Parsimonious Modeling of Snow Accumulation and Snowmelt Processes in High Mountain Basins

dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Ingeniería Hidráulica y Medio Ambiente
dc.contributor.affiliationInstituto Universitario de Ingeniería del Agua y del Medio Ambiente
dc.contributor.affiliationEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería de Caminos, Canales y Puertos
dc.contributor.authorOrozco Medina, Ismaeles_ES
dc.contributor.authorFrancés, F.
dc.contributor.authorMora, Jesúses_ES
dc.contributor.funderAgencia Estatal de Investigaciónes_ES
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Economía y Competitividades_ES
dc.contributor.funderUniversidad de Guanajuatoes_ES
dc.contributor.funderOrganismo Autónomo de Parques Nacionaleses_ES
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovaciónes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-22T03:03:00Z
dc.date.available2020-05-22T03:03:00Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-20es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN] The success of hydrological modeling of a high mountain basin depends in most case on the accurate quantification of the snowmelt. However, mathematically modeling snowmelt is not a simple task due to, on one hand, the high number of variables that can be relevant and can change significantly in space and, in the other hand, the low availability of most of them in practical engineering. Therefore, this research proposes to modify the original equation of the classical degree-day model to introduce the spatial and temporal variability of the degree-day factor. To evaluate the effects of the variability in the hydrological modeling and the snowmelt modeling at the cell and hillslope scale. We propose to introduce the spatial and temporal variability of the degree-day factor using maps of radiation indices. These maps consider the position of the sun according to the time of year, solar radiation, insolation, topography and shaded-relief topography. Our priority has been to keep the parsimony of the snowmelt model that can be implemented in high mountain basins with limited observed input. The snowmelt model was included as a new module in the TETIS distributed hydrological model. The results show significant improvements in hydrological modeling in the spring period when the snowmelt is more important. At cell and hillslope scale errors are diminished in the snowpack, improving the representation of the flows and storages that intervene in high mountain basins.en_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationOrozco Medina, I.; Francés, F.; Mora, J. (2019). Parsimonious Modeling of Snow Accumulation and Snowmelt Processes in High Mountain Basins. Water. 11(6):1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11061288es_ES
dc.description.issue6es_ES
dc.description.referencesRiboust, P., Thirel, G., Moine, N. L., & Ribstein, P. (2019). Revisiting a Simple Degree-Day Model for Integrating Satellite Data: Implementation of Swe-Sca Hystereses. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 67(1), 70-81. doi:10.2478/johh-2018-0004es_ES
dc.description.referencesBeniston, M., Farinotti, D., Stoffel, M., Andreassen, L. M., Coppola, E., Eckert, N., … Vincent, C. (2018). The European mountain cryosphere: a review of its current state, trends, and future challenges. The Cryosphere, 12(2), 759-794. doi:10.5194/tc-12-759-2018es_ES
dc.description.referencesBernsteinová, J., Bässler, C., Zimmermann, L., Langhammer, J., & Beudert, B. (2015). Changes in runoff in two neighbouring catchments in the Bohemian Forest related to climate and land cover changes. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 63(4), 342-352. doi:10.1515/johh-2015-0037es_ES
dc.description.referencesMateo-Lázaro, J., Castillo-Mateo, J., Sánchez-Navarro, J., Fuertes-Rodríguez, V., García-Gil, A., & Edo-Romero, V. (2019). Assessment of the Role of Snowmelt in a Flood Event in a Gauged Catchment. Water, 11(3), 506. doi:10.3390/w11030506es_ES
dc.description.referencesVormoor, K., Lawrence, D., Heistermann, M., & Bronstert, A. (2015). Climate change impacts on the seasonality and generation processes of floods – projections and uncertainties for catchments with mixed snowmelt/rainfall regimes. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19(2), 913-931. doi:10.5194/hess-19-913-2015es_ES
dc.description.referencesKling, H., Fürst, J., & Nachtnebel, H. P. (2006). Seasonal, spatially distributed modelling of accumulation and melting of snow for computing runoff in a long-term, large-basin water balance model. Hydrological Processes, 20(10), 2141-2156. doi:10.1002/hyp.6203es_ES
dc.description.referencesVerdhen, A., Chahar, B. R., & Sharma, O. P. (2014). Springtime Snowmelt and Streamflow Predictions in the Himalayan Mountains. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 19(7), 1452-1461. doi:10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0000816es_ES
dc.description.referencesDudley, R. W., Hodgkins, G. A., McHale, M. R., Kolian, M. J., & Renard, B. (2017). Trends in snowmelt-related streamflow timing in the conterminous United States. Journal of Hydrology, 547, 208-221. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.01.051es_ES
dc.description.referencesPenna, D., van Meerveld, H. J., Zuecco, G., Dalla Fontana, G., & Borga, M. (2016). Hydrological response of an Alpine catchment to rainfall and snowmelt events. Journal of Hydrology, 537, 382-397. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.040es_ES
dc.description.referencesVormoor, K., Lawrence, D., Schlichting, L., Wilson, D., & Wong, W. K. (2016). Evidence for changes in the magnitude and frequency of observed rainfall vs. snowmelt driven floods in Norway. Journal of Hydrology, 538, 33-48. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.066es_ES
dc.description.referencesYilmaz, A. G., Imteaz, M. A., & Ogwuda, O. (2012). Accuracy of HEC-HMS and LBRM Models in Simulating Snow Runoffs in Upper Euphrates Basin. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 17(2), 342-347. doi:10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0000442es_ES
dc.description.referencesCosta, D., Pomeroy, J., & Wheater, H. (2018). A numerical model for the simulation of snowpack solute dynamics to capture runoff ionic pulses during snowmelt: The PULSE model. Advances in Water Resources, 122, 37-48. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.09.008es_ES
dc.description.referencesFuka, D. R., Easton, Z. M., Brooks, E. S., Boll, J., Steenhuis, T. S., & Walter, M. T. (2012). A Simple Process-Based Snowmelt Routine to Model Spatially Distributed Snow Depth and Snowmelt in the SWAT Model1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 48(6), 1151-1161. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00680.xes_ES
dc.description.referencesSchilling, O. S., Park, Y.-J., Therrien, R., & Nagare, R. M. (2018). Integrated Surface and Subsurface Hydrological Modeling with Snowmelt and Pore Water Freeze-Thaw. Groundwater, 57(1), 63-74. doi:10.1111/gwat.12841es_ES
dc.description.referencesSemádeni-Davies, A. F. (2000). Representation of Snow in Urban Drainage Models. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 5(4), 363-370. doi:10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(2000)5:4(363)es_ES
dc.description.referencesŽaknić-Ćatović, A., Howard, K. W. F., & Ćatović, Z. (2017). Modification of the degree-day formula for diurnal meltwater generation and refreezing. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 131(3-4), 1157-1171. doi:10.1007/s00704-017-2034-8es_ES
dc.description.referencesHock, R. (1999). A distributed temperature-index ice- and snowmelt model including potential direct solar radiation. Journal of Glaciology, 45(149), 101-111. doi:10.3189/s0022143000003087es_ES
dc.description.referencesKustas, W. P., Rango, A., & Uijlenhoet, R. (1994). A simple energy budget algorithm for the snowmelt runoff model. Water Resources Research, 30(5), 1515-1527. doi:10.1029/94wr00152es_ES
dc.description.referencesBraithwaite, R. J. (1995). Positive degree-day factors for ablation on the Greenland ice sheet studied by energy-balance modelling. Journal of Glaciology, 41(137), 153-160. doi:10.1017/s0022143000017846es_ES
dc.description.referencesCazorzi, F., & Dalla Fontana, G. (1996). Snowmelt modelling by combining air temperature and a distributed radiation index. Journal of Hydrology, 181(1-4), 169-187. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(95)02913-3es_ES
dc.description.referencesHock, R. (2003). Temperature index melt modelling in mountain areas. Journal of Hydrology, 282(1-4), 104-115. doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(03)00257-9es_ES
dc.description.referencesFrancés, F., Vélez, J. I., & Vélez, J. J. (2007). Split-parameter structure for the automatic calibration of distributed hydrological models. Journal of Hydrology, 332(1-2), 226-240. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.06.032es_ES
dc.description.referencesBuendia, C., Bussi, G., Tuset, J., Vericat, D., Sabater, S., Palau, A., & Batalla, R. J. (2016). Effects of afforestation on runoff and sediment load in an upland Mediterranean catchment. Science of The Total Environment, 540, 144-157. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.005es_ES
dc.description.referencesRogelis, M. C., Werner, M., Obregón, N., & Wright, N. (2016). Hydrological model assessment for flood early warning in a tropical high mountain basin. doi:10.5194/hess-2016-30es_ES
dc.description.referencesRuiz-Villanueva, V., Stoffel, M., Bussi, G., Francés, F., & Bréthaut, C. (2014). Climate change impacts on discharges of the Rhone River in Lyon by the end of the twenty-first century: model results and implications. Regional Environmental Change, 15(3), 505-515. doi:10.1007/s10113-014-0707-8es_ES
dc.description.referencesOrozco, I., Ramírez, A. I., & Francés, F. (2018). Modelación de los impactos del Cambio Climático sobre los flujos y almacenamientos en una cuenca de alta montaña. Ingeniería del agua, 22(3), 125. doi:10.4995/ia.2018.8931es_ES
dc.description.referencesMcGrane, S. J., Hutchins, M. G., Miller, J. D., Bussi, G., Kjeldsen, T. R., & Loewenthal, M. (2017). During a winter of storms in a small UK catchment, hydrology and water quality responses follow a clear rural-urban gradient. Journal of Hydrology, 545, 463-477. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.037es_ES
dc.description.referencesLi, Z., & Fang, H. (2017). Modeling the impact of climate change on watershed discharge and sediment yield in the black soil region, northeastern China. Geomorphology, 293, 255-271. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.06.005es_ES
dc.description.referencesSmith, M., Koren, V., Zhang, Z., Moreda, F., Cui, Z., Cosgrove, B., … Staggs, S. (2013). The distributed model intercomparison project – Phase 2: Experiment design and summary results of the western basin experiments. Journal of Hydrology, 507, 300-329. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.08.040es_ES
dc.description.referencesSimpson, J. J., Dettinger, M. D., Gehrke, F., McIntire, T. J., & Hufford, G. L. (2004). Hydrologic Scales, Cloud Variability, Remote Sensing, and Models: Implications for Forecasting Snowmelt and Streamflow. Weather and Forecasting, 19(2), 251-276. doi:10.1175/1520-0434(2004)019<0251:hscvrs>2.0.co;2es_ES
dc.description.referencesRango, A., & Martinec, J. (1995). REVISITING THE DEGREE-DAY METHOD FOR SNOWMELT COMPUTATIONS. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 31(4), 657-669. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1995.tb03392.xes_ES
dc.description.referencesGaren, D. C., & Marks, D. (2005). Spatially distributed energy balance snowmelt modelling in a mountainous river basin: estimation of meteorological inputs and verification of model results. Journal of Hydrology, 315(1-4), 126-153. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.026es_ES
dc.description.referencesKane, D. L., Gieck, R. E., & Hinzman, L. D. (1997). Snowmelt Modeling at Small Alaskan Arctic Watershed. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2(4), 204-210. doi:10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(1997)2:4(204)es_ES
dc.description.referencesGranberg, G., Grip, H., Löfvenius, M. O., Sundh, I., Svensson, B. H., & Nilsson, M. (1999). A simple model for simulation of water content, soil frost, and soil temperatures in boreal mixed mires. Water Resources Research, 35(12), 3771-3782. doi:10.1029/1999wr900216es_ES
dc.description.referencesViviroli, D., Zappa, M., Gurtz, J., & Weingartner, R. (2009). An introduction to the hydrological modelling system PREVAH and its pre- and post-processing-tools. Environmental Modelling & Software, 24(10), 1209-1222. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.04.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesSmith, T. J., & Marshall, L. A. (2010). Exploring uncertainty and model predictive performance concepts via a modular snowmelt-runoff modeling framework. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(6), 691-701. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.11.010es_ES
dc.description.referencesOhmura, A., Kasser, P., & Funk, M. (1992). Climate at the Equilibrium Line of Glaciers. Journal of Glaciology, 38(130), 397-411. doi:10.1017/s0022143000002276es_ES
dc.description.referencesFu, P., & Rich, P. M. (2002). A geometric solar radiation model with applications in agriculture and forestry. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 37(1-3), 25-35. doi:10.1016/s0168-1699(02)00115-1es_ES
dc.description.referencesDuan, Q., Sorooshian, S., & Gupta, V. (1992). Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resources Research, 28(4), 1015-1031. doi:10.1029/91wr02985es_ES
dc.description.referencesDuan, Q., Sorooshian, S., & Gupta, V. K. (1994). Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models. Journal of Hydrology, 158(3-4), 265-284. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(94)90057-4es_ES
dc.description.referencesK. Ajami, N., Gupta, H., Wagener, T., & Sorooshian, S. (2004). Calibration of a semi-distributed hydrologic model for streamflow estimation along a river system. Journal of Hydrology, 298(1-4), 112-135. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.033es_ES
dc.description.referencesPerrin, C., Michel, C., & Andréassian, V. (2003). Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation. Journal of Hydrology, 279(1-4), 275-289. doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(03)00225-7es_ES
dc.description.referencesMuttil, N., & Jayawardena, A. W. (2008). Shuffled Complex Evolution model calibrating algorithm: enhancing its robustness and efficiency. Hydrological Processes, 22(23), 4628-4638. doi:10.1002/hyp.7082es_ES
dc.description.referencesNash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10(3), 282-290. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6es_ES
dc.description.referencesEckhardt, K., Haverkamp, S., Fohrer, N., & Frede, H.-G. (2002). SWAT-G, a version of SWAT99.2 modified for application to low mountain range catchments. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 27(9-10), 641-644. doi:10.1016/s1474-7065(02)00048-7es_ES
dc.description.referencesKalin, L., Govindaraju, R. S., & Hantush, M. M. (2003). Effect of geomorphologic resolution on modeling of runoff hydrograph and sedimentograph over small watersheds. Journal of Hydrology, 276(1-4), 89-111. doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(03)00072-6es_ES
dc.description.referencesMerz, R., & Blöschl, G. (2004). Regionalisation of catchment model parameters. Journal of Hydrology, 287(1-4), 95-123. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.09.028es_ES
dc.description.referencesD. N. Moriasi, J. G. Arnold, M. W. Van Liew, R. L. Bingner, R. D. Harmel, & T. L. Veith. (2007). Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations. Transactions of the ASABE, 50(3), 885-900. doi:10.13031/2013.23153es_ES
dc.description.referencesKapnick, S., & Hall, A. (2010). Observed Climate–Snowpack Relationships in California and their Implications for the Future. Journal of Climate, 23(13), 3446-3456. doi:10.1175/2010jcli2903.1es_ES
dc.description.referencesSingh, P., Kumar, N., & Arora, M. (2000). Degree–day factors for snow and ice for Dokriani Glacier, Garhwal Himalayas. Journal of Hydrology, 235(1-2), 1-11. doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(00)00249-3es_ES
dc.description.referencesKoren, V., Reed, S., Smith, M., Zhang, Z., & Seo, D.-J. (2004). Hydrology laboratory research modeling system (HL-RMS) of the US national weather service. Journal of Hydrology, 291(3-4), 297-318. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.039es_ES
dc.description.referencesCiarapica, L., & Todini, E. (2002). TOPKAPI: a model for the representation of the rainfall-runoff process at different scales. Hydrological Processes, 16(2), 207-229. doi:10.1002/hyp.342es_ES
dc.description.referencesShamir, E., & Georgakakos, K. P. (2006). Distributed snow accumulation and ablation modeling in the American River basin. Advances in Water Resources, 29(4), 558-570. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.06.010es_ES
dc.description.referencesShamir, E., & Georgakakos, K. P. (2007). Estimating snow depletion curves for American River basins using distributed snow modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 334(1-2), 162-173. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.10.007es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the Universidad de Guanajuato, Spanish National Parks Administration through the ACOPLA project (OAPN 011/2008), the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the projects ECO-TETIS (CGL2011-28776-C02-01), TETISMED (CGL2014-58127-C3-3-R) and TETISCHANGE (RTI2018-093717-B-I00).es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin19es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio1es_ES
dc.description.volume11es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/w11061288es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2073-4441es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/144101
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherMDPI AGes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofWateres_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaS\410656es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/OAPN//011%2F2008/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//CGL2011-28776-C02-01/ES/MODELACION ECOHIDROLOGICA DISTRIBUIDA A ESCALA DE CUENCA PARA BOSQUES EN CLIMAS SEMIARIDOS/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//CGL2014-58127-C3-3-R/ES/MEJORAS BIOGEOQUIMICAS EN EL MODELO TETIS Y SU EXPLOTACION EN EL ANALISIS DEL IMPACTO DEL CAMBIO GLOBAL EN LOS CICLOS DEL AGUA, CALIDAD Y SEDIMENTOS EN CUENCAS MEDITERRANEAS/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/RTI2018-093717-B-I00/ES/MEJORAS DEL CONOCIMIENTO Y DE LAS CAPACIDADES DE MODELIZACION PARA LA PROGNOSIS DE LOS EFECTOS DEL CAMBIO GLOBAL EN UNA CUENCA HIDROLOGICA/es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/w11061288es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2478/johh-2018-0004es_ES
dc.relation.references10.5194/tc-12-759-2018es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1515/johh-2015-0037es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3390/w11030506es_ES
dc.relation.references10.5194/hess-19-913-2015es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/hyp.6203es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000816es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.01.051es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.040es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.066es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000442es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.09.008es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00680.xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1111/gwat.12841es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2000)5:4(363)es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s00704-017-2034-8es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3189/S0022143000003087es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1029/94WR00152es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1017/S0022143000017846es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0022-1694(95)02913-3es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00257-9es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.06.032es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.005es_ES
dc.relation.references10.5194/hess-2016-30es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10113-014-0707-8es_ES
dc.relation.references10.4995/ia.2018.8931es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.037es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.06.005es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.08.040es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1175/1520-0434(2004)019<0251:HSCVRS>2.0.CO;2es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1111/j.1752-1688.1995.tb03392.xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.026es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1997)2:4(204)es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1029/1999WR900216es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.04.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.11.010es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1017/S0022143000002276es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0168-1699(02)00115-1es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1029/91WR02985es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0022-1694(94)90057-4es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.033es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00225-7es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/hyp.7082es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S1474-7065(02)00048-7es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00072-6es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.09.028es_ES
dc.relation.references10.13031/2013.23153es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1175/2010JCLI2903.1es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00249-3es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.039es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/hyp.342es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.06.010es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.10.007es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento (by)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectDistributed degree-day snowmelt modeles_ES
dc.subjectParsimonious hydrological modelinges_ES
dc.subjectTETIS modeles_ES
dc.subject.classificationINGENIERIA HIDRAULICAes_ES
dc.titleParsimonious Modeling of Snow Accumulation and Snowmelt Processes in High Mountain Basinses_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier2212
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1173-4969
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5d8e1d59-3bdc-420c-8c9b-2382b499e013
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5d8e1d59-3bdc-420c-8c9b-2382b499e013
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicatione8876040-9428-45e8-b805-b5bbc20e9e1e
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication937991bf-5e71-4f67-ae2a-1fb780a35167
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa4b47ff5-95f4-430f-a1a3-541cb8eaa9b7
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye8876040-9428-45e8-b805-b5bbc20e9e1e
upv.uuid858bf3c9-eb10-44ab-be26-8eda65500a6aes_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Orozco;Francés;Mora - Parsimonious Modeling of Snow Accumulation and Snowmelt Processes in High M....pdf
Tamaño:
6.62 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial