Production of microalgal external organic matter in a Chlorella-dominated culture: influence of temperature and stress factors

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Ingeniería Hidráulica y Medio Ambiente
dc.contributor.affiliationInstituto Universitario de Ingeniería del Agua y del Medio Ambiente
dc.contributor.affiliationEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería de Caminos, Canales y Puertos
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez-Camejo, Josuees_ES
dc.contributor.authorPaches Giner, Maria Aguas Vivas
dc.contributor.authorMarín, A.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorJiménez Benítez, Antonio Luises_ES
dc.contributor.authorSeco, A.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorBarat, Ramón
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Regional Development Fundes_ES
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Economía y Competitividades_ES
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Educación, Cultura y Deportees_ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-17T04:33:51Z
dc.date.available2020-12-17T04:33:51Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-01es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN] Although microalgae are recognised to release external organic matter (EOM), little is known about this phenomenon in microalgae cultivation systems, especially on a large scale. A study on the effect of microalgae-stressing factors such as temperature, nutrient limitation and ammonium oxidising bacteria (AOB) competition in EOM production by microalgae was carried out. The results showed non-statistically significant differences in EOM production at constant temperatures of 25, 30 and 35 degrees C. However, when the temperature was raised from 25 to 35 degrees C for 4 h a day, polysaccharide production increased significantly, indicating microalgae stress. Nutrient limitation also seemed to increase EOM production. No significant differences were found in EOM production under lab conditions when the microalgae competed with AOB for ammonium uptake. However, when the EOM concentration was monitored during continuous outdoor operation of a membrane photobioreactor (MPBR) plant, nitrifying bacteria activity was likely to be responsible for the increase in EOM concentration in the culture. Other factors such as high temperatures, ammonium-depletion and low light intensities could also have induced cell deterioration and thus have influenced EOM production in the outdoor MPBR plant. Membrane fouling seemed to depend on the biomass concentration of the culture. However, under the operating conditions tested, the behaviour of fouling rate with respect to the EOM concentration was different depending on the initial membrane state.en_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationGonzalez-Camejo, J.; Paches Giner, MAV.; Marín, A.; Jiménez Benítez, AL.; Seco, A.; Barat, R. (2020). Production of microalgal external organic matter in a Chlorella-dominated culture: influence of temperature and stress factors. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology. (7):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ew00176ges_ES
dc.description.issue7es_ES
dc.description.referencesPuyol, D., Batstone, D. J., Hülsen, T., Astals, S., Peces, M., & Krömer, J. O. (2017). Resource Recovery from Wastewater by Biological Technologies: Opportunities, Challenges, and Prospects. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.02106es_ES
dc.description.referencesRobles, Á., Ruano, M. V., Charfi, A., Lesage, G., Heran, M., Harmand, J., … Ferrer, J. (2018). A review on anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs) focused on modelling and control aspects. Bioresource Technology, 270, 612-626. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.049es_ES
dc.description.referencesSeco, A., Aparicio, S., González-Camejo, J., Jiménez-Benítez, A., Mateo, O., Mora, J. F., … Ferrer, J. (2018). Resource recovery from sulphate-rich sewage through an innovative anaerobic-based water resource recovery facility (WRRF). Water Science and Technology, 78(9), 1925-1936. doi:10.2166/wst.2018.492es_ES
dc.description.referencesPretel, R., Robles, A., Ruano, M. V., Seco, A., & Ferrer, J. (2016). Economic and environmental sustainability of submerged anaerobic MBR-based (AnMBR-based) technology as compared to aerobic-based technologies for moderate-/high-loaded urban wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Management, 166, 45-54. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.10.004es_ES
dc.description.referencesStuckey, D. C. (2012). Recent developments in anaerobic membrane reactors. Bioresource Technology, 122, 137-148. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.138es_ES
dc.description.referencesWallace, J., Champagne, P., & Hall, G. (2016). Time series relationships between chlorophyll-a, dissolved oxygen, and pH in three facultative wastewater stabilization ponds. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 2(6), 1032-1040. doi:10.1039/c6ew00202aes_ES
dc.description.referencesKang, D., Kim, K., Jang, Y., Moon, H., Ju, D., & Jahng, D. (2018). Nutrient removal and community structure of wastewater-borne algal-bacterial consortia grown in raw wastewater with various wavelengths of light. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 126, 10-20. doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.09.022es_ES
dc.description.referencesLi, Y., Slouka, S. A., Henkanatte-Gedera, S. M., Nirmalakhandan, N., & Strathmann, T. J. (2019). Seasonal treatment and economic evaluation of an algal wastewater system for energy and nutrient recovery. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 5(9), 1545-1557. doi:10.1039/c9ew00242aes_ES
dc.description.referencesPrice, J. R., Keshani Langroodi, S., Lan, Y., Becker, J. M., Shieh, W. K., Rosen, G. L., & Sales, C. M. (2016). Emerging investigators series: untangling the microbial ecosystem and kinetics in a nitrogen removing photosynthetic high density bioreactor. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 2(4), 705-716. doi:10.1039/c6ew00078aes_ES
dc.description.referencesGonzález-Camejo, J., Jiménez-Benítez, A., Ruano, M. V., Robles, A., Barat, R., & Ferrer, J. (2019). Optimising an outdoor membrane photobioreactor for tertiary sewage treatment. Journal of Environmental Management, 245, 76-85. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.010es_ES
dc.description.referencesGonzález-Camejo, J., Aparicio, S., Jiménez-Benítez, A., Pachés, M., Ruano, M. V., Borrás, L., … Seco, A. (2020). Improving membrane photobioreactor performance by reducing light path: operating conditions and key performance indicators. Water Research, 172, 115518. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2020.115518es_ES
dc.description.referencesGuldhe, A., Kumari, S., Ramanna, L., Ramsundar, P., Singh, P., Rawat, I., & Bux, F. (2017). Prospects, recent advancements and challenges of different wastewater streams for microalgal cultivation. Journal of Environmental Management, 203, 299-315. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.08.012es_ES
dc.description.referencesTenorio, R., Fedders, A. C., Strathmann, T. J., & Guest, J. S. (2017). Impact of growth phases on photochemically produced reactive species in the extracellular matrix of algal cultivation systems. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 3(6), 1095-1108. doi:10.1039/c7ew00172jes_ES
dc.description.referencesTogarcheti, S. C., Mediboyina, M. kumar, Chauhan, V. S., Mukherji, S., Ravi, S., & Mudliar, S. N. (2017). Life cycle assessment of microalgae based biodiesel production to evaluate the impact of biomass productivity and energy source. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 122, 286-294. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.01.008es_ES
dc.description.referencesZhang, Y., Kendall, A., & Yuan, J. (2014). A comparison of on-site nutrient and energy recycling technologies in algal oil production. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 88, 13-20. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.04.011es_ES
dc.description.referencesGonzález-Camejo, J., Barat, R., Aguado, D., & Ferrer, J. (2020). Continuous 3-year outdoor operation of a flat-panel membrane photobioreactor to treat effluent from an anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Water Research, 169, 115238. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2019.115238es_ES
dc.description.referencesGupta, S., Pawar, S. B., & Pandey, R. A. (2019). Current practices and challenges in using microalgae for treatment of nutrient rich wastewater from agro-based industries. Science of The Total Environment, 687, 1107-1126. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.115es_ES
dc.description.referencesBilad, M. R., Azizo, A. S., Wirzal, M. D. H., Jia Jia, L., Putra, Z. A., Nordin, N. A. H. M., … Yusoff, A. R. M. (2018). Tackling membrane fouling in microalgae filtration using nylon 6,6 nanofiber membrane. Journal of Environmental Management, 223, 23-28. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.007es_ES
dc.description.referencesRazzak, S. A., Ali, S. A. M., Hossain, M. M., & deLasa, H. (2017). Biological CO2 fixation with production of microalgae in wastewater – A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 379-390. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.038es_ES
dc.description.referencesGao, F., Cui, W., Xu, J.-P., Li, C., Jin, W.-H., & Yang, H.-L. (2019). Lipid accumulation properties of Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus obliquus in membrane photobioreactor (MPBR) fed with secondary effluent from municipal wastewater treatment plant. Renewable Energy, 136, 671-676. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.038es_ES
dc.description.referencesFortunato, L., Lamprea, A. F., & Leiknes, T. (2020). Evaluation of membrane fouling mitigation strategies in an algal membrane photobioreactor (AMPBR) treating secondary wastewater effluent. Science of The Total Environment, 708, 134548. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134548es_ES
dc.description.referencesGong, H., Jin, Z., Xu, H., Yuan, Q., Zuo, J., Wu, J., & Wang, K. (2019). Enhanced membrane-based pre-concentration improves wastewater organic matter recovery: Pilot-scale performance and membrane fouling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 206, 307-314. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.209es_ES
dc.description.referencesLuo, Y., Henderson, R. K., & Le-Clech, P. (2019). Characterisation of organic matter in membrane photobioreactors (MPBRs) and its impact on membrane performance. Algal Research, 44, 101682. doi:10.1016/j.algal.2019.101682es_ES
dc.description.referencesKeyvan Hosseini, P., Pajoum Shariati, F., Delavari Amrei, H., & Heydarinasab, A. (2020). The influence of various orifice diameters on cake resistance and pore blocking resistance of a hybrid membrane photobioreactor (HMPBR). Separation and Purification Technology, 235, 116187. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116187es_ES
dc.description.referencesWang, L., Pan, B., Gao, Y., Li, C., Ye, J., Yang, L., … Zhang, X. (2019). Efficient membrane microalgal harvesting: Pilot-scale performance and techno-economic analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218, 83-95. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.321es_ES
dc.description.referencesNovoa, A. F., Fortunato, L., Rehman, Z. U., & Leiknes, T. (2020). Evaluating the effect of hydraulic retention time on fouling development and biomass characteristics in an algal membrane photobioreactor treating a secondary wastewater effluent. Bioresource Technology, 309, 123348. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123348es_ES
dc.description.referencesBin Liu, Qu, F., Liang, H., Gan, Z., Yu, H., Li, G., & Van der Bruggen, B. (2017). Algae-laden water treatment using ultrafiltration: Individual and combined fouling effects of cells, debris, extracellular and intracellular organic matter. Journal of Membrane Science, 528, 178-186. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2017.01.032es_ES
dc.description.referencesRobles, A., Ruano, M. V., Ribes, J., & Ferrer, J. (2013). Performance of industrial scale hollow-fibre membranes in a submerged anaerobic MBR (HF-SAnMBR) system at mesophilic and psychrophilic conditions. Separation and Purification Technology, 104, 290-296. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2012.12.004es_ES
dc.description.referencesRobles, A., Ruano, M. V., Ribes, J., & Ferrer, J. (2012). Sub-critical long-term operation of industrial scale hollow-fibre membranes in a submerged anaerobic MBR (HF-SAnMBR) system. Separation and Purification Technology, 100, 88-96. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2012.09.010es_ES
dc.description.referencesRobles, Á., Capson-Tojo, G., Gales, A., Viruela, A., Sialve, B., Seco, A., … Ferrer, J. (2020). Performance of a membrane-coupled high-rate algal pond for urban wastewater treatment at demonstration scale. Bioresource Technology, 301, 122672. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122672es_ES
dc.description.referencesPorcelli, N., & Judd, S. (2010). Chemical cleaning of potable water membranes: A review. Separation and Purification Technology, 71(2), 137-143. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2009.12.007es_ES
dc.description.referencesDelattre, C., Pierre, G., Laroche, C., & Michaud, P. (2016). Production, extraction and characterization of microalgal and cyanobacterial exopolysaccharides. Biotechnology Advances, 34(7), 1159-1179. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.08.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesSha, J., Lu, Z., Ye, J., Wang, G., Hu, Q., Chen, Y., & Zhang, X. (2019). The inhibition effect of recycled Scenedesmus acuminatus culture media: Influence of growth phase, inhibitor identification and removal. Algal Research, 42, 101612. doi:10.1016/j.algal.2019.101612es_ES
dc.description.referencesDiscart, V., Bilad, M. R., Marbelia, L., & Vankelecom, I. F. J. (2014). Impact of changes in broth composition on Chlorella vulgaris cultivation in a membrane photobioreactor (MPBR) with permeate recycle. Bioresource Technology, 152, 321-328. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.11.019es_ES
dc.description.referencesLi, M., Zhu, W., Gao, L., & Lu, L. (2012). Changes in extracellular polysaccharide content and morphology of Microcystis aeruginosa at different specific growth rates. Journal of Applied Phycology, 25(4), 1023-1030. doi:10.1007/s10811-012-9937-7es_ES
dc.description.referencesBarker, D. J., & Stuckey, D. C. (1999). A review of soluble microbial products (SMP) in wastewater treatment systems. Water Research, 33(14), 3063-3082. doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(99)00022-6es_ES
dc.description.referencesJebali, A., Acién, F. G., Rodriguez Barradas, E., Olguín, E. J., Sayadi, S., & Molina Grima, E. (2018). Pilot-scale outdoor production of Scenedesmus sp. in raceways using flue gases and centrate from anaerobic digestion as the sole culture medium. Bioresource Technology, 262, 1-8. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.057es_ES
dc.description.referencesGonzález-Camejo, J., Aparicio, S., Ruano, M. V., Borrás, L., Barat, R., & Ferrer, J. (2019). Effect of ambient temperature variations on an indigenous microalgae-nitrifying bacteria culture dominated by Chlorella. Bioresource Technology, 290, 121788. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121788es_ES
dc.description.referencesNagarajan, D., Lee, D.-J., Chen, C.-Y., & Chang, J.-S. (2020). Resource recovery from wastewaters using microalgae-based approaches: A circular bioeconomy perspective. Bioresource Technology, 302, 122817. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122817es_ES
dc.description.referencesKwon, G., Kim, H., Song, C., & Jahng, D. (2019). Co-culture of microalgae and enriched nitrifying bacteria for energy-efficient nitrification. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 152, 107385. doi:10.1016/j.bej.2019.107385es_ES
dc.description.referencesDay, J. G., Gong, Y., & Hu, Q. (2017). Microzooplanktonic grazers – A potentially devastating threat to the commercial success of microalgal mass culture. Algal Research, 27, 356-365. doi:10.1016/j.algal.2017.08.024es_ES
dc.description.referencesQureshi, N., Annous, B. A., Ezeji, T. C., Karcher, P., & Maddox, I. S. (2005). Microbial Cell Factories, 4(1), 24. doi:10.1186/1475-2859-4-24es_ES
dc.description.referencesGonzález-Camejo, J., Serna-García, R., Viruela, A., Pachés, M., Durán, F., Robles, A., … Seco, A. (2017). Short and long-term experiments on the effect of sulphide on microalgae cultivation in tertiary sewage treatment. Bioresource Technology, 244, 15-22. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.126es_ES
dc.description.referencesRossi, S., Casagli, F., Mantovani, M., Mezzanotte, V., & Ficara, E. (2020). Selection of photosynthesis and respiration models to assess the effect of environmental conditions on mixed microalgae consortia grown on wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 305, 122995. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122995es_ES
dc.description.referencesLuo, Y., Le-Clech, P., & Henderson, R. K. (2018). Assessment of membrane photobioreactor (MPBR) performance parameters and operating conditions. Water Research, 138, 169-180. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.050es_ES
dc.description.referencesGonzález-Camejo, J., Barat, R., Pachés, M., Murgui, M., Seco, A., & Ferrer, J. (2017). Wastewater nutrient removal in a mixed microalgae–bacteria culture: effect of light and temperature on the microalgae–bacteria competition. Environmental Technology, 39(4), 503-515. doi:10.1080/09593330.2017.1305001es_ES
dc.description.referencesKrustok, I., Odlare, M., Truu, J., & Nehrenheim, E. (2016). Inhibition of nitrification in municipal wastewater-treating photobioreactors: Effect on algal growth and nutrient uptake. Bioresource Technology, 202, 238-243. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.020es_ES
dc.description.referencesLing, Y., Sun, L., Wang, S., Lin, C. S. K., Sun, Z., & Zhou, Z. (2019). Cultivation of oleaginous microalga Scenedesmus obliquus coupled with wastewater treatment for enhanced biomass and lipid production. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 148, 162-169. doi:10.1016/j.bej.2019.05.012es_ES
dc.description.referencesDuBois, M., Gilles, K. A., Hamilton, J. K., Rebers, P. A., & Smith, F. (1956). Colorimetric Method for Determination of Sugars and Related Substances. Analytical Chemistry, 28(3), 350-356. doi:10.1021/ac60111a017es_ES
dc.description.referencesPeterson, G. L. (1979). Review of the folin phenol protein quantitation method of lowry, rosebrough, farr and randall. Analytical Biochemistry, 100(2), 201-220. doi:10.1016/0003-2697(79)90222-7es_ES
dc.description.referencesAPHA , Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21th. American Public Health Association , American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation , Washington, USA , 2012es_ES
dc.description.referencesSheng, G.-P., Yu, H.-Q., & Li, X.-Y. (2010). Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of microbial aggregates in biological wastewater treatment systems: A review. Biotechnology Advances, 28(6), 882-894. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.08.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesGonzález-Camejo, J., Jiménez-Benítez, A., Ruano, M. V., Robles, A., Barat, R., & Ferrer, J. (2019). Preliminary data set to assess the performance of an outdoor membrane photobioreactor. Data in Brief, 27, 104599. doi:10.1016/j.dib.2019.104599es_ES
dc.description.referencesRossi, S., Bellucci, M., Marazzi, F., Mezzanotte, V., & Ficara, E. (2018). Activity assessment of microalgal-bacterial consortia based on respirometric tests. Water Science and Technology, 78(1), 207-215. doi:10.2166/wst.2018.078es_ES
dc.description.referencesLau, A. K. S., Bilad, M. R., Osman, N. B., Marbelia, L., Putra, Z. A., Nordin, N. A. H. M., … Khan, A. L. (2019). Sequencing batch membrane photobioreactor for simultaneous cultivation of aquaculture feed and polishing of real secondary effluent. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 29, 100779. doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100779es_ES
dc.description.referencesMolinuevo-Salces, B., García-González, M. C., & González-Fernández, C. (2010). Performance comparison of two photobioreactors configurations (open and closed to the atmosphere) treating anaerobically degraded swine slurry. Bioresource Technology, 101(14), 5144-5149. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.006es_ES
dc.description.referencesFoladori, P., Petrini, S., & Andreottola, G. (2020). How suspended solids concentration affects nitrification rate in microalgal-bacterial photobioreactors without external aeration. Heliyon, 6(1), e03088. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03088es_ES
dc.description.referencesMarazzi, F., Bellucci, M., Rossi, S., Fornaroli, R., Ficara, E., & Mezzanotte, V. (2019). Outdoor pilot trial integrating a sidestream microalgae process for the treatment of centrate under non optimal climate conditions. Algal Research, 39, 101430. doi:10.1016/j.algal.2019.101430es_ES
dc.description.referencesRobles, A., Ruano, M. V., Ribes, J., Seco, A., & Ferrer, J. (2013). Mathematical modelling of filtration in submerged anaerobic MBRs (SAnMBRs): Long-term validation. Journal of Membrane Science, 446, 303-309. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2013.07.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesZhang, X., Devanadera, M. C. E., Roddick, F. A., Fan, L., & Dalida, M. L. P. (2016). Impact of algal organic matter released from Microcystis aeruginosa and Chlorella sp. on the fouling of a ceramic microfiltration membrane. Water Research, 103, 391-400. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2016.07.061es_ES
dc.description.referencesOzkan, A., & Berberoglu, H. (2013). Cell to substratum and cell to cell interactions of microalgae. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 112, 302-309. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.08.007es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research work has been supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO, Projects CTM2014-54980-C2-1-R and CTM2014-54980-C2-2-R) jointly with the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), both of which are gratefully acknowledged. This was also supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport via a pre-doctoral FPU fellowship to author J. Gonzalez-Camejo (FPU14/05082)es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin14es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio1es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1039/d0ew00176ges_ES
dc.identifier.issn2053-1400es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/157306
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherThe Royal Society of Chemistryes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Science: Water Research & Technologyes_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaS\412334es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//CTM2014-54980-C2-1-R/ES/OBTENCION DE BIONUTRIENTES Y ENERGIA DEL AGUA RESIDUAL URBANA MEDIANTE CULTIVO DE MICROALGAS, TRATAMIENTOS ANAEROBIOS, CRISTALIZACION DE FOSFORO, ABSORCION DE NH3 Y COMPOSTAJE/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MECD//FPU14%2F05082/ES/FPU14%2F05082/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//CTM2014-54980-C2-2-R/ES/DESARROLLO DE UN SISTEMA DE CONTROL Y DE SOPORTE A LA DECISION PARA LA OBTENCION DE BIONUTRIENTES Y ENERGIA EN PROCESOS DE TRATAMIENTO DE AGUAS RESIDUALES URBANAS/es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1039/d0ew00176ges_ES
dc.relation.references10.3389/fmicb.2016.02106es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.049es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2166/wst.2018.492es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.10.004es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.138es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1039/c6ew00202aes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.09.022es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1039/c9ew00242aes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1039/c6ew00078aes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.010es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.watres.2020.115518es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.08.012es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1039/c7ew00172jes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.01.008es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.04.011es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.watres.2019.115238es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.115es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.007es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.038es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.038es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134548es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.209es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.algal.2019.101682es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116187es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.321es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123348es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.memsci.2017.01.032es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.seppur.2012.12.004es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.seppur.2012.09.010es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122672es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.seppur.2009.12.007es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.08.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.algal.2019.101612es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2013.11.019es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10811-012-9937-7es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00022-6es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.057es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121788es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122817es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.bej.2019.107385es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.algal.2017.08.024es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1186/1475-2859-4-24es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.126es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122995es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.050es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/09593330.2017.1305001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.020es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.bej.2019.05.012es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1021/ac60111a017es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0003-2697(79)90222-7es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.077es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.08.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.dib.2019.104599es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2166/wst.2018.078es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100779es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s00253-006-0446-yes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.006es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03088es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.dib.2019.104143jes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.algal.2020.101850es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.algal.2019.101508es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.algal.2019.101430es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.memsci.2013.07.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/J.WATRES.2016.07.061es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/J.COLSURFB.2013.08.007es_ES
dc.rightsReserva de todos los derechoses_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectMicroalgaees_ES
dc.subjectExtracellular organic matteres_ES
dc.subjectProteines_ES
dc.subjectPolysaccharidees_ES
dc.subjectStress factores_ES
dc.subject.classificationTECNOLOGIA DEL MEDIO AMBIENTEes_ES
dc.subject.classificationINGENIERIA HIDRAULICAes_ES
dc.subject.ods06.- Garantizar la disponibilidad y la gestión sostenible del agua y el saneamiento para todoses_ES
dc.titleProduction of microalgal external organic matter in a Chlorella-dominated culture: influence of temperature and stress factorses_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier257405
person.identifier29803
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7796-5228
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0484-3614
relation.isAuthorOfPublication19096679-3997-474f-af27-7a6e29b99576
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5f17a6fb-372c-4668-83b0-036b020dc9e3
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5f17a6fb-372c-4668-83b0-036b020dc9e3
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicatione8876040-9428-45e8-b805-b5bbc20e9e1e
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication937991bf-5e71-4f67-ae2a-1fb780a35167
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa4b47ff5-95f4-430f-a1a3-541cb8eaa9b7
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye8876040-9428-45e8-b805-b5bbc20e9e1e
upv.uuid892c344f-d8b5-48fc-9b80-e1fff867534bes_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Miniatura
Nombre:
Gonzalez-Camejo;Paches;Marín - Production of microalgal external organic matter in a Chlorella-do....pdf
Tamaño:
635.12 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión del Autor.
[object Object] Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
Rev.pdf
Tamaño:
3.78 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial
Descargar

Colecciones

Artículos, conferencias, monografías