Programmable photonic circuits

dc.contributor.affiliationEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería de Telecomunicación
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Comunicaciones
dc.contributor.affiliationInstituto Universitario de Telecomunicación y Aplicaciones Multimedia
dc.contributor.authorBogaerts, Wimes_ES
dc.contributor.authorPérez-López, Danieles_ES
dc.contributor.authorCapmany Francoy, José
dc.contributor.authorMiller, David A. B.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorPoon, Joycees_ES
dc.contributor.authorEnglund, Dirkes_ES
dc.contributor.authorMorichetti, Francescoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorMelloni, Andreaes_ES
dc.contributor.funderAGENCIA ESTATAL DE INVESTIGACIONes_ES
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commissiones_ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-05T14:07:37Z
dc.date.available2021-11-05T14:07:37Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-08es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN] The growing maturity of integrated photonic technology makes it possible to build increasingly large and complex photonic circuits on the surface of a chip. Today, most of these circuits are designed for a specific application, but the increase in complexity has introduced a generation of photonic circuits that can be programmed using software for a wide variety of functions through a mesh of on-chip waveguides, tunable beam couplers and optical phase shifters. Here we discuss the state of this emerging technology, including recent developments in photonic building blocks and circuit architectures, as well as electronic control and programming strategies. We cover possible applications in linear matrix operations, quantum information processing and microwave photonics, and examine how these generic chips can accelerate the development of future photonic circuits by providing a higher-level platform for prototyping novel optical functionalities without the need for custom chip fabricationen_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationBogaerts, W.; Pérez-López, D.; Capmany Francoy, J.; Miller, DAB.; Poon, J.; Englund, D.; Morichetti, F.... (2020). Programmable photonic circuits. Nature. 586(7828):207-216. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2764-0es_ES
dc.description.issue7828es_ES
dc.description.referencesChen, X. et al. The emergence of silicon photonics as a flexible technology platform. Proc. IEEE 106, 2101–2116 (2018).es_ES
dc.description.referencesSmit, M., Williams, K. & van der Tol, J. Past, present, and future of InP-based photonic integration. APL Photonics 4, 050901 (2019).es_ES
dc.description.referencesCapmany, J. & Perez, D. Programmable Integrated Photonics (Oxford Univ. Press, 2020). The first book on the subject of programmable photonics gives a detailed overview of the fundamental principles, architectures and potential applications.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMarpaung, D., Yao, J. & Capmany, J. Integrated microwave photonics. Nat. Photon. 13, 80–90 (2019).es_ES
dc.description.referencesZhuang, L., Roeloffzen, C. G. H., Hoekman, M., Boller, K. & Lowery, A. J. Programmable photonic signal processor chip for radiofrequency applications. Optica 2, 854–859 (2015).es_ES
dc.description.referencesShen, Y. et al. Deep learning with coherent nanophotonic circuits. Nat. Photon. 11, 441–446 (2017).es_ES
dc.description.referencesHarris, N. C. et al. Linear programmable nanophotonic processors. Optica 5, 1623–1631 (2018). One of the largest-scale demonstrations of a programmable photonic circuit, using a silicon photonics forward-only mesh that maps 26 input modes onto 26 output modes, for use in deep learning and quantum information processing.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMiller, D. A. B. Self-configuring universal linear optical component. Photon. Res. 1, 1–15 (2013). This foundational paper in the field of programmable photonics is the first to bring together waveguide meshes with self-configuration algorithms that require no active computation, including the concept of the self-aligning beam coupler.es_ES
dc.description.referencesCarolan, J. et al. Universal linear optics. Science 349, 711–716 (2015).es_ES
dc.description.referencesHarris, N. C. et al. Large-scale quantum photonic circuits in silicon. Nanophotonics 5, 456–468 (2016).es_ES
dc.description.referencesNotaros, J. et al. Programmable dispersion on a photonic integrated circuit for classical and quantum applications. Opt. Express 25, 21275–21285 (2017).es_ES
dc.description.referencesClements, W. R., Humphreys, P. C., Metcalf, B. J., Kolthammer, W. S. & Walmsley, I. A. An optimal design for universal multiport interferometers. Optica 12, 1460–1465 (2016).es_ES
dc.description.referencesPerez-Lopez, D. Programmable integrated silicon photonics waveguide meshes: optimized designs and control algorithms. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 26, 8301312 (2020).es_ES
dc.description.referencesRibeiro, A., Ruocco, A., Vanacker, L. & Bogaerts, W. Demonstration of a 4×4-port universal linear circuit. Optica 3, 1348–1357 (2016).es_ES
dc.description.referencesHarris, N. C. et al. Quantum transport simulations in a programmable nanophotonic processor. Nat. Photon. 11, 447–452 (2017).es_ES
dc.description.referencesMennea, P. L. et al. Modular linear optical circuits. Optica 5, 1087–1090 (2018).es_ES
dc.description.referencesTaballione, C. et al. 8×8 programmable quantum photonic processor based on silicon nitride waveguides. In Frontiers in Optics, JTu3A.58 (Optical Society of America, 2018). A demonstration of an 8 × 8 forward-only programmable linear circuit in silicon nitride that benefits from the notably low optical losses of this material and is therefore attractive for linear quantum operations on single photons.es_ES
dc.description.referencesPerez, D. et al. Silicon photonics rectangular universal interferometer. Laser Photonics Rev. 11, 1700219 (2017).es_ES
dc.description.referencesXie, Y. et al. Programmable optical processor chips: toward photonic RF filters with DSP-level flexibility and MHz-band selectivity. Nanophotonics 7, 421–454 (2017). A comprehensive overview of the various ways in which a programmable photonic circuit can be used to process microwave signals, and on how this type of circuit is transitioning from custom ASPICs to generic programmable PICs.es_ES
dc.description.referencesHall, T. J. & Hasan, M. Universal discrete Fourier optics RF photonic integrated circuit architecture. Opt. Express 24, 7600–7610 (2016).es_ES
dc.description.referencesDyakonov, I. V. et al. Reconfigurable photonics on a glass chip. Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 044048 (2018).es_ES
dc.description.referencesShokraneh, F., Geoffroy-Gagnon, S., Nezami, M. S. & Liboiron-Ladouceur, O. A single layer neural network implemented by a 4×4 MZI-based optical processor. IEEE Photonics J. 11, 4501612 (2019).es_ES
dc.description.referencesLu, L., Zhou, L. & Chen, J. Programmable SCOW mesh silicon photonic processor for linear unitary operator. Micromachines 10, 646 (2019).es_ES
dc.description.referencesQiang, X. et al. Large-scale silicon quantum photonics implementing arbitrary two-qubit processing. Nat. Photon. 12, 534–539 (2018).es_ES
dc.description.referencesWang, J. et al. Multidimensional quantum entanglement with large-scale integrated optics. Science 360, 285–291 (2018).es_ES
dc.description.referencesSchaeff, C., Polster, R., Huber, M., Ramelow, S. & Zeilinger, A. Experimental access to higher-dimensional entangled quantum systems using integrated optics. Optica 2, 523–529 (2015).es_ES
dc.description.referencesShadbolt, P. J. et al. Generating, manipulating and measuring entanglement and mixture with a reconfigurable photonic circuit. Nat. Photon. 6, 45–49 (2012).es_ES
dc.description.referencesMiller, D. A. B. Waves, modes, communications, and optics: a tutorial. Adv. Opt. Photonics 11, 679 (2019).es_ES
dc.description.referencesMiller, D. A. B. Self-aligning universal beam coupler. Opt. Express 21, 6360–6370 (2013).es_ES
dc.description.referencesMiller, D. A. B. Perfect optics with imperfect components. Optica 2, 747–750 (2015).es_ES
dc.description.referencesAnnoni, A. et al. Unscrambling light—automatically undoing strong mixing between modes. Light Sci. Appl. 6, e17110 (2017). Early demonstration of a forward-only programmable mesh used to unmix different modes in a waveguide, implementing integrated transparent detectors that measure the light intensity in the waveguide without inducing additional optical loss.es_ES
dc.description.referencesPai, S. et al. Parallel programming of an arbitrary feedforward photonic network. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 25, 6100813 (2020).es_ES
dc.description.referencesReck, M., Zeilinger, A., Bernstein, H. J. & Bertani, P. Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 58–61 (1994).es_ES
dc.description.referencesWang, M., Alves, A. R., Xing, Y. & Bogaerts, W. Tolerant, broadband tunable 2×2 coupler circuit. Opt. Express 28, 5555–5566 (2020).es_ES
dc.description.referencesPérez-López, D., Gutierrez, A. M., Sánchez, E., DasMahapatra, P. & Capmany, J. Integrated photonic tunable basic units using dual-drive directional couplers. Opt. Express 27, 38071 (2019).es_ES
dc.description.referencesChoutagunta, K., Roberts, I., Miller, D. A. B. & Kahn, J. M. Adapting Mach–Zehnder mesh equalizers in direct-detection mode-division-multiplexed links. J. Light. Technol. 38, 723–735 (2020).es_ES
dc.description.referencesMiller, D. A. B. Analyzing and generating multimode optical fields using self-configuring networks. Optica 7, 794–801 (2020).es_ES
dc.description.referencesMorizur, J.-F. et al. Programmable unitary spatial mode manipulation. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 27, 2524 (2010).es_ES
dc.description.referencesLabroille, G. et al. Efficient and mode selective spatial mode multiplexer based on multi-plane light conversion. Opt. Express 22, 15599–15607 (2014).es_ES
dc.description.referencesTanomura, R., Tang, R., Ghosh, S., Tanemura, T. & Nakano, T. Robust integrated optical unitary converter using multiport directional couplers. J. Light. Technol. 38, 60–66 (2020).es_ES
dc.description.referencesMiller, D. A. B. Setting up meshes of interferometers – reversed local light interference method. Opt. Express 25, 29233 (2017).es_ES
dc.description.referencesLi, H. W. et al. Calibration and high fidelity measurement of a quantum photonic chip. New J. Phys. 15, 063017 (2013).es_ES
dc.description.referencesCong, G. et al. Arbitrary reconfiguration of universal silicon photonic circuits by bacteria foraging algorithm to achieve reconfigurable photonic digital-to-analog conversion. Opt. Express 27, 24914 (2019).es_ES
dc.description.referencesPérez, D. et al. Multipurpose silicon photonics signal processor core. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–9 (2017). The first experimental demonstration of a recirculating waveguide mesh with seven unit cells that can be programmed to perform more than a hundred different functions.es_ES
dc.description.referencesPérez, D., Gasulla, I. & Capmany, J. Field-programmable photonic arrays. Opt. Express 26, 27265 (2018).es_ES
dc.description.referencesRahim, A., Spuesens, T., Baets, R. & Bogaerts, W. Open-access silicon photonics: current status and emerging initiatives. Proc. IEEE 106, 2313–2330 (2018).es_ES
dc.description.referencesMunoz, P. et al. Foundry developments toward silicon nitride photonics from visible to the mid-infrared. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 25, 8200513 (2019).es_ES
dc.description.referencesTeng, M. et al. Miniaturized silicon photonics devices for integrated optical signal processors. J. Light. Technol. 38, 6–17 (2020).es_ES
dc.description.referencesSacher, W. D. et al. Monolithically integrated multilayer silicon nitride-on-silicon waveguide platforms for 3-D photonic circuits and devices. Proc. IEEE 106, 2232–2245 (2018).es_ES
dc.description.referencesBaudot, C. et al. Developments in 300mm silicon photonics using traditional CMOS fabrication methods and materials. In 2017 IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meeting, 765–768 (IEEE, 2017).es_ES
dc.description.referencesFahrenkopf, N. M. et al. The AIM photonics MPW: a highly accessible cutting edge technology for rapid prototyping of photonic integrated circuits. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 25, 8201406 (2019).es_ES
dc.description.referencesChiles, J. et al. Multi-planar amorphous silicon photonics with compact interplanar couplers, cross talk mitigation, and low crossing loss. APL Photonics 2, 116101 (2017).es_ES
dc.description.referencesVan Campenhout, J., Green, W. M. J., Assefa, S. & Vlasov, Y. A. Integrated NiSi waveguide heaters for CMOS-compatible silicon thermo-optic devices. Opt. Lett. 35, 1013–1015 (2010).es_ES
dc.description.referencesMasood, A. et al. Comparison of heater architectures for thermal control of silicon photonic circuits. In Proc. 10th Int. Conference on Group IV Photonics 83–84 (IEEE, 2013).es_ES
dc.description.referencesMilanizadeh, M., Aguiar, D., Melloni, A. & Morichetti, F. Canceling thermal cross-talk effects in photonic integrated circuits. J. Light. Technol. 37, 1325–1332 (2019).es_ES
dc.description.referencesSoref, R. A. & Bennett, B. R. Electrooptical effects in silicon. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 23, 123–129 (1987).es_ES
dc.description.referencesReed, G. T., Mashanovich, G., Gardes, F. Y. & Thomson, D. J. Silicon optical modulators. Nat. Photon. 4, 518–526 (2010); corrigendum 4, 660 (2010).es_ES
dc.description.referencesMemon, F. A. et al. Silicon oxycarbide platform for integrated photonics. J. Light. Technol. 38, 784–791 (2020).es_ES
dc.description.referencesJin, W., Polcawich, R. G., Morton, P. A. & Bowers, J. E. Piezoelectrically tuned silicon nitride ring resonator. Opt. Express 26, 3174–3187 (2018).es_ES
dc.description.referencesHosseini, N. et al. Stress-optic modulator in TriPleX platform using a piezoelectric lead zirconate titanate (PZT) thin film. Opt. Express 23, 14018 (2015).es_ES
dc.description.referencesDe Cort, W., Beeckman, J., Claes, T., Neyts, K. & Baets, R. Wide tuning of silicon-on-insulator ring resonators with a liquid crystal cladding. Opt. Lett. 36, 3876–3878 (2011).es_ES
dc.description.referencesXing, Y. et al. Digitally controlled phase shifter using an SOI slot waveguide with liquid crystal infiltration. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 27, 1269–1272 (2015).es_ES
dc.description.referencesAbel, S. et al. Large Pockels effect in micro- and nanostructured barium titanate integrated on silicon. Nat. Mater. 18, 42–47 (2019).es_ES
dc.description.referencesDesiatov, B., Shams-Ansari, A., Zhang, M., Wang, C. & Lončar, M. Ultra-low-loss integrated visible photonics using thin-film lithium niobate. Optica 6, 380 (2019).es_ES
dc.description.referencesAlexander, K. et al. Nanophotonic Pockels modulators on a silicon nitride platform. Nat. Commun. 9, 3444 (2018).es_ES
dc.description.referencesLeuthold, J. et al. Silicon-organic hybrid electro-optical devices. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 19, 114–126 (2013).es_ES
dc.description.referencesErrando-Herranz, C. et al. MEMS for photonic integrated circuits. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 26, 8200916 (2020).es_ES
dc.description.referencesQuack, N. et al. MEMS-enabled silicon photonic integrated devices and circuits. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 56, 8400210 (2020).es_ES
dc.description.referencesHoessbacher, C. et al. The plasmonic memristor: a latching optical switch. Optica 1, 198 (2014).es_ES
dc.description.referencesRíos, C. et al. Integrated all-photonic non-volatile multi-level memory. Nat. Photon. 9, 725–732 (2015).es_ES
dc.description.referencesWuttig, M., Bhaskaran, H. & Taubner, T. Phase-change materials for non-volatile photonic applications. Nat. Photon. 11, 465–476 (2017).es_ES
dc.description.referencesMorichetti, F. et al. Non-invasive on-chip light observation by contactless waveguide conductivity monitoring. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 20, 292–301 (2014).es_ES
dc.description.referencesJayatilleka, H., Shoman, H., Chrostowski, L. & Shekhar, S. Photoconductive heaters enable control of large-scale silicon photonic ring resonator circuits. Optica 6, 84–91 (2019).es_ES
dc.description.referencesGrillanda, S. et al. Non-invasive monitoring and control in silicon photonics using CMOS integrated electronics. Optica 1, 129 (2014).es_ES
dc.description.referencesAnnoni, A. et al. Automated routing and control of silicon photonic switch fabrics. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 22, 169–176 (2016).es_ES
dc.description.referencesDumais, P. et al. Silicon photonic switch subsystem with 900 monolithically integrated calibration photodiodes and 64-fiber package. J. Light. Technol. 36, 233–238 (2018).es_ES
dc.description.referencesChen, H., Luo, X. & Poon, A. W. Cavity-enhanced photocurrent generation by 1.55 μm wavelengths linear absorption in a p–i–n diode embedded silicon microring resonator. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 171111 (2009).es_ES
dc.description.referencesRibeiro, A. & Bogaerts, W. Digitally controlled multiplexed silicon photonics phase shifter using heaters with integrated diodes. Opt. Express 25, 29778 (2017).es_ES
dc.description.referencesZimmermann, L. et al. BiCMOS silicon photonics platform. In Optical Fiber Communication Conference Th4E-5 (Optical Society of America, 2015).es_ES
dc.description.referencesOrcutt, J. S. et al. Nanophotonic integration in state-of-the-art CMOS foundries. Opt. Express 19, 2335–2346 (2011).es_ES
dc.description.referencesStojanović, V. et al. Monolithic silicon-photonic platforms in state-of-the-art CMOS SOI processes. Opt. Express 26, 13106 (2018).es_ES
dc.description.referencesCarroll, L. et al. Photonic packaging: transforming silicon photonic integrated circuits into photonic devices. Appl. Sci. 6, 426 (2016).es_ES
dc.description.referencesPatterson, D., De Sousa, I. & Archard, L.-M. The future of packaging with silicon photonics. Chip Scale Rev. 21, 1–10 (2017).es_ES
dc.description.referencesRibeiro, A., Declercq, S., Khan, U., Wang, M. & Van Iseghem, L. Column-row addressing of thermo-optic phase shifters for controlling large silicon photonic circuits. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 26, 6100708 (2020).es_ES
dc.description.referencesPantouvaki, M. et al. Active components for 50 Gb/s NRZ-OOK optical interconnects in a silicon photonics platform. J. Light. Technol. 35, 631–638 (2017).es_ES
dc.description.referencesChen, H. et al. 100-Gbps RZ data reception in 67-GHz Si-contacted germanium waveguide p-i-n photodetectors. J. Light. Technol. 35, 722–726 (2017).es_ES
dc.description.referencesPérez, D., Gasulla, I. & Capmany, J. Toward programmable microwave photonics processors. J. Light. Technol. 36, 519–532 (2018).es_ES
dc.description.referencesZoldak, M., Halmo, L., Turkiewicz, J. P., Schumann, S. & Henker, R. Packaging of ultra-high speed optical fiber data interconnects. In Opt. Fibers and Their Applications 2017 10325, 103250R (International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2017).es_ES
dc.description.referencesWillner, A. E., Khaleghi, S., Chitgarha, M. R. & Yilmaz, O. F. All-optical signal processing. J. Light. Technol. 32, 660–680 (2014).es_ES
dc.description.referencesRamirez, J. M. et al. III–V-on-silicon integration: from hybrid devices to heterogeneous photonic integrated circuits. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 26, 6100213 (2020).es_ES
dc.description.referencesLiu, A. Y. & Bowers, J. Photonic integration with epitaxial III–V on silicon. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 24, 6000412 (2018).es_ES
dc.description.referencesZhang, J. et al. Transfer-printing-based integration of a III–V-on-silicon distributed feedback laser. Opt. Express 26, 8821–8830 (2018).es_ES
dc.description.referencesThiessen, T. et al. Back-side-on-BOX heterogeneously integrated III–V-on-silicon O-band distributed feedback lasers. J. Light. Technol. 38, 3000–3006 (2020).es_ES
dc.description.referencesLópez, A., Perez, D., DasMahapatra, P. & Capmany, J. Auto-routing algorithm for field-programmable photonic gate arrays. Opt. Express 28, 737–752 (2020).es_ES
dc.description.referencesChen, X., Stroobant, P., Pickavet, M. & Bogaerts, W. Graph representations for programmable photonic circuits. J. Light. Technol. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9056549 (2020).es_ES
dc.description.referencesZand, I. & Bogaerts, W. Effects of coupling and phase imperfections in programmable photonic hexagonal waveguide meshes. Photon. Res. 8, 211–218 (2020).es_ES
dc.description.referencesBogaerts, W. & Rahim, A. Programmable photonics: an opportunity for an accessible large-volume PIC ecosystem. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 26, 1–17 (2020). A simple techno-economic analysis of how general-purpose programmable photonic circuits can reduce the cost of prototyping photonics applications.es_ES
dc.description.referencesDubrovsky, M., Ball, M. & Penkovsky, B. Optical proof of work. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.05193 (2019).es_ES
dc.description.referencesPaquot, Y., Schroeder, J., Pelusi, M. D. & Eggleton, B. J. All-optical hash code generation and verification for low latency communications. Opt. Express 21, 23873 (2013).es_ES
dc.description.referencesWang, J., Sciarrino, F., Laing, A. & Thompson, M. G. Integrated photonic quantum technologies. Nat. Photon. 14, 273–284 (2019).es_ES
dc.description.referencesNorberg, E. J., Guzzon, R. S., Parker, J. S., Johansson, L. A. & Coldren, L. A. Programmable photonic microwave filters monolithically integrated in InP-InGaAsP. J. Light. Technol. 29, 1611–1619 (2011).es_ES
dc.description.referencesWang, J. et al. Reconfigurable radio-frequency arbitrary waveforms synthesized in a silicon photonic chip. Nat. Commun. 6, 5957 (2015).es_ES
dc.description.referencesBurla, M. et al. On-chip CMOS compatible reconfigurable optical delay line with separate carrier tuning for microwave photonic signal processing. Opt. Express 19, 21475 (2011).es_ES
dc.description.referencesLiu, L. et al. Photonic measurement of microwave frequency using a silicon microdisk resonator. Opt. Commun. 335, 266–270 (2015).es_ES
dc.description.referencesPerez-Lopez, D., Sanchez, E. & Capmany, J. Programmable true-time delay lines using integrated waveguide meshes. J. Light. Technol. 36, 4591–4601 2018.es_ES
dc.description.referencesNovak, D. et al. Radio-over-fiber technologies for emerging wireless systems. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 52, 0600311 (2016).es_ES
dc.description.referencesBehroozpour, B., Sandborn, P. A. M., Wu, M. C. & Boser, B. E. Lidar system architectures and circuits. IEEE Commun. Mag. 55, 135–142 (2017).es_ES
dc.description.referencesHeck, M. J. R. Highly integrated optical phased arrays: photonic integrated circuits for optical beam shaping and beam steering. Nanophotonics 6, 93–107 (2017).es_ES
dc.description.referencesVan Acoleyen, K. Efficient light collection and direction-of-arrival estimation using a photonic integrated circuit. Photonics 24, 933–935 (2012).es_ES
dc.description.referencesMiller, D. A. B. Establishing optimal wave communication channels automatically. J. Light. Technol. 31, 3987–3994 (2013).es_ES
dc.description.referencesLuan, E., Shoman, H., Ratner, D. M., Cheung, K. C. & Chrostowski, L. Silicon photonic biosensors using label-free detection. Sensors 18, 3519 (2018).es_ES
dc.description.referencesSubramanian, A. Z. et al. Silicon and silicon nitride photonic circuits for spectroscopic sensing on-a-chip. Photon. Res. 3, B47–B59 (2015).es_ES
dc.description.referencesLi, Y. et al. Six-beam homodyne laser Doppler vibrometry based on silicon photonics technology. Opt. Express 26, 3638 (2018).es_ES
dc.description.referencesTrimberger, S. M. Three ages of FPGAs: a retrospective on the first thirty years of FPGA technology. Proc. IEEE 103, 318–331 (2015).es_ES
dc.description.referencesMohomed, I. & Dutta, P. The age of DIY and dawn of the maker movement. Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev. 18, 41–43 (2015).es_ES
dc.description.referencesPreskill, J. Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum 7, 79 (2018).es_ES
dc.description.referencesArute, F. et al. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574, 505–510 (2019).es_ES
dc.description.referencesBiamonte, J. et al. Quantum machine learning. Nature 549, 195–202 (2017).es_ES
dc.description.referencesSteinbrecher, G. R., Olson, J. P., Englund, D. & Carolan, J. Quantum optical neural networks. npj Quantum Inf. 5, 60 (2019).es_ES
dc.description.referencesMiatto, F. M., Epping, M. & Lütkenhaus, N. Hamiltonians for one-way quantum repeaters. Quantum 2, 75 (2018).es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin216es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio207es_ES
dc.description.volume586es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41586-020-2764-0es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1476-4687es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid33028997es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/176295
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherNature Publishing Groupes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofNaturees_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaS\434349es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/741415/EU/Universal microwave photonics programmable processor for seamlessly interfacing wireless and optical ICT systems/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI//FJC2018-037347-I//AYUDA JUAN DE LA CIERVA FORMACION-PEREZ LOPEZ/es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2764-0es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JPROC.2018.2854372es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1063/1.5087862es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/s41566-018-0310-5es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OPTICA.2.000854es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/nphoton.2017.93es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OPTICA.5.001623es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/PRJ.1.000001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1126/science.aab3642es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1515/nanoph-2015-0146es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OE.25.021275es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OPTICA.3.001460es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OPTICA.3.001348es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/nphoton.2017.95es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OPTICA.5.001087es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/FIO.2018.JTu3A.58es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/lpor.201700219es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1515/nanoph-2017-0077es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OE.24.007600es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.044048es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JPHOT.2019.2952562es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3390/mi10100646es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/s41566-018-0236-yes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1126/science.aar7053es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OPTICA.2.000523es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/nphoton.2011.283es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/AOP.11.000679es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OE.21.006360es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OPTICA.2.000747es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/lsa.2017.110es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.58es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OE.384018es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OE.27.038071es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JLT.2019.2952060es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OPTICA.391592es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/JOSAA.27.002524es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OE.22.015599es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JLT.2019.2943116es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OE.25.029233es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1088/1367-2630/15/6/063017es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OE.27.024914es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/s41467-016-0009-6es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OE.26.027265es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JPROC.2018.2878686es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JSTQE.2019.2902903es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JLT.2019.2943251es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JPROC.2018.2860994es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/IEDM.2017.8268495es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JSTQE.2019.2935698es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1063/1.5000384es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OL.35.001013es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/Group4.2013.6644437es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JLT.2019.2892512es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JQE.1987.1073206es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/nphoton.2010.179es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JLT.2019.2948999es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OE.26.003174es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OE.23.014018es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OL.36.003876es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/LPT.2015.2416438es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/s41563-018-0208-0es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OPTICA.6.000380es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/s41467-018-05846-6es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JSTQE.2013.2271846es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JSTQE.2019.2943384es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JQE.2019.2946841es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OPTICA.1.000198es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/nphoton.2015.182es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/nphoton.2017.126es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JSTQE.2014.2300046es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OPTICA.6.000084es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OPTICA.1.000129es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JSTQE.2016.2551943es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JLT.2017.2755578es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1063/1.3257384es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OE.25.029778es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OFC.2015.Th4E.5es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OE.19.002335es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OE.26.013106es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3390/app6120426es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JSTQE.2020.2975669es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JLT.2016.2604839es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JLT.2016.2593942es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JLT.2017.2778741es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1117/12.2271032es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JLT.2013.2287219es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JSTQE.2019.2939503es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OE.26.008821es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JLT.2020.2978413es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OE.382753es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JLT.2020.2984990es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/PRJ.376227es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OE.21.023873es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/s41566-019-0532-1es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JLT.2011.2134073es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OE.19.021475es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.optcom.2014.09.030es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JLT.2018.2831008es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JQE.2015.2504107es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/MCOM.2017.1700030es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1515/nanoph-2015-0152es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JLT.2013.2278809es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3390/s18103519es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/PRJ.3.000B47es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1364/OE.26.003638es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/JPROC.2015.2392104es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1145/2721896.2721905es_ES
dc.relation.references10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/nature23474es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1038/s41534-019-0174-7es_ES
dc.relation.references10.22331/q-2018-07-05-75es_ES
dc.rightsReserva de todos los derechoses_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectIntegrated opticses_ES
dc.subjectMicrowave photonicses_ES
dc.subjectQuantum opticses_ES
dc.subjectSilicon photonicses_ES
dc.subjectTransformation opticses_ES
dc.subject.classificationTEORIA DE LA SEÑAL Y COMUNICACIONESes_ES
dc.titleProgrammable photonic circuitses_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier2324
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6460-4167
relation.isAuthorOfPublication083eaf43-bcbb-49d5-b25c-9fa3bf92539f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery083eaf43-bcbb-49d5-b25c-9fa3bf92539f
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationaa6a0db9-4584-45eb-b7e3-73606ac49444
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication02a0f2c5-c452-4e1d-a7d9-b731347d078c
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication7eb466f9-a4ba-4215-bab2-52a6a5dd6c63
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryaa6a0db9-4584-45eb-b7e3-73606ac49444
upv.uuid9fe5e126-8cf3-4f2b-8948-e4f388927442es_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
BogaertsPerez-LopezCapmany - Programmable photonic circuits.pdf
Tamaño:
2.13 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión del Autor.
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
s41586-020-2764-0(1).pdf
Tamaño:
3.68 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial