The Evolution of Gender Monitoring and its Challenges: the Case of Research and Innovation in Europe

dc.contributor.affiliationInstituto de Gestión de la Innovación y del Conocimiento
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Proyectos de Ingeniería
dc.contributor.authorOtero-Hermida, Paula
dc.contributor.authorFurió-Vico, Clara
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Social Fundes_ES
dc.contributor.funderAgencia Estatal de Investigaciónes_ES
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovaciónes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-02T09:46:20Z
dc.date.available2026-06-02T09:46:20Z
dc.date.issued2025-12es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN] This article examines the European Commission¿s flagship initiative on gender monitoring in science and innovation, offering a responsible metrics perspective informed by equal- ity policy literature. We qualitatively analyse all She Figures reports since their inception in 2003, exploring how gender monitoring has evolved and in which directions. Our ana- lytical framework addresses the why (justifications and purposes), what (concepts, transla- tions, topics, policy focus), and how (policy process, gendered framing, contextualisation) of monitoring practices. We assess the challenges inherent in using monitoring as a gov- ernance instrument within the European Union, and propose improvements. Over two dec- ades, the initiative has shifted from competitiveness-oriented justifications towards more transformative objectives linked to gender equality and policy evaluation. The focus of measurement has expanded¿from merely tracking presence to also including institutional processes, albeit still marginally. Despite notable progress in data availability and contex- tualisation, the analysis highlights the persistence of a superficial gender perspective in the conceptualisation, framing, and selection of indicators. We argue that the policy process could better incorporate the voices of those affected. To that end, the article offers concrete proposals grounded in multidimensional perspectives aimed at enhancing policy learning and producing more effective equality policies. Our aim is to present an encouraging vision of monitoring, one that places greater emphasis on who is being monitored and promotes the opening rather than the closure of critical debates.es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationOtero-Hermida, P.; Furió-Vico, Clara (2025). The Evolution of Gender Monitoring and its Challenges: the Case of Research and Innovation in Europe. Social Indicators Research (Online). 180(3):1291-1317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-025-03698-4es_ES
dc.description.issue3es_ES
dc.description.referencesAcker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002es_ES
dc.description.referencesAckers, L. (2008). Internationalisation, mobility and metrics: A new form of indirect discrimination? Minerva, 46(4), 411–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-008-9110-2es_ES
dc.description.referencesAckers, L. (2013). Internet mobility, co-presence and purpose: Contextualising internationalisation in research careers. Sociología y Tecnociencia: Revista Digital De Sociología Del Sistema Tecnocientífico, 3, 117–141.es_ES
dc.description.referencesAlonso, A., Bustelo, M., Forest, M., spsampsps Lombardo, E. (2012). Institutionalising intersectionality in Southern Europe: Italy, Spain, and Portugal. In A. Krizsan, H. Skjeie, spsampsps J. Squires (Eds.), Institutionalising intersectionality (pp. 148–178). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137031068_6es_ES
dc.description.referencesAlsos, G., Ljunggren, E., & Hytti, U. (2013). Gender and innovation: State of the art and a research agenda. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 5(3), 236–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-06-2013-0049es_ES
dc.description.referencesBarad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321es_ES
dc.description.referencesBarad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBear, L., Ho, K., Tsing, A., & Yanagisako, S. (2015). Gens: A feminist manifesto for the study of capitalism. Theorizing the Contemporary, Fieldsights, March 30. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/gens-a-feminist-manifesto-for-the-study-of-capitalismes_ES
dc.description.referencesBreitenbach, E., Brown, A., Mackay, F., spsampsps Webb, J. (Eds.). (2002). The changing politics of gender equality in Britain. Palgrave Macmillan.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522572es_ES
dc.description.referencesBennet, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv111jh6wes_ES
dc.description.referencesBlickenstaff, J. C. (2005a). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBooth, C., & Bennett, C. (2002). Gender mainstreaming in the European Union: Towards a new conception and practice of equal opportunities? European Journal of Women’s Studies, 9(4), 430–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068020090040401es_ES
dc.description.referencesBorrás, S., & Jacobsson, K. (2004). The open method of co-ordination and new governance patterns in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350es_ES
dc.description.referencesBordons, M., Morillo, F., Fernández, M. T., & Gómez, I. (2003). One step further in the production of bibliometric indicators at the micro level: Differences by gender in scientific output in a Spanish university. Scientometrics, 57(2), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024181400646es_ES
dc.description.referencesBozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2011). How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaborative motives and strategies of academic researchers. Research Policy, 40(10), 1393–1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.002es_ES
dc.description.referencesBruno, I., Jacquot, S., & Mandin, L. (2006). Europeanization through its instrumentation: Benchmarking, mainstreaming and the open method of co-ordination... toolbox or Pandora’s box? Journal of European Public Policy, 13(4), 519–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760600693895es_ES
dc.description.referencesBurton, A. (2005). Gender, sexuality and colonial modernities. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203984499es_ES
dc.description.referencesBustelo, M. (2009). A long way to go: The institutionalisation of "intersectionality" in Spain. Paper presented at the IX AECPA Congress: Rethinking Democracy: Inclusion and Diversity, Malaga, 23-24.es_ES
dc.description.referencesCañibano, C., Fox, M. F., & Otamendi, F. J. (2016). Gender and patterns of temporary mobility among researchers. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 320–331.es_ES
dc.description.referencesCech, E. A., & Blair-Loy, M. (2019). The changing career trajectories of new parents in STEM. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(10), 4182–4187. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810862116es_ES
dc.description.referencesChilds, S., & Krook, M. L. (2009). Analysing women’s substantive representation: From critical mass to critical actors. Government and Opposition, 44(2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01279.xes_ES
dc.description.referencesBlickenstaff, J. C. (2005b). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500145072es_ES
dc.description.referencesConnell, R. (2006). Glass ceilings or gendered institutions? Mapping the gender regimes of public sector worksites. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 837–849. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00652.xes_ES
dc.description.referencesCorona-Sobrino, C., García-Melón, M., Poveda-Bautista, R., & González-Urango, H. (2020). Closing the gender gap at academic conferences: A tool for monitoring and assessing academic events. PLoS ONE, 15(12), e0243549. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243549es_ES
dc.description.referencesCrenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalising the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139. Available at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8es_ES
dc.description.referencesCriado Pérez, C. (2019). Invisible women: Data bias in a world designed for men. Ed. Abrams. Spanish Edition 2020, Seix Barral.es_ES
dc.description.referencesDíaz-Faes, A. A., Otero-Hermida, P., Ozman, M., & D’Este, P. (2020). Do women in science form more diverse research networks than men? An analysis of Spanish biomedical scientists. PLoS ONE, 15(8), e0238229. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238229es_ES
dc.description.referencesEtzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., Neuschatz, M., Uzzi, B., & Alonzo, J. (1994). The paradox of critical mass for women in science. Science, 266(5182), 51–54. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7939644es_ES
dc.description.referencesEuropean Union. Council Recommendation (EU) 2021/2122 of 26 November 2021 on a Pact for Research and Innovation in Europe.es_ES
dc.description.referencesEuropean Union. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. (2020). A Union of Equality: Gender Equality Strategy 2020–2025 (COM/2020/152 final).es_ES
dc.description.referencesEuropean Union. European Commission. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, She figures 2021 – Gender in research and innovation – Statistics and indicators, Publications Office, 2021, https://data.europa.eu/doi/https://doi.org/10.2777/06090es_ES
dc.description.referencesEuropean Union. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (2015). Indicators for Promoting and Monitoring Responsible Research and Innovation – Report from the Expert Group on policy indicators for responsible research and innovation, Publications Office of the European Union https://data.europa.eu/doi/https://doi.org/10.2777/9742es_ES
dc.description.referencesEuropean Union. European Commission. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. (2020). Progress on Open Science: Towards a Shared Research Knowledge System - Final Report of the Open Science Policy Platform. Publications Office of the European Uniones_ES
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, She figures 2012 – Gender in research and innovation – Statistics and indicators, Publications Office, 2013, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/38520es_ES
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, She figures 2018 – Gender in research and innovation – Statistics and indicators, Publications Office, 2019, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/124790es_ES
dc.description.referencesEuropean Union. Regulation (EU) 2021/695 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 April 2021 establishing Horizon Europe.es_ES
dc.description.referencesForsberg, E. M., Shelley-Egan, C., Ladikas, M., spsampsps Owen, R. (2018). Implementing Responsible Research and Innovation in Research Funding and Research Conducting Organisations-What Have We Learned so Far? In Governance and Sustainability of Responsible Research and Innovation Processes (pp. 3–11). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73105-6_1es_ES
dc.description.referencesFraser, N. (2006). Mapping the feminist imagination: From redistribution to recognition to representation. In U. Degener spsampsps B. Rosenzweig (Eds.), Die Neuverhandlung sozialer Gerechtigkeit (pp. 37–51). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90382-8_2es_ES
dc.description.referencesFurió-Vico, C., & Otero-Hermida, P. (2024). The evolution of gender monitoring and its challenges in Research and Innovation in Europe: She Figures reports analysis dataset. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11657642es_ES
dc.description.referencesGläser, J., spsampsps Laudel, G. (2007). The social construction of bibliometric evaluations. In The changing governance of the sciences (pp. 101–123). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6746-4_5es_ES
dc.description.referencesGonzalez Ramos, A. M., & Malpica Lander, C. (2013). International mobility of Spanish men and women doctorate holders. Sociology and Technoscience, 3(3), 31–53.es_ES
dc.description.referencesGrey, S. (2006). Numbers and beyond: The relevance of critical mass in gender research. Politics & Gender, 2(4), 492–502. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X06221147es_ES
dc.description.referencesGrogan, K. E. (2019). How the entire scientific community can confront gender bias in the workplace. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 3(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0747-4es_ES
dc.description.referencesHernández, J., Rodríguez-Bustos, L., Barreras, A., Caballero, L., Lara, I., Guevara, M., Lopera, A., Vázquez-Lule, A., Torres-Gómez, M., & Prado, B. (2023). Women representation in soil science: Gender indicators in the University Program of Interdisciplinary Soil Studies. Frontiers in Soil Science, 3, 1194828. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2023.1194828es_ES
dc.description.referencesHuang, J., Gates, A. J., Sinatra, R., & Barabási, A.-L. (2020). Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(9), 4609–4616. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1914221117es_ES
dc.description.referencesHumbert, A. L., Guenther, E. A., & Müller, J. (2021). Not simply “counting heads”: A gender diversity index for the team level. Social Indicators Research, 157(2), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02635-5es_ES
dc.description.referencesHuyer, S., & Westholm, G. (2007). Gender indicators in engineering, science and technology: An information toolkit. UNESCO/IDRC.es_ES
dc.description.referencesIncorvaia, A. D., Fealing, K. H., & Schiebinger, L. (2023). Gender and innovation: indicators and measurement gaps. In Handbook of Innovation Indicators and Measurement (pp. 278–296). Edward Elgar Publishinges_ES
dc.description.referencesKantola, J., & Lombardo, E. (2017). Gender and political analysis. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN: 9780230214187es_ES
dc.description.referencesKaraulova, M., Wienand, C., Walker, D., Bührer, S., Reidl, S., & Yorulmaz, M. (2023). Gendered innovations. INSPIRE Project. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10033625es_ES
dc.description.referencesLatour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope. Harvard University Press.es_ES
dc.description.referencesLarivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0127502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502es_ES
dc.description.referencesLeydesdorff, L., Wouters, P., & Bornmann, L. (2016). Professional and citizen bibliometrics: Complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators-A state-of-the-art report. Scientometrics, 109(3), 2129–2150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2150-8es_ES
dc.description.referencesLombardo, E. (2017). The Spanish gender regime in the EU context: Changes and struggles in times of austerity. Gender, Work & Organization, 24(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12148es_ES
dc.description.referencesLombardo, E., Kantola, J., & Rubio-Marin, R. (2021). De-democratisation and opposition to gender equality politics in Europe. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 28(3), 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxab030es_ES
dc.description.referencesLombardo, E., Meier, P., & Verloo, M. (2009). The discursive politics of gender equality: Stretching, bending and policymaking. Routledge.es_ES
dc.description.referencesLombardo, E., & Verloo, M. (2010). The intersectionality of gender with other inequalities in European Union politics. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 23, 11–30. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/recp/article/view/37496es_ES
dc.description.referencesLombardo, E., & Verloo, M. (2017). Institutionalizing intersectionality in the European Union? Policy developments and contestations. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 19(2), 214–232.es_ES
dc.description.referencesLombardo, E., & Meier, P. (2006). Gender mainstreaming in the EU: Incorporating a feminist reading? European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(2), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806062753es_ES
dc.description.referencesMcNutt, K., & Béland, D. (2015). Implementing an integrated governance strategy: The quest for gender mainstreaming in Canada. American Review of Canadian Studies, 45(4), 467–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/02722011.2015.1116591es_ES
dc.description.referencesMejlgaard, N., Bloch, C., & Madsen, E. B. (2018). Responsible research and innovation in Europe: A cross-country comparative analysis. Science and Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy048es_ES
dc.description.referencesMICIU-Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (2025). Científicas en Cifras. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Gobierno de España.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMinto, R., & Mergaert, L. (2018). Gender mainstreaming and evaluation in the EU: Comparative perspectives from feminist institutionalism. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 20(2), 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2018.1440181es_ES
dc.description.referencesMolas-Gallart, J., & Castro-Martínez, E. (2007). Ambiguity and conflict in the development of ’Third Mission’indicators. Research Evaluation, 16(4), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820207X263592es_ES
dc.description.referencesNielsen, M. W. (2017). Reasons for leaving the academy: A case study on the ’opt out phenomenon among younger female researchers. Gender, Work & Organization, 24(2), 134–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12151es_ES
dc.description.referencesNygaard, L. P., Piro, F. N., & Aksnes, D. W. (2022). Gendering excellence through research productivity indicators. Gender and Education, 34(6), 690–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2022.2041186es_ES
dc.description.referencesOtero-Hermida, P., & García-Melón, M. (2018). Gender equality indicators for research and innovation from a responsible perspective: The case of Spain. Sustainability, 10(9), 2980. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10092980es_ES
dc.description.referencesOtero-Hermida, P., & Lorenzo, R. B. (2018). El rol del ámbito local en la adopción del" mainstreaming" de género en políticas de empleo. Revista de estudios políticos, (182), 191-224.es_ES
dc.description.referencesOtero-Hermida, P., & Lorenzo, R. B. (2019). Gender mainstreaming in Spain: Policy instruments, influencing factors, and the role of local government. Local Government Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2019.1682556es_ES
dc.description.referencesOtero-Hermida, P., Cañibano, C., & Castro-Martínez. (2020). Mujeres e Innovación 2020. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Gobierno de España.es_ES
dc.description.referencesOtero-Hermida, P. (2022). Transformative Metrics for Responsible and Transformative Innovation: Putting People at the Centre. In Transformative Metrics: Contributions to the Studies for Monitoring and Evaluating How Science, Technology, and Innovation Can Address Social and Environmental Challenges: 106–124. https://doi.org/10.17533/978-628-7592-15-5_3es_ES
dc.description.referencesPollack, M. A., & Hafner-Burton, E. (2000). Mainstreaming gender in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(3), 432–456.es_ES
dc.description.referencesRàfols, I. (2018). S&T indicators in the wild: Contextualisation and participation for responsible metrics. Research Evaluation, 28(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy030es_ES
dc.description.referencesRees, T. (1998). 1.Tinkering, Tailoring, Transforming: Principles and tools of Gender Mainstreaming. In Gender Mainstreaming: a Step into the 21st Century Conference, Athens, 16.18 September. https://hdl.handle.net/2066/129468es_ES
dc.description.referencesSaltelli, A., & Di Fiore, M. (2020). From sociology of quantification to ethics of quantification. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00557-0es_ES
dc.description.referencesSamper-Gras, T. (2022). To what is important, they go. A contextual proposal from the new materialisms to understand why there are so few women in technical sciences. Cuestiones De Género: De La Igualdad y La Diferencia, 17, 209–231.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSamper-Gras, T., Jabbaz, M., Tomás, S., & Ferrer, A. (2021). It's Not the Creatures, It's the Academy! Gender Pay Gaps and Research Careers in Academia. Asparkia, 165–184.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSandercock, L. (2002). Review of culture and equality: An egalitarian critique of multiculturalism, by B. Barry. Planning Theory, 1(2), 189–193.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSánchez-López, S., Poveda-Bautista, R., Corona-Sobrino, C., Otero-Hermida, P., & García-Melón, M. (2024). Tackling gender disparities in energy research: A diagnostic tool for equality in research centres. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 14(1), 51.es_ES
dc.description.referencesShauman, K. A., & Xie, Y. (2003). Explaining sex differences in publication productivity among postsecondary faculty. In L. S. Hornig (Ed.), Equal Rites, Unequal Outcomes. (Vol. 15). Innovations in Science Education and Technology, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0007-9_8es_ES
dc.description.referencesSquires, J. (2007). The new politics of gender equality. Macmillan International Higher Education.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSquires, J. (2013). Gender and intersectionality. In W. Kymlicka & M. Bashir (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford University Press.es_ES
dc.description.referencesStirling, A. (2008). “Opening up” and “closing down” power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 33(2), 262–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311265es_ES
dc.description.referencesSugimoto, C. R., Ni, C., & Larivière, V. (2015). On the relationship between gender disparities in scholarly communication and country-level development indicators. Science and Public Policy, 42(6), 789–810. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv007es_ES
dc.description.referencesSümer, S. (2016). European gender regimes and policies: Comparative perspectives. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315580906es_ES
dc.description.referencesTannenbaum, C., Ellis, R. P., Eyssel, F., Zou, J., & Schiebinger, L. (2019). Sex and gender analysis improves science and engineering. Nature, 575(7781), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1657-6es_ES
dc.description.referencesVan den Brink, M., & Benschop, Y. (2012). Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs. Organization, 19(4), 507–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411414293es_ES
dc.description.referencesVerloo, M. (2005). Displacement and empowerment: Reflections on the concept and practice of the Council of Europe approach to gender mainstreaming and gender equality. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 12(3), 344–365. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxi019es_ES
dc.description.referencesVerloo, M. (Ed.). (2007). Multiple meanings of gender equality: A critical frame analysis of gender policies in Europe. CEU Press.es_ES
dc.description.referencesWalby, S. (2004). The European Union and gender equality: Emergent varieties of gender regime. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 11(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxh024es_ES
dc.description.referencesWalby, S. (2005). Measuring women’s progress in a global era. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 57(184), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2451.2005.00556.xes_ES
dc.description.referencesWalby, S. (2020). Varieties of gender regimes. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 27(3), 414–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxaa018es_ES
dc.description.referencesWalby, S., & Armstrong, J. (2010). Measuring equalities: Data and indicators in Britain. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(3), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.482259es_ES
dc.description.referencesWalby, S., Armstrong, J., & Humphreys, L. (2008). Review of equality statistics. Equality and Human Rights Commission.es_ES
dc.description.referencesWalby, S., Armstrong, J., & Strid, S. (2012). Intersectionality and the quality of the gender equality architecture. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 19(4), 446–481. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxs015es_ES
dc.description.referencesWest, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002es_ES
dc.description.referencesWilsdon, J. (2015). The metric tide: Independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management. HEFCE. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363es_ES
dc.description.referencesWilsdon, J., Bar-ilan, J., Frodeman, R., Lex, E., Peters, I., & Wouters, P. F. (2017). Next-Generation Metrics: Responsible Metrics and Evaluation for Open Science. Report of the European Commission Expert Group on Altmetrics. https://data.europa.eu/doi/https://doi.org/10.2777/337729es_ES
dc.description.referencesWoodward, A. (2003). European gender mainstreaming: Promises and pitfalls of transformative policy. Review of Policy Research, 20(1), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-1338.d01-5es_ES
dc.description.referencesZippel, K. (2011). How gender neutral are state policies on science and international mobility of academics?. Sociologica, (1), 0–0.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities funded by the European Union s Resilience and Recovery Facility [Grant number: IJC2020-044013-I] and with the European Social Fund+ [Grant number: PID2022-136612OB-I00].es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin1317es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio1291es_ES
dc.description.volume180es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11205-025-03698-4es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn1573-0921es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/235635
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlages_ES
dc.relation.ispartofSocial Indicators Research (Online)es_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaS\566869es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2021-2023/PID2022-136612OB-I00/ES/PROMOCIONANDO LAS TRANSICIONES REGIONALES A LAS SOSTENIBILIDAD A TRAVES DE LA POLITICA DE INNOVACION TRANSFORMADORA: EL CASO DE LAS AGENDAS COMPARTIDAS/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//IJC2020-044013-I/es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-025-03698-4es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectGender mainstreaminges_ES
dc.subjectWomen in sciencees_ES
dc.subjectTransformative metricses_ES
dc.subjectGendered dataes_ES
dc.subjectGendered innovationes_ES
dc.titleThe Evolution of Gender Monitoring and its Challenges: the Case of Research and Innovation in Europees_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier426681
person.identifier695532
person.identifier.orcid0009-0007-3170-9679
relation.isAuthorOfPublication4dd04728-be49-44ab-8989-6bee0e65bf81
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationea3e5ffd-7d6d-4de0-a3c8-b9bc36de4460
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryea3e5ffd-7d6d-4de0-a3c8-b9bc36de4460
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication76fb6fa8-d7b6-417c-97d9-f6123ab8a8a5
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication17f25075-b8f9-4e51-b0cb-c521cf49badc
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery76fb6fa8-d7b6-417c-97d9-f6123ab8a8a5
upv.uuida1469292-9df5-44bf-895b-91c2cbdf58b8es_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Otero-HermidaFurio-Vico - The Evolution of Gender Monitoring and its Challenges the Case of Resea....pdf
Tamaño:
1.07 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial