Producción, control y gestión distribuida de energía: una revisión de terminología y enfoques habituales

dc.contributor.authorRamos-Teodoro, Jerónimoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, Franciscoes_ES
dc.contributor.funderAgencia Estatal de Investigaciónes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-04T12:11:10Z
dc.date.available2022-10-04T12:11:10Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-29
dc.description.abstract[EN] Over the last few decades, lines of research related to distributed generation and energy management have given rise to the introduction of novel terms referring to continuous production systems and their optimal design, scheduling, control, or modelling. Although some of those ones emerged in the field of power grid analysis and operation, and their later extension towards other energy sources, all they share some common features and hence can be studied from a holistic perspective. In this paper, a review of different ongoing approaches is performed, aimed at offering a global and straightforward view of the stateof-the-art concepts to readers. In order to do so, the most remarkable elements that can be found in publications employed terminology, context, research purpose, mathematical treatment, optimisation strategies, and tools are first defined and characteri-sed. This helped to analyse and classify, in tabular form, some articles selected according to the impact of the journal, their number of cites and the use of certain terms that emerged in the ambit of distributed energy sistems, in order to find possible research gaps in this topic in relation the usual simulation, control, and optimisation techniques. The main conclusions evidence a scarce realisation of applied testing in real-world facilities and a broad neglect of environmental criteria, when it comes to designing and operating this kind of systems.en_EN
dc.description.abstract[ES] Durante las últimas décadas, las líneas de investigación relacionadas con la producción distribuida y la gestión energética han dado lugar a la introducción de términos nuevos que aluden a sistemas de producción continuos y su diseño óptimo, planificación, control o modelado. Aunque algunos de estos se han originado en el campo del análisis y operación de la red eléctrica, y su posterior extensión a otras fuentes de energía, todos comparten algunos rasgos comunes que permiten su análisis desde una perspectiva holística. En este artículo, se lleva a cabo una revisión de diferentes enfoques actuales con el objetivo de ofrecer una visión global y sencilla del estado actual de estos conceptos a los lectores. Para ello, se definen primeramente los elementos más significativos presentes en las publicaciones: terminología empleada, contexto, propósito, tratamiento matemático, estrategias de optimización y herramientas. Esto ha servido para realizar una clasificación, en forma de tabla, de artículos más representativos de entre los disponibles en la literatura, así como un análisis comparativo, a fin de dilucidar posibles nichos de investigación en este tema. Las principales concusiones ponen de manifiesto una escasa realización de experimentos en instalaciones reales y una generalizada omisión de criterios medioambientales, cuando se trata del diseño y operación de este tipo de sistemas.es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethodOJSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationRamos-Teodoro, J.; Rodríguez, F. (2022). Producción, control y gestión distribuida de energía: una revisión de terminología y enfoques habituales. Revista Iberoamericana de Automática e Informática industrial. 19(3):233-253. https://doi.org/10.4995/riai.2022.16497es_ES
dc.description.issue3es_ES
dc.description.referencesAlahyari, A., Ehsan, M., Mousavizadeh, M., 2019. A hybrid storage-wind virtual power plant (VPP) participation in the electricity markets: A selfscheduling optimization considering price, renewable generation, and electric vehicles uncertainties. Journal of Energy Storage 25, 100812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2019.100812es_ES
dc.description.referencesAlHajri, I., Ahmadian, A., Elkamel, A., 2021. Stochastic day-ahead unit commitment scheduling of integrated electricity and gas networks with hydrogen energy storage (HES), plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) and renewable energies. Sustainable Cities and Society 67, 102736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102736es_ES
dc.description.referencesAli, H., Hussain, A., Bui, V., Kim, H., 2020. Consensus algorithm-based distributed operation of microgrids during grid-connected and islanded modes. IEEE Access 8, 78151-78165. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2989457es_ES
dc.description.referencesAlipour, M., Zare, K., Abapour, M., 2018. MINLP probabilistic scheduling model for demand response programs integrated energy hubs. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 14 (1), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2017.2730440es_ES
dc.description.referencesAllegrini, J., Orehounig, K., Mavromatidis, G., Ruesch, F., Dorer, V., Evins, R., 2015. A review of modelling approaches and tools for the simulation of district-scale energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 52, 1391-1404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.123es_ES
dc.description.referencesBakken, B. H., Skjelbred, H. I., Wolfgang, O., 2007. eTransport: Investment planning in energy supply systems with multiple energy carriers. Energy 32 (9), 1676-1689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2007.01.003es_ES
dc.description.referencesBaringo, A., Baringo, L., Arroyo, J. M., 2019. Day-ahead self-scheduling of a virtual power plant in energy and reserve electricity markets under uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 34 (3), 1881-1894. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2883753es_ES
dc.description.referencesBatic, M., Tomasevic, N., Beccuti, G., Demiray, T., Vranes, S., 2016. Combined energy hub optimisation and demand side management for buildings. Energy and Buildings 127, 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.087es_ES
dc.description.referencesBeigvand, S. D., Abdi, H., La Scala, M., 2017. A general model for energy hub economic dispatch. Applied Energy 190, 1090-1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.126es_ES
dc.description.referencesBisschop, J., Meeraus, A., 1982. On the development of a general algebraic modeling system in a strategic planning environment. In: Applications. Vol. 20 of Mathematical programming studies. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 1- 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0121223es_ES
dc.description.referencesBolzoni, A., Parisio, A., Todd, R., Forsyth, A., 2021. Model predictive control for optimizing the flexibility of sustainable energy assets: An experimental case study. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 129, 106822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.106822es_ES
dc.description.referencesBordons, C., Garcia-Torres, F., Ridao, M. Á., 2020. Control predictivo en microrredes interconectadas y con vehículos eléctricos. Revista Iberoamericana de Automática e Informática industrial 17 (3), 239-253. https://doi.org/10.4995/riai.2020.13304es_ES
dc.description.referencesBozchalui, M. C., Cañizares, C. A., Bhattacharya, K., 2015. Optimal energy management of greenhouses in smart grids. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 6 (2), 827-835. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2014.2372812es_ES
dc.description.referencesBrahman, F., Honarmand, M., Jadid, S., 2015. Optimal electrical and thermal energy management of a residential energy hub, integrating demand response and energy storage system. Energy and Buildings 90, 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.12.039es_ES
dc.description.referencesBraun, M., Strauss, P., 2008. A review on aggregation approaches of controllable distributed energy units in electrical power systems. International Journal of Distributed Energy Resources 4 (4), 297-319.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBurnham, J. F., 2006. Scopus database: a review. Biomedical digital libraries 3 (1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-3-1es_ES
dc.description.referencesChen, B., Wang, J., Shahidehpour, M., 2018. Cyber-physical perspective on smart grid design and operation. IET Cyber-Physical Systems: Theory & Applications 3 (3), 129-141. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cps.2017.0143es_ES
dc.description.referencesChicco, G., Mancarella, P., 2009. Distributed multi-generation: A comprehensive view. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13 (3), 535-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2007.11.014es_ES
dc.description.referencesClegg, S., Mancarella, P., 2019a. Integrated electricity-heat-gas modelling and assessment, with applications to the Great Britain system. Part I: Highresolution spatial and temporal heat demand modelling. Energy 184, 180- 190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.079es_ES
dc.description.referencesClegg, S., Mancarella, P., 2019b. Integrated electricity-heat-gas modelling and assessment, with applications to the Great Britain system. Part II: Transmission network analysis and low carbon technology and resilience case studies. Energy 184, 191-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.078es_ES
dc.description.referencesCrawley, D. B., Pedersen, C. O., Lawrie, L. K., Winkelmann, F. C., 2000. Energyplus: Energy simulation program. ASHRAE Journal 42, 49-56.es_ES
dc.description.referencesCzyzyk, J., Mesnier, M. P., Moré, J. J., 1998. The NEOS server. IEEE Journal on Computational Science and Engineering 5 (3), 68""-75. https://doi.org/10.1109/99.714603es_ES
dc.description.referencesDagoumas, A. S., Koltsaklis, N. E., 2019. Review of models for integrating renewable energy in the generation expansion planning. Applied Energy 242, 1573-1587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.194es_ES
dc.description.referencesDall'Anese, E., Guggilam, S. S., Simonetto, A., Chen, Y. C., Dhople, S. V., 2018. Optimal regulation of virtual power plants. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 33 (2), 1868-1881. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2741920es_ES
dc.description.referencesDolan, E. D., 2001. The NEOS server 4.0 administrative guide. Technical Memorandum ANL/MCS-TM-250, Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.2172/822567es_ES
dc.description.referencesEhsan, A., Yang, Q., 2018. Optimal integration and planning of renewable distributed generation in the power distribution networks: A review of analytical techniques. Applied Energy 210, 44-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.106es_ES
dc.description.referencesElkamel, M., Ahmadian, A., Diabat, A., Zheng, Q. P., 2021. Stochastic optimization for price-based unit commitment in renewable energy-based personal rapid transit systems in sustainable smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society 65, 102618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102618es_ES
dc.description.referencesEvins, R., 2015. Multi-level optimization of building design, energy system sizing and operation. Energy 90, 1775-1789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.007es_ES
dc.description.referencesEvins, R., Orehounig, K., Dorer, V., Carmeliet, J., 2014. New formulations of the 'energy hub' model to address operational constraints. Energy 73, 387- 398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.06.029es_ES
dc.description.referencesFabrizio, E., Branciforti, V., Costantino, A., Filippi, M., Barbero, S., Tecco, G., Mollo, P., Molino, A., 2017. Monitoring and managing of a micro-smart grid for renewable sources exploitation in an agro-industrial site. Sustainable Cities and Society 28, 88-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.08.026es_ES
dc.description.referencesFabrizio, E., Corrado, V., Filippi, M., 2010. A model to design and optimize multi-energy systems in buildings at the design concept stage. Renewable Energy 35 (3), 644-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2009.08.012es_ES
dc.description.referencesFan, H., Yuan, Q., Xia, S., Lu, J., Li, Z., 2020. Optimally coordinated expansion planning of coupled electricity, heat and natural gas infrastructure for multi-energy system. IEEE Access 8, 91139-91149. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2993035es_ES
dc.description.referencesFang, Y., Zhao, S., Wang, N., Li, Z., Liu, J., 2019. Power system stochastic optimal dispatch considering thermal and electrical coordination. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 110, 772-780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.03.065es_ES
dc.description.referencesFaraji, J., Hashemi-Dezaki, H., Ketabi, A., 2021. Stochastic operation and scheduling of energy hub considering renewable energy sources' uncertainty and n-1 contingency. Sustainable Cities and Society 65, 102578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102578es_ES
dc.description.referencesFarhangi, H., 2010. The path of the smart grid. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine 8 (1), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPE.2009.934876es_ES
dc.description.referencesFirouzmakan, P., Hooshmand, R.-A., Bornapour, M., Khodabakhshian, A., 2019. A comprehensive stochastic energy management system of micro-CHP units, renewable energy sources and storage systems in microgrids considering demand response programs. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 108, 355-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesForoughi, M., Pasban, A., Moeini-Aghtaie, M., Fayaz-Heidari, A., 2021. A bilevel model for optimal bidding of a multi-carrier technical virtual power plant in energy markets. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 125, 106397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106397es_ES
dc.description.referencesFourer, R., Gay, D. M., Kernighan, B., 1989. AMPL: A mathematical programming language. In: Wallace, S. W. (Ed.), Algorithms and model formulations in mathematical programming. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 150-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83724-1_12es_ES
dc.description.referencesFreire, V. A., De Arruda, L. V. R., Bordons, C., Márquez, J. J., 2020. Optimal demand response management of a residential microgrid using model predictive control. IEEE Access 8, 228264-228276. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3045459es_ES
dc.description.referencesFu, Y., Lu, Z., Hu, W., Wu, S., Wang, Y., Dong, L., Zhang, J., 2019. Research on joint optimal dispatching method for hybrid power system considering system security. Applied Energy 238, 147-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.034es_ES
dc.description.referencesGabrielli, P., Gazzani, M., Martelli, E., Mazzotti, M., 2018. Optimal design of multi-energy systems with seasonal storage. Applied Energy 219, 408-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.142es_ES
dc.description.referencesGarcía, C. E., Prett, D. M., Morari, M., 1989. Model predictive control: Theory and practice""A survey. Automatica 25 (3), 335-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(89)90002-2es_ES
dc.description.referencesGarcia-Torres, F., Vilaplana, D. G., Bordons, C., Roncero-Sanchez, P., Ridao, M. A., 2019. Optimal management of microgrids with external agents including battery/fuel cell electric vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 10 (4), 4299-4308. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2018.2856524es_ES
dc.description.referencesGeidl, M., Andersson, G., 2007. Optimal power flow of multiple energy carriers. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 22 (1), 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2006.888988es_ES
dc.description.referencesGeidl, M., Koeppel, G., Favre-Perrod, P., Klöckl, B., Andersson, G., Fröhlich, K., 2006. Energy hubs for the future. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine 5 (1), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPAE.2007.264850es_ES
dc.description.referencesGhaem Sigarchian, S., Orosz, M. S., Hemond, H. F., Malmquist, A., 2016. Optimum design of a hybrid PV-CSP-LPG microgrid with particle swarm optimization technique. Applied Thermal Engineering 109, 1031-1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.05.119es_ES
dc.description.referencesGhaemi, S., Salehi, J., Moeini-Aghtaie, M., 2021. Estimating abilities of distributed energy resources in providing flexible ramp products for active distribution networks. Sustainable Cities and Society 65, 102593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102593es_ES
dc.description.referencesGhedamsi, K., Aouzellag, D., 2010. Improvement of the performances for wind energy conversions systems. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 32 (9), 936-945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2010.02.012es_ES
dc.description.referencesGil, J. D., Álvarez, J., Roca, L., Sánchez-Molina, J., Berenguel, M., Rodríguez, F., 2019. Optimal thermal energy management of a distributed energy system comprising a solar membrane distillation plant and a greenhouse. Energy Conversion and Management 198, 111791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111791es_ES
dc.description.referencesGivler, T., Lilienthal, P., 2005. Using HOMER software, NREL's micropower optimization model, to explore the role of gen-sets in small solar power systems""Case study: Sri Lanka. Tech. rep., National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado, United States. https://doi.org/10.2172/15016073es_ES
dc.description.referencesGong, X., Dong, F., Mohamed, M. A., Abdalla, O. M., Ali, Z. M., 2020. A secured energy management architecture for smart hybrid microgrids considering pem-fuel cell and electric vehicles. IEEE Access 8, 47807-47823. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2978789es_ES
dc.description.referencesGood, N., Mancarella, P., 2019. Flexibility in multi-energy communities with electrical and thermal storage: A stochastic, robust approach for multiservice demand response. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 10 (1), 503- 513. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2017.2745559es_ES
dc.description.referencesGroissböck, M., 2019. Are open source energy system optimization tools mature enough for serious use? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 102, 234-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.020es_ES
dc.description.referencesGroover, M. P., 2015. Automation, production systems, and computerintegrated manufacturing, 4th Edition. Pearson.es_ES
dc.description.referencesGropp, W., Moré, J. J., 1997. Optimization environments and the NEOS server. In: Buhman, M. D., Iserles, A. (Eds.), Approximation theory and optimization. Cambridge University Press, pp. 167-182.es_ES
dc.description.referencesGu, W., Wu, Z., Bo, R., Liu, W., Zhou, G., Chen, W., Wu, Z., 2014. Modeling, planning and optimal energy management of combined cooling, heating and power microgrid: A review. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 54, 26-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.06.028es_ES
dc.description.referencesGuelpa, E., Bischi, A., Verda, V., Chertkov, M., Lund, H., 2019. Towards future infrastructures for sustainable multi-energy systems: A review. Energy 184, 2-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.057es_ES
dc.description.referencesGurobi Optimization, LLC, 2019. Gurobi Optimizer Reference Manual. [Online]. Available: http://www.gurobi.com. Accessed on: Sep. 20, 2020. Hatziargyriou, N., Asano, H., Iravani, R., Marnay, C., 2007. Microgrids. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine 5 (4), 78-94. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPAE.2007.376583es_ES
dc.description.referencesHemmati, M., Mirzaei, M. A., Abapour, M., Zare, K., Mohammadi-ivatloo, B., Mehrjerdi, H., Marzband, M., 2021. Economic-environmental analysis of combined heat and power-based reconfigurable microgrid integrated with multiple energy storage and demand response program. Sustainable Cities and Society 69, 102790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102790es_ES
dc.description.referencesHeredia, F. J., Cuadrado, M. D., Corchero, C., 2018. On optimal participation in the electricity markets of wind power plants with battery energy storage systems. Computers & Operations Research 96, 316-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2018.03.004es_ES
dc.description.referencesHolmström, K., Göran, A. O., Edvall, M. M., 2010. User's Guide for TOMLAB 7. [Online]. Available: https://tomopt.com/docs/TOMLAB.pdf. Accessed on: Sep. 20, 2020.es_ES
dc.description.referencesHou, W., Liu, Z., Ma, L., Wang, L., 2020. A real-time rolling horizon chance constrained optimization model for energy hub scheduling. Sustainable Cities and Society 62, 102417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102417es_ES
dc.description.referencesHuang, W., Zhang, N., Yang, J., Wang, Y., Kang, C., 2019. Optimal configuration planning of multi-energy systems considering distributed renewable energy. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 10 (2), 1452-1464. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2017.2767860es_ES
dc.description.referencesInternational Business Machines Corporation (IBM), 2019. IBM ILOG CPLEX Optimization Studio. [Online]. Available: https://www.ibm.com/ es-es/products/ilog-cplex-optimization-studio. Accessed on: Sep. 20, 2020.es_ES
dc.description.referencesJamalzadeh, F., Mirzahosseini, A. H., Faghihi, F., Panahi, M., 2020. Optimal operation of energy hub system using hybrid stochastic-interval optimization approach. Sustainable Cities and Society 54, 101998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101998es_ES
dc.description.referencesJiang, Y., Xu, J., Sun, Y., Wei, C., Wang, J., Ke, D., Li, X., Yang, J., Peng, X., Tang, B., 2017. Day-ahead stochastic economic dispatch of wind integrated power system considering demand response of residential hybrid energy system. Applied Energy 190, 1126-1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.030es_ES
dc.description.referencesJu, L., Zhao, R., Tan, Q., Lu, Y., Tan, Q., Wang, W., 2019. A multi-objective robust scheduling model and solution algorithm for a novel virtual power plant connected with power-to-gas and gas storage tank considering uncertainty and demand response. Applied Energy 250, 1336-1355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.027es_ES
dc.description.referencesKlessmann, C., Held, A., Rathmann, M., Ragwitz, M., 2011. Status and perspectives of renewable energy policy and deployment in the European Union""What is needed to reach the 2020 targets? Energy policy 39 (12), 7637-7657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.038es_ES
dc.description.referencesKong, X., Xiao, J., Wang, C., Cui, K., Jin, Q., Kong, D., 2019. Bi-level multitime scale scheduling method based on bidding for multi-operator virtual power plant. Applied Energy 249, 178-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.130es_ES
dc.description.referencesKoraki, D., Strunz, K., 2018. Wind and solar power integration in electricity markets and distribution networks through service-centric virtual power plants. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 33 (1), 473-485. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2710481es_ES
dc.description.referencesKriechbaum, L., Scheiber, G., Kienberger, T., 2018. Grid-based multi-energy systems-modelling, assessment, open source modelling frameworks and challenges. Energy, Sustainability and Society 8 (35), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-018-0176-xes_ES
dc.description.referencesKyriakarakos, G., Dounis, A., Rozakis, S., Arvanitis, K., Papadakis, G., 2011. Polygeneration microgrids: A viable solution in remote areas for supplying power, potable water and hydrogen as transportation fuel. Applied Energy 88 (12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.05.038es_ES
dc.description.referencesLekvan, A. A., Habibifar, R., Moradi, M., Khoshjahan, M., Nojavan, S., Jermsittiparsert, K., 2021. Robust optimization of renewable-based multi-energy micro-grid integrated with flexible energy conversion and storage devices. Sustainable Cities and Society 64, 102532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102532es_ES
dc.description.referencesLi, H., Rezvani, A., Hu, J., Ohshima, K., 2021. Optimal day-ahead scheduling of microgrid with hybrid electric vehicles using MSFLA algorithm considering control strategies. Sustainable Cities and Society 66, 102681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102681es_ES
dc.description.referencesLi, P., Liu, Y., Xin, H., Jiang, X., 2018. A robust distributed economic dispatch strategy of virtual power plant under cyber-attacks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 14 (10), 4343-4352. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2017.2788868es_ES
dc.description.referencesLiang, Z., Alsafasfeh, Q., Jin, T., Pourbabak, H., Su, W., 2019. Risk-constrained optimal energy management for virtual power plants considering correlated demand response. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 10 (2), 1577-1587. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2017.2773039es_ES
dc.description.referencesLiu, C., Wang, D., Yin, Y., 2019. Two-stage optimal economic scheduling for commercial building multi-energy system through internet of things. IEEE Access 7, 174562-174572. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2957267es_ES
dc.description.referencesLiu, J., Wang, A., Song, C., Tao, R., Wang, X., 2020. Cooperative operation for integrated multi-energy system considering transmission losses. IEEE Access 8, 96934-96945. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2996913es_ES
dc.description.referencesLiu, X., Mancarella, P., 2016. Modelling, assessment and Sankey diagrams of integrated electricity-heat-gas networks in multi-vector district energy systems. Applied Energy 167, 336-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.089es_ES
dc.description.referencesLöfberg, J., 2004. YALMIP : a toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. pp. 284-289. DOI: 10.1109/cacsd.2004.1393890es_ES
dc.description.referencesLong, S., Marjanovic, O., Parisio, A., 2019. Generalised control-oriented modelling framework for multi-energy systems. Applied Energy 235, 320-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.074es_ES
dc.description.referencesLu, S., Gu, W., Zhou, J., Zhang, X., Wu, C., 2018. Coordinated dispatch of multi-energy system with district heating network: Modeling and solution strategy. Energy 152, 358-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.088es_ES
dc.description.referencesLuo, X., Xia, J., Liu, Y., 2021. Extraction of dynamic operation strategy for standalone solar-based multi-energy systems: A method based on decision tree algorithm. Sustainable Cities and Society 70, 102917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102917es_ES
dc.description.referencesMancarella, P., 2014. MES (multi-energy systems): An overview of concepts and evaluation models. Energy 65, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.041es_ES
dc.description.referencesMansour-Saatloo, A., Mirzaei, M. A., Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B., Zare, K., 2020. A risk-averse hybrid approach for optimal participation of powerto-hydrogen technology-based multi-energy microgrid in multi-energy markets. Sustainable Cities and Society 63, 102421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102421es_ES
dc.description.referencesMansouri, S. A., Ahmarinejad, A., Nematbakhsh, E., Javadi, M. S., Jordehi, A. R., Catalão, J. P., 2021. Energy management in microgrids including smart homes: A multi-objective approach. Sustainable Cities and Society 69, 102852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102852es_ES
dc.description.referencesMarnay, C., Venkataramanan, G., Stadler, M., Siddiqui, A., Firestone, R., Chandran, B., 2008. Optimal technology selection and operation of commercialbuilding microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 23 (3), 975-982. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2008.922654es_ES
dc.description.referencesMaroufmashat, A., Taqvi, S. T., Miragha, A., Fowler, M., Elkamel, A., 2019. Modeling and optimization of energy hubs: A comprehensive review. Inventions 4 (3), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions4030050es_ES
dc.description.referencesMartinez Cesena, E. A., Mancarella, P., 2019. Energy systems integration in smart districts: Robust optimisation of multi-energy flows in integrated electricity, heat and gas networks. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 10 (1), 1122-1131. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2018.2828146es_ES
dc.description.referencesMavromatidis, G., Petkov, I., 2021. Mango: A novel optimization model for the long-term, multi-stage planning of decentralized multi-energy systems. Applied Energy 288, 116585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116585es_ES
dc.description.referencesMehdi, M., Kim, C., Saad, M., 2020. Robust centralized control for dc islanded microgrid considering communication network delay. IEEE Access 8, 77765-77778. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2989777es_ES
dc.description.referencesMehrabadi, R. A., Moghaddam, M. P., Sheikh-El-Eslami, M. K., 2020. Regulatory-intervented sustainable generation expansion planning in multielectricity markets. Sustainable Cities and Society 52, 101794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101794es_ES
dc.description.referencesMenezes Morato, M., da Costa Mendes, P. R., Normey-Rico, J. E., Bordons, C., 2017. Optimal operation of hybrid power systems including renewable sources in the sugar cane industry. IET Renewable Power Generation 11 (8), 1237-1245. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0443es_ES
dc.description.referencesMinutillo, M., Perna, A., Sorce, A., 2019. Combined hydrogen, heat and electricity generation via biogas reforming: Energy and economic assessments. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44 (43), 23880-23898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.105es_ES
dc.description.referencesMirzapour-Kamanaj, A., Majidi, M., Zare, K., Kazemzadeh, R., 2020. Optimal strategic coordination of distribution networks and interconnected energy hubs: A linear multi-follower bi-level optimization model. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 119, 105925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.105925es_ES
dc.description.referencesMohamed, M. A., Abdullah, H. M., El-Meligy, M. A., Sharaf, M., Soliman, A. T., Hajjiah, A., 2021. A novel fuzzy cloud stochastic framework for energy management of renewable microgrids based on maximum deployment of electric vehicles. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 129, 106845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.106845es_ES
dc.description.referencesMohammadi, M., Ghasempour, R., Astaraei, F. R., Ahmadi, E., Aligholian, A., Toopshekan, A., 2018. Optimal planning of renewable energy resource for a residential house considering economic and reliability criteria. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 96, 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2017.10.017es_ES
dc.description.referencesMohammadi, M., Noorollahi, Y., Mohammadi-ivatloo, B., Yousefi, H., 2017a. Energy hub: From a model to a concept""A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 80, 1512-1527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.030es_ES
dc.description.referencesMohammadi, M., Noorollahi, Y., Mohammadi-ivatloo, B., Yousefi, H., Jalilinasrabady, S., 2017b. Optimal scheduling of energy hubs in the presence of uncertainty""A review. Journal of Energy Management and Technology 1 (1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.22109/jemt.2017.49432es_ES
dc.description.referencesMohammed, A., Refaat, S. S., Bayhan, S., Abu-Rub, H., 2019. AC microgrid control and management strategies: Evaluation and review. IEEE Power Electronics Magazine 6 (2), 18-31. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPEL.2019.2910292es_ES
dc.description.referencesNasiri, N., Yazdankhah, A. S., Mirzaei, M. A., Loni, A., Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B., Zare, K., Marzband, M., 2020. A bi-level market-clearing for coordinated regional-local multi-carrier systems in presence of energy storage technologies. Sustainable Cities and Society 63, 102439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102439es_ES
dc.description.referencesNaval, N., Sánchez, R., Yusta, J. M., 2020. A virtual power plant optimal dispatch model with large and small-scale distributed renewable generation. Renewable Energy 151, 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.144es_ES
dc.description.referencesNosratabadi, S. M., Jahandide, M., Guerrero, J. M., 2021. Robust scenariobased concept for stochastic energy management of an energy hub contains intelligent parking lot considering convexity principle of chp nonlinear model with triple operational zones. Sustainable Cities and Society 68, 102795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102795es_ES
dc.description.referencesOmbach, J., 2014. A short introduction to stochastic optimization. Schedae Informaticae 23, 9-20. https://doi.org/10.4467/20838476si.14.001.3018es_ES
dc.description.referencesOrehounig, K., Evins, R., Dorer, V., 2015. Integration of decentralized energy systems in neighbourhoods using the energy hub approach. Applied Energy 154, 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.114es_ES
dc.description.referencesPandžic, H., Kuzle, I., Capuder, T., 2013. Virtual power plant mid-term dispatch' optimization. Applied Energy 101, 134-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.05.039es_ES
dc.description.referencesParisio, A., Del Vecchio, C., Vaccaro, A., 2012. A robust optimization approach to energy hub management. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 42 (1), 98-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.03.015es_ES
dc.description.referencesPasetti, M., Rinaldi, S., Manerba, D., Pasetti, M., Rinaldi, S., Manerba, D., 2018. A virtual power plant architecture for the demand-side management of smart prosumers. Applied Sciences 8 (3), 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8030432es_ES
dc.description.referencesPei, W., Ma, X., Deng, W., Chen, X., Sun, H., Li, D., 2019. Industrial multienergy and production management scheme in cyber-physical environments: A case study in a battery manufacturing plant. IET Cyber-Physical Systems: Theory & Applications 4 (1), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cps.2018.5029es_ES
dc.description.referencesPhurailatpam, C., Rajpurohit, B. S., Wang, L., 2018. Planning and optimization of autonomous DC microgrids for rural and urban applications in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 82, 194-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.022es_ES
dc.description.referencesPudjianto, D., Ramsay, C., Strbac, G., 2007. Virtual power plant and system integration of distributed energy resources. IET Renewable Power Generation 1 (1), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg:20060023es_ES
dc.description.referencesRamos-Teodoro, J., 2021. Estrategias de gestión energética en entornos productivos con apoyo de energía solar. Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Almería.es_ES
dc.description.referencesRamos-Teodoro, J., Gil, J. D., Roca, L., Rodríguez, F., Berenguel, M., 2021. Optimal water management in agro-industrial districts: An energy hub's case study in the southeast of spain. Processes 9 (2), 333. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9020333es_ES
dc.description.referencesRamos-Teodoro, J., Rodríguez, F., Berenguel, M., Torres, J. L., 2018. Heterogeneous resource management in energy hubs with self-consumption: Contributions and application example. Applied Energy 229, 537-550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.007es_ES
dc.description.referencesRodríguez-Blanco, T., Sarabia, D., De Prada, C., 2018. Optimización en tiempo real utilizando la metodología de adaptación de modificadores. Revista Iberoamericana de Automática e Informática industrial 15 (2), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.4995/riai.2017.8846es_ES
dc.description.referencesSadeghi, H., Rashidinejad, M., Moeini-Aghtaie, M., Abdollahi, A., 2019. The energy hub: An extensive survey on the state-of-the-art. Applied Thermal Engineering 161, 114071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114071es_ES
dc.description.referencesSadeghian, O., Oshnoei, A., Khezri, R., Muyeen, S., 2020. Risk-constrained stochastic optimal allocation of energy storage system in virtual power plants. Journal of Energy Storage 31, 101732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2020.101732es_ES
dc.description.referencesSadeghian, O., Shotorbani, A. M., Mohammadi-ivatloo, B., 2019. Generation maintenance scheduling in virtual power plants. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 13 (12), 2584-2596. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.6751es_ES
dc.description.referencesSahinidis, N. V., 2019. BARON v. 2019.7.13: Global Optimization of MixedInteger Nonlinear Programs, User's Manual. [Online]. Available: http:// www.minlp.com/downloads/docs/baron%20manual.pdf. Accessed on: Sep. 20, 2020.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSalehpour, M. J., Alishavandi, A. M., Hossain, M. J., Rostami, S. M. H., Wang, J., Yu, X., 2021. A stochastic decentralized model for the privately interactive operation of a multi-carrier energy system. Sustainable Cities and Society 64, 102551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102551es_ES
dc.description.referencesSuman, G. K., Guerrero, J. M., Roy, O. P., 2021. Optimisation of solar/wind/bio-generator/diesel/battery based microgrids for rural areas: A PSO-GWO approach. Sustainable Cities and Society 67, 102723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102723es_ES
dc.description.referencesTahir, M. F., Haoyong, C., Mehmood, K., Ali, N., Bhutto, J. A., 2019. Integrated energy system modeling of china for 2020 by incorporating demand response, heat pump and thermal storage. IEEE Access 7, 40095-40108. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2905684es_ES
dc.description.referencesTaylor, M., Long, S., Marjanovic, O., Parisio, A., 2021. Model predictive control of smart districts with fifth generation heating and cooling networks. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2021.3082405es_ES
dc.description.referencesThe MathWorks, Inc., 2019. MATLAB R2019a. [Online]. Available: http: //es.mathworks.com/products/matlab/. Accessed on: Sep. 20, 2020.es_ES
dc.description.referencesTorres-Moreno, J., Gimenez-Fernandez, A., Perez-Garcia, M., Rodriguez, F., 2018. Energy management strategy for micro-grids with PV-battery systems and electric vehicles. Energies 11 (3), 522. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11030522es_ES
dc.description.referencesVahedipour-Dahraie, M., Rashidizade-Kermani, H., Shafie-khah, M., Catalão, J. P., 2020. Risk-averse optimal energy and reserve scheduling for virtual power plants incorporating demand response programs. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid. DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2020.3026971es_ES
dc.description.referencesvan Beuzekom, I., Gibescu, M., Slootweg, J., 2015. A review of multi-energy system planning and optimization tools for sustainable urban development. In: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Eindhoven PowerTech. IEEE, pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1109/PTC.2015.7232360es_ES
dc.description.referencesVelarde, P., Valverde, L., Maestre, J., Ocampo-Martinez, C., Bordons, C., 2017. On the comparison of stochastic model predictive control strategies applied to a hydrogen-based microgrid. Journal of Power Sources 343, 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.015es_ES
dc.description.referencesVergara-Dietrich, J. D., Menezes Morato, M., da Costa Mendes, P. R., Cani, A. A., Normey-Rico, J. E., Bordons, C., 2019. Advanced chance-constrained predictive control for the efficient energy management of renewable power systems. Journal of Process Control 74, 120-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2017.11.003es_ES
dc.description.referencesWang, H., Riaz, S., Mancarella, P., 2020. Integrated techno-economic modeling, flexibility analysis, and business case assessment of an urban virtual power plant with multi-market co-optimization. Applied Energy 259, 114142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114142es_ES
dc.description.referencesWang, J., Hu, Z., Xie, S., 2019. Expansion planning model of multi-energy system with the integration of active distribution network. Applied Energy 253, 113517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113517es_ES
dc.description.referencesWang, Y., Zhang, N., Zhuo, Z., Kang, C., Kirschen, D., 2018. Mixed-integer linear programming-based optimal configuration planning for energy hub: Starting from scratch. Applied Energy 210, 1141-1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.114es_ES
dc.description.referencesWei, C., Xu, J., Liao, S., Sun, Y., Jiang, Y., Ke, D., Zhang, Z., Wang, J., 2018. A bi-level scheduling model for virtual power plants with aggregated thermostatically controlled loads and renewable energy. Applied Energy 224, 659-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.032es_ES
dc.description.referencesWenzel, S., Paulen, R., Stojanovski, G., Krämer, S., Beisheim, B., Engell, S., 2016. Optimal resource allocation in industrial complexes by distributed optimization and dynamic pricing. Automatisierungstechnik 64 (6), 428-442. https://doi.org/10.1515/auto-2016-0003es_ES
dc.description.referencesWirtz, M., Hahn, M., Schreiber, T., Müller, D., 2021. Design optimization of multi-energy systems using mixed-integer linear programming: Which model complexity and level of detail is sufficient? Energy Conversion and Management 240, 114249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114249es_ES
dc.description.referencesWozabal, D., Rameseder, G., 2020. Optimal bidding of a virtual power plant on the Spanish day-ahead and intraday market for electricity. European Journal of Operational Research 280 (2), 639-655.es_ES
dc.description.referenceshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.07.022es_ES
dc.description.referencesYu, S., Fang, F., Liu, Y., Liu, J., 2019. Uncertainties of virtual power plant: Problems and countermeasures. Applied Energy 239, 454-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.224es_ES
dc.description.referencesYuan, Z., Wogrin, S., Hesamzadeh, M. R., 2017. Towards the Power Synergy Hub (PSHub): Coordinating the energy dispatch of super grid by modified Benders decomposition. Applied Energy 205, 1419-1434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.086es_ES
dc.description.referencesZamani, A. G., Zakariazadeh, A., Jadid, S., 2016. Day-ahead resource scheduling of a renewable energy based virtual power plant. Applied Energy 169, 324-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.011es_ES
dc.description.referencesZamanloo, S., Abyaneh, H. A., Nafisi, H., Azizi, M., 2021. Optimal two-level active and reactive energy management of residential appliances in smart homes. Sustainable Cities and Society, 102972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102972es_ES
dc.description.referencesZeng, L., Sun, Y., Zhou, X., Li, B., Qi, B., 2018. Demand dispatch in cyberphysical load aggregation system with multilevel incentives. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy 6 (5), 968-978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40565-018-0451-zes_ES
dc.description.referencesZhang, G., Jiang, C., Wang, X., 2019. Comprehensive review on structure and operation of virtual power plant in electrical system. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 13 (2), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.5880es_ES
dc.description.referencesZhang, Y., Zhang, T., Wang, R., Liu, Y., Guo, B., 2015. Optimal operation of a smart residential microgrid based on model predictive control by considering uncertainties and storage impacts. Solar Energy 122, 1052-1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.10.027es_ES
dc.description.referencesZhong, W., Yang, C., Xie, K., Xie, S., Zhang, Y., 2018. ADMM-based distributed auction mechanism for energy hub scheduling in smart buildings. IEEE Access 6, 45635-45645. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2865625es_ES
dc.description.referencesZia, M. F., Benbouzid, M., Elbouchikhi, E., Muyeen, S., Techato, K., Guerrero, J. M., 2020. Microgrid transactive energy: Review, architectures, distributed ledger technologies, and market analysis. IEEE Access 8, 19410-19432. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968402es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEste trabajo ha sido financiado con el Proyecto R+D+i del Plan Nacional DPI2017-85007-R del Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades y Fondos FEDER.es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin253es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio233es_ES
dc.description.volume19es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.4995/riai.2022.16497
dc.identifier.eissn1697-7920
dc.identifier.issn1697-7912
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/186921
dc.languageEspañoles_ES
dc.publisherUniversitat Politècnica de Valènciaes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Iberoamericana de Automática e Informática industriales_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaOJS\16497es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/DPI2017-85007-R/ES/CONTROL Y GESTION OPTIMA DE RECURSOS HETEROGENEOS EN DISTRITOS PRODUCTIVOS AGROINDUSTRIALES INTEGRANDO ENERGIAS RENOVABLES/es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.4995/riai.2022.16497es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.est.2019.100812es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scs.2021.102736es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2989457es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/TII.2017.2730440es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.123es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.energy.2007.01.003es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2883753es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.087es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.126es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/BFb0121223es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.106822es_ES
dc.relation.references10.4995/riai.2020.13304es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/TSG.2014.2372812es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.12.039es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1186/1742-5581-3-1es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1049/iet-cps.2017.0143es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.rser.2007.11.014es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.079es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.078es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/99.714603es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.194es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2741920es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2172/822567es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.106es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scs.2020.102618es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.007es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.energy.2014.06.029es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scs.2016.08.026es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.renene.2009.08.012es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2993035es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.03.065es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scs.2020.102578es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/MPE.2009.934876es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106397es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/978-3-642-83724-1_12es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3045459es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.034es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.142es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0005-1098(89)90002-2es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/TSG.2018.2856524es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/TPWRS.2006.888988es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/MPAE.2007.264850es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.05.119es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scs.2020.102593es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ijepes.2010.02.012es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111791es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2172/15016073es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2978789es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/TSG.2017.2745559es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.020es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.06.028es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.057es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/MPAE.2007.376583es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scs.2021.102790es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.cor.2018.03.004es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scs.2020.102417es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/TSG.2017.2767860es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scs.2019.101998es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.030es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.027es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.038es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.130es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2710481es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1186/s13705-018-0176-xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.05.038es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scs.2020.102532es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scs.2020.102681es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/TII.2017.2788868es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/TSG.2017.2773039es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2957267es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2996913es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.089es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/CACSD.2004.1393890es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.074es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.088es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scs.2021.102917es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.041es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scs.2020.102421es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scs.2021.102852es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/TPWRS.2008.922654es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3390/inventions4030050es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/TSG.2018.2828146es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116585es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2989777es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scs.2019.101794es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0443es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.105es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.105925es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.106845es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ijepes.2017.10.017es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.030es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/MPEL.2019.2910292es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scs.2020.102439es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.144es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scs.2021.102795es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.114es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.05.039es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.03.015es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3390/app8030432es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1049/iet-cps.2018.5029es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.022es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1049/iet-rpg:20060023es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3390/pr9020333es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.007es_ES
dc.relation.references10.4995/riai.2017.8846es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114071es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.est.2020.101732es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.6751es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scs.2020.102551es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scs.2021.102723es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2905684es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/TEC.2021.3082405es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3390/en11030522es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/TSG.2020.3026971es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/PTC.2015.7232360es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.015es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jprocont.2017.11.003es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114142es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113517es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.114es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.032es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1515/auto-2016-0003es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114249es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ejor.2019.07.022es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.224es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.086es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.011es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scs.2021.102972es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s40565-018-0451-zes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.5880es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.solener.2015.10.027es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2865625es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968402es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento - No comercial - Compartir igual (by-nc-sa)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectMicrogridses_ES
dc.subjectVirtual power plantses_ES
dc.subjectEnergy hubses_ES
dc.subjectMulti-energy systemses_ES
dc.subjectDistributed multi-generationes_ES
dc.subjectEconomic dispatches_ES
dc.subjectEnergy managementes_ES
dc.subjectModel-based predictive controles_ES
dc.subjectControl and schedulinges_ES
dc.subjectMicrorredeses_ES
dc.subjectPlantas de energía virtualeses_ES
dc.subjectConcentradores de energíaes_ES
dc.subjectSistemas multienergíaes_ES
dc.subjectMultigeneración distribuidaes_ES
dc.subjectReparto económicoes_ES
dc.subjectGestión de energíaes_ES
dc.subjectControl predictivo basado en modeloes_ES
dc.subjectControl y planificaciónes_ES
dc.titleProducción, control y gestión distribuida de energía: una revisión de terminología y enfoques habitualeses_ES
dc.title.alternativeDistributed energy production, control and management: a review of terminology and common approacheses_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
upv.uuid859f5969-e64f-44bb-a786-8c93191e1dabes_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Ramos-TeodoroRodriguez - Produccion control y gestion distribuida de energia una revision de term....pdf
Tamaño:
1.15 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial