A methodology for analysing the impact of contemporary transformation processes in vernacular built environments

dc.contributor.authorArias Tapiero, Juan Camiloes_ES
dc.contributor.authorOrtega, Javieres_ES
dc.contributor.authorVasconcelos, Graçaes_ES
dc.contributor.funderFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugales_ES
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-29T06:48:02Z
dc.date.available2026-05-29T06:48:02Z
dc.date.issued2025-09-25es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN] Vernacular built heritage, which is rich in cultural knowledge and identity, is increasingly threatened by modernisation. The absence of specific assessment tools, however, prevents a thorough evaluation of this impact. To address this gap, this paper presents a methodology for assessing how contemporary transformation processes affect the built heritage of vernacular settlements facing abandonment. This methodology involves inventorying the buildings of a vernacular settlement to identify alterations that significantly impact their vernacular character. Each building is assigned an index value quantifying the impact of these alterations. This process is facilitated by a multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) approach that incorporates the combined judgement and expertise of stakeholders typically involved in site management. The results yield an index that quantifies the preserved vernacular character of a site. Designed to be adaptable to diverse cultural contexts and situations, this methodology was implemented in thirteen vernacular villages within Montesinho Natural Park (MNP), Portugal, where buildings undergo continuous substitution, modification, and abandonment. This research offers policy-makers and site managers a replicable model for developing management strategies that can help safeguard and revitalise these unique heritage assets. This research hypothesises that enhancing vernacular building practices can reverse depopulation by fostering dynamic community engagement.es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationArias Tapiero, JC.; Ortega, J.; Vasconcelos, G. (2025). A methodology for analysing the impact of contemporary transformation processes in vernacular built environments. Built Heritage (Online). 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-025-00220-0es_ES
dc.description.referencesAchenza, Maddalena. 2018. Preservación y Gestión de Asentamientos En El Desierto: Consideraciones Generales y Técnicas. Loggia, Arquitectura & Restauración 31:66–79. https://doi.org/10.4995/loggia.2018.7210.es_ES
dc.description.referencesAlmeida, Maria Antónia Pires De. 2018. Fighting Depopulation in Portugal: Local and Central Government Policies in Times of Crisis. Portuguese Journal of Social Science 17 (3): 289–309. https://doi.org/10.1386/pjss.17.3.289_1.es_ES
dc.description.referencesAmiri, Ali Ahmad, Muhammad Nurdin Wahid, Abdulrahman S. Al-Buraiki, and Abdullah Al-Sharafi. 2024. A Strategic Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework for Renewable Energy Source Selection in Saudi Arabia Using AHP-TOPSIS. Renewable Energy 236 (September) : 121523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.121523.es_ES
dc.description.referencesArias Tapiero, Juan Camilo, Javier Ortega Heras, and Graça Vasconcelos. 2024a. Datset with Answers for Impact Assessment of Vernacular Settlements Using an Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach [Data set]. Genève: Zenedo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11032248.es_ES
dc.description.referencesArias Tapiero, Juan Camilo, et al. 2024b. An ICT-enhanced methodology for the characterization of vernacular built heritage at a regional scale. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 19(6):966–984. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2024.2320862.es_ES
dc.description.referencesAshrafi, Baharak, Michael Kloos, and Carola Neugebauer. 2021. Heritage impact assessment, beyond an assessment tool: A comparative analysis of urban development impact on visual integrity in four UNESCO world heritage properties. Journal of Cultural Heritage 47:199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2020.08.002.es_ES
dc.description.referencesAsquith, Lindsay, and Marcell Vellinga. 2006. Introduction. In Vernacular Architecture in the Twenty-First Century: Theory Education and Practice, 1–20. London: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203003862.es_ES
dc.description.referencesAznar Bellver, Jerónimo, and Francisco Guijarro Martínez. 2020. Nuevos Métodos de Valoración. Modelos Multicriterio. 2nd ed. Valencia: Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBandarin, Francesco, and Ron van Oers. 2012. The Historic Urban Landscape: Managing Heritage in an Urban Century. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBhushan, Navneet, and Kanwal Rai. 2004. Strategic decision making: Applying the analytic hierarchy process. London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/b97668.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBystrova, T.Y. 2020. Determining the degree of degradation of a historical and architectural object: Assessment scale. IOP Conference series: materials science and engineering 962:032070. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/962/3/032070.es_ES
dc.description.referencesCarlos, G. Duarte, Mariana Correia, Letizia Dipasquale, and Saverio Mecca. 2020. Discovering vernacular heritage and its tangible dimensions. In From Vernacular to World Heritage, eds. Letizia Dipasquale, Saverio Mecca, and Mariana Correia, 38–43. Florence: Firenze University Press. https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-293-5.es_ES
dc.description.referencesCleere, Henry. 1995. The evaluation of authenticity in the context of the world heritage convention. In Nara Conference on Authenticity in Relation to the World Heritage Convention, ed. Knut Einar Larsen. UNESCO World Heritage Centre.es_ES
dc.description.referencesComissão de Cogestão do Parque Natural de Montesinho. 2023. Plano de Cogestão Parque Natural de Montesinho. Parque Natural de Montesinho.es_ES
dc.description.referencesCorreia Lopes, Gonçalo, Romeu Vicente, Tiago Miguel Ferreira, and Miguel Azenha. 2019. Intervened URM Buildings with RC Elements: Typological characterisation and associated challenges. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17:4987–5019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00651-y.es_ES
dc.description.referencesDenyer, Susan. 2017. Authenticity in world heritage cultural landscapes: continuity and change. In Nuevas Miradas En La Autenticidad e Integridad En El Patrimonio Mundial de Las Américas, eds. Francisco Javier López Morales and Francisco Vidargas, 2nd ed., 60–64. Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.es_ES
dc.description.referencesDias, Jorge. 1984. Rio de Onor: Comunitarismo Agro-Pastoril. Lisboa: Presença.es_ES
dc.description.referencesDipasquale, Letizia, Lucia Montoni, Alessia Montacchini, and Saverio Mecca. 2022. Vernacular and World Heritage Impact Assessment: The Case Study of Patmos. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development 12 (2): 150–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-06-2021-0105.es_ES
dc.description.referencesFang, Qunli, and Zao Li. 2022. Cultural Ecology Cognition and Heritage Value of Huizhou Traditional Villages. Heliyon 8 (12) : e12627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12627.es_ES
dc.description.referencesFernandes, Jorge, Ricardo Mateus, Helena Gervásio, Sandra M. Silva, and Luís. Bragança. 2019. Passive strategies used in southern portugal vernacular rammed earth buildings and their influence in thermal performance. Renewable Energy 142:345–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.098.es_ES
dc.description.referencesForuzanmehr, Ahmadreza, and Marcel Vellinga. 2011. Vernacular Architecture: Questions of Comfort and Practicability. Building Research and Information 39 (3): 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2011.562368.es_ES
dc.description.referencesGallo, C., M. Sala, and A. M. M. Sayigh. 1998. Architecture: Comfort and energy. Oxford: Pergamon.es_ES
dc.description.referencesGao, Qian, and Siân Jones. 2020. Authenticity and heritage conservation: Seeking common complexities beyond the ‘Eastern’ and ‘Western’ Dichotomy. International Journal of Heritage Studies 27(1):90–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1793377.es_ES
dc.description.referencesGuillaud, Hubert. 2014. Cultural values of earthen architecture for sustainable development. In Vernacular Heritage and Earthen Architecture, eds. Mariana Correia, Gilberto Carlos, and Sandra Rocha. London: Taylor & Francis Group.es_ES
dc.description.referencesConvention on Biological Diversity. 2009. What Is Impact Assessment? . Convention on biological diversity. http://www.cbd.int/impact/whatis.shtml.es_ES
dc.description.referencesICN (Instituto da Conservação da Natureza; Ministério do Ambiente, do Ordenamento do Território e do Desenvolvimento). 2007. Plano de Ordenamento Do Parque Natural de Montesinho - Estudos de Caracterização. Bragança: ICN.es_ES
dc.description.referencesICOMOS. 1987. Charter for the Conservation of Historic Towns and Urban Areas. ICOMOS. http://www.international.icomos.org/charters/towns_e.pdf.es_ES
dc.description.referencesICOMOS. 1999. Charter on the Built Vernacular Architecture. ICOMOS.es_ES
dc.description.referencesUNESCO. 2011. Guidance on Heritage Impact Assessments for Cultural World Heritage Properties. UNESCO.es_ES
dc.description.referencesICNF (Instituto da Conservaçao da Natureza e das Florestas). 2020. Caracterização Do Parque Natural de Montesinho. ICNF.es_ES
dc.description.referencesJokilehto, Jukka. 1995. Authenticity: A general framework for the concept. In Nara Conference on Authenticity in Relation to the World Heritage Convention, ed. Knut Einar Larsen. UNESCO World Heritage Centre.es_ES
dc.description.referencesKhei, Soon, Ricardo Mateus, Javier Ortega, and Raúl Briones-Llorente. 2024. Quantitative analysis of vernacular residential building typologies and bioclimatic strategies in the warm-summer mediterranean climate: The Montesinho Natural Park as a Case Study. Buildings 14 (8). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082321.es_ES
dc.description.referencesKono, Toshiyuki. 2020. The challenges of vernacular architecture. In From Vernacular to World Heritage, eds. Letizia Dipasquale, Saverio Mecca, and Mariana Correia, 12–13. Florence: Firenze University Press.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMarchand, Trevor H.J. 2006. Endorsing indigenous knowledge. The role of masons and apprenticeship in sustaining vernacular architecture - the case of Djenne. In Vernacular Architecture in the Twenty-First Century. Theory Education and Practice, eds. Lindsay Asquith and Marcell Vellinga, 46–62. London: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203003862.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMartins, João Vicente. 1995. Moimenta Da Raia. Uma Aldeia Comunitária Em Evoluçao e Mudança. Braga: Junta de Freguesia de Moimenta.es_ES
dc.description.referencesNakonieczna, El. żbieta, and Jakub Szczepański. 2024. Authenticity of Cultural Heritage Vis-à-Vis Heritage Reproducibility and Intangibility: From Conservation Philosophy to Practice. International Journal of Cultural Policy 30 (2): 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2023.2177642.es_ES
dc.description.referencesOliveira, Ernesto Veiga de, and Fernando Galhano. 1992. I. Casa-Bloco, Térrea e de Andar. Arquitectura Tradicional Portuguesa July: 25–213. https://doi.org/10.4000/BOOKS.ETNOGRAFICAPRESS.6558.es_ES
dc.description.referencesOliver, Paul. 1997. Encyclopedia of Vernacular Architecture of the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.es_ES
dc.description.referencesOrnelas, Cilísia, Fernanda Sousa, João Miranda Guedes, and Isabel Breda-Vázquez. 2023. Monitoring and assessment heritage tool: Quantify and classify urban heritage buildings. Cities 137:104274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104274.es_ES
dc.description.referencesOrtega, Javier, Graça Vasconcelos, Hugo Rodrigues, and Mariana Correia. 2019. A vulnerability index formulation for the seismic vulnerability assessment of vernacular architecture. engineering structures 197:109381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109381.es_ES
dc.description.referencesPatiwael, Patrick R., Peter Groote, and Frank Vanclay. 2019. Improving Heritage Impact Assessment: An Analytical Critique of the ICOMOS Guidelines. International Journal of Heritage Studies 25 (4): 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2018.1477057.es_ES
dc.description.referencesPereira, Vijay, and Umesh Bamel. 2023. Charting the Managerial and Theoretical Evolutionary Path of AHP Using Thematic and Systematic Review: A Decadal (2012–2021) Study. Annals of Operations Research 326 (2): 635–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04540-7.es_ES
dc.description.referencesPereira Roders, Ana, and John Hudson. 2012. Change management and cultural heritage. In Facilities Change Management, ed. Edward Finch, 175–189. Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119967316.ch12.es_ES
dc.description.referencesRogers, Ayesha Pamela. 2017. Built Heritage and Development: Heritage Impact Assessment of Change in Asia. Built Heritage 1 (2): 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03545660.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSaaty, R. W. 1987. The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling 9(3–5):161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSaaty, Thomas L. 2003. Decision-Making with the AHP: Why Is the Principal Eigenvector Necessary. European Journal of Operational Research 145 (1): 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00227-8.es_ES
dc.description.referencesServiço Nacional de Parques Reservas e Património Paisagístico. 1980. Parque Natural de Montesinho. Lisboa: Secretaria de Estado do Ordenamento e Ambiente.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSeyedashrafi, Baharak, Mohammad Ravankhah, Silke Weidner, and Michael Schmidt. 2017. Applying heritage impact assessment to urban development: World heritage property of Masjed-e Jame of Isfahan in Iran. Sustainable Cities and Society 31:213–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.01.002.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSmith, Laurajane. 2006. Uses of Heritage. London: Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203602263.es_ES
dc.description.referencesStovel, Herb. 1995. Working towards the nara document. In Nara Conference on Authenticity in Relation to the World Heritage Convention, ed. Knut Einar Larsen. UNESCO World Heritage Centre.es_ES
dc.description.referencesInstituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia. 2017. An overview on emerging authenticity and integrity requirements for world heritage nominations. In Nuevas Miradas En La Autenticidad e Integridad En El Patrimonio Mundial de Las Américas, eds. Francisco Javier López Morales and Francisco Vidargas, 2nd ed., 65–73. México: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.es_ES
dc.description.referencesTaherdoost, Hamed, and Mitra Madanchian. 2023. Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods and Concepts. Encyclopedia 3 (1): 77–87. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3010006.es_ES
dc.description.referencesUNESCO. 1994. The Nara Document on Authenticity. UNESCO. https://www.icomos.org/charters/nara-e.pdf.es_ES
dc.description.referencesUNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage. 2024. Art of Dry Stone Walling, Knowledge and Techniques. UNESCO. https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/art-of-dry-stone-walling-knowledge-and-techniques-01393.es_ES
dc.description.referencesUNESCO World Heritage Convention. 2007. International Expert Workshop on Integrity and Authenticity of World Heritage Cultural Landscapes. UNESCO. https://whc.unesco.org/en/events/450.es_ES
dc.description.referencesUNESCO, ICCROM, ICOMOS, and IUCN. 2022. Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assesments in a World Heritage Context. UNESCO.es_ES
dc.description.referencesVaidya, Omkarprasad S., and Sushil Kumar. 2006. Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Overview of Applications. European Journal of Operational Research 169 (1): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028.es_ES
dc.description.referencesVegas, Fernando, and Camilla Mileto. 2007. Renovar Conservando: Manual Para La Restauración de La Arquitectura Rural Del Rincón de Ademuz. Mancomunidad del Rincón de Ademuz.es_ES
dc.description.referencesVegas, Fernando, Camilla Mileto, Alicia Hueto, and María Lidón. 2020a. Valuing and Codifying Intangible Knowledge. In From Vernacular to World Heritage, eds. Letizia Dipasquale, Saverio Mecca, and Mariana Correia, 52–59. Florence: Firenze University Press. https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-293-5.es_ES
dc.description.referencesVegas, Fernando, Camilla Mileto, Maria Diodato, and Juan María Songel González. 2020b. Understanding the dimension of historical evolution. In From Vernacular to World Heritage, eds. Letizia Dipasquale, Saverio Mecca, and Mariana Correia, 44–51. Florence: Firenze University Press. https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-293-5.es_ES
dc.description.referencesVlachakis, Georgios, Evangelia Vlachaki, and Paulo B. Lourenço. 2020. Learning from Failure: Damage and Failure of Masonry Structures, after the 2017 Lesvos Earthquake (Greece). Engineering Failure Analysis 117 (August) : 104803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104803.es_ES
dc.description.referencesYüceer, Hülya, and Başak Ipekoĝlu. 2012. An architectural assessment method for new exterior additions to historic buildings. Journal of Cultural Heritage 13(4):419–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2011.12.002.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was financed with national funds through the Portuguese funding agency, FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, within the INHAVIT project (https://doi.org/10.54499/MTS/BRB/0086/2020) and with the PhD scholarship 2021.07522.BD of the first author (https://doi.org/10.54499/2021.07522. BD). This work has also been supported by the FCT/MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC) under the R & D Unit Institute for Sustainability and Innovation in Structural Engineering (ISISE), under reference UIDB/04029/2020 (https:// doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/04029/2020), and under the Associated Laboratory of Advanced Production and Intelligent Systems ARISE under reference LA/P/0112/2020.es_ES
dc.description.volume9es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s43238-025-00220-0es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn2662-6802es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/235564
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherSpringerOpenes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofBuilt Heritage (Online)es_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaS\564849es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/LA%2FP%2F0112%2F2020/PT/Advanced Production and Intelligent Systems/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F04029%2F2020/PT/Institute for Sustainability and Innovation in Structural Engineering/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/POR_NORTE/2021.07522.BD/PT/Development of a Conservation Management Plan for the self-sustainable rehabilitation and regeneration of traditional rural settlements susceptible to abandonment./es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-025-00220-0es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento (by)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectVernacular architecturees_ES
dc.subjectHeritage impact assessmentes_ES
dc.subjectCultural landscapeses_ES
dc.subjectAuthenticityes_ES
dc.subjectMCDMes_ES
dc.subjectDepopulationes_ES
dc.titleA methodology for analysing the impact of contemporary transformation processes in vernacular built environmentses_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
upv.uuid88269703-331e-48a6-aac1-fd26ea180bfbes_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
AriasOrtegaVasconcelos - A methodology for analysing the impact of contemporary transformation pr....pdf
Tamaño:
6.97 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial