The Evolution of Gender Monitoring and its Challenges: the Case of Research and Innovation in Europe
| dc.contributor.affiliation | Instituto de Gestión de la Innovación y del Conocimiento | |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | Departamento de Proyectos de Ingeniería | |
| dc.contributor.author | Otero-Hermida, Paula | |
| dc.contributor.author | Furió-Vico, Clara | |
| dc.contributor.funder | European Social Fund | es_ES |
| dc.contributor.funder | Agencia Estatal de Investigación | es_ES |
| dc.contributor.funder | Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación | es_ES |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-02T09:46:20Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-06-02T09:46:20Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-12 | es_ES |
| dc.description.abstract | [EN] This article examines the European Commission¿s flagship initiative on gender monitoring in science and innovation, offering a responsible metrics perspective informed by equal- ity policy literature. We qualitatively analyse all She Figures reports since their inception in 2003, exploring how gender monitoring has evolved and in which directions. Our ana- lytical framework addresses the why (justifications and purposes), what (concepts, transla- tions, topics, policy focus), and how (policy process, gendered framing, contextualisation) of monitoring practices. We assess the challenges inherent in using monitoring as a gov- ernance instrument within the European Union, and propose improvements. Over two dec- ades, the initiative has shifted from competitiveness-oriented justifications towards more transformative objectives linked to gender equality and policy evaluation. The focus of measurement has expanded¿from merely tracking presence to also including institutional processes, albeit still marginally. Despite notable progress in data availability and contex- tualisation, the analysis highlights the persistence of a superficial gender perspective in the conceptualisation, framing, and selection of indicators. We argue that the policy process could better incorporate the voices of those affected. To that end, the article offers concrete proposals grounded in multidimensional perspectives aimed at enhancing policy learning and producing more effective equality policies. Our aim is to present an encouraging vision of monitoring, one that places greater emphasis on who is being monitored and promotes the opening rather than the closure of critical debates. | es_ES |
| dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
| dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Otero-Hermida, P.; Furió-Vico, Clara (2025). The Evolution of Gender Monitoring and its Challenges: the Case of Research and Innovation in Europe. Social Indicators Research (Online). 180(3):1291-1317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-025-03698-4 | es_ES |
| dc.description.issue | 3 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Ackers, L. (2008). Internationalisation, mobility and metrics: A new form of indirect discrimination? Minerva, 46(4), 411–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-008-9110-2 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Ackers, L. (2013). Internet mobility, co-presence and purpose: Contextualising internationalisation in research careers. Sociología y Tecnociencia: Revista Digital De Sociología Del Sistema Tecnocientífico, 3, 117–141. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Alonso, A., Bustelo, M., Forest, M., spsampsps Lombardo, E. (2012). Institutionalising intersectionality in Southern Europe: Italy, Spain, and Portugal. In A. Krizsan, H. Skjeie, spsampsps J. Squires (Eds.), Institutionalising intersectionality (pp. 148–178). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137031068_6 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Alsos, G., Ljunggren, E., & Hytti, U. (2013). Gender and innovation: State of the art and a research agenda. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 5(3), 236–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-06-2013-0049 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Bear, L., Ho, K., Tsing, A., & Yanagisako, S. (2015). Gens: A feminist manifesto for the study of capitalism. Theorizing the Contemporary, Fieldsights, March 30. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/gens-a-feminist-manifesto-for-the-study-of-capitalism | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Breitenbach, E., Brown, A., Mackay, F., spsampsps Webb, J. (Eds.). (2002). The changing politics of gender equality in Britain. Palgrave Macmillan.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522572 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Bennet, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv111jh6w | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005a). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Booth, C., & Bennett, C. (2002). Gender mainstreaming in the European Union: Towards a new conception and practice of equal opportunities? European Journal of Women’s Studies, 9(4), 430–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068020090040401 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Borrás, S., & Jacobsson, K. (2004). The open method of co-ordination and new governance patterns in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Bordons, M., Morillo, F., Fernández, M. T., & Gómez, I. (2003). One step further in the production of bibliometric indicators at the micro level: Differences by gender in scientific output in a Spanish university. Scientometrics, 57(2), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024181400646 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2011). How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaborative motives and strategies of academic researchers. Research Policy, 40(10), 1393–1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.002 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Bruno, I., Jacquot, S., & Mandin, L. (2006). Europeanization through its instrumentation: Benchmarking, mainstreaming and the open method of co-ordination... toolbox or Pandora’s box? Journal of European Public Policy, 13(4), 519–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760600693895 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Burton, A. (2005). Gender, sexuality and colonial modernities. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203984499 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Bustelo, M. (2009). A long way to go: The institutionalisation of "intersectionality" in Spain. Paper presented at the IX AECPA Congress: Rethinking Democracy: Inclusion and Diversity, Malaga, 23-24. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Cañibano, C., Fox, M. F., & Otamendi, F. J. (2016). Gender and patterns of temporary mobility among researchers. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 320–331. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Cech, E. A., & Blair-Loy, M. (2019). The changing career trajectories of new parents in STEM. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(10), 4182–4187. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810862116 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Childs, S., & Krook, M. L. (2009). Analysing women’s substantive representation: From critical mass to critical actors. Government and Opposition, 44(2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01279.x | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005b). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500145072 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Connell, R. (2006). Glass ceilings or gendered institutions? Mapping the gender regimes of public sector worksites. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 837–849. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00652.x | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Corona-Sobrino, C., García-Melón, M., Poveda-Bautista, R., & González-Urango, H. (2020). Closing the gender gap at academic conferences: A tool for monitoring and assessing academic events. PLoS ONE, 15(12), e0243549. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243549 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalising the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139. Available at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Criado Pérez, C. (2019). Invisible women: Data bias in a world designed for men. Ed. Abrams. Spanish Edition 2020, Seix Barral. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Díaz-Faes, A. A., Otero-Hermida, P., Ozman, M., & D’Este, P. (2020). Do women in science form more diverse research networks than men? An analysis of Spanish biomedical scientists. PLoS ONE, 15(8), e0238229. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238229 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., Neuschatz, M., Uzzi, B., & Alonzo, J. (1994). The paradox of critical mass for women in science. Science, 266(5182), 51–54. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7939644 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | European Union. Council Recommendation (EU) 2021/2122 of 26 November 2021 on a Pact for Research and Innovation in Europe. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | European Union. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. (2020). A Union of Equality: Gender Equality Strategy 2020–2025 (COM/2020/152 final). | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | European Union. European Commission. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, She figures 2021 – Gender in research and innovation – Statistics and indicators, Publications Office, 2021, https://data.europa.eu/doi/https://doi.org/10.2777/06090 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | European Union. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (2015). Indicators for Promoting and Monitoring Responsible Research and Innovation – Report from the Expert Group on policy indicators for responsible research and innovation, Publications Office of the European Union https://data.europa.eu/doi/https://doi.org/10.2777/9742 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | European Union. European Commission. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. (2020). Progress on Open Science: Towards a Shared Research Knowledge System - Final Report of the Open Science Policy Platform. Publications Office of the European Union | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, She figures 2012 – Gender in research and innovation – Statistics and indicators, Publications Office, 2013, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/38520 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, She figures 2018 – Gender in research and innovation – Statistics and indicators, Publications Office, 2019, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/124790 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | European Union. Regulation (EU) 2021/695 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 April 2021 establishing Horizon Europe. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Forsberg, E. M., Shelley-Egan, C., Ladikas, M., spsampsps Owen, R. (2018). Implementing Responsible Research and Innovation in Research Funding and Research Conducting Organisations-What Have We Learned so Far? In Governance and Sustainability of Responsible Research and Innovation Processes (pp. 3–11). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73105-6_1 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Fraser, N. (2006). Mapping the feminist imagination: From redistribution to recognition to representation. In U. Degener spsampsps B. Rosenzweig (Eds.), Die Neuverhandlung sozialer Gerechtigkeit (pp. 37–51). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90382-8_2 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Furió-Vico, C., & Otero-Hermida, P. (2024). The evolution of gender monitoring and its challenges in Research and Innovation in Europe: She Figures reports analysis dataset. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11657642 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Gläser, J., spsampsps Laudel, G. (2007). The social construction of bibliometric evaluations. In The changing governance of the sciences (pp. 101–123). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6746-4_5 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Gonzalez Ramos, A. M., & Malpica Lander, C. (2013). International mobility of Spanish men and women doctorate holders. Sociology and Technoscience, 3(3), 31–53. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Grey, S. (2006). Numbers and beyond: The relevance of critical mass in gender research. Politics & Gender, 2(4), 492–502. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X06221147 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Grogan, K. E. (2019). How the entire scientific community can confront gender bias in the workplace. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 3(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0747-4 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Hernández, J., Rodríguez-Bustos, L., Barreras, A., Caballero, L., Lara, I., Guevara, M., Lopera, A., Vázquez-Lule, A., Torres-Gómez, M., & Prado, B. (2023). Women representation in soil science: Gender indicators in the University Program of Interdisciplinary Soil Studies. Frontiers in Soil Science, 3, 1194828. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2023.1194828 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Huang, J., Gates, A. J., Sinatra, R., & Barabási, A.-L. (2020). Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(9), 4609–4616. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1914221117 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Humbert, A. L., Guenther, E. A., & Müller, J. (2021). Not simply “counting heads”: A gender diversity index for the team level. Social Indicators Research, 157(2), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02635-5 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Huyer, S., & Westholm, G. (2007). Gender indicators in engineering, science and technology: An information toolkit. UNESCO/IDRC. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Incorvaia, A. D., Fealing, K. H., & Schiebinger, L. (2023). Gender and innovation: indicators and measurement gaps. In Handbook of Innovation Indicators and Measurement (pp. 278–296). Edward Elgar Publishing | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Kantola, J., & Lombardo, E. (2017). Gender and political analysis. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN: 9780230214187 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Karaulova, M., Wienand, C., Walker, D., Bührer, S., Reidl, S., & Yorulmaz, M. (2023). Gendered innovations. INSPIRE Project. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10033625 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope. Harvard University Press. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0127502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Leydesdorff, L., Wouters, P., & Bornmann, L. (2016). Professional and citizen bibliometrics: Complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators-A state-of-the-art report. Scientometrics, 109(3), 2129–2150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2150-8 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Lombardo, E. (2017). The Spanish gender regime in the EU context: Changes and struggles in times of austerity. Gender, Work & Organization, 24(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12148 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Lombardo, E., Kantola, J., & Rubio-Marin, R. (2021). De-democratisation and opposition to gender equality politics in Europe. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 28(3), 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxab030 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Lombardo, E., Meier, P., & Verloo, M. (2009). The discursive politics of gender equality: Stretching, bending and policymaking. Routledge. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Lombardo, E., & Verloo, M. (2010). The intersectionality of gender with other inequalities in European Union politics. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 23, 11–30. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/recp/article/view/37496 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Lombardo, E., & Verloo, M. (2017). Institutionalizing intersectionality in the European Union? Policy developments and contestations. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 19(2), 214–232. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Lombardo, E., & Meier, P. (2006). Gender mainstreaming in the EU: Incorporating a feminist reading? European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(2), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806062753 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | McNutt, K., & Béland, D. (2015). Implementing an integrated governance strategy: The quest for gender mainstreaming in Canada. American Review of Canadian Studies, 45(4), 467–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/02722011.2015.1116591 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Mejlgaard, N., Bloch, C., & Madsen, E. B. (2018). Responsible research and innovation in Europe: A cross-country comparative analysis. Science and Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy048 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | MICIU-Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (2025). Científicas en Cifras. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Gobierno de España. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Minto, R., & Mergaert, L. (2018). Gender mainstreaming and evaluation in the EU: Comparative perspectives from feminist institutionalism. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 20(2), 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2018.1440181 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Molas-Gallart, J., & Castro-Martínez, E. (2007). Ambiguity and conflict in the development of ’Third Mission’indicators. Research Evaluation, 16(4), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820207X263592 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Nielsen, M. W. (2017). Reasons for leaving the academy: A case study on the ’opt out phenomenon among younger female researchers. Gender, Work & Organization, 24(2), 134–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12151 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Nygaard, L. P., Piro, F. N., & Aksnes, D. W. (2022). Gendering excellence through research productivity indicators. Gender and Education, 34(6), 690–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2022.2041186 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Otero-Hermida, P., & García-Melón, M. (2018). Gender equality indicators for research and innovation from a responsible perspective: The case of Spain. Sustainability, 10(9), 2980. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10092980 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Otero-Hermida, P., & Lorenzo, R. B. (2018). El rol del ámbito local en la adopción del" mainstreaming" de género en políticas de empleo. Revista de estudios políticos, (182), 191-224. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Otero-Hermida, P., & Lorenzo, R. B. (2019). Gender mainstreaming in Spain: Policy instruments, influencing factors, and the role of local government. Local Government Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2019.1682556 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Otero-Hermida, P., Cañibano, C., & Castro-Martínez. (2020). Mujeres e Innovación 2020. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Gobierno de España. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Otero-Hermida, P. (2022). Transformative Metrics for Responsible and Transformative Innovation: Putting People at the Centre. In Transformative Metrics: Contributions to the Studies for Monitoring and Evaluating How Science, Technology, and Innovation Can Address Social and Environmental Challenges: 106–124. https://doi.org/10.17533/978-628-7592-15-5_3 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Pollack, M. A., & Hafner-Burton, E. (2000). Mainstreaming gender in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(3), 432–456. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Ràfols, I. (2018). S&T indicators in the wild: Contextualisation and participation for responsible metrics. Research Evaluation, 28(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy030 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Rees, T. (1998). 1.Tinkering, Tailoring, Transforming: Principles and tools of Gender Mainstreaming. In Gender Mainstreaming: a Step into the 21st Century Conference, Athens, 16.18 September. https://hdl.handle.net/2066/129468 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Saltelli, A., & Di Fiore, M. (2020). From sociology of quantification to ethics of quantification. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00557-0 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Samper-Gras, T. (2022). To what is important, they go. A contextual proposal from the new materialisms to understand why there are so few women in technical sciences. Cuestiones De Género: De La Igualdad y La Diferencia, 17, 209–231. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Samper-Gras, T., Jabbaz, M., Tomás, S., & Ferrer, A. (2021). It's Not the Creatures, It's the Academy! Gender Pay Gaps and Research Careers in Academia. Asparkia, 165–184. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Sandercock, L. (2002). Review of culture and equality: An egalitarian critique of multiculturalism, by B. Barry. Planning Theory, 1(2), 189–193. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Sánchez-López, S., Poveda-Bautista, R., Corona-Sobrino, C., Otero-Hermida, P., & García-Melón, M. (2024). Tackling gender disparities in energy research: A diagnostic tool for equality in research centres. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 14(1), 51. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Shauman, K. A., & Xie, Y. (2003). Explaining sex differences in publication productivity among postsecondary faculty. In L. S. Hornig (Ed.), Equal Rites, Unequal Outcomes. (Vol. 15). Innovations in Science Education and Technology, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0007-9_8 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Squires, J. (2007). The new politics of gender equality. Macmillan International Higher Education. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Squires, J. (2013). Gender and intersectionality. In W. Kymlicka & M. Bashir (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford University Press. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Stirling, A. (2008). “Opening up” and “closing down” power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 33(2), 262–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311265 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Sugimoto, C. R., Ni, C., & Larivière, V. (2015). On the relationship between gender disparities in scholarly communication and country-level development indicators. Science and Public Policy, 42(6), 789–810. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv007 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Sümer, S. (2016). European gender regimes and policies: Comparative perspectives. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315580906 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Tannenbaum, C., Ellis, R. P., Eyssel, F., Zou, J., & Schiebinger, L. (2019). Sex and gender analysis improves science and engineering. Nature, 575(7781), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1657-6 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Van den Brink, M., & Benschop, Y. (2012). Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs. Organization, 19(4), 507–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411414293 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Verloo, M. (2005). Displacement and empowerment: Reflections on the concept and practice of the Council of Europe approach to gender mainstreaming and gender equality. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 12(3), 344–365. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxi019 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Verloo, M. (Ed.). (2007). Multiple meanings of gender equality: A critical frame analysis of gender policies in Europe. CEU Press. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Walby, S. (2004). The European Union and gender equality: Emergent varieties of gender regime. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 11(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxh024 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Walby, S. (2005). Measuring women’s progress in a global era. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 57(184), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2451.2005.00556.x | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Walby, S. (2020). Varieties of gender regimes. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 27(3), 414–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxaa018 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Walby, S., & Armstrong, J. (2010). Measuring equalities: Data and indicators in Britain. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(3), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.482259 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Walby, S., Armstrong, J., & Humphreys, L. (2008). Review of equality statistics. Equality and Human Rights Commission. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Walby, S., Armstrong, J., & Strid, S. (2012). Intersectionality and the quality of the gender equality architecture. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 19(4), 446–481. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxs015 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Wilsdon, J. (2015). The metric tide: Independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management. HEFCE. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Wilsdon, J., Bar-ilan, J., Frodeman, R., Lex, E., Peters, I., & Wouters, P. F. (2017). Next-Generation Metrics: Responsible Metrics and Evaluation for Open Science. Report of the European Commission Expert Group on Altmetrics. https://data.europa.eu/doi/https://doi.org/10.2777/337729 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Woodward, A. (2003). European gender mainstreaming: Promises and pitfalls of transformative policy. Review of Policy Research, 20(1), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-1338.d01-5 | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Zippel, K. (2011). How gender neutral are state policies on science and international mobility of academics?. Sociologica, (1), 0–0. | es_ES |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities funded by the European Union s Resilience and Recovery Facility [Grant number: IJC2020-044013-I] and with the European Social Fund+ [Grant number: PID2022-136612OB-I00]. | es_ES |
| dc.description.upvformatpfin | 1317 | es_ES |
| dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 1291 | es_ES |
| dc.description.volume | 180 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11205-025-03698-4 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1573-0921 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/235635 | |
| dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
| dc.publisher | Springer-Verlag | es_ES |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Social Indicators Research (Online) | es_ES |
| dc.relation.pasarela | S\566869 | es_ES |
| dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2021-2023/PID2022-136612OB-I00/ES/PROMOCIONANDO LAS TRANSICIONES REGIONALES A LAS SOSTENIBILIDAD A TRAVES DE LA POLITICA DE INNOVACION TRANSFORMADORA: EL CASO DE LAS AGENDAS COMPARTIDAS/ | es_ES |
| dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//IJC2020-044013-I/ | es_ES |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-025-03698-4 | es_ES |
| dc.rights | Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) | es_ES |
| dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Gender mainstreaming | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Women in science | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Transformative metrics | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Gendered data | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Gendered innovation | es_ES |
| dc.title | The Evolution of Gender Monitoring and its Challenges: the Case of Research and Innovation in Europe | es_ES |
| dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
| dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| person.identifier | 426681 | |
| person.identifier | 695532 | |
| person.identifier.orcid | 0009-0007-3170-9679 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 4dd04728-be49-44ab-8989-6bee0e65bf81 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | ea3e5ffd-7d6d-4de0-a3c8-b9bc36de4460 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | ea3e5ffd-7d6d-4de0-a3c8-b9bc36de4460 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | 76fb6fa8-d7b6-417c-97d9-f6123ab8a8a5 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | 17f25075-b8f9-4e51-b0cb-c521cf49badc | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 76fb6fa8-d7b6-417c-97d9-f6123ab8a8a5 | |
| upv.uuid | a1469292-9df5-44bf-895b-91c2cbdf58b8 | es_ES |
Archivos
Bloque original
1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- Otero-HermidaFurio-Vico - The Evolution of Gender Monitoring and its Challenges the Case of Resea....pdf
- Tamaño:
- 1.07 MB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descripción:
- Versión editorial