. H., Angers, D. A., Rochette, P., Bélanger, G., Massé, D., & Côté, D. (2007). Gaseous Nitrogen Emissions and Forage Nitrogen Uptake on Soils Fertilized with Raw and Treated Swine Manure. Journal of Environment Quality, 36(6), 1864. doi:10.2134/jeq2007.0083es_ES
dc.description.referencesLoria, E. R., & Sawyer, J. E. (2005). Extractable Soil Phosphorus and Inorganic Nitrogen following Application of Raw and Anaerobically Digested Swine Manure. Agronomy Journal, 97(3), 879. doi:10.2134/agronj2004.0249es_ES
dc.description.referencesMöller, K., Stinner, W., Deuker, A., & Leithold, G. (2008). Effects of different manuring systems with and without biogas digestion on nitrogen cycle and crop yield in mixed organic dairy farming systems. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 82(3), 209-232. doi:10.1007/s10705-008-9196-9es_ES
dc.description.referencesKoehler, B., Diepolder, M., Ostertag, J., Thurner, S., & Spiekers, H. (2013). Dry matter losses of grass, lucerne and maize silages in bunker silos. Agricultural and Food Science, 22(1), 145-150. doi:10.23986/afsci.6715es_ES
dc.description.referencesHerrmann, C., Heiermann, M., & Idler, C. (2011). Effects of ensiling, silage additives and storage period on methane formation of biogas crops. Bioresource Technology, 102(8), 5153-5161. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.01.012es_ES
dc.description.referencesSchittenhelm, S. (2010). Effect of Drought Stress on Yield and Quality of Maize/Sunflower and Maize/Sorghum Intercrops for Biogas Production. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.2010.00418.xes_ES
dc.description.referencesGas Engines for CHP Units and Gensetshttp://www.truck.man.eu/man/media/content_medien/doc/global_engines/power/BR_Power_Gas_EN.pdf?_ga=1.109727301.1989443271.1432903866es_ES
dc.description.referencesWalla, C., & Schneeberger, W. (2008). The optimal size for biogas plants. Biomass and Bioenergy, 32(6), 551-557. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.11.009es_ES
dc.description.referencesLiebetrau, J., Clemens, J., Cuhls, C., Hafermann, C., Friehe, J., Weiland, P., & Daniel-Gromke, J. (2010). Methane emissions from biogas-producing facilities within the agricultural sector. Engineering in Life Sciences, 10(6), 595-599. doi:10.1002/elsc.201000070es_ES
dc.description.referencesLi, Z., Yin, F., Li, H., Wang, X., & Lian, J. (2013). A novel test method for evaluating the methane gas permeability of biogas storage membrane. Renewable Energy, 60, 572-577. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2013.06.010es_ES
dc.description.referencesAmon, B., Kryvoruchko, V., Amon, T., & Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S. (2006). Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 112(2-3), 153-162. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.030es_ES
dc.description.referencesAmon, B., Kryvoruchko, V., Moitzi, G., & Amon, T. (2006). Greenhouse gas and ammonia emission abatement by slurry treatment. International Congress Series, 1293, 295-298. doi:10.1016/j.ics.2006.01.069es_ES
dc.description.referencesMuñoz, I., Schmidt, J. H., Brandão, M., & Weidema, B. P. (2014). Rebuttal to ‘Indirect land use change (iLUC) within life cycle assessment (LCA) - scientific robustness and consistency with international standards’. GCB Bioenergy, 7(4), 565-566. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12231es_ES
dc.description.referencesCarrosio, G. (2013). Energy production from biogas in the Italian countryside: Policies and organizational models. Energy Policy, 63, 3-9. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.072es_ES
dc.description.referencesPosch, M., Seppälä, J., Hettelingh, J.-P., Johansson, M., Margni, M., & Jolliet, O. (2008). The role of atmospheric dispersion models and ecosystem sensitivity in the determination of characterisation factors for acidifying and eutrophying emissions in LCIA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(6), 477-486. doi:10.1007/s11367-008-0025-9es_ES
dc.description.referencesSeppälä, J., Posch, M., Johansson, M., & Hettelingh, J.-P. (2005). Country-dependent Characterisation Factors for Acidification and Terrestrial Eutrophication Based on Accumulated Exceedance as an Impact Category Indicator (14 pp). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 11(6), 403-416. doi:10.1065/lca2005.06.215es_ES
dc.description.referencesThe Riskpoll Softwarehttp://www.arirabl.com/softwarees_ES
dc.description.referencesGreco, S. L., Wilson, A. M., Spengler, J. D., & Levy, J. I. (2007). Spatial patterns of mobile source particulate matter emissions-to-exposure relationships across the United States. Atmospheric Environment, 41(5), 1011-1025. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.09.025es_ES
dc.description.referencesAbdalla, M., Osborne, B., Lanigan, G., Forristal, D., Williams, M., Smith, P., & Jones, M. B. (2013). Conservation tillage systems: a review of its consequences for greenhouse gas emissions. Soil Use and Management, 29(2), 199-209. doi:10.1111/sum.12030es_ES
dc.description.referencesSnyder, C. S., Bruulsema, T. W., Jensen, T. L., & Fixen, P. E. (2009). Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 133(3-4), 247-266. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2009.04.021es_ES
dc.description.referencesZhang, S., Li, Q., Lü, Y., Zhang, X., & Liang, W. (2013). Contributions of soil biota to C sequestration varied with aggregate fractions under different tillage systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 62, 147-156. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.03.023es_ES
dc.description.referencesDerpsch, R., Franzluebbers, A. J., Duiker, S. W., Reicosky, D. C., Koeller, K., Friedrich, T., … Weiss, K. (2014). Why do we need to standardize no-tillage research? Soil and Tillage Research, 137, 16-22. doi:10.1016/j.still.2013.10.002es_ES
dc.description.referencesFranzluebbers, A. J. (2010). Achieving Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration with Conservation Agricultural Systems in the Southeastern United States. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 74(2), 347. doi:10.2136/sssaj2009.0079es_ES
dc.description.referencesSoane, B. D., Ball, B. C., Arvidsson, J., Basch, G., Moreno, F., & Roger-Estrade, J. (2012). No-till in northern, western and south-western Europe: A review of problems and opportunities for crop production and the environment. Soil and Tillage Research, 118, 66-87. doi:10.1016/j.still.2011.10.015es_ES
dc.description.referencesMircea, M., Ciancarella, L., Briganti, G., Calori, G., Cappelletti, A., Cionni, I., … Zanini, G. (2014). Assessment of the AMS-MINNI system capabilities to simulate air quality over Italy for the calendar year 2005. Atmospheric Environment, 84, 178-188. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.11.006es_ES
dc.description.referencesTabaglio, V., & Gavazzi, C. (2009). Monoculture Maize (Zea mays L.) Cropped Under Conventional Tillage, No-tillage and N Fertilization: (I) Three Year Yield Performances. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 4(3), 61. doi:10.4081/ija.2009.3.61es_ES
dc.description.referencesPirlo, G., & Carè, S. (2013). A Simplified Tool for Estimating Carbon Footprint of Dairy Cattle Milk. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 12(4), e81. doi:10.4081/ijas.2013.e81es_ES
dc.description.referencesSanz-Cobena, A., Sánchez-Martín, L., García-Torres, L., & Vallejo, A. (2012). Gaseous emissions of N2O and NO and NO3− leaching from urea applied with urease and nitrification inhibitors to a maize (Zea mays) crop. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 149, 64-73. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.12.016es_ES
dc.description.referencesStehfest, E., & Bouwman, L. (2006). N2O and NO emission from agricultural fields and soils under natural vegetation: summarizing available measurement data and modeling of global annual emissions. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 74(3), 207-228. doi:10.1007/s10705-006-9000-7es_ES
dc.description.referencesPerego, A., Basile, A., Bonfante, A., De Mascellis, R., Terribile, F., Brenna, S., & Acutis, M. (2012). Nitrate leaching under maize cropping systems in Po Valley (Italy). Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 147, 57-65. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.06.014es_ES
dc.description.referencesVan der Werf, H. M. G., Kanyarushoki, C., & Corson, M. S. (2009). An operational method for the evaluation of resource use and environmental impacts of dairy farms by life cycle assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(11), 3643-3652. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.07.003es_ES
dc.description.referencesÁlvaro-Fuentes, J., Plaza-Bonilla, D., Arrúe, J. L., Lampurlanés, J., & Cantero-Martínez, C. (2012). Soil organic carbon storage in a no-tillage chronosequence under Mediterranean conditions. Plant and Soil, 376(1-2), 31-41. doi:10.1007/s11104-012-1167-xes_ES
dc.description.referencesBaker, J. M., Ochsner, T. E., Venterea, R. T., & Griffis, T. J. (2007). Tillage and soil carbon sequestration—What do we really know? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 118(1-4), 1-5. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.014es_ES
dc.description.referencesBorin, M., Menini, C., & Sartori, L. (1997). Effects of tillage systems on energy and carbon balance in north-eastern Italy. Soil and Tillage Research, 40(3-4), 209-226. doi:10.1016/s0167-1987(96)01057-4es_ES
dc.description.referencesDe Sanctis, G., Roggero, P. P., Seddaiu, G., Orsini, R., Porter, C. H., & Jones, J. W. (2012). Long-term no tillage increased soil organic carbon content of rain-fed cereal systems in a Mediterranean area. European Journal of Agronomy, 40, 18-27. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2012.02.002es_ES
dc.description.referencesPowlson, D. S., Stirling, C. M., Jat, M. L., Gerard, B. G., Palm, C. A., Sanchez, P. A., & Cassman, K. G. (2014). Limited potential of no-till agriculture for climate change mitigation. Nature Climate Change, 4(8), 678-683. doi:10.1038/nclimate2292es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin5265es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio5234es_ES
dc.description.volume8es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/en8065234
dc.identifier.issn1996-1073
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/67546
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofEnergieses_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en8065234es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.109es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.renene.2011.05.005es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.049es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.038es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.02.020es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.10.003es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.017es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/elsc.201100061es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.renene.2014.03.005es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.022es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.energy.2014.03.103es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00040-7es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/bbb.295es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0926-6690(99)00063-1es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.indcrop.2003.12.016es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.fcr.2011.12.010es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.eja.2006.03.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1126/science.1151861es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1111/gcbb.12189es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1111/jiec.12074es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.015es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2134/jeq2007.0083es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2134/agronj2004.0249es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10705-008-9196-9es_ES
dc.relation.references10.23986/afsci.6715es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2011.01.012es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1111/j.1439-037X.2010.00418.xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.11.009es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/elsc.201000070es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.renene.2013.06.010es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.030es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ics.2006.01.069es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1111/gcbb.12231es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.072es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s11367-008-0025-9es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1065/lca2005.06.215es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.09.025es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1111/sum.12030es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.agee.2009.04.021es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.03.023es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.still.2013.10.002es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2136/sssaj2009.0079es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.still.2011.10.015es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.11.006es_ES
dc.relation.references10.4081/ija.2009.3.61es_ES
dc.relation.references10.4081/ijas.2013.e81es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.agee.2011.12.016es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10705-006-9000-7es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.agee.2011.06.014es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.07.003es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s11104-012-1167-xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.014es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0167-1987(96)01057-4es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.eja.2012.02.002es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/nclimate2292es_ES
dc.relation.senia298704es_ES
dc.rightsReserva de todos los derechoses_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectMaizees_ES
dc.subjectManurees_ES
dc.subjectSorghumes_ES
dc.subjectBiogases_ES
dc.subjectGHG emissionses_ES
dc.subjectEnvironmental impactses_ES
dc.titleEnvironmentally sustainable biogas? the key role of manure co-digestion with energy cropses_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
upv.uuid657cde8d-970b-4585-91dc-e65c33111214es_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Agostini;Battini;Giuntoli - Environmentally sustainable biogas? the key role of manure co-digesti....pdf
Tamaño:
1.57 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial
[object Object] Descargar

Colecciones

Artículos, conferencias, monografías