Ergonomic risk and cycle time minimization for the U-shaped worker assignment assembly line balancing problem: A multi-objective approach

dc.contributor.authorZhang, Zikaies_ES
dc.contributor.authorTang, QiuHuaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorRuiz García, Rubénes_ES
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Lipinges_ES
dc.contributor.funderAgencia Estatal de Investigaciónes_ES
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Regional Development Fundes_ES
dc.contributor.funderNational Natural Science Foundation of Chinaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-29T03:31:30Z
dc.date.available2021-04-29T03:31:30Z
dc.date.issued2020-06es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN] Workers still perform the bulk of operations in the manufacturing industry. The consideration of the assignment of workers and the reduction of ergonomic risks in U-shaped assembly lines is of paramount importance. However, the objectives of efficient task and worker assignment and a reduction in ergonomic risks are not usually correlated. Moreover, there is limited research in the existing literature into multi-objective approaches in U-shaped assembly lines. We formulate a U-shaped assembly worker assignment and balancing problem to simultaneously minimize cycle times and ergonomic risks. In addition, and due to its simplicity and successful results in flow shop scheduling problems, a Restarted Iterated Pareto Greedy algorithm is designed to optimize both objectives. In this algorithm, a problem-specific heuristic-based initialization is extended to improve the initial solution. Two precedence-based greedy and local search phases are developed to exploit the space around the current solution. Finally, a restart mechanism is proposed to help the algorithm escape from local optima. Comprehensive computational results, supported by detailed statistical analyses, suggest that the proposed multi-objective algorithm outperforms existing methods on a large number of benchmark instances.en_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationZhang, Z.; Tang, Q.; Ruiz García, R.; Zhang, L. (2020). Ergonomic risk and cycle time minimization for the U-shaped worker assignment assembly line balancing problem: A multi-objective approach. Computers & Operations Research. 118:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2020.104905es_ES
dc.description.referencesAkyol, S. D., & Baykasoğlu, A. (2016). A multiple-rule based constructive randomized search algorithm for solving assembly line worker assignment and balancing problem. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 30(2), 557-573. doi:10.1007/s10845-016-1262-6es_ES
dc.description.referencesAkyol, S. D., & Baykasoğlu, A. (2016). ErgoALWABP: a multiple-rule based constructive randomized search algorithm for solving assembly line worker assignment and balancing problem under ergonomic risk factors. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 30(1), 291-302. doi:10.1007/s10845-016-1246-6es_ES
dc.description.referencesAlavidoost, M. H., Babazadeh, H., & Sayyari, S. T. (2016). An interactive fuzzy programming approach for bi-objective straight and U-shaped assembly line balancing problem. Applied Soft Computing, 40, 221-235. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.11.025es_ES
dc.description.referencesAlavidoost, M. H., Tarimoradi, M., & Zarandi, M. H. F. (2015). Fuzzy adaptive genetic algorithm for multi-objective assembly line balancing problems. Applied Soft Computing, 34, 655-677. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.06.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesAraújo, F. F. B., Costa, A. M., & Miralles, C. (2012). Two extensions for the ALWABP: Parallel stations and collaborative approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 483-495. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.06.032es_ES
dc.description.referencesAryanezhad, M. B., Kheirkhah, A. S., Deljoo, V., & Mirzapour Al-e-hashem, S. M. J. (2008). Designing safe job rotation schedules based upon workers’ skills. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 41(1-2), 193-199. doi:10.1007/s00170-008-1446-0es_ES
dc.description.referencesAvikal, S., Jain, R., Mishra, P. K., & Yadav, H. C. (2013). A heuristic approach for U-shaped assembly line balancing to improve labor productivity. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 64(4), 895-901. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2013.01.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesBattini, D., Calzavara, M., Otto, A., & Sgarbossa, F. (2016). The Integrated Assembly Line Balancing and Parts Feeding Problem with Ergonomics Considerations. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(12), 191-196. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.594es_ES
dc.description.referencesBattini, D., Faccio, M., Persona, A., & Sgarbossa, F. (2011). New methodological framework to improve productivity and ergonomics in assembly system design. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 41(1), 30-42. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2010.12.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesBautista, J., Batalla-García, C., & Alfaro-Pozo, R. (2016). Models for assembly line balancing by temporal, spatial and ergonomic risk attributes. European Journal of Operational Research, 251(3), 814-829. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.042es_ES
dc.description.referencesBaykasoglu, A. (2006). Multi-rule Multi-objective Simulated Annealing Algorithm for Straight and U Type Assembly Line Balancing Problems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 17(2), 217-232. doi:10.1007/s10845-005-6638-yes_ES
dc.description.referencesBaykasoğlu, A., Demirkol Akyol, S., & Demirkan, B. (2017). An Excel-based program to teach students quick ergonomic risk assessment techniques with an application to an assembly system. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 25(3), 489-507. doi:10.1002/cae.21816es_ES
dc.description.referencesBaykasoglu, A., Tasan, S. O., Tasan, A. S., & Akyol, S. D. (2017). Modeling and solving assembly line design problems by considering human factors with a real-life application. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 27(2), 96-115. doi:10.1002/hfm.20695es_ES
dc.description.referencesBlum, C., & Miralles, C. (2011). On solving the assembly line worker assignment and balancing problem via beam search. Computers & Operations Research, 38(1), 328-339. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2010.05.008es_ES
dc.description.referencesBorba, L., & Ritt, M. (2014). A heuristic and a branch-and-bound algorithm for the Assembly Line Worker Assignment and Balancing Problem. Computers & Operations Research, 45, 87-96. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2013.12.002es_ES
dc.description.referencesBortolini, M., Faccio, M., Gamberi, M., & Pilati, F. (2017). Multi-objective assembly line balancing considering component picking and ergonomic risk. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 112, 348-367. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2017.08.029es_ES
dc.description.referencesBotti, L., Mora, C., & Regattieri, A. (2017). Integrating ergonomics and lean manufacturing principles in a hybrid assembly line. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 111, 481-491. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2017.05.011es_ES
dc.description.referencesBukchin, Y., & Raviv, T. (2018). Constraint programming for solving various assembly line balancing problems. Omega, 78, 57-68. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2017.06.008es_ES
dc.description.referencesCosta, A. M., & Miralles, C. (2009). Job rotation in assembly lines employing disabled workers. International Journal of Production Economics, 120(2), 625-632. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.04.013es_ES
dc.description.referencesDeb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 182-197. doi:10.1109/4235.996017es_ES
dc.description.referencesDing, J.-Y., Song, S., Gupta, J. N. D., Zhang, R., Chiong, R., & Wu, C. (2015). An improved iterated greedy algorithm with a Tabu-based reconstruction strategy for the no-wait flowshop scheduling problem. Applied Soft Computing, 30, 604-613. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.02.006es_ES
dc.description.referencesFattahi, A., Elaoud, S., Sadeqi Azer, E., & Turkay, M. (2013). A novel integer programming formulation with logic cuts for the U-shaped assembly line balancing problem. International Journal of Production Research, 52(5), 1318-1333. doi:10.1080/00207543.2013.832489es_ES
dc.description.referencesGrunert da Fonseca, V., Fonseca, C.M., Hall, A.O., 2001. Inferential performance assessment of stochastic optimisers and the attainment function. 1993, 213–225.es_ES
dc.description.referencesGuo, Z. X., Wong, W. K., Leung, S. Y. S., Fan, J. T., & Chan, S. F. (2008). A Genetic-Algorithm-Based Optimization Model for Solving the Flexible Assembly Line Balancing Problem With Work Sharing and Workstation Revisiting. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 38(2), 218-228. doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2007.913912es_ES
dc.description.referencesHatami, S., Ruiz, R., & Andrés-Romano, C. (2015). Heuristics and metaheuristics for the distributed assembly permutation flowshop scheduling problem with sequence dependent setup times. International Journal of Production Economics, 169, 76-88. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.027es_ES
dc.description.referencesHazır, Ö., & Dolgui, A. (2015). A decomposition based solution algorithm for U-type assembly line balancing with interval data. Computers & Operations Research, 59, 126-131. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2015.01.010es_ES
dc.description.referencesHignett, S., & McAtamney, L. (2000). Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA). Applied Ergonomics, 31(2), 201-205. doi:10.1016/s0003-6870(99)00039-3es_ES
dc.description.referencesHOFFMANN, T. R. (1990). Assembly line balancing: a set of challenging problems. International Journal of Production Research, 28(10), 1807-1815. doi:10.1080/00207549008942835es_ES
dc.description.referencesKarhu, O., Kansi, P., & Kuorinka, I. (1977). Correcting working postures in industry: A practical method for analysis. Applied Ergonomics, 8(4), 199-201. doi:10.1016/0003-6870(77)90164-8es_ES
dc.description.referencesKnowles, J.D., Thiele, L., Zitzler, E., 2006. A tutorial on the performance assessment of stochastic multiobjective optimizers. TIK-Report 214.es_ES
dc.description.referencesLópez-Ibáñez, M., Paquete, L., & Stützle, T. (2006). Hybrid Population-Based Algorithms for the Bi-Objective Quadratic Assignment Problem. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Algorithms, 5(1), 111-137. doi:10.1007/s10852-005-9034-xes_ES
dc.description.referencesLi, M., Tang, Q., Zheng, Q., Xia, X., & Floudas, C. A. (2017). Rules-based heuristic approach for the U-shaped assembly line balancing problem. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 48, 423-439. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2016.12.031es_ES
dc.description.referencesLi, Z., Tang, Q., & Zhang, L. (2017). Two-sided assembly line balancing problem of type I: Improvements, a simple algorithm and a comprehensive study. Computers & Operations Research, 79, 78-93. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2016.10.006es_ES
dc.description.referencesLiles, D. H., Deivanayagam, S., Ayoub, M. M., & Mahajan, P. (1984). A Job Severity Index for the Evaluation and Control of Lifting Injury. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 26(6), 683-693. doi:10.1177/001872088402600608es_ES
dc.description.referencesMcAtamney, L., & Nigel Corlett, E. (1993). RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Applied Ergonomics, 24(2), 91-99. doi:10.1016/0003-6870(93)90080-ses_ES
dc.description.referencesMiltenburg, G. J., & Wijngaard, J. (1994). The U-line Line Balancing Problem. Management Science, 40(10), 1378-1388. doi:10.1287/mnsc.40.10.1378es_ES
dc.description.referencesMinella, G., Ruiz, R., & Ciavotta, M. (2011). Restarted Iterated Pareto Greedy algorithm for multi-objective flowshop scheduling problems. Computers & Operations Research, 38(11), 1521-1533. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2011.01.010es_ES
dc.description.referencesMiralles, C., García-Sabater, J. P., Andrés, C., & Cardós, M. (2008). Branch and bound procedures for solving the Assembly Line Worker Assignment and Balancing Problem: Application to Sheltered Work centres for Disabled. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 156(3), 352-367. doi:10.1016/j.dam.2005.12.012es_ES
dc.description.referencesMoreira, M. C. O., Miralles, C., & Costa, A. M. (2015). Model and heuristics for the Assembly Line Worker Integration and Balancing Problem. Computers & Operations Research, 54, 64-73. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2014.08.021es_ES
dc.description.referencesMutlu, Ö., Polat, O., & Supciller, A. A. (2013). An iterative genetic algorithm for the assembly line worker assignment and balancing problem of type-II. Computers & Operations Research, 40(1), 418-426. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2012.07.010es_ES
dc.description.referencesNourmohammadi, A., Zandieh, M., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2013). An imperialist competitive algorithm for multi-objective U-type assembly line design. Journal of Computational Science, 4(5), 393-400. doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2012.09.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesOCCHIPINTI, E. (1998). OCRA: a concise index for the assessment of exposure to repetitive movements of the upper limbs. Ergonomics, 41(9), 1290-1311. doi:10.1080/001401398186315es_ES
dc.description.referencesOksuz, M. K., Buyukozkan, K., & Satoglu, S. I. (2017). U-shaped assembly line worker assignment and balancing problem: A mathematical model and two meta-heuristics. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 112, 246-263. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2017.08.030es_ES
dc.description.referencesOtto, A., & Battaïa, O. (2017). Reducing physical ergonomic risks at assembly lines by line balancing and job rotation: A survey. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 111, 467-480. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2017.04.011es_ES
dc.description.referencesOtto, A., & Scholl, A. (2011). Incorporating ergonomic risks into assembly line balancing. European Journal of Operational Research, 212(2), 277-286. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2011.01.056es_ES
dc.description.referencesPan, Q.-K., & Ruiz, R. (2014). An effective iterated greedy algorithm for the mixed no-idle permutation flowshop scheduling problem. Omega, 44, 41-50. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2013.10.002es_ES
dc.description.referencesPereira, J. (2018). The robust (minmax regret) assembly line worker assignment and balancing problem. Computers & Operations Research, 93, 27-40. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2018.01.009es_ES
dc.description.referencesPolat, O., Kalayci, C. B., Mutlu, Ö., & Gupta, S. M. (2015). A two-phase variable neighbourhood search algorithm for assembly line worker assignment and balancing problem type-II: an industrial case study. International Journal of Production Research, 54(3), 722-741. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1055344es_ES
dc.description.referencesRabbani, M., Kazemi, S. M., & Manavizadeh, N. (2012). Mixed model U-line balancing type-1 problem: A new approach. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 31(2), 131-138. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2012.02.002es_ES
dc.description.referencesRamezanian, R., & Ezzatpanah, A. (2015). Modeling and solving multi-objective mixed-model assembly line balancing and worker assignment problem. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 87, 74-80. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2015.04.017es_ES
dc.description.referencesRitt, M., Costa, A. M., & Miralles, C. (2015). The assembly line worker assignment and balancing problem with stochastic worker availability. International Journal of Production Research, 54(3), 907-922. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1108534es_ES
dc.description.referencesŞahin, M., & Kellegöz, T. (2017). An efficient grouping genetic algorithm for U-shaped assembly line balancing problems with maximizing production rate. Memetic Computing, 9(3), 213-229. doi:10.1007/s12293-017-0239-0es_ES
dc.description.referencesSchaub, K., Caragnano, G., Britzke, B., & Bruder, R. (2013). The European Assembly Worksheet. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 14(6), 616-639. doi:10.1080/1463922x.2012.678283es_ES
dc.description.referencesShin, W., & Park, M. (2017). Ergonomic interventions for prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in a small manufacturing assembly line. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 25(1), 110-122. doi:10.1080/10803548.2017.1373487es_ES
dc.description.referencesSungur, B., & Yavuz, Y. (2015). Assembly line balancing with hierarchical worker assignment. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 37, 290-298. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2014.08.004es_ES
dc.description.referencesTalbot, F. B., Patterson, J. H., & Gehrlein, W. V. (1986). A Comparative Evaluation of Heuristic Line Balancing Techniques. Management Science, 32(4), 430-454. doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.4.430es_ES
dc.description.referencesTan, K. C., Yang, Y. J., & Goh, C. K. (2006). A distributed Cooperative coevolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 10(5), 527-549. doi:10.1109/tevc.2005.860762es_ES
dc.description.referencesTasgetiren, M. F., Kizilay, D., Pan, Q.-K., & Suganthan, P. N. (2017). Iterated greedy algorithms for the blocking flowshop scheduling problem with makespan criterion. Computers & Operations Research, 77, 111-126. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2016.07.002es_ES
dc.description.referencesTiacci, L., & Mimmi, M. (2018). Integrating ergonomic risks evaluation through OCRA index and balancing/sequencing decisions for mixed model stochastic asynchronous assembly lines. Omega, 78, 112-138. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2017.08.011es_ES
dc.description.referencesVilà, M., & Pereira, J. (2014). A branch-and-bound algorithm for assembly line worker assignment and balancing problems. Computers & Operations Research, 44, 105-114. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2013.10.016es_ES
dc.description.referencesWATERS, T. R., PUTZ-ANDERSON, V., GARG, A., & FINE, L. J. (1993). Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics, 36(7), 749-776. doi:10.1080/00140139308967940es_ES
dc.description.referencesYorke, J., 2017. Henry Ford – Master of flow.es_ES
dc.description.referencesZacharia, P. T., & Nearchou, A. C. (2016). A population-based algorithm for the bi-objective assembly line worker assignment and balancing problem. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 49, 1-9. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2015.11.007es_ES
dc.description.referencesZaman, T., Paul, S. K., & Azeem, A. (2012). Sustainable operator assignment in an assembly line using genetic algorithm. International Journal of Production Research, 50(18), 5077-5084. doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.636764es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and constructive suggestions. This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51875421, No. 51875420). Ruben Ruiz is partly supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Universities, under the project "OPTEP-Port Terminal Operations Optimization"(No.\ RTI2018-094940-B-I00) financed with FEDER funds.es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin15es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio1es_ES
dc.description.volume118es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cor.2020.104905es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0305-0548es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/165755
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relation.ispartofComputers & Operations Researches_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaS\424878es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/NSFC//51875420/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/NSFC//51875421/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/RTI2018-094940-B-I00/ES/OPTIMIZACION DE OPERACIONES EN TERMINALES PORTUARIAS/es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2020.104905es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10845-016-1262-6es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10845-016-1246-6es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.asoc.2015.11.025es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.asoc.2015.06.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.06.032es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s00170-008-1446-0es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.cie.2013.01.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.594es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ergon.2010.12.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.042es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10845-005-6638-yes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/cae.21816es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/hfm.20695es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.cor.2010.05.008es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.cor.2013.12.002es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.cie.2017.08.029es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.cie.2017.05.011es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.omega.2017.06.008es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.04.013es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/4235.996017es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.asoc.2015.02.006es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/00207543.2013.832489es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/3-540-44719-9_15es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/TSMCC.2007.913912es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.027es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.cor.2015.01.010es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0003-6870(99)00039-3es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/00207549008942835es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0003-6870(77)90164-8es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10852-005-9034-xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.apm.2016.12.031es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.cor.2016.10.006es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1177/001872088402600608es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0003-6870(93)90080-Ses_ES
dc.relation.references10.1287/mnsc.40.10.1378es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.cor.2011.01.010es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.dam.2005.12.012es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.cor.2014.08.021es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.cor.2012.07.010es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jocs.2012.09.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/001401398186315es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.cie.2017.08.030es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.cie.2017.04.011es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ejor.2011.01.056es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.omega.2013.10.002es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.cor.2018.01.009es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/00207543.2015.1055344es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jmsy.2012.02.002es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.cie.2015.04.017es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/00207543.2015.1108534es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ejor.2005.12.009es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s12293-017-0239-0es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/1463922X.2012.678283es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/10803548.2017.1373487es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jmsy.2014.08.004es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1287/mnsc.32.4.430es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/TEVC.2005.860762es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.cor.2016.07.002es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.omega.2017.08.011es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.cor.2013.10.016es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/00140139308967940es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.engappai.2015.11.007es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/00207543.2011.636764es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectU-shaped assembly linees_ES
dc.subjectWorker assignmentes_ES
dc.subjectErgonomic riskses_ES
dc.subjectMulti-objectiveses_ES
dc.subject.classificationESTADISTICA E INVESTIGACION OPERATIVAes_ES
dc.titleErgonomic risk and cycle time minimization for the U-shaped worker assignment assembly line balancing problem: A multi-objective approaches_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
upv.uuid7c9dfa3c-e3ff-4f6e-aa70-3583efba56f3es_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Zhang;Tang;Ruz - Ergonomc rsk and cycle tme mnmzaton for the U-shaped worker assgnment assembly l....pdf
Tamaño:
752.58 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión del Autor.
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
published_Zikai.pdf
Tamaño:
1.88 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial