Maximising resource recovery from wastewater grown microalgae and primary sludge in an anaerobic membrane co-digestion pilot plant coupled to a composting process

dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Ingeniería Hidráulica y Medio Ambiente
dc.contributor.affiliationInstituto Universitario de Ingeniería del Agua y del Medio Ambiente
dc.contributor.affiliationEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería de Caminos, Canales y Puertos
dc.contributor.authorSerna-García, R.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Barriga, P.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorNoriega-Hevia, G.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorSerralta Sevilla, Joaquín
dc.contributor.authorPaches Giner, Maria Aguas Vivas
dc.contributor.authorBouzas, A.es_ES
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Economía y Empresaes_ES
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Regional Development Fundes_ES
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Economía y Competitividades_ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-05T04:32:21Z
dc.date.available2021-03-05T04:32:21Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-01es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN] A pilot-scale microalgae (Chlorella spp.) and primary sludge anaerobic co-digestion (ACoD) plant was run for one year in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) at 35 °C, 70 d solids retention time and 30 d hydraulic retention time, showing high stability in terms of pH and VFA concentration. The plant achieved a high degree of microalgae and primary sludge substrate degradation, resulting in a methane yield of 370 mLCH4·gVSinf¿1. Nutrient-rich effluent streams (685 mgN·L¿1 and 145 mgP·L¿1 in digestate and 395 mgNH4-N·L¿1 and 37 mgPO4-P·L¿1 in permeate) were obtained, allowing posterior nutrient recovery. Ammonium was recovered from the permeate as ammonia sulphate through a hydrophobic polypropylene hollow fibre membrane contactor, achieving 99% nitrogen recovery efficiency. However, phosphorus recovery through processes such as struvite precipitation was not applied since only 26% of the phosphate was available in the effluent. Composting process of the digestate coming from the ACoD pilot plant was assessed on laboratory-scale Dewar reactors, as was the conventional sludge compost from an industrial WWTP digestion process, obtaining similar values from both. Sanitised (free of Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp.) and stable compost (respirometric index at 37 °C below 0.5 mgO 2 g organic matter¿1·h¿1) was obtained from both sludges.en_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationSerna-García, R.; Ruiz-Barriga, P.; Noriega-Hevia, G.; Serralta Sevilla, J.; Paches Giner, MAV.; Bouzas, A. (2021). Maximising resource recovery from wastewater grown microalgae and primary sludge in an anaerobic membrane co-digestion pilot plant coupled to a composting process. Journal of Environmental Management. 281:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111890es_ES
dc.description.referencesAcién, F. G., Gómez-Serrano, C., Morales-Amaral, M. M., Fernández-Sevilla, J. M., & Molina-Grima, E. (2016). Wastewater treatment using microalgae: how realistic a contribution might it be to significant urban wastewater treatment? Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 100(21), 9013-9022. doi:10.1007/s00253-016-7835-7es_ES
dc.description.referencesBarat, R., Bouzas, A., Martí, N., Ferrer, J., & Seco, A. (2009). Precipitation assessment in wastewater treatment plants operated for biological nutrient removal: A case study in Murcia, Spain. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(2), 850-857. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.02.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesBarrena Gómez, R., Vázquez Lima, F., Gordillo Bolasell, M. A., Gea, T., & Sánchez Ferrer, A. (2005). Respirometric assays at fixed and process temperatures to monitor composting process. Bioresource Technology, 96(10), 1153-1159. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.09.026es_ES
dc.description.referencesBecker, A. M., Yu, K., Stadler, L. B., & Smith, A. L. (2017). Co-management of domestic wastewater and food waste: A life cycle comparison of alternative food waste diversion strategies. Bioresource Technology, 223, 131-140. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.10.031es_ES
dc.description.referencesCornel, P., & Schaum, C. (2009). Phosphorus recovery from wastewater: needs, technologies and costs. Water Science and Technology, 59(6), 1069-1076. doi:10.2166/wst.2009.045es_ES
dc.description.referencesDereli, R. K., Ersahin, M. E., Ozgun, H., Ozturk, I., Jeison, D., van der Zee, F., & van Lier, J. B. (2012). Potentials of anaerobic membrane bioreactors to overcome treatment limitations induced by industrial wastewaters. Bioresource Technology, 122, 160-170. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.139es_ES
dc.description.referencesDoyle, J. D., & Parsons, S. A. (2002). Struvite formation, control and recovery. Water Research, 36(16), 3925-3940. doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(02)00126-4es_ES
dc.description.referencesDube, P. J., Vanotti, M. B., Szogi, A. A., & García-González, M. C. (2016). Enhancing recovery of ammonia from swine manure anaerobic digester effluent using gas-permeable membrane technology. Waste Management, 49, 372-377. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.12.011es_ES
dc.description.referencesFuchs, W., & Drosg, B. (2013). Assessment of the state of the art of technologies for the processing of digestate residue from anaerobic digesters. Water Science and Technology, 67(9), 1984-1993. doi:10.2166/wst.2013.075es_ES
dc.description.referencesGao, M., Liang, F., Yu, A., Li, B., & Yang, L. (2010). Evaluation of stability and maturity during forced-aeration composting of chicken manure and sawdust at different C/N ratios. Chemosphere, 78(5), 614-619. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.10.056es_ES
dc.description.referencesGiménez, J. B., Robles, A., Carretero, L., Durán, F., Ruano, M. V., Gatti, M. N., … Seco, A. (2011). Experimental study of the anaerobic urban wastewater treatment in a submerged hollow-fibre membrane bioreactor at pilot scale. Bioresource Technology, 102(19), 8799-8806. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.014es_ES
dc.description.referencesGonzález-Camejo, J., Serna-García, R., Viruela, A., Pachés, M., Durán, F., Robles, A., … Seco, A. (2017). Short and long-term experiments on the effect of sulphide on microalgae cultivation in tertiary sewage treatment. Bioresource Technology, 244, 15-22. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.126es_ES
dc.description.referencesGonzález-Camejo, J., Aparicio, S., Jiménez-Benítez, A., Pachés, M., Ruano, M. V., Borrás, L., … Seco, A. (2020). Improving membrane photobioreactor performance by reducing light path: operating conditions and key performance indicators. Water Research, 172, 115518. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2020.115518es_ES
dc.description.referencesGonzález-Fernández, C., Sialve, B., Bernet, N., & Steyer, J. P. (2012). Thermal pretreatment to improve methane production of Scenedesmus biomass. Biomass and Bioenergy, 40, 105-111. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.02.008es_ES
dc.description.referencesGreses, S., Gaby, J. C., Aguado, D., Ferrer, J., Seco, A., & Horn, S. J. (2017). Microbial community characterization during anaerobic digestion of Scenedesmus spp. under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Algal Research, 27, 121-130. doi:10.1016/j.algal.2017.09.002es_ES
dc.description.referencesGreses, S., Zamorano-López, N., Borrás, L., Ferrer, J., Seco, A., & Aguado, D. (2018). Effect of long residence time and high temperature over anaerobic biodegradation of Scenedesmus microalgae grown in wastewater. Journal of Environmental Management, 218, 425-434. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.086es_ES
dc.description.referencesHuang, G. F., Wong, J. W. C., Wu, Q. T., & Nagar, B. B. (2004). Effect of C/N on composting of pig manure with sawdust. Waste Management, 24(8), 805-813. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2004.03.011es_ES
dc.description.referencesKhalid, A. A. H., Yaakob, Z., Abdullah, S. R. S., & Takriff, M. S. (2019). Assessing the feasibility of microalgae cultivation in agricultural wastewater: The nutrient characteristics. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 15, 100402. doi:10.1016/j.eti.2019.100402es_ES
dc.description.referencesKartohardjono, S., Iwan Fermi, M., Yuliusman, Y., Elkardiana, K., Putra Sangaji, A., & Maghfirwan Ramadhan, A. (2015). The Removal of Dissolved Ammonia from Wastewater through a Polypropylene Hollow Fiber Membrane Contactor. International Journal of Technology, 6(7), 1146. doi:10.14716/ijtech.v6i7.1845es_ES
dc.description.referencesMagdalena, J., Ballesteros, M., & González-Fernandez, C. (2018). Efficient Anaerobic Digestion of Microalgae Biomass: Proteins as a Key Macromolecule. Molecules, 23(5), 1098. doi:10.3390/molecules23051098es_ES
dc.description.referencesManu, M. K., Kumar, R., & Garg, A. (2017). Performance assessment of improved composting system for food waste with varying aeration and use of microbial inoculum. Bioresource Technology, 234, 167-177. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.023es_ES
dc.description.referencesMarti, N., Ferrer, J., Seco, A., & Bouzas, A. (2008). Optimisation of sludge line management to enhance phosphorus recovery in WWTP. Water Research, 42(18), 4609-4618. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2008.08.012es_ES
dc.description.referencesMarti, N., Bouzas, A., Seco, A., & Ferrer, J. (2008). Struvite precipitation assessment in anaerobic digestion processes. Chemical Engineering Journal, 141(1-3), 67-74. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2007.10.023es_ES
dc.description.referencesMonlau, F., Sambusiti, C., Ficara, E., Aboulkas, A., Barakat, A., & Carrère, H. (2015). New opportunities for agricultural digestate valorization: current situation and perspectives. Energy & Environmental Science, 8(9), 2600-2621. doi:10.1039/c5ee01633aes_ES
dc.description.referencesNag, R., Auer, A., Markey, B. K., Whyte, P., Nolan, S., O’Flaherty, V., … Cummins, E. (2019). Anaerobic digestion of agricultural manure and biomass – Critical indicators of risk and knowledge gaps. Science of The Total Environment, 690, 460-479. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.512es_ES
dc.description.referencesNikaeen, M., Nafez, A. H., Bina, B., Nabavi, B. F., & Hassanzadeh, A. (2015). Respiration and enzymatic activities as indicators of stabilization of sewage sludge composting. Waste Management, 39, 104-110. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.01.028es_ES
dc.description.referencesNkoa, R. (2013). Agricultural benefits and environmental risks of soil fertilization with anaerobic digestates: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34(2), 473-492. doi:10.1007/s13593-013-0196-zes_ES
dc.description.referencesNoriega-Hevia, G., Serralta, J., Borrás, L., Seco, A., & Ferrer, J. (2020). Nitrogen recovery using a membrane contactor: Modelling nitrogen and pH evolution. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 8(4), 103880. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2020.103880es_ES
dc.description.referencesPassos, F., Hernández-Mariné, M., García, J., & Ferrer, I. (2014). Long-term anaerobic digestion of microalgae grown in HRAP for wastewater treatment. Effect of microwave pretreatment. Water Research, 49, 351-359. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.013es_ES
dc.description.referencesPuyuelo, B., Ponsá, S., Gea, T., & Sánchez, A. (2011). Determining C/N ratios for typical organic wastes using biodegradable fractions. Chemosphere, 85(4), 653-659. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.07.014es_ES
dc.description.referencesRas, M., Lardon, L., Bruno, S., Bernet, N., & Steyer, J.-P. (2011). Experimental study on a coupled process of production and anaerobic digestion of Chlorella vulgaris. Bioresource Technology, 102(1), 200-206. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.146es_ES
dc.description.referencesRobles, Á., Ruano, M. V., Charfi, A., Lesage, G., Heran, M., Harmand, J., … Ferrer, J. (2018). A review on anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs) focused on modelling and control aspects. Bioresource Technology, 270, 612-626. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.049es_ES
dc.description.referencesSeco, A., Aparicio, S., González-Camejo, J., Jiménez-Benítez, A., Mateo, O., Mora, J. F., … Ferrer, J. (2018). Resource recovery from sulphate-rich sewage through an innovative anaerobic-based water resource recovery facility (WRRF). Water Science and Technology, 78(9), 1925-1936. doi:10.2166/wst.2018.492es_ES
dc.description.referencesSerna-García, R., Zamorano-López, N., Seco, A., & Bouzas, A. (2020). Co-digestion of harvested microalgae and primary sludge in a mesophilic anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR): Methane potential and microbial diversity. Bioresource Technology, 298, 122521. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122521es_ES
dc.description.referencesSerna-García, R., Mora-Sánchez, J. F., Sanchis-Perucho, P., Bouzas, A., & Seco, A. (2020). Anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) scale-up from laboratory to pilot-scale for microalgae and primary sludge co-digestion: Biological and filtration assessment. Bioresource Technology, 316, 123930. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123930es_ES
dc.description.referencesSolé-Bundó, M., Salvadó, H., Passos, F., Garfí, M., & Ferrer, I. (2018). Strategies to Optimize Microalgae Conversion to Biogas: Co-Digestion, Pretreatment and Hydraulic Retention Time. Molecules, 23(9), 2096. doi:10.3390/molecules23092096es_ES
dc.description.referencesSolé-Bundó, M., Garfí, M., Matamoros, V., & Ferrer, I. (2019). Co-digestion of microalgae and primary sludge: Effect on biogas production and microcontaminants removal. Science of The Total Environment, 660, 974-981. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.011es_ES
dc.description.referencesUllah, K., Ahmad, M., Sofia, Sharma, V. K., Lu, P., Harvey, A., … Sultana, S. (2015). Assessing the potential of algal biomass opportunities for bioenergy industry: A review. Fuel, 143, 414-423. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2014.10.064es_ES
dc.description.referencesWang, M., Lee, E., Dilbeck, M. P., Liebelt, M., Zhang, Q., & Ergas, S. J. (2016). Thermal pretreatment of microalgae for biomethane production: experimental studies, kinetics and energy analysis. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 92(2), 399-407. doi:10.1002/jctb.5018es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Projects CTM 2014-54980-C2-1-R and CTM 2014- 54980-C2-2-R) jointly with the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), which are gratefully acknowledged. It was also supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation via a pre/doctoral FPI fellowship to the first author (BES-2015-071884, Project CTM 2014- 54980-C2-1-R). Technical support from the Entidad Pública de Saneamiento de Aguas Residuales de la Comunidad Valenciana is also gratefully acknowledged.es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin9es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio1es_ES
dc.description.volume281es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111890es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0301-4797es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid33385906es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/163186
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Environmental Managementes_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaS\424730es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//CTM2014-54980-C2-1-R/ES/OBTENCION DE BIONUTRIENTES Y ENERGIA DEL AGUA RESIDUAL URBANA MEDIANTE CULTIVO DE MICROALGAS, TRATAMIENTOS ANAEROBIOS, CRISTALIZACION DE FOSFORO, ABSORCION DE NH3 Y COMPOSTAJE/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//BES-2015-071884/ES/BES-2015-071884/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//CTM2014-54980-C2-2-R/ES/DESARROLLO DE UN SISTEMA DE CONTROL Y DE SOPORTE A LA DECISION PARA LA OBTENCION DE BIONUTRIENTES Y ENERGIA EN PROCESOS DE TRATAMIENTO DE AGUAS RESIDUALES URBANAS/es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111890es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s00253-016-7835-7es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.02.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2004.09.026es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2016.10.031es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2166/wst.2009.045es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.139es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00126-4es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.wasman.2015.12.011es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2166/wst.2013.075es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.10.056es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.014es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.126es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.watres.2020.115518es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.02.008es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.algal.2017.09.002es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.086es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.wasman.2004.03.011es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.eti.2019.100402es_ES
dc.relation.references10.14716/ijtech.v6i7.1845es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3390/molecules23051098es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.023es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.watres.2008.08.012es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.cej.2007.10.023es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1039/C5EE01633Aes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.512es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.wasman.2015.01.028es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s13593-013-0196-zes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jece.2020.103880es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.013es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.07.014es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.146es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.049es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2166/wst.2018.492es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122521es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123930es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3390/molecules23092096es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.011es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.fuel.2014.10.064es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/jctb.5018es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectCompostinges_ES
dc.subjectAnaerobic co-digestiones_ES
dc.subjectMicroalgaees_ES
dc.subjectResource recoveryes_ES
dc.subjectNutrientses_ES
dc.subjectMethanees_ES
dc.subject.classificationTECNOLOGIA DEL MEDIO AMBIENTEes_ES
dc.subject.ods06.- Garantizar la disponibilidad y la gestión sostenible del agua y el saneamiento para todoses_ES
dc.titleMaximising resource recovery from wastewater grown microalgae and primary sludge in an anaerobic membrane co-digestion pilot plant coupled to a composting processes_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier188822
person.identifier257405
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5015-0689
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7796-5228
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6cead848-bbae-4a48-9669-cea840a6dc32
relation.isAuthorOfPublication19096679-3997-474f-af27-7a6e29b99576
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery6cead848-bbae-4a48-9669-cea840a6dc32
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicatione8876040-9428-45e8-b805-b5bbc20e9e1e
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication937991bf-5e71-4f67-ae2a-1fb780a35167
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa4b47ff5-95f4-430f-a1a3-541cb8eaa9b7
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye8876040-9428-45e8-b805-b5bbc20e9e1e
upv.uuid9341e98f-d296-444c-9b5f-757befa581bces_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Serna-García;Ruiz-Barriga;Noriega-Hevia - Maximising resource recovery from wastewater grownmicro....pdf
Tamaño:
1000.42 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión del Autor.
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Serna-García et al_ 2021. Maximising resource recovery from wastewater grown microalgae and primary sludge in an anaerobic membrane co-digestion pilot plant coupled to a composting process.pdf
Tamaño:
1.75 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial