Rural Landscape Simplification and Provision of Cultural Ecosystem Services. A Case Study in the Argentine Pampas

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorCabrini, Silvina Maríaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorCristeche, Estela Raqueles_ES
dc.contributor.authorPace Guerrero, Ignacio Raules_ES
dc.contributor.authorBitar, María Victoriaes_ES
dc.contributor.funderInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaes_ES
dc.contributor.funderUniversidad Nacional del Noroeste de la Provincia de Buenos Aireses_ES
dc.contributor.funderCenter of Applied Ecology and Sustainability, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chilees_ES
dc.coverage.spatialeast=-60.5745999; north=-33.8912831; name=Pinto, Pergamino, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-12T07:57:05Z
dc.date.available2023-07-12T07:57:05Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-26
dc.description.abstract[ES] En las últimas décadas, el paisaje rural de la Pampa argentina ha experimentado un proceso de simplificación debido al aumento de tierras destinadas a cultivos, reemplazando pasturas y pastizales, con un aumento sustancial de la superficie sojera. En 2016-2017, se realizó una encuesta para analizar cambios en los servicios ecosistémicos culturales en esta región. Los ciudadanos de Pergamino relacionan la mejora en el valor estético y recreacional del paisaje con el aumento de su complejidad, ya que prefieren más cultivos de invierno y áreas de pastoreo, vegetación nativa, árboles y aves. La relación significativa entre las variables sociodemográficas y las preferencias por los atributos del paisaje es consistente con la noción de que la percepción de la belleza del paisaje se construye a partir de experiencias personales.es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN] In recent decades, the rural landscape of the Argentine Pampas has undergone a process of simplification due to the increased land allocated to crops, replacing pastures and grasslands, with a substantial increase in soybean area. In 2016-2017, a survey was conducted to analyze changes in cultural ecosystem services in this region. Pergamino citizens relate landscape improvement in terms of aesthetic and recreational values to increasing its complexity since they prefer more winter crops, grazing areas, native vegetation, trees, and birds. The significant relationship between sociodemographic variables and preferences for landscape attributes is consistent with the notion that aesthetic perception is constructed from personal experiences and background.en_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodOJSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationCabrini, SM.; Cristeche, ER.; Pace Guerrero, IR.; Bitar, MV. (2023). Rural Landscape Simplification and Provision of Cultural Ecosystem Services. A Case Study in the Argentine Pampas. Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales - Agricultural and Resource Economics. 23(1):7-34. https://doi.org/10.7201/earn.2023.01.01es_ES
dc.description.issue1es_ES
dc.description.referencesAbraham, L., Van Den Bosch, M.E., Alturria, L., Hidalgo, V., Fioretti, S., Videla, E. & Comellas, E. (2014). "Viticulture and landscape, values for the society in Mendoza, Argentina". BIO Web of Conferences, 3, 03010. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20140303010es_ES
dc.description.referencesArelovich, H.M., Bravo R.D. & Martínez M. (2011). "Development, characteristics, and trends for beef cattle production in Argentina". Animal Frontiers, 1(2), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2011-0021es_ES
dc.description.referencesAssandri, G., Bogliani, G., Pedrini, P. & Brambilla, M. (2018). "Beautiful agricultural landscapes promote cultural ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation". Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 256, 200-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.01.012es_ES
dc.description.referencesAuer, A., Maceira, N. & Nahuelhual, L. (2017). "Agriculturisation and trade-offs between commodity production and cultural ecosystem services: A case study in Balcarce County". Journal of Rural Studies, 53, 88-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.013es_ES
dc.description.referencesAuer, A., Nahuelhual, L. & Maceira, N. (2018). "Cultural ecosystem services trade-offs arising from agriculturization in Argentina: A case study in Mar Chiquita Basin". Applied Geography, 91, 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.12.025es_ES
dc.description.referencesBitar, M.V., Cabrini, S.M., Orlando, L., Lingua, M., Paolilli, C., Fillat, F., Elustondo, L., Bevaqua, F. & Senigagliesi, C. (2020). Los sistemas productivos del partido de Pergamino. Resultados de una encuesta a productores. Retrieved from: Indicadores económicos e informes técnicos. Informes técnicos / EEA Pergamino INTA. Economía y sociología, no.2: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7057es_ES
dc.description.referencesCabrini, S.M. & Calcaterra, C.P. (2016). "Modeling economic-environmental decision making for agricultural land use in Argentinean Pampas". Agricultural Systems, 143, 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.12.016es_ES
dc.description.referencesCabrini, S.M., Cristeche, E.R., Guerrero, I.R.P. & Bitar, M.V. (2023). Rural Landscape Simplification and Provision of Cultural Ecosystem Services. A Case Study in the Argentine Pampas. Supplementary material (survey questionnaire and dataset). Retrieved from: Zenodo.org: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7982312es_ES
dc.description.referencesCarreño, L. & Frank, F.C. (2012). "Tradeoffs between economic and ecosystem services in Argentina during 50 years of land-use change". Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 154, 68-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.019es_ES
dc.description.referencesCerezo, A., Conde, M.C. & Poggio, S.L. (2011). "Pasture area and landscape heterogeneity are key determinants of bird diversity in intensively managed farmland". Biodiversity and Conservation, 20(12), 2649-2667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0096-yes_ES
dc.description.referencesCodesido, M., González-Fischer, C.M. & Bilenca, D.N. (2013). "Landbird Assemblages in Different Agricultural Landscapes: A Case Study in the Pampas of Central Argentina". The Condor, 115(1), 8-16. https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2012.120011es_ES
dc.description.referencesCodesido, M., Zufiaurre, E. & Bilenca, D. (2015). "Relationship between pest birds and landscape elements in the Pampas of Central Argentina". Emu - Austral Ornithology, 115(1), 80-84. https://doi.org/10.1071/MU13110es_ES
dc.description.referencesDaniel, T.C. (2001). "Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century". Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1-4), 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4es_ES
dc.description.referencesDaniel, T.C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J.W., Chan, K.M.A., Costanza, R., Elmqvist, T., Flint, C.G., Gobster, P.H., Gret-Regamey, A., Lave, R., Muhar, S., Penker, M., Ribe, R.G., Schauppenlehner, T., Sikor, T., Soloviy, I., Spierenburg, M., Taczanowska, K., Tam, J. & von der Dunk, A. (2012). "Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(23), 8812-8819. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114773109es_ES
dc.description.referencesDarder, M.L., Caprile, A.C. & Delaye, L.M. (2016). "Contaminación en agroecosistemas, estudio de caso de la cuenca del Arroyo Pergamino". Revista de Tecnología Agropuecaria - RTA, 10(30), 57-61.es_ES
dc.description.referencesFerrere, P. & Signorelli, A. (2018). "Desarrollo de sistemas agro forestales en áreas periurbanas". En Tittonel, P. & Giobellina, B.: Periurbanos Hacia El Consenso. Ciudad, Ambiente y Producción de Alimentos: Propuestas Para Reordenar El Territorio (pp. 248-251). Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina: INTA - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/9090es_ES
dc.description.referencesFranzluebbers, A.J., Sawchik, J. & Taboada, M.A. (2014). "Agronomic and environmental impacts of pasture-crop rotations in temperate North and South America". Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 190, 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.09.017es_ES
dc.description.referencesGarcía, L.S., Améndola, C., Torti, M.J. & Andriulo, A.E. (2017). "Trace elements in pergamino stream and its relationship with land use". Ciencia del suelo, 35(2), 351-363.es_ES
dc.description.referencesHäfner, K., Zasada, I., van Zanten, B.T., Ungaro, F., Koetse, M. & Piorr, A. (2018). "Assessing landscape preferences: A visual choice experiment in the agricultural region of Märkische Schweiz, Germany". Landscape Research, 43(6), 846-861. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2017.1386289es_ES
dc.description.referencesHagle, T.M. & Mitchell, G.E.M. (1992). "Goodness-of-Fit measures for Probit and Logit". American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 762-784. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111590es_ES
dc.description.referencesHaines-Young, R. & Potschin, M. (2013). Common international classification of ecosystem services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August-December 2012. Retrieved from: European Environment Agency: https://cices.eu/content/uploads/sites/8/2012/07/CICES-V43_Revised-Final_Report_29012013.pdfes_ES
dc.description.referencesHowley, P. (2011). "Landscape aesthetics: Assessing the general publics' preferences towards rural landscapes". Ecological Economics, 72, 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.026es_ES
dc.description.referencesINDEC (2022a). Argentine foreign trade statistics: Preliminary Data for 2021. Retrieved from: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos - Informes Técnicos Vol. 6 Núm. 17 - Comercio Exterior Vol. 6 Núm. 2: https://www.indec.gob.ar/uploads/informesdeprensa/i_argent_02_22911A4A9AB1.pdfes_ES
dc.description.referencesINDEC (2022b) Origen provincial de las exportaciones. Retrieved from: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos - Informes Técnicos Vol. 6 Núm. 41 - Comercio Exterior Vol 6 Núm. 5: https://www.indec.gob.ar/uploads/informesdeprensa/opex_03_22AC291C9FFE.pdfes_ES
dc.description.referencesJunge, X., Schüpbach, B., Walter, T., Schmid, B. & Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2015). "Aesthetic quality of agricultural landscape elements in different seasonal stages in Switzerland". Landscape and Urban Planning, 133, 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.010es_ES
dc.description.referencesKosanic, A. & Petzold, J. (2020) "A systematic review of cultural ecosystem services and human wellbeing". Ecosystem Services, 45, 101168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101168es_ES
dc.description.referencesLandis, D.A. (2017). "Designing agricultural landscapes for biodiversity-based ecosystem services". Basic and Applied Ecology, 18, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BAAE.2016.07.005es_ES
dc.description.referencesMaddala, G.S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810176es_ES
dc.description.referencesMcFadden, D. (1973). "Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior". In Zarembka, P. (Ed.): Frontiers in Economics (pp. 105-142). New York, USA: Academic Press: http://elsa.berkeley.edu/reprints/mcfadden/zarembka.pdfes_ES
dc.description.referencesNahuelhual, L., Laterra, P., Jiménez, D., Andrea Báez, A., Echeverría, C. & Fuentes, R. (2018). "Do People Prefer Natural Landscapes? An Empirical Study in Chile". Bosque, 39(2), 205-16. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92002018000200205es_ES
dc.description.referencesOcchiuzzi, S., Basualdo, A, Boragno, S., Carrasco Galleguillos, F., Gabrás, N. & Artola, J. (2018). Mapas de áreas aptas para cultivos de secano en Argentina. Retrieved from: Secretaría de Agroindustria Argentina: https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/publicacion1-mapasareasaptas.pdfes_ES
dc.description.referencesPacín, F. & Oesterheld, M. (2014). "In-farm diversity stabilizes return on capital in Argentine agro-ecosystems". Agricultural Systems, 124, 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.10.008es_ES
dc.description.referencesPeyraud, J.L., Taboada, M. & Delaby, L. (2014). "Integrated crop and livestock systems in Western Europe and South America: A review". European Journal of Agronomy, 57, 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2014.02.005es_ES
dc.description.referencesRussell, R., Guerry, A.D., Balvanera, P., Gould, R.K., Basurto, X., Chan, K.M.A., Klain, S., Levine, J. & Tam, J. (2013). "Humans and Nature: How Knowing and Experiencing Nature Affect Well-Being". Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 38(1), 473-502. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev environ-012312-110838es_ES
dc.description.referencesSayadi, S., González-Roa M.C. & Calatrava-Requena J. (2009). "Public preferences for landscape features: The Case of Agricultural Landscape in Mountainous Mediterranean Areas". Land Use Policy, 26(2), 334-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.04.003es_ES
dc.description.referencesSatorre, E.H. & Andrade F.H. (2021) "Cambios productivos y tecnológicos de la agricultura extensiva argentina en los últimos quince años". Ciencia Hoy, 29(173), 39-47.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSolbrig, O.T. & Viglizzo, E. (1999). Sustainable farming in the Argentine Pampas: History, society, economy, and ecology. Retrieved from: David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Working Paper, Article 99/00-1: https://lccn.loc.gov/00301344es_ES
dc.description.referencesTardiff, T.J. (1976). "A note on goodness-of-fit statistics for probit and logit models". Transportation, 5(4), 377-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00151098es_ES
dc.description.referencesTorti, J. & Andriulo, A. (2014). "Dinámica espacial y temporal de fracciones de fósforo y nitrógeno en el arroyo Pergamino". Communication presented in II Congreso Internacional de Hidrología de Llanuras, Santa Fe, Argentina.es_ES
dc.description.referencesvan Zanten, B.T., Verburg, P.H., Koetse, M.J. & Van Beukering, P.J.H. (2014a). "Preferences for European agrarian landscapes: A meta-analysis of case studies". Landscape and Urban Planning, 132, 89-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.012es_ES
dc.description.referencesvan Zanten, B.T., Verburg, P.H., Espinosa M., Gomez-y-Paloma S., Giuliano Galimberti G., Kantelhardt J., Kapfer M., Lefebvre M. Manrique R., Piorr A., Raggi M., Schaller L., Targetti S., Zasada I. & Viaggi D. (2014b). "European agricultural landscapes, Common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: A review". Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34(2), 309-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0183-4es_ES
dc.description.referencesvan Zanten, B.T., Zasada, I., Koetse, M.J., Ungaro, F., Häfner, K. & Verburg, P.H. (2016). "A comparative approach to assess the contribution of landscape features to aesthetic and recreational values in agricultural landscapes". Ecosystem Services, 17, 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.011es_ES
dc.description.referencesWeyland, F., Baudry, J. & Ghersa, C.M. (2014). "Rolling Pampas agroecosystem: Which landscape attributes are relevant for determining bird distributions?". Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 87, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/0717-6317-87-1es_ES
dc.description.referencesYazici, B., Alpu, Ö. & Yang, Y. (2007). "Comparison of goodness-of-fit measures in probit regression model". Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation, 36(5), 1061-1073. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610910701539898es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEste trabajo fue financiado por el Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria Argentina, bajo del proyecto PE 1129024, por la Universidad Nacional del Noroeste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, bajo el proyecto 0611/2019 y por el Center of Applied Ecology and Sustainability, con la beca CAPES-ANID PIA/BASAL FB0002es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin34es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio7es_ES
dc.description.volume23es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.7201/earn.2023.01.01
dc.identifier.eissn2174-7350
dc.identifier.issn1578-0732
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/194834
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherUniversitat Politècnica de Valènciaes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofEconomía Agraria y Recursos Naturales - Agricultural and Resource Economicses_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaOJS\16671es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/INTA//PE 1129024es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/UNNOBA//0611%2F2019es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/CAPES/ANID PIA%2FBASAL/FB0002/CLes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.7201/earn.2023.01.01es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1051/bioconf/20140303010es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2527/af.2011-0021es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.agee.2018.01.012es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.013es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.12.025es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.agsy.2015.12.016es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.019es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10531-011-0096-yes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1525/cond.2012.120011es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1071/MU13110es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1073/pnas.1114773109es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.agee.2013.09.017es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/01426397.2017.1386289es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2307/2111590es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.026es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.010es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101168es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.baae.2016.07.005es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1017/CBO9780511810176es_ES
dc.relation.references10.4067/S0717-92002018000200205es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.agsy.2013.10.008es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.eja.2014.02.005es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1146/annurev-environ-012312-110838es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.04.003es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/BF00151098es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.012es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s13593-013-0183-4es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.011es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1186/0717-6317-87-1es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/03610910701539898es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectRural landscapeses_ES
dc.subjectIndividual preferencees_ES
dc.subjectCultural ecosystem serviceses_ES
dc.subjectLandscape simplificationes_ES
dc.subjectAesthetic valueses_ES
dc.subjectPaisaje rurales_ES
dc.subjectPreferencias individualeses_ES
dc.subjectServicios ecosistémicos culturaleses_ES
dc.subjectSimplificación del paisajees_ES
dc.subjectValores estéticoses_ES
dc.titleRural Landscape Simplification and Provision of Cultural Ecosystem Services. A Case Study in the Argentine Pampases_ES
dc.title.alternativeSimplificación del Paisaje y Provisión de Servicios Ecosistémicos Culturales. Un Estudio de Caso en las Pampas de Argentinaes_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
upv.uuid9ccebb38-4d98-40f5-bd0b-146c8482edcaes_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
CabriniCristechePace - Rural Landscape Simplification and Provision of Cultural Ecosystem Service....pdf
Tamaño:
1.81 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial
[object Object] Descargar

Colecciones

Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales - Agricultural and Resource Economics - Vol 23, No 1 (2023)