Chance and necessity in the genome evolution of endosymbiotic bacteria of insects

dc.contributor.authorSabater-Muñoz, Beatrizes_ES
dc.contributor.authorToft, Christinaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorAlvarez-Ponce, Davides_ES
dc.contributor.authorFares Riaño, Mario Alies_ES
dc.contributor.funderScience Foundation Irelandes_ES
dc.contributor.funderUniversity of Nevada, Renoes_ES
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Economía y Competitividades_ES
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovaciónes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-29T04:32:22Z
dc.date.available2020-10-29T04:32:22Z
dc.date.issued2017-06es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN] An open question in evolutionary biology is how does the selection¿drift balance determine the fates of biological interactions. We searched for signatures of selection and drift in genomes of five endosymbiotic bacterial groups known to evolve under strong genetic drift. Although most genes in endosymbiotic bacteria showed evidence of relaxed purifying selection, many genes in these bacteria exhibited stronger selective constraints than their orthologs in free-living bacterial relatives. Remarkably, most of these highly constrained genes had no role in the host¿symbiont interactions but were involved in either buffering the deleterious consequences of drift or other host-unrelated functions, suggesting that they have either acquired new roles or their role became more central in endosymbiotic bacteria. Experimental evolution of Escherichia coli under strong genetic drift revealed remarkable similarities in the mutational spectrum, genome reduction patterns and gene losses to endosymbiotic bacteria of insects. Interestingly, the transcriptome of the experimentally evolved lines showed a generalized deregulation of the genome that affected genes encoding proteins involved in mutational buffering, regulation and amino acid biosynthesis, patterns identical to those found in endosymbiotic bacteria. Our results indicate that drift has shaped endosymbiotic associations through a change in the functional landscape of bacterial genes and that the host had only a small role in such a shiften_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationSabater-Muñoz, B.; Toft, C.; Alvarez-Ponce, D.; Fares Riaño, MA. (2017). Chance and necessity in the genome evolution of endosymbiotic bacteria of insects. The ISME Journal. 11(6):1291-1304. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.18es_ES
dc.description.issue6es_ES
dc.description.referencesAguilar-Rodriguez J, Sabater-Munoz B, Montagud-Martinez R, Berlanga V, Alvarez-Ponce D, Wagner A et al. (2016). The molecular chaperone DnaK is a source of mutational robustness. Genome Biol Evol 8: 2979–2991.es_ES
dc.description.referencesAlvarez-Ponce D, Sabater-Munoz B, Toft C, Ruiz-Gonzalez MX, Fares MA . (2016). Essentiality is a strong determinant of protein rates of evolution during mutation accumulation experiments in Escherichia coli. Genome Biol Evol 8: 2914–2927.es_ES
dc.description.referencesAnders S, Huber W . (2010). Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol 11: R106.es_ES
dc.description.referencesArchibald J . (2014) One Plus One Equals One: Symbiosis and the Evolution of Complex Life. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.es_ES
dc.description.referencesAussel L, Loiseau L, Hajj Chehade M, Pocachard B, Fontecave M, Pierrel F et al. (2014). ubiJ, a new gene required for aerobic growth and proliferation in macrophage, is involved in coenzyme Q biosynthesis in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J Bacteriol 196: 70–79.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBaumann P, Baumann L, Clark MA . (1996). Levels of Buchnera aphidicola chaperonin groEL during growth of the aphid Schizaphis graminum. Curr Microbiol 32: 7.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBenjamini Y, Yekutieli Y . (2005). False discovery rate controlling confidence intervals for selected parameters. J Am Stat Assoc 100: 10.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBennett GM, Moran NA . (2015). Heritable symbiosis: the advantages and perils of an evolutionary rabbit hole. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112: 10169–10176.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBermingham J, Rabatel A, Calevro F, Vinuelas J, Febvay G, Charles H et al. (2009). Impact of host developmental age on the transcriptome of the symbiotic bacterium Buchnera aphidicola in the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 7294–7297.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBogumil D, Dagan T . (2010). Chaperonin-dependent accelerated substitution rates in prokaryotes. Genome Biol Evol 2: 602–608.es_ES
dc.description.referencesCarbon S, Ireland A, Mungall CJ, Shu S, Marshall B, Lewis S et al. (2009). AmiGO: online access to ontology and annotation data. Bioinformatics 25: 288–289.es_ES
dc.description.referencesChen Z, Wang Y, Li Y, Li Y, Fu N, Ye J et al. (2012). Esre: a novel essential non-coding RNA in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett 586: 1195–1200.es_ES
dc.description.referencesClark JW, Hossain S, Burnside CA, Kambhampati S . (2001). Coevolution between a cockroach and its bacterial endosymbiont: a biogeographical perspective. Proc Biol Sci 268: 393–398.es_ES
dc.description.referencesDale C, Wang B, Moran N, Ochman H . (2003). Loss of DNA recombinational repair enzymes in the initial stages of genome degeneration. Mol Biol Evol 20: 1188–1194.es_ES
dc.description.referencesDeatherage DE, Barrick JE . (2014). Identification of mutations in laboratory-evolved microbes from next-generation sequencing data using breseq. Methods Mol Biol 1151: 165–188.es_ES
dc.description.referencesDouglas AE . (2003). The nutritional physiology of aphids. Adv Insect Physiol 31: 68.es_ES
dc.description.referencesFares MA, Barrio E, Sabater-Munoz B, Moya A . (2002a). The evolution of the heat-shock protein GroEL from Buchnera, the primary endosymbiont of aphids, is governed by positive selection. Mol Biol Evol 19: 1162–1170.es_ES
dc.description.referencesFares MA, Ruiz-Gonzalez MX, Moya A, Elena SF, Barrio E . (2002b). Endosymbiotic bacteria: groEL buffers against deleterious mutations. Nature 417: 398.es_ES
dc.description.referencesGancedo C, Flores CL, Gancedo JM . (2016). The expanding landscape of moonlighting proteins in yeasts. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 80: 765–777.es_ES
dc.description.referencesGerardo NM, Altincicek B, Anselme C, Atamian H, Barribeau SM, de Vos M et al. (2010). Immunity and other defenses in pea aphids, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Genome Biol 11: R21.es_ES
dc.description.referencesGomez-Valero L, Latorre A, Silva FJ . (2004). The evolutionary fate of nonfunctional DNA in the bacterial endosymbiont Buchnera aphidicola. Mol Biol Evol 21: 2172–2181.es_ES
dc.description.referencesGomez-Valero L, Silva FJ, Christophe Simon J, Latorre A . (2007). Genome reduction of the aphid endosymbiont Buchnera aphidicola in a recent evolutionary time scale. Gene 389: 87–95.es_ES
dc.description.referencesGonzalez-Domenech CM, Belda E, Patino-Navarrete R, Moya A, Pereto J, Latorre A . (2012). Metabolic stasis in an ancient symbiosis: genome-scale metabolic networks from two Blattabacterium cuenoti strains, primary endosymbionts of cockroaches. BMC Microbiol 12 (Suppl 1): S5.es_ES
dc.description.referencesHansen AK, Moran NA . (2011). Aphid genome expression reveals host-symbiont cooperation in the production of amino acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 2849–2854.es_ES
dc.description.referencesHansen AK, Moran NA . (2014). The impact of microbial symbionts on host plant utilization by herbivorous insects. Mol Ecol 23: 1473–1496.es_ES
dc.description.referencesHenderson B, Fares MA, Lund PA . (2013). Chaperonin 60: a paradoxical, evolutionarily conserved protein family with multiple moonlighting functions. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 88: 955–987.es_ES
dc.description.referencesHumphreys NJ, Douglas AE . (1997). Partitioning of symbiotic bacteria between generations of an insect: a quantitative study of a Buchnera sp. in the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum reared at different temperatures. Appl Environ Microbiol 63: 3294–3296.es_ES
dc.description.referencesInternational Aphid Genomics Consortium. (2010). Genome sequence of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. PLoS Biol 8: e1000313.es_ES
dc.description.referencesKadibalban AS, Bogumil D, Landan G, Dagan T . (2016). DnaK-dependent accelerated evolutionary rate in prokaryotes. Genome Biol Evol 8: 1590–1599.es_ES
dc.description.referencesKatoh K, Standley DM . (2013). MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30: 772–780.es_ES
dc.description.referencesKelkar YD, Ochman H . (2013). Genome reduction promotes increase in protein functional complexity in bacteria. Genetics 193: 303–307.es_ES
dc.description.referencesKoga R, Meng XY, Tsuchida T, Fukatsu T . (2012). Cellular mechanism for selective vertical transmission of an obligate insect symbiont at the bacteriocyte-embryo interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: E1230–E1237.es_ES
dc.description.referencesKuo CH, Moran NA, Ochman H . (2009). The consequences of genetic drift for bacterial genome complexity. Genome Res 19: 1450–1454.es_ES
dc.description.referencesKuo CH, Ochman H . (2009). Deletional bias across the three domains of life. Genome Biol Evol 1: 145–152.es_ES
dc.description.referencesLaw R, Lewis DH . (1983). Biotic environments and the maintenance of sex-some evidence from mutualistic symbioses. Biol J Linnean Soc 20: 28.es_ES
dc.description.referencesLiu XD, Xie L, Wei Y, Zhou X, Jia B, Liu J et al. (2014). Abiotic stress resistance, a novel moonlighting function of ribosomal protein RPL44 in the halophilic fungus Aspergillus glaucus. Appl Environ Microbiol 80: 4294–4300.es_ES
dc.description.referencesLohse M, Bolger AM, Nagel A, Fernie AR, Lunn JE, Stitt M et al. (2012). RobiNA: a user-friendly, integrated software solution for RNA-Seq-based transcriptomics. Nucleic Acids Res 40: W622–W627.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMacdonald SJ, Lin GG, Russell CW, Thomas GH, Douglas AE . (2012). The central role of the host cell in symbiotic nitrogen metabolism. Proc Biol Sci 279: 2965–2973.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMcClure R, Balasubramanian D, Sun Y, Bobrovskyy M, Sumby P, Genco CA et al. (2013). Computational analysis of bacterial RNA-Seq data. Nucleic Acids Res 41: e140.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMcCutcheon JP, Moran NA . (2012). Extreme genome reduction in symbiotic bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 10: 13–26.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMcFall-Ngai M, Hadfield MG, Bosch TC, Carey HV, Domazet-Loso T, Douglas AE et al. (2013). Animals in a bacterial world, a new imperative for the life sciences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 3229–3236.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMira A, Ochman H, Moran NA . (2001). Deletional bias and the evolution of bacterial genomes. Trends Genet 17: 589–596.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMoran NA . (1996). Accelerated evolution and Muller's rachet in endosymbiotic bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 2873–2878.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMoran NA, Dunbar HE, Wilcox JL . (2005). Regulation of transcription in a reduced bacterial genome: nutrient-provisioning genes of the obligate symbiont Buchnera aphidicola. J Bacteriol 187: 4229–4237.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMoran NA, McCutcheon JP, Nakabachi A . (2008). Genomics and evolution of heritable bacterial symbionts. Annu Rev Genet 42: 165–190.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMoran NA, McLaughlin HJ, Sorek R . (2009). The dynamics and time scale of ongoing genomic erosion in symbiotic bacteria. Science 323: 379–382.es_ES
dc.description.referencesNakabachi A, Ishida K, Hongoh Y, Ohkuma M, Miyagishima SY . (2014). Aphid gene of bacterial origin encodes a protein transported to an obligate endosymbiont. Curr Biol 24: R640–R641.es_ES
dc.description.referencesNilsson AI, Koskiniemi S, Eriksson S, Kugelberg E, Hinton JC, Andersson DI . (2005). Bacterial genome size reduction by experimental evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 12112–12116.es_ES
dc.description.referencesPatino-Navarrete R, Moya A, Latorre A, Pereto J . (2013). Comparative genomics of Blattabacterium cuenoti: the frozen legacy of an ancient endosymbiont genome. Genome Biol Evol 5: 351–361.es_ES
dc.description.referencesPettersson ME, Berg OG . (2007). Muller's ratchet in symbiont populations. Genetica 130: 199–211.es_ES
dc.description.referencesPrice DR, Feng H, Baker JD, Bavan S, Luetje CW, Wilson AC . (2014). Aphid amino acid transporter regulates glutamine supply to intracellular bacterial symbionts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: 320–325.es_ES
dc.description.referencesReyes-Prieto M, Vargas-Chavez C, Latorre A, Moya A . (2015). SymbioGenomesDB: a database for the integration and access to knowledge on host-symbiont relationships. Database 2015: bav109 (1–8).es_ES
dc.description.referencesRobinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK . (2010). edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26: 139–140.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSabater-Muñoz B, Prats-Escriche M, Montagud-Martinez R, Lopez-Cerdan A, Toft C, Aguilar-Rodriguez J et al. (2015). Fitness trade-offs determine the role of the molecular chaperonin groel in buffering mutations. Mol Biol Evol 32: 2681–2693.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSchlicker A, Domingues FS, Rahnenfuhrer J, Lengauer T . (2006). A new measure for functional similarity of gene products based on Gene Ontology. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 302.es_ES
dc.description.referencesShigenobu S, Watanabe H, Hattori M, Sakaki Y, Ishikawa H . (2000). Genome sequence of the endocellular bacterial symbiont of aphids Buchnera sp. APS. Nature 407: 81–86.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSupek F, Bosnjak M, Skunca N, Smuc T . (2011). REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms. PLoS ONE 6: e21800.es_ES
dc.description.referencesTamas I, Klasson L, Canback B, Naslund AK, Eriksson AS, Wernegreen JJ et al. (2002). 50 million years of genomic stasis in endosymbiotic bacteria. Science 296: 2376–2379.es_ES
dc.description.referencesToft C, Fares MA . (2008). The evolution of the flagellar assembly pathway in endosymbiotic bacterial genomes. Mol Biol Evol 25: 2069–2076.es_ES
dc.description.referencesvan Ham RC, Kamerbeek J, Palacios C, Rausell C, Abascal F, Bastolla U et al. (2003). Reductive genome evolution in Buchnera aphidicola. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 581–586.es_ES
dc.description.referencesWernegreen JJ . (2002). Genome evolution in bacterial endosymbionts of insects. Nat Rev Genet 3: 850–861.es_ES
dc.description.referencesWernegreen JJ . (2011). Reduced selective constraint in endosymbionts: elevation in radical amino acid replacements occurs genome-wide. PLoS One 6: e28905.es_ES
dc.description.referencesWilliams TA, Fares MA . (2010). The effect of chaperonin buffering on protein evolution. Genome Biol Evol 2: 609–619.es_ES
dc.description.referencesYang Z . (2007). PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol 24: 1586–1591.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by Science Foundation Ireland (12/IP/1637) and grants from the Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO-FEDER; BFU2012-36346 and BFU2015-66073-P) to MAF. DAP and CT were supported by Juan de la Cierva fellowships from MINECO (references: JCI-2011-11089 and JCA-2012-14056, respectively). DAP is supported by funds from the University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA.es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin1304es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio1291es_ES
dc.description.volume11es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/ismej.2017.18es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1751-7362es_ES
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC5437351es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid28323281es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/153469
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherNature Publishing Groupes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofThe ISME Journales_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaS\350714es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/SFI//12%2FIP%2F1637/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//BFU2012-36346/ES/EL PAPEL DE LA DUPLICACION GENICA EN LA COMPLEJIDAD DE SISTEMAS BIOLOGICOS: RE-DIRECCION DE DINAMICAS MUTACIONALES Y ORIGEN DE INNOVACIONES BIOLOGICAS/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//BFU2015-66073-P/ES/CARACTERIZANDO LOS MECANISMOS DE INNOVACION POR DUPLICACION GENICA/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//JCI-2012-14056/ES/JCI-2012-14056/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//JCI-2011-11089/ES/JCI-2011-11089/es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.18es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/gbe/evw176es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/gbe/evw205es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1128/JB.01065-13es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s002849900050es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1073/pnas.1421388112es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1128/AEM.01472-09es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/gbe/evq044es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/bioinformatics/btn615es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.febslet.2012.03.010es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1098/rspb.2000.1390es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/molbev/msg138es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/978-1-4939-0554-6_12es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004174es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/417398aes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1128/MMBR.00012-16es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r21es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/molbev/msh232es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.gene.2006.10.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1186/1471-2180-12-S1-S5es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1073/pnas.1013465108es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1111/mec.12421es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1111/brv.12037es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1128/AEM.63.8.3294-3296.1997es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1371/journal.pbio.1000313es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/gbe/evw102es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/molbev/mst010es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1534/genetics.112.145656es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1073/pnas.1119212109es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1101/gr.091785.109es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/gbe/evp016es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1111/j.1095-8312.1983.tb01876.xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1128/AEM.00292-14es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/nar/gks540es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1098/rspb.2012.0414es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/nar/gkt444es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/nrmicro2670es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1073/pnas.1218525110es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0168-9525(01)02447-7es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1073/pnas.93.7.2873es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1128/JB.187.12.4229-4237.2005es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130119es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1126/science.1167140es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.038es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1073/pnas.0503654102es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/gbe/evt011es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10709-006-9007-7es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1073/pnas.1306068111es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/molbev/msv144es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1186/1471-2105-7-302es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/35024074es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1371/journal.pone.0021800es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1126/science.1071278es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/molbev/msn153es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1073/pnas.0235981100es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/nrg931es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1371/journal.pone.0028905es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/gbe/evq045es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/molbev/msm088es_ES
dc.rightsReserva de todos los derechoses_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.titleChance and necessity in the genome evolution of endosymbiotic bacteria of insectses_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
upv.uuid70de80b0-797c-4b4e-b1ec-24cbc64da688es_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Sabater-Muñoz;Toft;Alvarez-Ponce - Chance and necessity in the genome evolution of endosymbiotic ....pdf
Tamaño:
1.85 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial