Value Analysis Model to Support the Building Design Process

dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Ingeniería de la Construcción y de Proyectos de Ingeniería Civil
dc.contributor.affiliationEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería de Caminos, Canales y Puertos
dc.contributor.affiliationGrupo de Gestión del Proceso Proyecto-Construcción
dc.contributor.authorGiménez, Zulayes_ES
dc.contributor.authorMourgues, Claudioes_ES
dc.contributor.authorAlarcón, Luis F.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorMesa, Harrisones_ES
dc.contributor.authorPellicer, Eugenio
dc.contributor.funderFondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico, Chilees_ES
dc.contributor.funderComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica, Chilees_ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-05T04:33:05Z
dc.date.available2020-12-05T04:33:05Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-21es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN] The architecture, engineering, and construction industry requires methods that link the capture of customer requirements with the continuous measurement of the value generated and the identification of value losses in the design process. A value analysis model (VAM) is proposed to measure the value creation expected by customers and to identify value losses through indexes. As points of reference, the model takes the Kano model and target costing, which is used in the building project design process. The VAM was developed under the design science research methodology, which focuses on solving practical problems by producing outputs by iteration. The resulting VAM allowed the measurement and analysis of value through desired, potential, and generated value indexes, value loss identification, and percentages of value fulfillment concerning the design stage. The VAM permits the comparison of different projects, visualization of the evolution of value generation, and identification of value losses to be eradicated. The VAM encourages constant feedback and has potential to deliver higher value, as it enables the determination of parameters that add value for different stakeholders and informs designers where to direct resources and efforts to enhance vital variables and not trivial variablesen_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationGiménez, Z.; Mourgues, C.; Alarcón, LF.; Mesa, H.; Pellicer, E. (2020). Value Analysis Model to Support the Building Design Process. Sustainability. 12(10):1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104224es_ES
dc.description.issue10es_ES
dc.description.referencesGunby, M., Damnjanovic, I., Anderson, S., Joyce, J., & Nuccio, J. (2013). Identifying, Communicating, and Responding to Project Value Interests. Journal of Management in Engineering, 29(1), 50-59. doi:10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000116es_ES
dc.description.referencesChaos Report. Project Smart UK. United Kingdomhttps://www.projectsmart.co.uk/white-papers/chaos-report.pdfes_ES
dc.description.referencesDíaz, H., Alarcón, L. F., Mourgues, C., & García, S. (2017). Multidisciplinary Design Optimization through process integration in the AEC industry: Strategies and challenges. Automation in Construction, 73, 102-119. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2016.09.007es_ES
dc.description.referencesBustos Chocomeli, Ó. H. (s. f.). Factores latentes de la desviación de presupuestos en proyectos de arquitectura. Un análisis empírico. doi:10.4995/thesis/10251/48558es_ES
dc.description.referencesKnotten, V., Svalestuen, F., Hansen, G. K., & Lædre, O. (2015). Design Management in the Building Process - A Review of Current Literature. Procedia Economics and Finance, 21, 120-127. doi:10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00158-6es_ES
dc.description.referencesKamara, J. M., Anumba, C. J., & Evbuomwan, N. F. O. (2000). Process model for client requirements processing in construction. Business Process Management Journal, 6(3), 251-279. doi:10.1108/14637150010325462es_ES
dc.description.referencesKumar, V., & Whitney, P. (2007). Daily life, not markets: customer-centered design. Journal of Business Strategy, 28(4), 46-58. doi:10.1108/02756660710760944es_ES
dc.description.referencesLove, P. E. D., Lopez, R., & Edwards, D. J. (2013). Reviewing the past to learn in the future: making sense of design errors and failures in construction. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 9(7), 675-688. doi:10.1080/15732479.2011.605369es_ES
dc.description.referencesHolmström, J., Ketokivi, M., & Hameri, A.-P. (2009). Bridging Practice and Theory: A Design Science Approach. Decision Sciences, 40(1), 65-87. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00221.xes_ES
dc.description.referencesPeffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45-77. doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222240302es_ES
dc.description.referencesHuang, J. (2017). Application of Kano Model in Requirements Analysis of Y Company’s Consulting Project. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 07(07), 910-918. doi:10.4236/ajibm.2017.77064es_ES
dc.description.referencesRachwan, R., Abotaleb, I., & Elgazouli, M. (2016). The Influence of Value Engineering and Sustainability Considerations on the Project Value. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 34, 431-438. doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2016.04.038es_ES
dc.description.referencesEskerod, P., & Ang, K. (2017). Stakeholder Value Constructs in Megaprojects: A Long-Term Assessment Case Study. Project Management Journal, 48(6), 60-75. doi:10.1177/875697281704800606es_ES
dc.description.referencesBolar, A. A., Tesfamariam, S., & Sadiq, R. (2017). Framework for prioritizing infrastructure user expectations using Quality Function Deployment (QFD). International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 6(1), 16-29. doi:10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.02.002es_ES
dc.description.referencesGallarza, M. G., Arteaga-Moreno, F., Servera-Francés, D., & Fayos-Gardó, T. (2016). Participar como voluntario en eventos especiales: comparación entre el valor esperado y percibido. Innovar, 26(59), 47-60. doi:10.15446/innovar.v26n59.54322es_ES
dc.description.referencesKowaltowski, D. C. C. K., & Granja, A. D. (2011). The concept of desired value as a stimulus for change in social housing in Brazil. Habitat International, 35(3), 435-446. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.12.002es_ES
dc.description.referencesTucker, J. R., Pearce, A. R., Bruce, R. D., McCoy, A. P., & Mills, T. H. (2012). The perceived value of green professional credentials to credential holders in the US building design and construction community. Construction Management and Economics, 30(11), 963-979. doi:10.1080/01446193.2012.728710es_ES
dc.description.referencesLee, B. D., & Paredis, C. J. J. (2014). A Conceptual Framework for Value-driven Design and Systems Engineering. Procedia CIRP, 21, 10-17. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.147es_ES
dc.description.referencesKamara, J. M., Anumba, C. J., & Evbuomwan, N. F. O. (2000). Establishing and processing client requirements-a key aspect of concurrent engineering in construction. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 7(1), 15-28. doi:10.1046/j.1365-232x.2000.00129.xes_ES
dc.description.referencesDrevland, F., & Tillmann, P. A. (2018). Value for Whom? 26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. doi:10.24928/2018/0533es_ES
dc.description.referencesRybkowski, Z. K., Shepley, M. M., & Ballard, H. G. (2012). Target Value Design: Applications to Newborn Intensive Care Units. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 5(4), 5-22. doi:10.1177/193758671200500402es_ES
dc.description.referencesYin, Y., Qin, S., & Holland, R. (2011). Development of a design performance measurement matrix for improving collaborative design during a design process. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60(2), 152-184. doi:10.1108/17410401111101485es_ES
dc.description.referencesVolkova, T., & Jākobsone, I. (2016). Design thinking as a business tool to ensure continuous value generation. Intellectual Economics, 10(1), 63-69. doi:10.1016/j.intele.2016.06.003es_ES
dc.description.referencesWestcott, M., Sato, S., Mrazek, D., Wallace, R., Vanka, S., Bilson, C., & Hardin, D. (2013). The DMI Design Value Scorecard: A New Design Measurement and Management Model. Design Management Review, 24(4), 10-16. doi:10.1111/drev.10257es_ES
dc.description.referencesHeikkilä, V. T., Paasivaara, M., Lasssenius, C., Damian, D., & Engblom, C. (2017). Managing the requirements flow from strategy to release in large-scale agile development: a case study at Ericsson. Empirical Software Engineering, 22(6), 2892-2936. doi:10.1007/s10664-016-9491-zes_ES
dc.description.referencesFARÍAS, P., & FISTROVIC, B. (2016). LAS PREFERENCIAS DEL CONSUMIDOR USANDO EL MÉTODO DE MÁXIMAS DIFERENCIAS. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 56(2), 138-151. doi:10.1590/s0034-759020160202es_ES
dc.description.referencesAmini, P., Falk, B., & Schmitt, R. (2016). A Framework for Value-optimized Design of Product Features. Procedia CIRP, 57, 386-391. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.067es_ES
dc.description.referencesMenezes, A. C., Cripps, A., Bouchlaghem, D., & Buswell, R. (2012). Predicted vs. actual energy performance of non-domestic buildings: Using post-occupancy evaluation data to reduce the performance gap. Applied Energy, 97, 355-364. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.11.075es_ES
dc.description.referencesZimina, D., Ballard, G., & Pasquire, C. (2012). Target value design: using collaboration and a lean approach to reduce construction cost. Construction Management and Economics, 30(5), 383-398. doi:10.1080/01446193.2012.676658es_ES
dc.description.referencesBorgianni, Y. (2018). Verifying dynamic Kano’s model to support new product/service development. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 11(3), 569. doi:10.3926/jiem.2591es_ES
dc.description.referencesPandolfo, A., Rojas, J. W., Kurek, J., Pandolfo, L., Lublo, R., Guimaráes, J., & Reinehr, R. (2008). Aplicación del modelo de evaluación de proyectos habitacionales para la medición de la satisfacción de las necesidades del usuario. Revista ingeniería de construcción, 23(1). doi:10.4067/s0718-50732008000100005es_ES
dc.description.referencesHaddadi, A., Johansen, A., & Andersen, B. (2016). A Conceptual Framework to Enhance Value Creation in Construction Projects. Procedia Computer Science, 100, 565-573. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.196es_ES
dc.description.referencesLin, G., & Shen, Q. (2007). Measuring the Performance of Value Management Studies in Construction: Critical Review. Journal of Management in Engineering, 23(1), 2-9. doi:10.1061/(asce)0742-597x(2007)23:1(2)es_ES
dc.description.referencesWitell, L., Löfgren, M., & Dahlgaard, J. J. (2013). Theory of attractive quality and the Kano methodology – the past, the present, and the future. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 24(11-12), 1241-1252. doi:10.1080/14783363.2013.791117es_ES
dc.description.referencesRischmoller, L., Alarcón, L. F., & Koskela, L. (2006). Improving Value Generation in the Design Process of Industrial Projects Using CAVT. Journal of Management in Engineering, 22(2), 52-60. doi:10.1061/(asce)0742-597x(2006)22:2(52)es_ES
dc.description.referencesTauriainen, M., Marttinen, P., Dave, B., & Koskela, L. (2016). The Effects of BIM and Lean Construction on Design Management Practices. Procedia Engineering, 164, 567-574. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.659es_ES
dc.description.referencesSong, J., Migliaccio, G. C., Wang, G., & Lu, H. (2017). Exploring the Influence of System Quality, Information Quality, and External Service on BIM User Satisfaction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 33(6), 04017036. doi:10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000549es_ES
dc.description.referencesMatzler, K., Hinterhuber, H. H., Bailom, F., & Sauerwein, E. (1996). How to delight your customers. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 5(2), 6-18. doi:10.1108/10610429610119469es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded by CONICYT grant number PCHA/National Doctorate/2016-21160571 for the postgraduate studies of Zulay Giménez and by FONDECYT (1181648).es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin24es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio1es_ES
dc.description.volume12es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su12104224es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn2071-1050es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/156520
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherMDPI AGes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofSustainabilityes_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaS\413213es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FONDECYT//1181648/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/CONICYT//2016-21160571/es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/su12104224es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000116es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.autcon.2016.09.007es_ES
dc.relation.references10.4995/Thesis/10251/48558es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00158-6es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1108/14637150010325462es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1108/02756660710760944es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/07370024.1991.9667173es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/15732479.2011.605369es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00221.xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302es_ES
dc.relation.references10.4236/ajibm.2017.77064es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.proenv.2016.04.038es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1177/875697281704800606es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.02.002es_ES
dc.relation.references10.15446/innovar.v26n59.54322es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.12.002es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/01446193.2012.728710es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.147es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1046/j.1365-232x.2000.00129.xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.24928/2018/0533es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1177/193758671200500402es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1108/17410401111101485es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.intele.2016.06.003es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1111/drev.10257es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10664-016-9491-zes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1590/S0034-759020160202es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.067es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.11.075es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/01446193.2012.676658es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3926/jiem.2591es_ES
dc.relation.references10.4067/S0718-50732008000100005es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.196es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:1(2)es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/14783363.2013.791117es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2006)22:2(52)es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.659es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000549es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1108/10610429610119469es_ES
dc.relation.references10.24928/2019/0196es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento (by)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectValue generationes_ES
dc.subjectValue losses_ES
dc.subjectDesired valuees_ES
dc.subjectPotential valuees_ES
dc.subjectValue indexeses_ES
dc.subjectDesign science researches_ES
dc.subject.classificationPROYECTOS DE INGENIERIAes_ES
dc.subject.ods09.- Desarrollar infraestructuras resilientes, promover la industrialización inclusiva y sostenible, y fomentar la innovaciónes_ES
dc.titleValue Analysis Model to Support the Building Design Processes_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier1848
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9100-0644
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7cb77cbd-8cdc-4b87-aed3-039755a16dea
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery7cb77cbd-8cdc-4b87-aed3-039755a16dea
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication0d87f640-7be6-4adb-b5cd-9eb294798a72
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa4b47ff5-95f4-430f-a1a3-541cb8eaa9b7
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication38c096ba-a68f-4127-8845-f6156608d94d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery0d87f640-7be6-4adb-b5cd-9eb294798a72
upv.uuid7ea1ba26-80b3-4d3d-961d-104f6984c49des_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Giménez;Mourgues;Alarcón - Value Analysis Model to Support the Building Design Process.pdf
Tamaño:
1.6 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial