Opening the black box: an explanatory model of data reuse in health research and beyond

dc.contributor.authorAleixos-Borras, Inmaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorD'Este, Pabloes_ES
dc.contributor.authorLopez, Jose J.es_ES
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commissiones_ES
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-13T08:15:58Z
dc.date.available2026-05-13T08:15:58Z
dc.date.issued2026-04-30es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN] Previous studies on the use of secondary data - or data reuse - found that researchers confront considerable (un)foreseen challenges related to finding, accessing, decoding, and recontextualizing secondary data. However, why some researchers persist in this endeavor while others do not is unclear. We develop a plausible theoretical explanatory model - the data-reuse mechanism of this phenomenon. This model captures the relational aspects of the different elements involved in the process, i.e. scientific horizon and reward system, researcher's cognitive frameworks and relational structures, the properties and relational structure of data, specific conditions, and time. We argue that it is the interaction among these elements that ultimately allows the researcher to decide about data reuse. Guided by this model, we analyze the data reuse process in ten molecular/computational biology and epidemiology case studies. The results of our analysis show how the intertwined synchronic and diachronic relations among these elements add considerable uncertainty to the reuse process. It is precisely this uncertainty combined with researchers' tenacity, scientific horizon, and flexibility in changing this horizon that enable data reuse. Our findings demonstrate also that while some data properties such as open access may facilitate data reuse, they do not fully determine whether data are reused.es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationAleixos-Borras, I.; D'este, P.; Lopez, JJ. (2026). Opening the black box: an explanatory model of data reuse in health research and beyond. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2026.2660308es_ES
dc.description.referencesAbbott, Andrew Delano. 2001. Time Matters: On Theory and Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.es_ES
dc.description.referencesAleixos-Borrás, I., & López, J. J. (2024). A hermeneutic dialogical understanding of data reuse across different access regimes. Science as Culture, 34(1), 114-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2024.2375218es_ES
dc.description.referencesAncori, B. (2000). The economics of knowledge: the debate about codification and tacit knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2), 255-287. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/9.2.255es_ES
dc.description.referencesAnsbacher, H. L. (1950). The Problem of Interpreting Attitude Survey Data. Public Opinion Quarterly, 14(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.1086/266155es_ES
dc.description.referencesBaxter, P., & Jack, S. (2015). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573es_ES
dc.description.referencesBeach, D. (2017). Process Tracing Methods in the Social Sciences. En (editor), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.176es_ES
dc.description.referencesBeach, D., & Pedersen, R. (2013). Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines (, ed.). University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.2556282es_ES
dc.description.referencesBorgman, C. L. (2007). Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet (, ed.). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7434.001.0001es_ES
dc.description.referencesBorgman, C. L. (2012). The conundrum of sharing research data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(6), 1059-1078. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22634es_ES
dc.description.referencesBorgman, C. L. (2015). Big Data, Little Data, No Data: Scholarship in the Networked World (, ed.). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9963.001.0001es_ES
dc.description.referencesBril-Mascarenhas, T., Maillet, A., & Mayaux, P.-L. (2017). Process tracing. Inducción, deducción e inferencia causal. Revista de ciencia política (Santiago), 37(3), 659-684. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-090x2017000300659es_ES
dc.description.referencesCaldas, A. (2003). Are newsgroups extending «invisible colleges» into the digital infrastructure of science? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(1), 43-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590303123es_ES
dc.description.referencesCohendet, P. (2000). The codification of knowledge: a conceptual and empirical exploration. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2), 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/9.2.195es_ES
dc.description.referencesCowan, R. (2001). Expert systems: aspects of and limitations to the codifiability of knowledge. Research Policy, 30(9), 1355-1372. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00156-1es_ES
dc.description.referencesCowan, R. (2000). The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2), 211-253. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/9.2.211es_ES
dc.description.referencesCurty Renata Gonçalves. 2015. “Beyond ‘Data Thrifting’: An Investigation of Factors Influencing Research Data Reuse in the Social Sciences (2015).” Dissertations-ALL.266. http://surface.syr.edu/etd/266.es_ES
dc.description.referencesCurty, R. G., Crowston, K., Specht, A., Grant, B. W., & Dalton, E. D. (2017). Attitudes and norms affecting scientists’ data reuse. PLOS ONE, 12(12), e0189288. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189288es_ES
dc.description.referencesDavid, P. A., & Steinmueller, W. E. (1991). THE IMPACT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY UPON ECONOMIC SCIENCE. Prometheus, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/08109029108631904es_ES
dc.description.referencesDavid, P., & Steinmueller, E. (2003). Introduction. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590303122es_ES
dc.description.referencesEdwards, P. N., Mayernik, M. S., Batcheller, A. L., Bowker, G. C., & Borgman, C. L. (2011). Science friction: Data, metadata, and collaboration. Social Studies of Science, 41(5), 667-690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711413314es_ES
dc.description.referencesFaniel, I. M., Frank, R. D., & Yakel, E. (2019). Context from the data reuser’s point of view. Journal of Documentation, 75(6), 1274-1297. https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-08-2018-0133es_ES
dc.description.referencesFaniel, I. M., Kriesberg, A., & Yakel, E. (2012). Data reuse and sensemaking among novice social scientists. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(1), 1-10. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504901068es_ES
dc.description.referencesFinholt, T. A. (2003). Collaboratories as a new form of scientific organization. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590303119es_ES
dc.description.referencesForay, D. (2003). The economics of knowledge reproduction by inscription. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(2), 299-319. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/12.2.299es_ES
dc.description.referencesGarmon Bibb, S. C. (2007). Issues associated with secondary analysis of population health data. Applied Nursing Research, 20(2), 94-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2006.02.003es_ES
dc.description.referencesGERRING, J. (2004). What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good for? American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341-354. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055404001182es_ES
dc.description.referencesGläser Jochen. 2012. “How Does Governance Change Research Content? On the Possibility of a Sociological Middle-Range Theory Linking Science Policy Studies to the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.” The Technical University Technology Studies Working Papers. https://www.ts.tu-berlin.de/fileadmin/fg226/TUTS/TUTS-WP-1-2012.pdf.es_ES
dc.description.references<!DOCTYPE html> <html lang="en-US" xml:lang="en-US"> <head> <meta charset="utf-8"> <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"> <title> Life With and Without Coding: Two Methods for Early-Stage Data Analysis in Qualitative Research Aiming at Causal Explanations | Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research </title> <link rel="icon" href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/public/journals/1/favicon_en_US.gif"> <meta name="generator" content="Open Journal Systems 3.3.0.15"> <meta name="author" content="FQS"> <meta name="language" content="en"> <meta name="copyright" content="FQS"> <meta name="robots" content="index, follow"> <meta name="revisit-after" content="30 days"> <link rel="schema.DC" href="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" /> <meta name="DC.Creator.PersonalName" content="Jochen Gläser"/> <meta name="DC.Creator.PersonalName" content="Grit Laudel"/> <meta name="DC.Date.created" scheme="ISO8601" content="2013-03-18"/> <meta name="DC.Date.dateSubmitted" scheme="ISO8601" content="2012-08-07"/> <meta name="DC.Date.issued" scheme="ISO8601" content="2013-03-31"/> <meta name="DC.Date.modified" scheme="ISO8601" content="2019-03-14"/> <meta name="DC.Description" xml:lang="de" content="Qualitative Forschung, die &quot;mechanismische&quot; Erklärungen konstruieren will, muss die bereits existierende Theorie mit in den Daten gefundenen Mustern integrieren, was eine besondere Herausforderung für qualitative Datenanalyse darstellt. In diesem Artikel diskutieren wir die Nutzung zweier Methoden – Kodieren und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse – als erste Schritte im Prozess der Datenanalyse. Beide Methoden produzieren durch Kategorien strukturierte Datenbasen, die für die Suche nach Mustern in den Daten und deren Integration in systematische, theoretisch eingebettete Erklärungen genutzt werden kann. Wenn es als separate Methode außerhalb des Grounded-Theory-Ansatzes genutzt wird, führt Kodieren auf einen indizierten Text, d.h. der Text selbst und die seinen Index bildenden Kodes werden in den folgenden Schritten weiter verarbeitet. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse extrahiert die relevanten Informationen (separiert sie vom Text) und verarbeitet sie getrennt weiter. Die qualitative Inhaltsanalyse scheint dem Kodieren überlegen, wenn Forschungsfragen aus der Theorie abgeleitet werden und ihre Beantwortung auf Informationen über die relative Position von Aussagen in Texten verzichten kann, was bei der Suche nach &quot;mechanismischen&quot; Erklärungen häufig der Fall ist. Kodieren scheint überlegen, wenn Forschungsfragen stärker explorativer Natur sind oder die Position von Informationen im Text für die Beantwortung der Forschungsfragen relevant ist.URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs130254"/> <meta name="DC.Description" xml:lang="en" content="Qualitative research aimed at &quot;mechanismic&quot; explanations poses specific challenges to qualitative data analysis because it must integrate existing theory with patterns identified in the data. We explore the utilization of two methods—coding and qualitative content analysis—for the first steps in the data analysis process, namely &quot;cleaning&quot; and organizing qualitative data. Both methods produce an information base that is structured by categories and can be used in the subsequent search for patterns in the data and integration of these patterns into a systematic, theoretically embedded explanation. Used as a stand-alone method outside the grounded theory approach, coding leads to an indexed text, i.e. both the original text and the index (the system of codes describing the content of text segments) are subjected to further analysis. Qualitative content analysis extracts the relevant information, i.e. separates it from the original text, and processes only this information. We suggest that qualitative content analysis has advantages compared to coding whenever the research question is embedded in prior theory and can be answered without processing knowledge about the form of statements and their position in the text, which usually is the case in the search for &quot;mechanismic&quot; explanations. Coding outperforms qualitative content analysis in research that needs this information in later stages of the analysis, e.g. the exploration of meaning or the study of the construction of narratives.URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs130254"/> <meta name="DC.Description" xml:lang="es" content="La investigación cualitativa que apunta a explicaciones &quot;mecanicistas&quot; posee retos específicos para el análisis cualitativo de datos ya que debe integrar la teoría existente con patrones identificados en los datos. Exploramos el uso de dos métodos- análisis cualitativo de contenido y codificación – para los primeros pasos del proceso de análisis de datos, llamados &quot;limpieza&quot; y organización de datos cualitativos. Ambos métodos producen una información base que es estructurada en categorías que pueden usarse subsecuentemente en la búsqueda de patrones en los datos e integración de esos patrones en una explicación teóricamente integrada y sistemática. Utilizado como método independiente, fuera del enfoque de teoría fundamentada, la codificación conduce a un texto indizado, es decir, tanto el texto original como el índice (el sistema de codificación que describe el contenido de dichos segmentos textuales) serán sujetos a un análisis posterior. El análisis cualitativo de contenido extrae la información relevante, la separa del texto original y procesa únicamente esta información. Sugerimos que el análisis cualitativo de contenido tiene ventajas al compararlo con la codificación, siempre que la pregunta de investigación esté integrada a teoría previa y pueda ser contestada sin necesidad de procesar el conocimiento acerca de la forma y posición de los enunciados en el texto, que es usualmente el caso de la búsqueda de explicaciones &quot;mecanicistas&quot;. La codificación supera al análisis cualitativo de contenido en la investigación que necesita esta información en las etapas posteriores del análisis, por ejemplo, en la exploración del significado o el estudio de la construcción de narrativas.URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs130254"/> <meta name="DC.Format" scheme="IMT" content="text/html"/> <meta name="DC.Format" scheme="IMT" content="application/pdf"/> <meta name="DC.Identifier" content="1886"/> <meta name="DC.Identifier.DOI" content="10.17169/fqs-14.2.1886"/> <meta name="DC.Identifier.URI" content="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1886"/> <meta name="DC.Language" scheme="ISO639-1" content="en"/> <meta name="DC.Rights" content="Copyright (c) 2013 Jochen Gläser, Grit Laudel"/> <meta name="DC.Rights" content="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"/> <meta name="DC.Source" content="Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research"/> <meta name="DC.Source.ISSN" content="1438-5627"/> <meta name="DC.Source.Issue" content="2"/> <meta name="DC.Source.Volume" content="14"/> <meta name="DC.Source.URI" content="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs"/> <meta name="DC.Subject" xml:lang="en" content="qualitative content analysis"/> <meta name="DC.Subject" xml:lang="en" content="grounded theory method"/> <meta name="DC.Subject" xml:lang="en" content="coding"/> <meta name="DC.Subject" xml:lang="en" content="sociological explanations"/> <meta name="DC.Subject" xml:lang="en" content="causal mechanisms"/> <meta name="DC.Subject" xml:lang="en" content="theory-guided research"/> <meta name="DC.Title" content="Life With and Without Coding: Two Methods for Early-Stage Data Analysis in Qualitative Research Aiming at Causal Explanations"/> <meta name="DC.Title.Alternative" xml:lang="de" content="Forschen mit und ohne Kodieren: Zwei Analysemethoden für die ersten Auswertungsschritte in der erklärenden qualitativen Forschung"/> <meta name="DC.Title.Alternative" xml:lang="es" content="La vida codificando y sin codificar: Dos métodos para el análisis temprano de datos en investigación cualitativa que busca explicaciones causales"/> <meta name="DC.Type" content="Text.Serial.Journal"/> <meta name="DC.Type" xml:lang="de" content=""/> <meta name="DC.Type" xml:lang="en" content=""/> <meta name="DC.Type" xml:lang="es" content=""/> <meta name="DC.Type.articleType" content="Single Contributions"/> <meta name="gs_meta_revision" content="1.1"/> <meta name="citation_journal_title" content="Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research"/> <meta name="citation_journal_abbrev" content="FQS"/> <meta name="citation_issn" content="1438-5627"/> <meta name="citation_author" content="Jochen Gläser"/> <meta name="citation_author_institution" content="TU Berlin"/> <meta name="citation_author" content="Grit Laudel"/> <meta name="citation_author_institution" content="TU Berlin"/> <meta name="citation_title" content="Life With and Without Coding: Two Methods for Early-Stage Data Analysis in Qualitative Research Aiming at Causal Explanations"/> <meta name="citation_language" content="en"/> <meta name="citation_date" content="2013/03/18"/> <meta name="citation_volume" content="14"/> <meta name="citation_issue" content="2"/> <meta name="citation_doi" content="10.17169/fqs-14.2.1886"/> <meta name="citation_abstract_html_url" content="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1886"/> <meta name="citation_keywords" xml:lang="en" content="qualitative content analysis"/> <meta name="citation_keywords" xml:lang="en" content="grounded theory method"/> <meta name="citation_keywords" xml:lang="en" content="coding"/> <meta name="citation_keywords" xml:lang="en" content="sociological explanations"/> <meta name="citation_keywords" xml:lang="en" content="causal mechanisms"/> <meta name="citation_keywords" xml:lang="en" content="theory-guided research"/> <meta name="citation_fulltext_html_url" content="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1886/3528"/> <meta name="citation_pdf_url" content="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/download/1886/3529"/> <link rel="alternate" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/gateway/plugin/WebFeedGatewayPlugin/atom"> <link rel="alternate" type="application/rdf+xml" href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/gateway/plugin/WebFeedGatewayPlugin/rss"> <link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/gateway/plugin/WebFeedGatewayPlugin/rss2"> <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/$$$call$$$/page/page/css?name=stylesheet" type="text/css" /><link rel="stylesheet" href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/$$$call$$$/page/page/css?name=font" type="text/css" /><link rel="stylesheet" href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/lib/pkp/styles/fontawesome/fontawesome.css?v=3.3.0.15" type="text/css" /><link rel="stylesheet" href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/public/journals/1/styleSheet.css?d=" type="text/css" /> </head> <body class="pkp_page_article pkp_op_view has_site_logo" dir="ltr"> <div class="pkp_structure_page"> <header class="pkp_structure_head" id="headerNavigationContainer" role="banner"> <nav class="cmp_skip_to_content" aria-label="Jump to content links"> <a href="#pkp_content_main">Skip to main content</a> <a href="#siteNav">Skip to main navigation menu</a> <a href="#pkp_content_footer">Skip to site footer</a> </nav> <div class="pkp_head_wrapper"> <div class="pkp_site_name_wrapper"> <button class="pkp_site_nav_toggle"> <span>Open Menu</span> </button> <div class="pkp_site_name"> <a href=" https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/index " class="is_img"> <img src="https://www.qualitative-research.net/public/journals/1/pageHeaderLogoImage_en_US.png" width="1569" height="236" alt="Forum: Qualitative Social Research / Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung" /> </a> </div> </div> <nav class="pkp_site_nav_menu" aria-label="Site Navigation"> <a id="siteNav"></a> <div class="pkp_navigation_primary_row"> <div class="pkp_navigation_primary_wrapper"> <ul id="navigationPrimary" class="pkp_navigation_primary pkp_nav_list"> <li class=""> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/about"> About </a> <ul> <li class=""> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/about"> About the Journal </a> </li> <li class=""> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/about/sections"> Sections </a> </li> <li class=""> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/about/review"> Peer Review </a> </li> <li class=""> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/about/publishing"> Publishing </a> </li> <li class=""> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/about/privacy"> Privacy Statement </a> </li> <li class=""> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/about/ethics"> Ethics Statement </a> </li> <li class=""> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/about/accessibility"> Accessibility Statement </a> </li> <li class=""> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/about/contact"> Contact </a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class=""> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/people"> People </a> <ul> <li class=""> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/people/team"> Editorial Team </a> </li> <li class=""> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/people/board"> Editorial Board </a> </li> <li class=""> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/people/reviewer"> External Reviewers </a> </li> <li class=""> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/people/former"> Former Members </a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class=""> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/about/submissions"> Submissions </a> <ul> <li class=""> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/submission/checklist"> Submission Preparation Checklist </a> </li> <li class=""> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/submission/guidelines"> Manuscript Guidelines </a> </li> <li class=""> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/submission/copyright"> Copyright </a> </li> <li class=""> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/submission/openaccess"> Open Access </a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class=""> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/current"> Current </a> </li> <li class=""> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/archive"> Archives </a> </li> <li class=""> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/announcement"> Announcements </a> </li> </ul> <div class="pkp_navigation_search_wrapper"> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/search" class="pkp_search pkp_search_desktop"> <span class="fa fa-search" aria-hidden="true"></span> Search </a> </div> </div> </div> <div class="pkp_navigation_user_wrapper" id="navigationUserWrapper"> <ul id="navigationUser" class="pkp_navigation_user pkp_nav_list"> <li class="profile"> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/user/register"> Register </a> </li> <li class="profile"> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/login"> Login </a> </li> </ul> </div> </nav> </div><!-- .pkp_head_wrapper --> </header><!-- .pkp_structure_head --> <div class="pkp_structure_content has_sidebar"> <div class="pkp_structure_main" role="main"> <a id="pkp_content_main"></a> <div class="page page_article"> <nav class="cmp_breadcrumbs" role="navigation" aria-label="You are here:"> <ol> <li> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/index"> Home </a> <span class="separator">/</span> </li> <li> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/archive"> Archives </a> <span class="separator">/</span> </li> <li> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/43"> Vol. 14 No. 2 (2013) </a> <span class="separator">/</span> </li> <li class="current" aria-current="page"> <span aria-current="page"> Single Contributions </span> </li> </ol> </nav> <article class="obj_article_details"> <h1 class="page_title"> Life With and Without Coding: Two Methods for Early-Stage Data Analysis in Qualitative Research Aiming at Causal Explanations </h1> <div class="row"> <div class="main_entry"> <section class="item authors"> <h2 class="pkp_screen_reader">Authors</h2> <ul class="authors"> <li> <span class="name"> Jochen Gläser </span> <span class="affiliation"> TU Berlin </span> </li> <li> <span class="name"> Grit Laudel </span> <span class="affiliation"> TU Berlin </span> </li> </ul> </section> <section class="item doi"> <h2 class="label"> DOI: </h2> <span class="value"> <a href="https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-14.2.1886"> https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-14.2.1886 </a> </span> </section> <section class="item keywords"> <h2 class="label"> Keywords: </h2> <span class="value"> qualitative content analysis, grounded theory method, coding, sociological explanations, causal mechanisms, theory-guided research </span> </section> <section class="item abstract"> <h2 class="label">Abstract</h2> <p>Qualitative research aimed at "mechanismic" explanations poses specific challenges to qualitative data analysis because it must integrate existing theory with patterns identified in the data. We explore the utilization of two methods—coding and qualitative content analysis—for the first steps in the data analysis process, namely "cleaning" and organizing qualitative data. Both methods produce an information base that is structured by categories and can be used in the subsequent search for patterns in the data and integration of these patterns into a systematic, theoretically embedded explanation. Used as a stand-alone method outside the grounded theory approach, coding leads to an indexed text, i.e. both the original text and the index (the system of codes describing the content of text segments) are subjected to further analysis. Qualitative content analysis extracts the relevant information, i.e. separates it from the original text, and processes only this information. We suggest that qualitative content analysis has advantages compared to coding whenever the research question is embedded in prior theory and can be answered without processing knowledge about the form of statements and their position in the text, which usually is the case in the search for "mechanismic" explanations. Coding outperforms qualitative content analysis in research that needs this information in later stages of the analysis, e.g. the exploration of meaning or the study of the construction of narratives.</p><p>URN: <a href="http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs130254">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs130254</a></p> </section> <div class="item downloads_chart"> <h3 class="label"> Downloads </h3> <div class="value"> <canvas class="usageStatsGraph" data-object-type="Submission" data-object-id="1886"></canvas> <div class="usageStatsUnavailable" data-object-type="Submission" data-object-id="1886"> Download data is not yet available. </div> </div> </div> <section class="item author_bios"> <h2 class="label"> Author Biographies </h2> <section class="sub_item"> <h3 class="label"> Jochen Gläser, <span class="affiliation">TU Berlin</span> </h3> <div class="value"> <p><em>Jochen GLÄSER</em> (corresponding author) is a senior researcher at the Center for Technology and Society, TU Berlin. His major research interests include the sociology of science, organizational sociology and sociological research methods. His current projects address bibliometric methods for measuring the diversity of research, the impact of authority relations on scientific innovation, and responses by German universities to research evaluation.</p> </div> </section> <section class="sub_item"> <h3 class="label"> Grit Laudel, <span class="affiliation">TU Berlin</span> </h3> <div class="value"> <p><em>Grit LAUDEL</em> is a senior research fellow at the University of Twente, Center for Higher Education Policy Research (CHEPS), the Netherlands. She is a sociologist of science who investigates the influence of institutions on knowledge production. Currently she is studying scientific careers and conditions for scientific innovations in cross-national comparisons. Since her PhD (obtained at the University of Bielefeld) Grit has always been developing methodology and methods for science studies and for social research in general.</p> </div> </section> </section> </div><!-- .main_entry --> <div class="entry_details"> <div class="item galleys"> <h2 class="pkp_screen_reader"> Downloads </h2> <ul class="value galleys_links"> <li> <a class="obj_galley_link file" href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1886/3528"> HTML </a> </li> <li> <a class="obj_galley_link pdf" href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1886/3529"> PDF </a> </li> </ul> </div> <div class="item published"> <section class="sub_item"> <h2 class="label"> Published </h2> <div class="value"> <span>2013-03-18</span> </div> </section> </div> <div class="item citation"> <section class="sub_item citation_display"> <h2 class="label"> How to Cite </h2> <div class="value"> <div id="citationOutput" role="region" aria-live="polite"> <div class="csl-bib-body"> <div class="csl-entry">Gläser, J., &#38; Laudel, G. (2013). Life With and Without Coding: Two Methods for Early-Stage Data Analysis in Qualitative Research Aiming at Causal Explanations. <i>Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research</i>, <i>14</i>(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-14.2.1886</div> </div> </div> <div class="citation_formats"> <button class="cmp_button citation_formats_button" aria-controls="cslCitationFormats" aria-expanded="false" data-csl-dropdown="true"> More Citation Formats </button> <div id="cslCitationFormats" class="citation_formats_list" aria-hidden="true"> <ul class="citation_formats_styles"> <li> <a aria-controls="citationOutput" href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/citationstylelanguage/get/acm-sig-proceedings?submissionId=1886&amp;publicationId=1763" data-load-citation data-json-href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/citationstylelanguage/get/acm-sig-proceedings?submissionId=1886&amp;publicationId=1763&amp;return=json" > ACM </a> </li> <li> <a aria-controls="citationOutput" href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/citationstylelanguage/get/acs-nano?submissionId=1886&amp;publicationId=1763" data-load-citation data-json-href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/citationstylelanguage/get/acs-nano?submissionId=1886&amp;publicationId=1763&amp;return=json" > ACS </a> </li> <li> <a aria-controls="citationOutput" href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/citationstylelanguage/get/apa?submissionId=1886&amp;publicationId=1763" data-load-citation data-json-href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/citationstylelanguage/get/apa?submissionId=1886&amp;publicationId=1763&amp;return=json" > APA </a> </li> <li> <a aria-controls="citationOutput" href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/citationstylelanguage/get/associacao-brasileira-de-normas-tecnicas?submissionId=1886&amp;publicationId=1763" data-load-citation data-json-href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/citationstylelanguage/get/associacao-brasileira-de-normas-tecnicas?submissionId=1886&amp;publicationId=1763&amp;return=json" > ABNT </a> </li> <li> <a aria-controls="citationOutput" href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/citationstylelanguage/get/chicago-author-date?submissionId=1886&amp;publicationId=1763" data-load-citation data-json-href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/citationstylelanguage/get/chicago-author-date?submissionId=1886&amp;publicationId=1763&amp;return=json" > Chicago </a> </li> <li> <a aria-controls="citationOutput" href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/citationstylelanguage/get/harvard-cite-them-right?submissionId=1886&amp;publicationId=1763" data-load-citation data-json-href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/citationstylelanguage/get/harvard-cite-them-right?submissionId=1886&amp;publicationId=1763&amp;return=json" > Harvard </a> </li> <li> <a aria-controls="citationOutput" href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/citationstylelanguage/get/ieee?submissionId=1886&amp;publicationId=1763" data-load-citation data-json-href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/citationstylelanguage/get/ieee?submissionId=1886&amp;publicationId=1763&amp;return=json" > IEEE </a> </li> <li> <a aria-controls="citationOutput" href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/citationstylelanguage/get/modern-language-association?submissionId=1886&amp;publicationId=1763" data-load-citation data-json-href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/citationstylelanguage/get/modern-language-association?submissionId=1886&amp;publicationId=1763&amp;return=json" > MLA </a> </li> <li> <a aria-controls="citationOutput" href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/citationstylelanguage/get/turabian-fullnote-bibliography?submissionId=1886&amp;publicationId=1763" data-load-citation data-json-href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/citationstylelanguage/get/turabian-fullnote-bibliography?submissionId=1886&amp;publicationId=1763&amp;return=json" > Turabian </a> </li> <li> <a aria-controls="citationOutput" href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/citationstylelanguage/get/vancouver?submissionId=1886&amp;publicationId=1763" data-load-citation data-json-href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/citationstylelanguage/get/vancouver?submissionId=1886&amp;publicationId=1763&amp;return=json" > Vancouver </a> </li> </ul> <div class="label"> Download Citation </div> <ul class="citation_formats_styles"> <li> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/citationstylelanguage/download/ris?submissionId=1886&amp;publicationId=1763"> <span class="fa fa-download"></span> Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) </a> </li> <li> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/citationstylelanguage/download/bibtex?submissionId=1886&amp;publicationId=1763"> <span class="fa fa-download"></span> BibTeX </a> </li> </ul> </div> </div> </div> </section> </div> <div class="item issue"> <section class="sub_item"> <h2 class="label"> Issue </h2> <div class="value"> <a class="title" href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/43"> Vol. 14 No. 2 (2013) </a> </div> </section> <section class="sub_item"> <h2 class="label"> Section </h2> <div class="value"> Single Contributions </div> </section> </div> <div class="item copyright"> <h2 class="label"> License </h2> <p>Copyright (c) 2013 Jochen Gläser, Grit Laudel</p> <a rel="license" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" src="//i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" /></a><p>This work is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a>.</p> </div> </div><!-- .entry_details --> </div><!-- .row --> </article> <div id="articlesBySameAuthorList"> <h3>Most read articles by the same author(s)</h3> <ul> <li> Jochen Glaser, Grit Laudel, <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/3386"> The Discovery of Causal Mechanisms: Extractive Qualitative Content Analysis as a Tool for Process Tracing </a>, <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/65"> Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research: Vol. 20 No. 3 (2019): Qualitative Content Analysis I </a> </li> <li> Grit Laudel, Jana Bielick, <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/3077"> Practical Problems of Archiving Semi-Structured Interviews </a>, <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/64"> Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research: Vol. 20 No. 2 (2019): Harold Garfinkel&#039;s &quot;Studies in Ethnomethodology&quot;. An Interview Issue </a> </li> <li> Jochen Gläser, Grit Laudel, <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1042"> Re-analysis as a Comparison of Constructions </a>, <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/27"> Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research: Vol. 1 No. 3 (2000): Text . Archive . Re-Analysis </a> </li> </ul> <div id="articlesBySameAuthorPages"> </div> </div> </div><!-- .page --> </div><!-- pkp_structure_main --> <div class="pkp_structure_sidebar left" role="complementary" aria-label="Sidebar"> <div class="pkp_block block_language"> <h2 class="title"> Language </h2> <div class="content"> <ul> <li class="locale_de_DE" lang="de-DE"> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/user/setLocale/de_DE?source=%2Findex.php%2Ffqs%2Farticle%2Fview%2F1886"> Deutsch </a> </li> <li class="locale_en_US current" lang="en-US"> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/user/setLocale/en_US?source=%2Findex.php%2Ffqs%2Farticle%2Fview%2F1886"> English </a> </li> </ul> </div> </div><!-- .block_language --> <div class="pkp_block block_make_submission"> <h2 class="pkp_screen_reader"> Make a Submission </h2> <div class="content"> <a class="block_make_submission_link" href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/about/submissions"> Make a Submission </a> </div> </div> <div class="pkp_block block_custom" id="customblock-doaj"> <h2 class="title pkp_screen_reader">doaj</h2> <div class="content"> <p><img src="https://www.qualitative-research.net/public/site/images/km/doaj-logo-black-slogan-whitespace-0b68cf01fb42d238bdf9897e3c90a0b3.png" alt="" width="1408" height="385"></p> </div> </div> <div class="pkp_block block_Keywordcloud"> <h2 class="title">Keywords</h2> <div class="content" id='wordcloud'></div> <script> function randomColor() { var cores = ['#1f77b4', '#ff7f0e', '#2ca02c', '#d62728', '#9467bd', '#8c564b', '#e377c2', '#7f7f7f', '#bcbd22', '#17becf']; return cores[Math.floor(Math.random()*cores.length)]; } document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", function() { var keywords = [{"text":"autoethnography","size":1},{"text":"computer tool","size":1},{"text":"team research","size":1},{"text":"depression","size":1},{"text":"george brown","size":1},{"text":"digitisation","size":1},{"text":"socio-medical research","size":1},{"text":"gate-keeping","size":1},{"text":"data access","size":1},{"text":"digital media of storage","size":1},{"text":"data bank","size":1},{"text":"right of use","size":1},{"text":"quantitative analysis","size":1},{"text":"mso","size":1},{"text":"work process","size":1},{"text":"g\u00f6teborg","size":1},{"text":"corpus","size":1},{"text":"spoken language","size":1},{"text":"youth organizations","size":1},{"text":"archiving qualitative data","size":1},{"text":"historical youth research","size":1},{"text":"secondary analysis and reanalysis","size":1},{"text":"anonymisation","size":1},{"text":"data protection and ethical aspects of research","size":1},{"text":"database system \"qbiq","size":1},{"text":"computerised archiving of qualitative longitudinal data","size":1},{"text":"data preservation","size":1},{"text":"data","size":1},{"text":"linguistic methods","size":1},{"text":"theory of society","size":1},{"text":"ergography","size":1},{"text":"large-scale","size":1},{"text":"computer mediated discourse","size":1},{"text":"social practice","size":1},{"text":"e-mail discussion","size":1},{"text":"literacy instruction","size":1},{"text":"concept mapping","size":1},{"text":"diagnose","size":1},{"text":"reconstructive social pedagogy","size":1},{"text":"biography analysis","size":1},{"text":"biographical approach to casework","size":1},{"text":"university didactics","size":1},{"text":"tape recording","size":1},{"text":"national diversity","size":1},{"text":"acceptability","size":1},{"text":"legitimation","size":1},{"text":"handbooks","size":1},{"text":"textbooks","size":1},{"text":"mental health","size":1},{"text":"roland barthes","size":1}]; var totalWeight = 0; var width = 300; var height = 200; var transitionDuration = 200; var length_keywords = keywords.length; var layout = d3.layout.cloud(); layout.size([width, height]) .words(keywords) .fontSize(function(d) { return fontSize(+d.size); }) .on('end', draw); var svg = d3.select("#wordcloud").append("svg") .attr("viewBox", "0 0 " + width + " " + height) .attr("width", '100%'); function update() { var words = layout.words(); fontSize = d3.scaleLinear().range([16, 34]); if (words.length) { fontSize.domain([+words[words.length - 1].size || 1, +words[0].size]); } } keywords.forEach(function(item,index){totalWeight += item.size;}); update(); function draw(words, bounds) { var w = layout.size()[0], h = layout.size()[1]; scaling = bounds ? Math.min( w / Math.abs(bounds[1].x - w / 2), w / Math.abs(bounds[0].x - w / 2), h / Math.abs(bounds[1].y - h / 2), h / Math.abs(bounds[0].y - h / 2), ) / 2 : 1; svg .append("g") .attr( "transform", "translate(" + [w >> 1, h >> 1] + ")scale(" + scaling + ")", ) .selectAll("text") .data(words) .enter().append("text") .style("font-size", function(d) { return d.size + "px"; }) .style("font-family", 'serif') .style("fill", randomColor) .style('cursor', 'pointer') .style('opacity', 0.7) .attr('class', 'keyword') .attr("text-anchor", "middle") .attr("transform", function(d) { return "translate(" + [d.x, d.y] + ")rotate(" + d.rotate + ")"; }) .text(function(d) { return d.text; }) .on("click", function(d, i){ window.location = "https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/search?query=QUERY_SLUG".replace(/QUERY_SLUG/, encodeURIComponent(''+d.text+'')); }) .on("mouseover", function(d, i) { d3.select(this).transition() .duration(transitionDuration) .style('font-size',function(d) { return (d.size + 3) + "px"; }) .style('opacity', 1); }) .on("mouseout", function(d, i) { d3.select(this).transition() .duration(transitionDuration) .style('font-size',function(d) { return d.size + "px"; }) .style('opacity', 0.7); }) .on('resize', function() { update() }); } layout.start(); }); </script> </div> <div class="pkp_block block_web_feed"> <h2 class="title">Current Issue</h2> <div class="content"> <ul> <li> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/gateway/plugin/WebFeedGatewayPlugin/atom"> <img src="https://www.qualitative-research.net/lib/pkp/templates/images/atom.svg" alt="Atom logo"> </a> </li> <li> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/gateway/plugin/WebFeedGatewayPlugin/rss2"> <img src="https://www.qualitative-research.net/lib/pkp/templates/images/rss20_logo.svg" alt="RSS2 logo"> </a> </li> <li> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/gateway/plugin/WebFeedGatewayPlugin/rss"> <img src="https://www.qualitative-research.net/lib/pkp/templates/images/rss10_logo.svg" alt="RSS1 logo"> </a> </li> </ul> </div> </div> <div class="pkp_block block_information"> <h2 class="title">Information</h2> <div class="content"> <ul> <li> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/information/readers"> For Readers </a> </li> <li> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/information/authors"> For Authors </a> </li> <li> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/information/librarians"> For Librarians </a> </li> </ul> </div> </div> <div class="pkp_block plugins_generic_usageStats_optout" id="usageStatsOptout"> <h2 class="title"> Usage Statistics Information </h2> <div class="content"> <p>We log anonymous usage statistics. Please read the <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/usageStats/privacyInformation">privacy information</a> for details.</p> </div> </div> <div class="pkp_block block_developed_by"> <h2 class="pkp_screen_reader"> Developed By </h2> <div class="content"> <a href="http://pkp.sfu.ca/ojs/"> Open Journal Systems </a> </div> </div> </div><!-- pkp_sidebar.left --> </div><!-- pkp_structure_content --> <div class="pkp_structure_footer_wrapper" role="contentinfo"> <a id="pkp_content_footer"></a> <div class="pkp_structure_footer"> <div class="pkp_footer_content"> <p>2000-2026 <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/index">Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research</a> (ISSN 1438-5627) <br /><a href="http://www.qualitative-forschung.de/institut/index.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Institut für Qualitative Forschung</a>, Internationale Akademie Berlin gGmbH</p> <p>Hosting: <a href="https://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/open_access/e-publishing/index.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Freie Universität Berlin</a><br />Funding 2023-2025 by <a href="https://www.tib.eu/en/services/koala" target="_blank" rel="noopener">KOALA</a><br />Funding 2026-2028 by <a href="https://www.sociohub-fid.de/p/Zeitschriftenbuendel" target="_blank" rel="noopener">SocioHub</a></p> <p><em>FQS</em> received the <a title="Enter-Award" href="https://enter-award.irights-lab.de/die-preistraegerinnen-2024/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Open-Access Award 2024 in the "Pioneering Achievement" category</a>, funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and implemented by the think tank iRights.Lab.</p> <p><a title="SCImago Journal &amp; Country Rank" href="https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=72827&amp;tip=sid&amp;exact=no" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://www.scimagojr.com/journal_img.php?id=72827" alt="SCImago Journal &amp; Country Rank" border="0" /></a></p> <p><a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/about/privacy" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Privacy Statement</a><br /><a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/about/accessibility" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Accessibility Statement</a></p> </div> <div class="pkp_brand_footer" role="complementary"> <a href="https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/about/aboutThisPublishingSystem"> <img alt="More information about the publishing system, Platform and Workflow by OJS/PKP." src="https://www.qualitative-research.net/templates/images/ojs_brand.png"> </a> </div> </div> </div><!-- pkp_structure_footer_wrapper --> </div><!-- pkp_structure_page --> <script src="https://www.qualitative-research.net/lib/pkp/lib/vendor/components/jquery/jquery.min.js?v=3.3.0.15" type="text/javascript"></script><script src="https://www.qualitative-research.net/lib/pkp/lib/vendor/components/jqueryui/jquery-ui.min.js?v=3.3.0.15" type="text/javascript"></script><script src="https://www.qualitative-research.net/plugins/themes/default/js/lib/popper/popper.js?v=3.3.0.15" type="text/javascript"></script><script src="https://www.qualitative-research.net/plugins/themes/default/js/lib/bootstrap/util.js?v=3.3.0.15" type="text/javascript"></script><script src="https://www.qualitative-research.net/plugins/themes/default/js/lib/bootstrap/dropdown.js?v=3.3.0.15" type="text/javascript"></script><script src="https://www.qualitative-research.net/plugins/themes/default/js/main.js?v=3.3.0.15" type="text/javascript"></script><script src="https://www.qualitative-research.net/plugins/generic/citationStyleLanguage/js/articleCitation.js?v=3.3.0.15" type="text/javascript"></script><script src="https://d3js.org/d3.v4.js?v=3.3.0.15" type="text/javascript"></script><script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/holtzy/D3-graph-gallery@master/LIB/d3.layout.cloud.js?v=3.3.0.15" type="text/javascript"></script><script type="text/javascript">var pkpUsageStats = pkpUsageStats || {};pkpUsageStats.data = pkpUsageStats.data || {};pkpUsageStats.data.Submission = pkpUsageStats.data.Submission || {};pkpUsageStats.data.Submission[1886] = {"data":{"2016":{"1":0,"2":2140,"3":13492,"4":16009,"5":9726,"6":12063,"7":8509,"8":6398,"9":6167,"10":7743,"11":8175,"12":5863},"2017":{"1":6006,"2":6452,"3":9195,"4":7901,"5":6718,"6":4794,"7":4296,"8":4439,"9":5128,"10":6318,"11":6367,"12":4655},"2018":{"1":5150,"2":6321,"3":8177,"4":8548,"5":6965,"6":5108,"7":4134,"8":4510,"9":3826,"10":5139,"11":5480,"12":4577},"2019":{"1":4984,"2":4868,"3":6605,"4":5558,"5":4971,"6":4046,"7":3407,"8":4082,"9":4303,"10":5654,"11":6180,"12":4047},"2020":{"1":3895,"2":3670,"3":1771,"4":1861,"5":1580,"6":1202,"7":1412,"8":2676,"9":3039,"10":3777,"11":5221,"12":2271},"2021":{"1":232,"2":232,"3":301,"4":316,"5":342,"6":261,"7":153,"8":173,"9":157,"10":187,"11":200,"12":162},"2022":{"1":190,"2":169,"3":213,"4":196,"5":150,"6":135,"7":94,"8":158,"9":160,"10":141,"11":166,"12":144},"2023":{"1":224,"2":244,"3":142,"4":140,"5":134,"6":113,"7":94,"8":116,"9":92,"10":88,"11":104,"12":94},"2024":{"1":115,"2":104,"3":120,"4":127,"5":106,"6":100,"7":107,"8":126,"9":99,"10":102,"11":87,"12":93},"2025":{"1":118,"2":108,"3":134,"4":115,"5":132,"6":123,"7":133,"8":104,"9":92,"10":75,"11":71,"12":43},"2026":{"1":83,"2":47,"3":58,"4":57,"5":58,"6":0,"7":0,"8":0,"9":0,"10":0,"11":0,"12":0}},"label":"All Downloads","color":"79,181,217","total":336623};</script><script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/Chart.js/2.0.1/Chart.js?v=3.3.0.15" type="text/javascript"></script><script type="text/javascript">var pkpUsageStats = pkpUsageStats || {};pkpUsageStats.locale = pkpUsageStats.locale || {};pkpUsageStats.locale.months = ["Jan","Feb","Mar","Apr","May","Jun","Jul","Aug","Sep","Oct","Nov","Dec"];pkpUsageStats.config = pkpUsageStats.config || {};pkpUsageStats.config.chartType = "line";</script><script src="https://www.qualitative-research.net/plugins/generic/usageStats/js/UsageStatsFrontendHandler.js?v=3.3.0.15" type="text/javascript"></script> </body> </html>es_ES
dc.description.referencesGregory, K., Groth, P., Scharnhorst, A., & Wyatt, S. (2020). Lost or Found? Discovering Data Needed for Research. Harvard Data Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.e38165ebes_ES
dc.description.referencesHemphill, L., Pienta, A., Lafia, S., Akmon, D., & Bleckley, D. A. (2022). How do properties of data, their curation, and their funding relate to reuse? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73(10), 1432-1444. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24646es_ES
dc.description.referencesHuang, C., & Soete, L. (2025). Reconciling open science with technological sovereignty. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2025.2459764es_ES
dc.description.referencesHyman, Herbert Hiram. 1972. Secondary Analysis of Sample Surveys. New York: Wiley.es_ES
dc.description.referencesIrwin Sarah and Mandy Winterton. 2011. “Debates in Qualitative Secondary Analysis: Critical Reflections Paper.” 3349 (4): 1–23. ISSN: 1758 3349.es_ES
dc.description.referencesKim, Y., & Yoon, A. (2017). Scientists” data reuse behaviors: A multilevel analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(12), 2709-2719. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23892es_ES
dc.description.referencesLatour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.es_ES
dc.description.referencesLatour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (, ed.). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001es_ES
dc.description.referencesLatour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.es_ES
dc.description.referencesLeonelli, S. (2015). What Counts as Scientific Data? A Relational Framework. Philosophy of Science, 82(5), 810-821. https://doi.org/10.1086/684083es_ES
dc.description.referencesLeonelli, S. (2016). Data-Centric Biology: A Philosophical Study (, ed.). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226416502.001.0001es_ES
dc.description.referencesMansell, Robin, and W. Edward Steinmueller. 2000. Mobilizing the Information Society. Strategies for Growth and Opportunity. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMarshall, Catherine, and Gretchen B. Rossman. 2011. Designing Qualitative Research. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMayntz, R. (2004). Mechanisms in the Analysis of Social Macro-Phenomena. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34(2), 237-259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393103262552es_ES
dc.description.referencesMiles, Matthew B., and A. Michael Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMurillo Angela Patricia. 2016. “Data Sharing and Data Reuse: An Investigation of Descriptive Information Facilitators and Inhibitors (Dissertation).”es_ES
dc.description.referencesNiu, J. (2009). Overcoming inadequate documentation. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 46(1), 1-14. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2009.145046024es_ES
dc.description.referencesNiu Jinfang. 2009b. “Perceived Documentation Quality of Social Science Data.”es_ES
dc.description.referencesOlson, G., & Olson, J. (2003). Mitigating the effects of distance on collaborative intellectual work. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(1), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590303117es_ES
dc.description.referencesPasquetto, I. V., Borgman, C. L., & Wofford, M. F. (2019). Uses and Reuses of Scientific Data: The Data Creators’ Advantage. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.fc14bf2des_ES
dc.description.referencesPasquetto, I. V., Randles, B. M., & Borgman, C. L. (2017). On the Reuse of Scientific Data. Data Science Journal, 16, 8. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-008es_ES
dc.description.referencesPettigrew, A. M. (1990). Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice. Organization Science, 1(3), 267-292. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.3.267es_ES
dc.description.referencesPienta, A. M., Akmon, D., Noble, J., Hoelter, L., & Jekielek, S. (2018). A Data-Driven Approach to Appraisal and Selection at a Domain Data Repository. International Journal of Digital Curation, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v12i2.500es_ES
dc.description.referencesPoole, Marshall S, and Andrew Van de Ven. 2010. “Empirical Methods for Research on Organizational Decision-Making Processes.” In Handbook of Decision Making, edited by Paul C Nutt and David C Wilson, 543–580. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.es_ES
dc.description.referencesReichenbach, H. (1952). Experience and prediction: An analysis of the foundations and the structure of knowledge. (, ed.). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/11656-000es_ES
dc.description.referencesRojas, F. (2017). Theory for the Working Sociologist (, ed.). Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/roja18164es_ES
dc.description.referencesSaldaña, J. (2003). Longitudinal Qualitative Research: Analyzing Change Through Time (, ed.). AltaMira Press. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216409625es_ES
dc.description.referencesSayer, A. (2000). Realism and Social Science (, ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446218730es_ES
dc.description.referencesSayer, A. (2010). Method in Social Science (, ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203850374es_ES
dc.description.referencesSimon, H. A. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852es_ES
dc.description.referencesSimon, Herbert A. 1957. Models of Man: Social and Rational. Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. New York: Wiley.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSimon, H. A. (2000). Bounded rationality in social science: Today and tomorrow. Mind &amp; Society, 1(1), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02512227es_ES
dc.description.referencesStake, Robert E. 2005. “Qualitative Case Studies.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Norman K Denzin and Yvonna S Lincoln, 443–466. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.es_ES
dc.description.referencesStake, Robert E. 2006. Multiple Case Study Analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.es_ES
dc.description.referencesEdward Steinmueller, W. (2000). Will new information and communication technologies improve the “codification” of knowledge? Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2), 361-376. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/9.2.361es_ES
dc.description.referencesTsoukas, Haridimos. 2010. “Strategic Decision Making and Knowledge: A Heideggerian Approach.” In Handbook of Decision Making, edited by Paul C Nutt and David C Wilson, 379–402. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.es_ES
dc.description.referencesWallis, J. C., Rolando, E., & Borgman, C. L. (2013). If We Share Data, Will Anyone Use Them? Data Sharing and Reuse in the Long Tail of Science and Technology. PLoS ONE, 8(7), e67332. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067332es_ES
dc.description.referencesWolfe, D. A., & Lucas, M. (2001). Investing Knowledge in Universities. En (editor), Knowledge Management in the Innovation Process (pp. 173-191). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1535-7_10es_ES
dc.description.referencesYin, Robert K. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.es_ES
dc.description.referencesYoon, A. (2016). Data reusers” trust development. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(4), 946-956. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23730es_ES
dc.description.referencesYoon, A. (2016). Red flags in data: Learning from failed data reuse experiences. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1-6. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301126es_ES
dc.description.referencesYoon, A. (2017). Role of communication in data reuse. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 54(1), 463-471. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401050es_ES
dc.description.referencesZimmerman, A. (2007). Not by metadata alone: the use of diverse forms of knowledge to locate data for reuse. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 7(1-2), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-007-0015-8es_ES
dc.description.referencesZimmerman, A. S. (2008). New Knowledge from Old Data: The Role of Standards in the Sharing and Reuse of Ecological Data. Science, Technology, &amp; Human Values, 33(5), 631-652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907306704es_ES
dc.description.referencesZuiderwijk, A., & Spiers, H. (2019). Sharing and re-using open data: A case study of motivations in astrophysics. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 228-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.024es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by NOVA DOMUS CHEMEDPHO (ERAMUS MUNDUS ACTION 2) [grant number 545700-EM-1-2013-1-ES-ERAMUNDUS-EMA22; 2015].es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10438599.2026.2660308es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1043-8599es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/235085
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherTaylor & Francises_ES
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics of Innovation and New Technologyes_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaS\582654es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC//545700-EM-1 2013-1-ES-ERAMUNDUS-EMA22/es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2026.2660308es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento (by)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectData reusees_ES
dc.subjectSocial mechanismes_ES
dc.subjectUse of secondary dataes_ES
dc.subjectBounded individual horizones_ES
dc.subjectHealth scienceses_ES
dc.titleOpening the black box: an explanatory model of data reuse in health research and beyondes_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
upv.uuid769c445a-3da2-4b97-bcdb-780c63f9d30des_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Aleixos-BorrasDEsteLopez - Opening the black box an explanatory model of data reuse in health res....pdf
Tamaño:
1.32 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial