Using PenzuTM for academic online diaries to enhance metacognitive skills in Higher Education

dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Lingüística Aplicada
dc.contributor.affiliationFacultad de Bellas Artes
dc.contributor.affiliationGrupo de Análisis de las Lenguas de Especialidad (GALE)
dc.contributor.authorBort-Mir, Lorena
dc.contributor.funderUniversitat Jaume Ies_ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-24T11:56:04Z
dc.date.available2021-02-24T11:56:04Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-30
dc.description.abstract[EN] Metacognition can be considered as knowledge about one's own cognitive activities and their regulation during learning processes (Flavell, 1979). Students are, then, involved in metacognitive mental activities when they think about what they have learned, how they have learned it, or how they can relate it to their personal experiences, among other things. Based on this, students who develop these skills should show more appropriate strategies to know what they need to find out or do while learning. Therefore, understanding and controlling these cognitive processes may be one of the most essential skills that teachers should encourage at all academic levels (Anderson, 2002)The Guided Learning Diary (GLD, Bort-Mir, 2016) was developed as a learning diary with several aims: (i) defining the general and specific objectives of the content to be taught, (ii) developing the students’ metacognitive skills through strategic questions, and (iii) promoting the development of important competences such as self-criticism, autonomous learning, self-evaluation and capacity for improvement. The GLD also allows a self-evaluation process for teachers, thus facilitating the supervision and improvement both of the contents of the course and the didactic methodology. This tool was developed and applied within the Theatre in English subject at Universitat Jaume I, embedded in the third course from the English Studies Degree, and the students’ results were significantly higher than those of previous years (Bort-Mir & Silvestre-López, 2017).The present research proposes a technological turn in the application of the GLD with the use of the open-source tool PenzuTM. The creation of academic online diaries with this tool may improve students’ motivation while promoting meaningful and self-regulated learning in Higher Education environments, thus helpìng students reach their so desired academic success. PenzuTM allows this investigation to widen the scope of the GLD to the general public. en_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodOJSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationBort-Mir, L. (2020). Using PenzuTM for academic online diaries to enhance metacognitive skills in Higher Education. The EuroCALL Review. 28(2):50-63. https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2020.12756es_ES
dc.description.issue2es_ES
dc.description.referencesAnderson, N.J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. ERIC Digest, pp. 3-4.es_ES
dc.description.referencesAusubel, D. (1983). Teoría del aprendizaje significativo. Fascículos de CEIF, 1, pp. 1-10.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBort-Mir, L. (2016). Desarrollando la Herramienta DAG: Diario de Aprendizaje Guiado para Promover y Evaluar los Procesos Metacognitivos de los Estudiantes en la Educación Superior. ATIDES, Avances en Tecnología, Innovación y Desafíos de la Educación Superior. pp. 421-434.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBort-Mir, L. & Silvestre-López, A. J. (2017). Enseñar y evaluar competencias en el aula de educación superior con el diario de aprendizaje guiado (DAG). JNEU, VI Jornada Nacional sobre Estudios Universitarios, II Taller de Innovación Educativa. Universitat Jaume I.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBrodskaya, M., & Thiele, R. (2004). Learning community in a combined ESL computer applications course. Retrieved October 2018 from http://www.cccone.org/scholars/04 05/Marina_Romy_final_report.pdfes_ES
dc.description.referencesClark, J.L. (1985). Curriculum renewal in second language learning: an overview. Canadian Modern Language Review 42, pp. 342-60. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.42.2.342es_ES
dc.description.referencesFlavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 34, pp. 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906es_ES
dc.description.referencesFrigaard, A. (2002). Does the computer lab improve student performance on vocabulary, grammar, and listening comprehension? (Master's thesis). (ED476749). Retrieved from ERIC database.es_ES
dc.description.referencesHixon, E. (2008). Team-based online course development: A case study of collaboration models. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 11(4), pp. 1-8.es_ES
dc.description.referencesKitano, K. (2001). Anxiety in the college Japanese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 85(4), pp. 549-566. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00125es_ES
dc.description.referencesMansor, N. (2007). Collaborative learning via email discussion: Strategies for ESL writing classroom. The Internet ESL Journal, 13(3). Retrieved January 2019 from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Mansor-EmailDiscussion/es_ES
dc.description.referencesMartín, M. G. (2012). La autorregulación académica como variable explicativa de los procesos de aprendizaje universitario. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 16(1), pp. 203-221.es_ES
dc.description.referencesÖz, H. (2015). The relationship between metacognitive awareness and academic achievement among pre-service English teachers. In J. Huang & A. C. Fernandes (Eds.), Non-native language teaching and learning: Putting the puzzle together (pp. 139-167). New York, NY: Untested Ideas Research Center.es_ES
dc.description.referencesPenzu (n.d.). Penzu. What is a Journal? Retrieved May 2019 from https://penzu.com/what-is-a-journales_ES
dc.description.referencesSalvador, C. C. (1990). Constructivismo y educación: la concepción constructivista de la enseñanza y del aprendizaje. In Desarrollo psicológico y educación, pp. 157-188. Alianza.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSchofield, J. W. & Davidson, A. L. (2003). The impact of internet use on relationships between teachers and students. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 10(1), pp. 62-79. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA1001_06es_ES
dc.description.referencesSchraw & Dennison (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, pp. 460-475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033es_ES
dc.description.referencesTimucin, M. (2006). Implementing CALL in the EFL context. ELT Journal, 60(3), pp. 262-271. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl006es_ES
dc.description.referencesWong, L. (2004). Using technology in a low-advanced ESL class. Retrieved September 2016 from http://www.cccone.org/scholars/04-05/LettyWong_final_report.pdfes_ES
dc.description.referencesZimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), pp. 329-339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research conducted in this study is part of Universitat Jaume I Education and Innovation esearch Project: 3622/18. Its rationale is also framed within the Universitat Jaume I Research Project UJI-B2018-59es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin63es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio50es_ES
dc.description.volume28es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.4995/eurocall.2020.12756
dc.identifier.issn1695-2618
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/162327
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherUniversitat Politècnica de Valènciaes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofThe EuroCALL Reviewes_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaOJS\12756es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/UJI//B2018-59/es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2020.12756es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3138/cmlr.42.2.342es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1111/0026-7902.00125es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1207/S15327884MCA1001_06es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1006/ceps.1994.1033es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/elt/ccl006es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectICTes_ES
dc.subjectSelf-regulated learninges_ES
dc.subjectMetacognitiones_ES
dc.subjectOnline pedagogic toolses_ES
dc.subjectPenzues_ES
dc.titleUsing PenzuTM for academic online diaries to enhance metacognitive skills in Higher Educationes_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier706720
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0067-6492
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9554387f-a941-4f2e-bd88-31a3a73c8ae9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery9554387f-a941-4f2e-bd88-31a3a73c8ae9
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication786564af-4761-48f9-8099-76bab4f8ebff
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicatione28a48d1-ccff-4c54-a4ff-db8644e1e2b3
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationba0fa6ff-60a8-44a0-afbe-5f506a05ac85
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery786564af-4761-48f9-8099-76bab4f8ebff
upv.uuida3cc9457-8b99-4fd0-8f1f-a4fff2e4101bes_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Using Penzu.pdf
Tamaño:
1.04 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format