Exploring the limits of anaerobic biodegradability of urban wastewater by AnMBR technology

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Ingeniería Hidráulica y Medio Ambiente
dc.contributor.affiliationInstituto Universitario de Ingeniería del Agua y del Medio Ambiente
dc.contributor.affiliationEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería de Caminos, Canales y Puertos
dc.contributor.authorSeco Torrecillas, Auroraes_ES
dc.contributor.authorMateo-Llosa, Oscares_ES
dc.contributor.authorZamorano-López, Núriaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorSanchis-Perucho, Pau
dc.contributor.authorSerralta Sevilla, Joaquín
dc.contributor.authorMartí Ortega, Nuriaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorBorrás Falomir, Luises_ES
dc.contributor.authorFerrer, J.es_ES
dc.contributor.funderGeneralitat Valencianaes_ES
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Economía y Empresaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-12T03:35:03Z
dc.date.available2020-09-12T03:35:03Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-01es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN] Anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs) can achieve maximum energy recovery from urban wastewater (UWW) by converting influent COD into methane. The aim of this study was to assess the anaerobic biodegradability limits of urban wastewater with AnMBR technology by studying the possible degradation of the organic matter considered as non-biodegradable as observed in aerobic membrane bioreactors operated at very high sludge retention times. For this, the results obtained in an AnMBR pilot plant operated at very high SRT (140 days) treating sulfate-rich urban wastewater were compared with those previously obtained with the system operating at lower SRT (29 to 70 days). At 140 days SRT the organic matter biodegraded by the AnMBR system accounted for 64.4% of the influent COD (45.9% was removed by sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB), and only 18.5% was converted into methane, highlighting the strong competition between SRB and methanogenic archaea (MA) when treating sulfate-rich wastewater). Almost half of the methane produced (46%) was dissolved in the permeate and most of it was recovered by a degassing membrane. The organic matter biodegraded by the AnMBR system was similar to the influent anaerobic biodegradability determined by wastewater characterization assays (68.5% of the influent COD), indicating that nearly all the influent's biodegradable organic matter had been removed. This percentage of degraded COD was similar to that obtained in previous studies working at 70 days SRT, showing that the limit of anaerobic biodegradability was already reached in this SRT. The organic matter considered as non-biodegradable according to wastewater characterization assays therefore was not seen to degrade in the AnMBR pilot plant, even at very high SRT. Once the biodegraded COD is close to the influent's anaerobic biodegradability, increasing the SRT is not justified as it only leads to higher operational costs for the same biogas production. These findings support the use of mathematical models for AnMBR design since they accurately represent the behaviour of these systems in a wide range of operating conditions.en_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationSeco Torrecillas, A.; Mateo-Llosa, O.; Zamorano-López, N.; Sanchis-Perucho, P.; Serralta Sevilla, J.; Martí Ortega, N.; Borrás Falomir, L.... (2018). Exploring the limits of anaerobic biodegradability of urban wastewater by AnMBR technology. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology. 4(11):1877-1887. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ew00313kes_ES
dc.description.issue11es_ES
dc.description.referencesLi, W.-W., & Yu, H.-Q. (2011). From wastewater to bioenergy and biochemicals via two-stage bioconversion processes: A future paradigm. Biotechnology Advances, 29(6), 972-982. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.08.012es_ES
dc.description.referencesShin, C., & Bae, J. (2018). Current status of the pilot-scale anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatments of domestic wastewaters: A critical review. Bioresource Technology, 247, 1038-1046. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.002es_ES
dc.description.referencesEEA , Performance of water utilities beyond compliance (Technical report No. 5/2014) , Luxemburg , 2014es_ES
dc.description.referencesMartin, I., Pidou, M., Soares, A., Judd, S., & Jefferson, B. (2011). Modelling the energy demands of aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. Environmental Technology, 32(9), 921-932. doi:10.1080/09593330.2011.565806es_ES
dc.description.referencesJEISON, D., & VANLIER, J. (2007). Cake formation and consolidation: Main factors governing the applicable flux in anaerobic submerged membrane bioreactors (AnSMBR) treating acidified wastewaters. Separation and Purification Technology, 56(1), 71-78. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2007.01.022es_ES
dc.description.referencesPretel, R., Robles, A., Ruano, M. V., Seco, A., & Ferrer, J. (2014). The operating cost of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) treating sulphate-rich urban wastewater. Separation and Purification Technology, 126, 30-38. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2014.02.013es_ES
dc.description.referencesCashman, S., Ma, X., Mosley, J., Garland, J., Crone, B., & Xue, X. (2018). Energy and greenhouse gas life cycle assessment and cost analysis of aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactor systems: Influence of scale, population density, climate, and methane recovery. Bioresource Technology, 254, 56-66. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.060es_ES
dc.description.referencesOzgun, H., Dereli, R. K., Ersahin, M. E., Kinaci, C., Spanjers, H., & van Lier, J. B. (2013). A review of anaerobic membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment: Integration options, limitations and expectations. Separation and Purification Technology, 118, 89-104. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2013.06.036es_ES
dc.description.referencesLin, H., Peng, W., Zhang, M., Chen, J., Hong, H., & Zhang, Y. (2013). A review on anaerobic membrane bioreactors: Applications, membrane fouling and future perspectives. Desalination, 314, 169-188. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2013.01.019es_ES
dc.description.referencesGiménez, J. B., Martí, N., Ferrer, J., & Seco, A. (2012). Methane recovery efficiency in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAnMBR) treating sulphate-rich urban wastewater: Evaluation of methane losses with the effluent. Bioresource Technology, 118, 67-72. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.019es_ES
dc.description.referencesGlória, R. M., Motta, T. M., Silva, P. V. O., Costa, P. da, Brandt, E. M. F., Souza, C. L., & Chernicharo, C. A. L. (2016). STRIPPING AND DISSIPATION TECHNIQUES FOR THE REMOVAL OF DISSOLVED GASES FROM ANAEROBIC EFFLUENTS. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 33(4), 713-721. doi:10.1590/0104-6632.20160334s20150291es_ES
dc.description.referencesScherer, E., & Wichmann, K. (2000). Treatment of Groundwater Containing Methane - Combination of the Processing Stages Desorption and Filtration. Acta hydrochimica et hydrobiologica, 28(3), 145-154. doi:10.1002/1521-401x(200003)28:3<145::aid-aheh145>3.0.co;2-ves_ES
dc.description.referencesD. Schippers and R.Schotsman , Recovery and beneficial use of water-based methane, Water21 , 2010 , pp. 34–35es_ES
dc.description.referencesCrone, B. C., Garland, J. L., Sorial, G. A., & Vane, L. M. (2016). Significance of dissolved methane in effluents of anaerobically treated low strength wastewater and potential for recovery as an energy product: A review. Water Research, 104, 520-531. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2016.08.019es_ES
dc.description.referencesCookney, J., Mcleod, A., Mathioudakis, V., Ncube, P., Soares, A., Jefferson, B., & McAdam, E. J. (2016). Dissolved methane recovery from anaerobic effluents using hollow fibre membrane contactors. Journal of Membrane Science, 502, 141-150. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2015.12.037es_ES
dc.description.referencesHatamoto, M., Yamamoto, H., Kindaichi, T., Ozaki, N., & Ohashi, A. (2010). Biological oxidation of dissolved methane in effluents from anaerobic reactors using a down-flow hanging sponge reactor. Water Research, 44(5), 1409-1418. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2009.11.021es_ES
dc.description.referencesPretel, R., Robles, A., Ruano, M. V., Seco, A., & Ferrer, J. (2013). Environmental impact of submerged anaerobic MBR (SAnMBR) technology used to treat urban wastewater at different temperatures. Bioresource Technology, 149, 532-540. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.060es_ES
dc.description.referencesLubello, C., Caffaz, S., Gori, R., & Munz, G. (2009). A modified Activated Sludge Model to estimate solids production at low and high solids retention time. Water Research, 43(18), 4539-4548. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2009.08.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesL. Cabrera , F.García-Usach , J.Ribes , A.Seco , J. J.Morenilla , F.Llavador and J.Ferrer , Estudio de la producción de fangos en bioreactores de membranas aerobios con elevados valores de tiempo de retención celular, Fangos y lodos , 2009 , vol. 7 , pp. 1–3es_ES
dc.description.referencesGiménez, J. B., Robles, A., Carretero, L., Durán, F., Ruano, M. V., Gatti, M. N., … Seco, A. (2011). Experimental study of the anaerobic urban wastewater treatment in a submerged hollow-fibre membrane bioreactor at pilot scale. Bioresource Technology, 102(19), 8799-8806. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.014es_ES
dc.description.referencesRobles, Á., Durán, F., Ruano, M. V., Ribes, J., Rosado, A., Seco, A., & Ferrer, J. (2015). Instrumentation, control, and automation for submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactors. Environmental Technology, 36(14), 1795-1806. doi:10.1080/09593330.2015.1012180es_ES
dc.description.referencesR. E. Moosbrugger , M. C.Wentzel , G. A.Ekama and G. R.Marais , Simple Titration Procedures to Determine H2CO3 * Alkalinity And Short-chain Fatty Acids In Aqueous Solutions Containing Known Concentrations Of Ammonium, Phosphate And Sulphide Weak Acid/Bases. WRC Report No. TT 57/92, UCT Research Report W 74 , 1992es_ES
dc.description.referencesMetcalf & Eddy, Inc. , G.Tchobanoglous , F.Burton and H.David Stensel , Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse , McGraw-Hill Education , 2002es_ES
dc.description.referencesD. A. Stahl and R.Amann , in Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics, Sequencing and Hybridization Techniques in Bacterial Systematics , 1991 , pp. 205–248es_ES
dc.description.referencesCrocetti, G., Murto, M., & Björnsson, L. (2006). An update and optimisation of oligonucleotide probes targeting methanogenic Archaea for use in fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). Journal of Microbiological Methods, 65(1), 194-201. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2005.07.007es_ES
dc.description.referencesDaims, H., Brühl, A., Amann, R., Schleifer, K.-H., & Wagner, M. (1999). The Domain-specific Probe EUB338 is Insufficient for the Detection of all Bacteria: Development and Evaluation of a more Comprehensive Probe Set. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 22(3), 434-444. doi:10.1016/s0723-2020(99)80053-8es_ES
dc.description.referencesC. W. Gellings and K. E.Parmenter , Energy efficiency in fertilizer production and use. In Knowledge for Sustainable Development , Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Eolss Publisher , Oxford , 2004 , vol. II , pp. 419–450es_ES
dc.description.referencesJ. B. Giménez , Estudio del tratamiento anaerobio de aguas residuales urbanas en biorreactores de membrana (Doctoral Thesis) , Universitat de València , Valencia , 2014es_ES
dc.description.referencesGiménez, J. B., Martí, N., Robles, A., Ferrer, J., & Seco, A. (2014). Anaerobic treatment of urban wastewater in membrane bioreactors: evaluation of seasonal temperature variations. Water Science and Technology, 69(7), 1581-1588. doi:10.2166/wst.2014.069es_ES
dc.description.referencesRobles, A., Ruano, M. V., Ribes, J., & Ferrer, J. (2012). Sub-critical long-term operation of industrial scale hollow-fibre membranes in a submerged anaerobic MBR (HF-SAnMBR) system. Separation and Purification Technology, 100, 88-96. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2012.09.010es_ES
dc.description.referencesRobles, A., Ruano, M. V., Ribes, J., & Ferrer, J. (2013). Factors that affect the permeability of commercial hollow-fibre membranes in a submerged anaerobic MBR (HF-SAnMBR) system. Water Research, 47(3), 1277-1288. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.055es_ES
dc.description.referencesFerrer, J., Pretel, R., Durán, F., Giménez, J. B., Robles, A., Ruano, M. V., … Seco, A. (2015). Design methodology for submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR): A case study. Separation and Purification Technology, 141, 378-386. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2014.12.018es_ES
dc.description.referencesRegueiro, L., Veiga, P., Figueroa, M., Alonso-Gutierrez, J., Stams, A. J. M., Lema, J. M., & Carballa, M. (2012). Relationship between microbial activity and microbial community structure in six full-scale anaerobic digesters. Microbiological Research, 167(10), 581-589. doi:10.1016/j.micres.2012.06.002es_ES
dc.description.referencesKhan, M. A., Patel, P. G., Ganesh, A. G., Rais, N., Faheem, S. M., & Khan, S. T. (2018). Assessing Methanogenic Archaeal Community in Full Scale Anaerobic Sludge Digester Systems in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. The Open Microbiology Journal, 12(1), 123-134. doi:10.2174/1874285801812010123es_ES
dc.description.referencesReyes, M., Borrás, L., Seco, A., & Ferrer, J. (2014). Identification and quantification of microbial populations in activated sludge and anaerobic digestion processes. Environmental Technology, 36(1), 45-53. doi:10.1080/09593330.2014.934745es_ES
dc.description.referencesShin, C., McCarty, P. L., Kim, J., & Bae, J. (2014). Pilot-scale temperate-climate treatment of domestic wastewater with a staged anaerobic fluidized membrane bioreactor (SAF-MBR). Bioresource Technology, 159, 95-103. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.060es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research project was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO, Project CTM2014-54980-C2-2-R). The authors are also grateful for the support received from the Generalitat Valenciana via CPI-16-155 fellowships.es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin1887es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio1877es_ES
dc.description.volume4es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1039/c8ew00313kes_ES
dc.identifier.issn2053-1400es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/149954
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherThe Royal Society of Chemistryes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Science: Water Research & Technologyes_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaS\378789es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/GVA//CPI-16-155/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//CTM2014-54980-C2-2-R/ES/DESARROLLO DE UN SISTEMA DE CONTROL Y DE SOPORTE A LA DECISION PARA LA OBTENCION DE BIONUTRIENTES Y ENERGIA EN PROCESOS DE TRATAMIENTO DE AGUAS RESIDUALES URBANAS/es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://10.1039/c8ew00313kes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.08.012es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.002es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/09593330.2011.565806es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.seppur.2007.01.022es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.seppur.2014.02.013es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.060es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.seppur.2013.06.036es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.desal.2013.01.019es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.019es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1590/0104-6632.20160334s20150291es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/1521-401X(200003)28:3<145::AID-AHEH145>3.0.CO;2-Ves_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.watres.2016.08.019es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.memsci.2015.12.037es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.watres.2009.11.021es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.060es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.watres.2009.08.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.014es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/09593330.2015.1012180es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.mimet.2005.07.007es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0723-2020(99)80053-8es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2166/wst.2014.069es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.seppur.2012.09.010es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.055es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.seppur.2014.12.018es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.micres.2012.06.002es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2174/1874285801812010123es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/09593330.2014.934745es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.060es_ES
dc.rightsReserva de todos los derechoses_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subject.classificationTECNOLOGIA DEL MEDIO AMBIENTEes_ES
dc.titleExploring the limits of anaerobic biodegradability of urban wastewater by AnMBR technologyes_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier536263
person.identifier188822
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5015-0689
relation.isAuthorOfPublication06286c92-8678-47d4-892b-8824bbc12b31
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6cead848-bbae-4a48-9669-cea840a6dc32
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery6cead848-bbae-4a48-9669-cea840a6dc32
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicatione8876040-9428-45e8-b805-b5bbc20e9e1e
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication937991bf-5e71-4f67-ae2a-1fb780a35167
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa4b47ff5-95f4-430f-a1a3-541cb8eaa9b7
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye8876040-9428-45e8-b805-b5bbc20e9e1e
upv.uuid87f8abe0-b98b-42af-89ba-b06346cb39f2es_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Miniatura
Nombre:
Seco;Mateo-Llosa;Zamorano-López - Exploring the limits of anaerobic biodegradability of urban was....pdf
Tamaño:
600.55 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión del Autor.
[object Object] Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
Seco2018_ExploringLimitsAnaerobicBiodegradabilityAnMBR.pdf
Tamaño:
1.53 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial
Descargar

Colecciones

Artículos, conferencias, monografías