The Flyby Anomaly in an Extended Whitehead’s Theory

dc.contributor.authorAcedo Rodríguez, Luises_ES
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-22T09:35:53Z
dc.date.available2016-07-22T09:35:53Z
dc.date.issued2015-07-30
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we consider an extended version of Whitehead s theory of gravity in connection with the flyby anomaly. Whitehead s theory is a linear approximation defined in a background Minkowski spacetime, which gives the same solutions as standard general relativity for the Schwarzschild and Kerr metrics cast in Kerr Schild coordinates. For a long time and because it gives the same results for the three classical tests perihelion advance, light bending and gravitational redshift it was considered a viable alternative to general relativity, but as it is really a linear approximation, it fails in more stringent tests. The model considered in this paper is a formal generalization of Whitehead s theory, including all possible bilinear forms. In the resulting theory, a circulating vector field of force in the low velocities approximation for a rotating planet is deduced, in addition to Newtonian gravity. This extra force gives rise to small variations in the asymptotic velocities of flybys around the Earth to be compared to the recently reported flyby anomaly.es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethodSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationAcedo Rodríguez, L. (2015). The Flyby Anomaly in an Extended Whitehead’s Theory. Galaxies. 3(3):113-128. doi:10.3390/galaxies3030113es_ES
dc.description.issue3es_ES
dc.description.referencesA Generalized Whiteheadian Theory of Gravity: The Kerr Solution, unpublished paper, 1986 http://www.ctr4process.org/publications/ProcessStudies/PSS/2004-6-Russell-Wasserman-A_Generalized_Whiteheadian_Theory _of_Gravity.pdfes_ES
dc.description.referencesKerr, R. P., & Schild, A. (1965). Some algebraically degenerate solutions of Einstein’s gravitational field equations. Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, 199-209. doi:10.1090/psapm/017/0216846es_ES
dc.description.referencesShapiro, I. I. (1964). Fourth Test of General Relativity. Physical Review Letters, 13(26), 789-791. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.13.789es_ES
dc.description.referencesEveritt, C. W. F., DeBra, D. B., Parkinson, B. W., Turneaure, J. P., Conklin, J. W., Heifetz, M. I., … Wang, S. (2011). Gravity Probe B: Final Results of a Space Experiment to Test General Relativity. Physical Review Letters, 106(22). doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.221101es_ES
dc.description.referencesEveritt, C. W. F., Adams, M., Bencze, W., Buchman, S., Clarke, B., Conklin, J. W., … Worden, P. W. (2009). Gravity Probe B Data Analysis. Space Science Reviews, 148(1-4), 53-69. doi:10.1007/s11214-009-9524-7es_ES
dc.description.referencesGibbons, G., & Will, C. M. (2008). On the multiple deaths of Whitehead’s theory of gravity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 39(1), 41-61. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2007.04.004es_ES
dc.description.referencesBain, J. (1998). Whitehead’s Theory of Gravity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 29(4), 547-574. doi:10.1016/s1355-2198(98)00022-7es_ES
dc.description.referencesReinhardt, M., & Rosenblum, A. (1974). Whitehead contra Einstein. Physics Letters A, 48(2), 115-116. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(74)90425-3es_ES
dc.description.referencesHunter, A., & Fowler, A. (1934). The Solar Limb Effect. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 94(7), 594-602. doi:10.1093/mnras/94.7.594es_ES
dc.description.referencesAdam, M. G., Ibbetson, P. A., & Petford, A. D. (1976). The Solar Limb Effect: Observations of Line Contours and Line Shifts. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 177(3), 687-708. doi:10.1093/mnras/177.3.687es_ES
dc.description.referencesAnderson, J. D., Campbell, J. K., Ekelund, J. E., Ellis, J., & Jordan, J. F. (2008). Anomalous Orbital-Energy Changes Observed during Spacecraft Flybys of Earth. Physical Review Letters, 100(9). doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.091102es_ES
dc.description.referencesIorio, L. (2015). Gravitational anomalies in the solar system? International Journal of Modern Physics D, 24(06), 1530015. doi:10.1142/s0218271815300153es_ES
dc.description.referencesPoincaré, M. H. (1906). Sur la dynamique de l’électron. Rendiconti del Circolo matematico di Palermo, 21(1), 129-175. doi:10.1007/bf03013466es_ES
dc.description.referencesCarlip, S. (2000). Aberration and the speed of gravity. Physics Letters A, 267(2-3), 81-87. doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(00)00101-8es_ES
dc.description.referencesA new look inside the theory of the linear approximation: Gravity assists and Flybys http://www.lluisbel.com/upload/OnHold/FlyBys.pdfes_ES
dc.description.referencesChapront, J., Chapront-Touzé, M., & Francou, G. (2002). A new determination of lunar orbital parameters, precession constant and tidal acceleration from LLR measurements. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 387(2), 700-709. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020420es_ES
dc.description.referencesDE430 Lunar Orbit, Physical Librations, and Surface Coordinates http://proba2.sidc.be/aux/data/spice/docs/DE430_Lunar_Ephemeris_and_Orientation.pdfes_ES
dc.description.referencesAdler, S. L. (2009). Can the flyby anomaly be attributed to earth-bound dark matter? Physical Review D, 79(2). doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.023505es_ES
dc.description.referencesPinheiro, M. J. (2014). The flyby anomaly and the effect of a topological torsion current. Physics Letters A, 378(41), 3007-3011. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2014.09.003es_ES
dc.description.referencesAcedo, L. (2014). The flyby anomaly: A case for strong gravitomagnetism? Advances in Space Research, 54(4), 788-796. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2014.04.014es_ES
dc.description.referencesIorio, L. (2014). A flyby anomaly for Juno? Not from standard physics. Advances in Space Research, 54(11), 2441-2445. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2014.06.035es_ES
dc.description.referencesIorio, L. (2009). The Effect of General Relativity on Hyperbolic Orbits and Its Application to the Flyby Anomaly. Scholarly Research Exchange, 2009, 1-8. doi:10.3814/2009/807695es_ES
dc.description.referencesCiufolini, I., Paolozzi, A., Koenig, R., Pavlis, E. C., Ries, J., Matzner, R., … Paris, C. (2013). Fundamental Physics and General Relativity with the LARES and LAGEOS satellites. Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements, 243-244, 180-193. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2013.09.005es_ES
dc.description.referencesCiufolini, I., Paolozzi, A., Pavlis, E., Ries, J., Gurzadyan, V., Koenig, R., … Sindoni, G. (2012). Testing General Relativity and gravitational physics using the LARES satellite. The European Physical Journal Plus, 127(11). doi:10.1140/epjp/i2012-12133-8es_ES
dc.description.referencesRenzetti, G. (2012). Are higher degree even zonals really harmful for the LARES/LAGEOS frame-dragging experiment? Canadian Journal of Physics, 90(9), 883-888. doi:10.1139/p2012-081es_ES
dc.description.referencesRenzetti, G. (2013). First results from LARES: An analysis. New Astronomy, 23-24, 63-66. doi:10.1016/j.newast.2013.03.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesRenzetti, G. (2014). Some reflections on the Lageos frame-dragging experiment in view of recent data analyses. New Astronomy, 29, 25-27. doi:10.1016/j.newast.2013.10.008es_ES
dc.description.referencesIorio, L., Luca Ruggiero, M., & Corda, C. (2013). Novel considerations about the error budget of the LAGEOS-based tests of frame-dragging with GRACE geopotential models. Acta Astronautica, 91, 141-148. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.06.002es_ES
dc.description.referencesIorio, L., Lichtenegger, H. I. M., Ruggiero, M. L., & Corda, C. (2010). Phenomenology of the Lense-Thirring effect in the solar system. Astrophysics and Space Science, 331(2), 351-395. doi:10.1007/s10509-010-0489-5es_ES
dc.description.referencesIorio, L. (2008). An Assessment of the Systematic Uncertainty in Present and Future Tests of the Lense-Thirring Effect with Satellite Laser Ranging. Space Science Reviews, 148(1-4), 363-381. doi:10.1007/s11214-008-9478-1es_ES
dc.description.referencesPáramos, J., & Hechenblaikner, G. (2013). Probing the flyby anomaly with the future STE-QUEST mission. Planetary and Space Science, 79-80, 76-81. doi:10.1016/j.pss.2013.02.005es_ES
dc.description.referencesIorio, L. (2010). Juno, the angular momentum of Jupiter and the Lense–Thirring effect. New Astronomy, 15(6), 554-560. doi:10.1016/j.newast.2010.01.004es_ES
dc.description.referencesTommei, G., Dimare, L., Serra, D., & Milani, A. (2014). On the Juno radio science experiment: models, algorithms and sensitivity analysis. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 446(3), 3089-3099. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2328es_ES
dc.description.referencesHelled, R., Anderson, J. D., Schubert, G., & Stevenson, D. J. (2011). Jupiter’s moment of inertia: A possible determination by Juno. Icarus, 216(2), 440-448. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2011.09.016es_ES
dc.description.referencesThe Determination of Jupiter’s Angular Momentum from the Lense-Thirring Precession of the Juno Spacecraft http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AGUFM.P41B1620Fes_ES
dc.description.referencesIorio, L. (2013). A possible new test of general relativity with Juno. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 30(19), 195011. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/19/195011es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin128es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio113es_ES
dc.description.volume3es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/galaxies3030113
dc.identifier.issn2075-4434
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/68016
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofGalaxieses_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/galaxies3030113es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1090/psapm/017/0216846es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.789es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.221101es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s11214-009-9524-7es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.shpsb.2007.04.004es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S1355-2198(98)00022-7es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0375-9601(74)90425-3es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/mnras/94.7.594es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/mnras/177.3.687es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.091102es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1142/S0218271815300153es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/BF03013466es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0375-9601(00)00101-8es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1051/0004-6361:20020420es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1103/PhysRevD.79.023505es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.physleta.2014.09.003es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.asr.2014.04.014es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.asr.2014.06.035es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3814/2009/807695es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2013.09.005es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1140/epjp/i2012-12133-8es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1139/p2012-081es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.newast.2013.03.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.newast.2013.10.008es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.06.002es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10509-010-0489-5es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s11214-008-9478-1es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.pss.2013.02.005es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.newast.2010.01.004es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1093/mnras/stu2328es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.icarus.2011.09.016es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1088/0264-9381/30/19/195011es_ES
dc.relation.senia306606es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento (by)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectExperimental tests of gravitational theorieses_ES
dc.subjectModified theories of gravityes_ES
dc.subjectPerihelion precessiones_ES
dc.titleThe Flyby Anomaly in an Extended Whitehead’s Theoryes_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
upv.uuidb231cba2-1a4e-4703-9fef-4a34aa8ee733es_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Acedo - The Flyby's Anomaly in an Extended Whitehead Theory.pdf
Tamaño:
632.86 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial