Dynamic performance of a real-scale reinforced concrete building test under a corner-column failure scenario

dc.contributor.affiliationDepartamento de Ingeniería de la Construcción y de Proyectos de Ingeniería Civil
dc.contributor.affiliationEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería de Caminos, Canales y Puertos
dc.contributor.affiliationInstituto Universitario de Investigación de Ciencia y Tecnología del Hormigón
dc.contributor.authorAdam, Jose M
dc.contributor.authorBuitrago, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorBertolesi, Elisaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorSagaseta, Juanes_ES
dc.contributor.authorMoragues, Juan J
dc.contributor.funderFundación BBVAes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-11T04:32:49Z
dc.date.available2021-02-11T04:32:49Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-01es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN] The topic of robustness and progressive collapse of structures has attracted significant attention within the field of structural engineering recently. This is reflected by the rise in the number of scientific papers published in recent years as well as efforts in reviewing and developing codes for design. Although important numerical and experimental studies have been carried out to date simulating the sudden removal of columns to reproduce the possible consequences of an extreme event, most of these studies focus on subassembly systems and internal columns. Edge and corner columns are most vulnerable to accidental events. This paper gives the results of a test carried out on a purpose-built full-scale reinforced concrete building with a specially designed corner steel column used for the sudden column removal. The test was highly instrumented, involving 38 strain gauges, 38 displacement transducers and 2 accelerometers to monitor the vertical and lateral response. The results were used to analyse the dynamic performance of the structure after the sudden column removal as well as the alternative load paths (ALPs) mobilised during the test (i.e. flexural and Vierendeel action). The test showed a clear dynamic amplification of the strains and displacements (with high peaks); dynamic amplification factors (DAFs) were obtained accordingly. The load initially carried by the removed column was redistributed through the entire building system (not just the neighbouring columns). Tests on full-scale buildings, including the one described here, can be used to compile a database to validate codes and future numerical studies.en_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationAdam, JM.; Buitrago, M.; Bertolesi, E.; Sagaseta, J.; Moragues, JJ. (2020). Dynamic performance of a real-scale reinforced concrete building test under a corner-column failure scenario. Engineering Structures. 210:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110414es_ES
dc.description.referencesAdam, J. M., Parisi, F., Sagaseta, J., & Lu, X. (2018). Research and practice on progressive collapse and robustness of building structures in the 21st century. Engineering Structures, 173, 122-149. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.082es_ES
dc.description.referencesDat, P. X., & Tan, K. H. (2015). Experimental Response of Beam-Slab Substructures Subject to Penultimate-External Column Removal. Journal of Structural Engineering, 141(7), 04014170. doi:10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001123es_ES
dc.description.referencesQian, K., & Li, B. (2016). Resilience of Flat Slab Structures in Different Phases of Progressive Collapse. ACI Structural Journal, 113(3). doi:10.14359/51688619es_ES
dc.description.referencesFu, F. (2009). Progressive collapse analysis of high-rise building with 3-D finite element modeling method. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65(6), 1269-1278. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.02.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesRussell, J. M., Sagaseta, J., Cormie, D., & Jones, A. E. K. (2019). Historical review of prescriptive design rules for robustness after the collapse of Ronan Point. Structures, 20, 365-373. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2019.04.011es_ES
dc.description.referencesGSA. General Services Administration. Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major organization projects; 2013.es_ES
dc.description.referencesDoD. Department of Defense. Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse (UFC 4-023-03); 2009.es_ES
dc.description.referencesEN 1991-1-7. Eurocode 1: Actions on structures - Part 1-7: General actions - Accidental actions; 2006.es_ES
dc.description.referencesQian, K., Weng, Y.-H., & Li, B. (2018). Impact of two columns missing on dynamic response of RC flat slab structures. Engineering Structures, 177, 598-615. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.011es_ES
dc.description.referencesRen, P., Li, Y., Lu, X., Guan, H., & Zhou, Y. (2016). Experimental investigation of progressive collapse resistance of one-way reinforced concrete beam–slab substructures under a middle-column-removal scenario. Engineering Structures, 118, 28-40. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.051es_ES
dc.description.referencesTohidi, M., & Baniotopoulos, C. (2017). Effect of floor joint design on catenary actions of precast floor slab system. Engineering Structures, 152, 274-288. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.017es_ES
dc.description.referencesKang, S.-B., & Tan, K. H. (2017). Progressive Collapse Resistance of Precast Concrete Frames with Discontinuous Reinforcement in the Joint. Journal of Structural Engineering, 143(9), 04017090. doi:10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001828es_ES
dc.description.referencesAl-Salloum, Y. A., Alrubaidi, M. A., Elsanadedy, H. M., Almusallam, T. H., & Iqbal, R. A. (2018). Strengthening of precast RC beam-column connections for progressive collapse mitigation using bolted steel plates. Engineering Structures, 161, 146-160. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.009es_ES
dc.description.referencesJian, H., Li, S., & Huanhuan, L. (2016). Testing and Analysis on Progressive Collapse-Resistance Behavior of RC Frame Substructures under a Side Column Removal Scenario. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 30(5), 04016022. doi:10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000873es_ES
dc.description.referencesQian, K., & Li, B. (2017). Dynamic and residual behavior of reinforced concrete floors following instantaneous removal of a column. Engineering Structures, 148, 175-184. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.059es_ES
dc.description.referencesPeng, Z., Orton, S. L., Liu, J., & Tian, Y. (2017). Experimental Study of Dynamic Progressive Collapse in Flat-Plate Buildings Subjected to Exterior Column Removal. Journal of Structural Engineering, 143(9), 04017125. doi:10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001865es_ES
dc.description.referencesKokot, S., Anthoine, A., Negro, P., & Solomos, G. (2012). Static and dynamic analysis of a reinforced concrete flat slab frame building for progressive collapse. Engineering Structures, 40, 205-217. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.026es_ES
dc.description.referencesLim, N. S., Tan, K. H., & Lee, C. K. (2017). Experimental studies of 3D RC substructures under exterior and corner column removal scenarios. Engineering Structures, 150, 409-427. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.041es_ES
dc.description.referencesStathas, N., Bousias, S. N., Palios, X., Strepelias, E., & Fardis, M. N. (2018). Tests and Simple Models of RC Frame Subassemblies for Postulated Loss of Column. Journal of Structural Engineering, 144(2), 04017195. doi:10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001951es_ES
dc.description.referencesQian, K., & Li, B. (2018). Performance of Precast Concrete Substructures with Dry Connections to Resist Progressive Collapse. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 32(2), 04018005. doi:10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0001147es_ES
dc.description.referencesKai, Q., & Li, B. (2012). Dynamic performance of RC beam-column substructures under the scenario of the loss of a corner column—Experimental results. Engineering Structures, 42, 154-167. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.04.016es_ES
dc.description.referencesGao, S., & Guo, L. (2015). Progressive collapse analysis of 20-storey building considering composite action of floor slab. International Journal of Steel Structures, 15(2), 447-458. doi:10.1007/s13296-015-6014-5es_ES
dc.description.referencesFeng, P., Qiang, H., Ou, X., Qin, W., & Yang, J. (2019). Progressive Collapse Resistance of GFRP-Strengthened RC Beam–Slab Subassemblages in a Corner Column–Removal Scenario. Journal of Composites for Construction, 23(1), 04018076. doi:10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000917es_ES
dc.description.referencesZhang, H., Shu, G., & Pan, R. (2019). Failure Mechanism of Composite Frames Under the Corner Column-Removal Scenario. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 19(3), 649-664. doi:10.1007/s11668-019-00644-8es_ES
dc.description.referencesMa, F., Gilbert, B. P., Guan, H., Xue, H., Lu, X., & Li, Y. (2019). Experimental study on the progressive collapse behaviour of RC flat plate substructures subjected to corner column removal scenarios. Engineering Structures, 180, 728-741. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.043es_ES
dc.description.referencesQian, K., & Li, B. (2013). Performance of Three-Dimensional Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Substructures under Loss of a Corner Column Scenario. Journal of Structural Engineering, 139(4), 584-594. doi:10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000630es_ES
dc.description.referencesPham, A. T., Lim, N. S., & Tan, K. H. (2017). Investigations of tensile membrane action in beam-slab systems under progressive collapse subject to different loading configurations and boundary conditions. Engineering Structures, 150, 520-536. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.060es_ES
dc.description.referencesXiao, Y., Kunnath, S., Li, F. W., Zhao, Y. B., Lew, H. S., & Bao, Y. (2015). Collapse Test of Three-Story Half-Scale Reinforced Concrete Frame Building. ACI Structural Journal, 112(4). doi:10.14359/51687746es_ES
dc.description.referencesZhang, L., Zhao, H., Wang, T., & Chen, Q. (2016). Parametric Analysis on Collapse-resistance Performance of Reinforced-concrete Frame with Specially Shaped Columns Under Loss of a Corner Column. The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, 10(1), 466-480. doi:10.2174/1874836801610010466es_ES
dc.description.referencesEN 1990. Eurocode: Basis of structural design; 2002.es_ES
dc.description.referencesRussell, J. M., Owen, J. S., & Hajirasouliha, I. (2015). Experimental investigation on the dynamic response of RC flat slabs after a sudden column loss. Engineering Structures, 99, 28-41. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.040es_ES
dc.description.referencesEN 1992-1-1. Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures - Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings; 2004.es_ES
dc.description.referencesEN 1991-1-1. Eurocode 1: Actions on structures. Part 1-1: Densities, self-weight, imposed loads for buildings; 2003.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSasani, M., & Sagiroglu, S. (2008). Progressive Collapse Resistance of Hotel San Diego. Journal of Structural Engineering, 134(3), 478-488. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2008)134:3(478)es_ES
dc.description.referencesBlack, M. S. (1975). Ultimate Strength Study of Two-Way Concrete Slabs. Journal of the Structural Division, 101(1), 311-324. doi:10.1061/jsdeag.0003976es_ES
dc.description.referencesRANKIN, G. I. B., & LONG, A. E. (1997). ARCHING ACTION STRENGTH ENHANCEMENT IN LATER ALLY-RESTRAINED SLAB STRIPS. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings, 122(4), 461-467. doi:10.1680/istbu.1997.29834es_ES
dc.description.referencesANSYS 15.0. Theory reference. ANSYS Inc. 2014.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was carried out with the support of a 2017 Leonardo Grant for Researchers and Cultural Creators from the BBVA Foundation. The authors would also like to express their gratitude to the Levantina, Ingenieria y Construccion S.L. (LIC) company for funding the construction of the building.es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin14es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio1es_ES
dc.description.volume210es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110414es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0141-0296es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/161055
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relation.ispartofEngineering Structureses_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaS\403295es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110414es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.082es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001123es_ES
dc.relation.references10.14359/51688619es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.02.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.024es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.istruc.2019.04.011es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.11.025es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.09.061es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.07.018es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.042es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.011es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.051es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.017es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001828es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.009es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000873es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.059es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001865es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.026es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.041es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001951es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001147es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.04.016es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s13296-015-6014-5es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000917es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s11668-019-00644-8es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.043es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000630es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.060es_ES
dc.relation.references10.14359/51687746es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2174/1874836801610010466es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.040es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:3(478)es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1061/JSDEAG.0003976es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1680/istbu.1997.29834es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectExperimental studyes_ES
dc.subjectExtreme eventses_ES
dc.subjectProgressive collapsees_ES
dc.subjectRobustnesses_ES
dc.subjectRC structureses_ES
dc.subjectCorner columnses_ES
dc.subject.classificationINGENIERIA DE LA CONSTRUCCIONes_ES
dc.subject.ods09.- Desarrollar infraestructuras resilientes, promover la industrialización inclusiva y sostenible, y fomentar la innovaciónes_ES
dc.titleDynamic performance of a real-scale reinforced concrete building test under a corner-column failure scenarioes_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier47637
person.identifier326819
person.identifier1216
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9205-8458
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5561-5104
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8111-5480
relation.isAuthorOfPublication44bfa0d4-9fab-41a4-9102-a90334f455c5
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb741c25d-cd2a-4c30-b32c-3ecdc614229a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0d98e4e0-3488-4512-904c-c48b5759c21f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery44bfa0d4-9fab-41a4-9102-a90334f455c5
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication0d87f640-7be6-4adb-b5cd-9eb294798a72
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa4b47ff5-95f4-430f-a1a3-541cb8eaa9b7
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication4076efbf-6ee0-4436-a575-d70919e80f7a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery0d87f640-7be6-4adb-b5cd-9eb294798a72
upv.uuidb067423c-c2cc-40b8-ab01-ba67178ae07ees_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Adam;Buitrago;Bertolesi - Dynamic performance of a real-scale reinforced concrete building test u....pdf
Tamaño:
2 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión del Autor.
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Adam et al. 2020.pdf
Tamaño:
4.66 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial